Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

thalestrader

Reading Charts in Real Time

Recommended Posts

The analogy I use when I'm teaching people goes like this ...

 

Perhaps one of the most valuable posts I've read if one accepts the truth contained within, not least of which is this:

 

People cannot be fully spoon-fed skills.

 

It takes practice, practice, practice.

 

A wonderful post, Richard. Thank you.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You will short circuit your progress and short change yourself by continually looking for short cuts.

 

A summary of Plato written anonymously on a publically edited and editable web site is hardly a substitute for reading Plato for yourself.

 

 

My girlfriends grandmother learnt Russian to read war and peace "as it should be read" (to quote her).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
For the record, my daughter was never under any threat of punishment, and she was free to give up at any time if she had found the activity boring, uninteresting, or burdensome in any way.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

 

I wonder whether having implicit trust is something to do with it? I think one of the reasons people have difficulty with trading (in general) is that whilst they acknowledge certain 'truths' they don't completely and unconditionally accept them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I wonder whether having implicit trust is something to do with it? I think one of the reasons people have difficulty with trading (in general) is that whilst they acknowledge certain 'truths' they don't completely and unconditionally accept them.

 

I think that is true, and as you and I have both said early on, and others have more recently offered, she did not have a brainful of baggage to contend with as most of us do by the time we get to a place such as this.

 

And of course, another factor in her favor is that she was all about the ticks won vs. lost, and not concerned with making money or losing money. Not too long ago, MidK posted about his struggles and wondered about our weekly PnL. I thought after that that it does more harm and no good to post PnL figures in dollar terms, so any PnL I may mention going forward will be strictly in terms of ticks(pips) won/lost, and not dollar terms. After all, the focus should be on capturing more pips of price movement than one loses. The money will follow.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
My girlfriends grandmother learnt Russian to read war and peace "as it should be read" (to quote her).

 

There is much to be said for reading an author in his or her own language, though I do believe a careful and sensitive translator can convey the author's intent (I'm one of those old fashioned folks who think that a writer's intended meaning can be accessible to the reader, even across time and culture). At the same time, a careless translator, or worse, a translator with a certain ideological agenda, can destroy a text beyond recognition in the process of translating. If one were to read Jowett's Republic, and then the Allen Bloom translation, one might find come away feeling that one or the other got something wrong given the differences. By the way, I'd argue that Bloom got it right.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Richard,

 

What were/are you teaching?

 

I ask because you seem to be talking about one style of teaching/learning and its not necessarily completely applicable to trading.

 

Years back I learned to ski. And over time I improved my skiing and like many applied the 1-2 lesson per year approach. Like traders, skiers arrived at instructors with their own baggage (the pain of large crashes, broken bones, the impact of previous styles of skiing and teaching).

 

When we started the Austrians held sway and teaching was as you described. Over time we went through french, american, and even zen influences. Over time, less intellectual and more effective techniques were developed and an important element was less talk and more modeling and shaping. Watch, do, "try pressing down a little with your big toe", wow. Very personal and very effective.

 

 

Discretionary trading is not unlike skiing. Good days truly flow down a slope of unending opportunity.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I............... I thought after that that it does more harm and no good to post PnL figures in dollar terms, so any PnL I may mention going forward will be strictly in terms of ticks(pips) won/lost, and not dollar terms................

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

 

I wonder if that is because your daughters account is larger than yours now :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A good start for the week.

44 pips on EJ with 1 unit only.

Reason was - potential closing of the gap which happens many times on Sunday.

For the rest of the week I will trade/annotate the EJ only as per the system of this thread.

 

Gabe

EJ_Nov_29_2009_15min.thumb.png.1e91cbdd4d3b2289b7137c3371c7f219.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
And of course, another factor in her favor is that she was all about the ticks won vs. lost, and not concerned with making money or losing money. Not too long ago, MidK posted about his struggles and wondered about our weekly PnL. I thought after that that it does more harm and no good to post PnL figures in dollar terms, so any PnL I may mention going forward will be strictly in terms of ticks(pips) won/lost, and not dollar terms. After all, the focus should be on capturing more pips of price movement than one loses. The money will follow.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

 

Hi,

 

I don't recall this exactly, but whatever....I think I've always posted any results from this exploration in average pips per trade (accounting for partial exits over the entire position). I may have commented on the Thales Family Trading Co % gains, but not dollars.

 

Anyways, it is with regret that I posted my struggles here and should have known better than to do so in public on the Internet. The exploration has been somewhat beneficial though, so maybe a case of no pain, no gain.

 

With kind regards,

MK

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Was the Russian version the first one she read?

 

Gabe

 

She (my GF) believes that she (her Grandmother) first read it in German or possibly Rumanian but had a smattering of Russian already.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
it is with regret that I posted my struggles here and should have known better than to do so in public on the Internet

 

I don't understand the REGRET part.

No one knows who you are.

You were honest with yourself and that is what counts.

I don't know if you were around when I wiped out 1/3 of my account and I was hesitant to post that fact.

But I did.

I told myself that that is the honest thing to do.

For myself and for the rest of the people that saw me gain day after day only to give it back and then some.

 

I am sure that deep inside you feel better. Especcially after Thales commented on your trades (hopefully that was of some benefit)

 

Don't leave us because I will be left alone to call a spade a spade :)

 

Gabe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

......Anyways, it is with regret that I posted my struggles here...

 

I'm sorry to hear that, I am not quite sure why you would feel that. I got something from your posts if that is any consolation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Anyways, it is with regret that I posted my struggles here

 

I am sorry to hear that, MidK. It certainly has not been my intent to cause anyone regret, and if you feel I have been picking on you, I apologize. You were kind enough to offer us a most honest and comprehensive view of what you were experiencing, and thus I perhaps over used your example.

