Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

thalestrader

Reading Charts in Real Time

Recommended Posts

I would add to Kiwi's comment that that low was clearly digging into what proved to be an important support zone.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

 

Hi Thales,

 

Can you elaborate on this term 'digging into' at all? My failed short we are dissecting looked to me like it was showing an important resistance area.

 

Sure, I can see the differences between our two charts if I look at bar by bar - but that isn't what I mean when I say that they look similar to me. I mean in general, in both cases price goes into an overlapping type behaviour. Kiwi has mentioned that the duration of this was longer in my trade - good point. I partially justified the extra bars because the time of day when I came in was Tokyo opening area, so I was being less stringent on the number of bars. Maybe I just shouldn't trade during that time of day for any 15m trades, but it would be OK for the larger time frame stuff.

 

With kind regards,

MK

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Nice short signal on GC.

Got in twice but did not trust it because the futures were moving up.

THis where what Thales wrote should be adhered to. ie Trade what you see, not what you think. :(

 

Gabe

 

Hi Gabe,

 

That has been a problem for me every time I have added more 'things' to watch. I end up getting shaken out of so many good trade ideas all because I'm trying to reduce my uncertainty. At one stage in my life, I was a commercial pilot and think this ingrained my need to try and get certainty....It's been large, ongoing issue with my trading that is slowly being chipped away at. I'm not saying trying to get better information isn't a good idea at all, but maybe track it and see if the added information being used is helpful overall vs unhelpful.

 

Have a great weekend.

 

With kind regards,

MK

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Thales,

 

I refer back to your trial defining post Rules at this Post .

 

I am coding some rules in Sierra Chart (available to anyone here who uses SC, just PM me) to help visualize the breaks so that its easy not to miss them and wondered about the potential view of a 2 overshoot and 3 overshoot.

 

As you've specified them there is no overshoot though Even on 3 is ok. And for a "beginner" while trying the base method I'd imagine you'd stick with this but from my years on hsi I know that I'd see (and accept) slight overshoots as still "ok." So, here's the question: what overshoots would you suggest to be acceptable on forex at points 2 and 3?

 

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=14956&stc=1&d=1257550111

Diagram.png.c79a5027ac9d90779c727b6b681e55b2.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi Gabe,

 

That has been a problem for me every time I have added more 'things' to watch. I end up getting shaken out of so many good trade ideas all because I'm trying to reduce my uncertainty. At one stage in my life, I was a commercial pilot and think this ingrained my need to try and get certainty....It's been large, ongoing issue with my trading that is slowly being chipped away at. I'm not saying trying to get better information isn't a good idea at all, but maybe track it and see if the added information being used is helpful overall vs unhelpful.

 

Have a great weekend.

 

With kind regards,

MK

 

As it happens, I posted chart about 2 minutes before it turned around and zoomed up about 100 pips. So I could have made 20-30 pips on the way down but it just did not feel right.

It was not a thought or an opinion. It was a feeling and I think that feelings should be used in trading.

Better safe than sorry.

 

Gabe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I now have some quite nice functionality for looking at how well it works; and Thales, it really does :)

 

I included internal swings (where it does abcde break) with a lighter colour as they are also good breaks but don't show up mechanically with a simple 123break rule. I also added adjustable day and night times so you can look at whether you'd be awake and how u might react the next morning to an "open trade."

 

I do observe that picking the trend using, higher timeframes plus standard hhhl and breaks and fakes from chopzones dramatically improves ones results. Its not so obvious in this particular picture.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=14957&stc=1&d=1257572189

GJ.thumb.png.3f2a01fae9477307c388b8db1bac915f.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Weekend Reading

 

Hi Folks,

 

I'll have a somewhat busy weekend, and also I have business obligations that will keep me from trading Monday-Wednesday this week.

 

I see some good posts here, and I will respond to all posts and the PM's as soon as I can.

 

Here is an article from the NYTimes from eight years ago called the "Wizard of Odds," and if you trade, you should be able to see its relevance to what you do.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Wizard of Odds.doc

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I would add to Kiwi's comment that that low was clearly digging into what proved