 

I hope we don't lose you, but I understand your feelings and I appreciate your contributions here.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
She (my GF) believes that she (her Grandmother) first read it in German or possibly Rumanian but had a smattering of Russian already.

 

I thought so.

My father was 1st violin in a phylharmonic orchestra back in the country that I was born in.

When I was a child I really disliked classical music. Especially violin.

I thought it sounded harsh.

I prefered Elvis, The Shadows, Deep Purple and the likes - music which my father called BANGA BANGA because of the rhythm.

So one day I called him to listen to a guitar section of Highway Star.

I thought that my father will ridicule me again but he said that he is really impressed because the motive is classical.

Then Beethoven's 40th came out as Joy To the World and became a big hit and some others.

I LOVE classical music today. and eventhough it represnts only about 15% of my CD collection if I would have to take 10 cd to a deserted island, probably more than half would be classical and sound tracks (which in my case fall into the same category)

 

The point I am trying to make is that sometimes the way to the original is through the backdoor and thinking that the fake, the immitation, the proccessed version has not relevance is a mistake.

 

Be it music, litrature, furniture or other art forms.

 

If I cannot afford Dali in my house should I not hang a poster of a Dali or Rembrandt, or Escher just because they are not originals?

Should I look down on someone because they like a second class form of expression?

 

Gabe

 

So here is that famous piece :)

Highway Star.mp3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Could you post some losing trades? Thanks, Don

 

We'll give it a try ...

 

GU with a sell stop at 1.6469, go to break even at 1.6436, with PT's at 1.6420 and 1.6369;

 

or

 

GU with a buy stop at 1.6507, go to break even at 1.6526, with PT's at 1.6557 and 1.6607

 

This thing is really rattling around.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70f705c813_11-29-2009GUAsiaShort1.thumb.jpg.fe3e63d31620cbb78317b00e9052e99c.jpg

5aa70f7061be7_11-29-2009GUAsiaLong1.thumb.jpg.9fd4b0426a91ababf588a042adfe93f2.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
GU with a buy stop at 1.6507, go to break even at 1.6526, with PT's at 1.6557 and 1.6607

 

The Gain data through Ninjatrader shows a 1.6525 high on that little pop, but our broker shows a high of 1.65262, so we are going to break even on this trade.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70f706775b_11-29-2009GUAsiaLongBreakeven1.thumb.jpg.7b00e3613b0b2952e483d394b77bc7c7.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
... awaiting the next opportunity.

 

Hi folks,

 

My daughter and I were saying good night to her little brother and we missed the entry on this opportunity.

 

Buy stop 1.6528, go to break even at 1.6557, PT1 1.6590, PT2 1.6645.

 

We're in, but not at 1.6528. We bought at market 1.65429. It happens.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70f706f176_11-29-2009GUAsiaLongLateentry1.thumb.jpg.7a56fbad9fd9dd053352dae039ce1402.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
A break even effort, and awaiting the next opportunity.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

 

I took this trade!

 

I handled it kinda funny, though...

 

I'm trading the 6B...My initial buy stop was @ 1.6513, with a S/L of 1.6470, with a PT of 1.6554...

 

Pulled out for BE (actually an average of 0.5 ticks of profit)..

 

BTW, got slipped 2 ticks on my entry...geez... EDIT: It was actually 1.5 ticks.

 

THEN, I actually placed a buy stop at 1.6534 (the "high", ie where Thales got BE, was 1.6530 on my chart), so a print of 1.6534 would mean a significant breakout of the high...

 

Then I got filled, put my S/L at 1.6513 (what would have been BE on my original trade), and my PT at the original 1.6554 (about a 1:1 R/R situation).

 

Got profit...ended up with 20.5 ticks of profit between both of the trades.

 

I guess I could have put my second trade buy stop @ 1.6531, but I picked 34 just because it was right in the middle between my original entry of 13 and my original PT of 54.

 

I normally wouldn't handle a trade this way but it seemed reasonable in the moment, and turned out well.

 

-Cory

 

EDIT: It would have probably been more prudent to take the trade Thales just mentioned, rather than doing what I did. Oh well...I think I was a little distracted because I was thinking about the trade I was just in, rather than looking for the next opportunity. Even though it worked just fine this time, and I think my handling of it was all right, I need to forget old trades and move on to new opportunities...

Edited by Cory2679

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I handled it kinda funny, though... It would have probably been more prudent to take the trade Thales just mentioned, rather than doing what I did. Oh well...I think I was a little distracted because I was thinking about the trade I was just in, rather than looking for the next opportunity. Even though it worked just fine this time, and I think my handling of it was all right, I need to forget old trades and move on to new opportunities...

 

Here is how we managed our missed entry. As I said, we bought at market and the fill was 1.65429. We then added twice as price moved in our favor. We now have three positions with an average buy of 1.65494, with a stop on each at 1.6560. We have PT1 limits on the two "first-in" positions at 1.6590, with a limit on the third position at 1.6645.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70f7071b45_11-29-2009GUAsiaLongLateentry2.jpg.e204126de4f71bf7dcc641a86b6435f7.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Does anyone on here that trades currency futures generally trade the Tokyo session with them?

 

This is my first time tonight, and it seems like overall, the volume, spreads, and slippage (all related, of course) are much less favorable.

 

That's not just based on my experience tonight...I've scrolled back through charts with volume plotted and Tokyo is substantially lower...London tooks all right and defintiely the first half of the NY session...

 

Not to mention, tonight seems like a relatively high volume night compared to some other Tokyo sessions...I could be mistaken though, I didn't do THAT much research.

 

Thanks,

Cory

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.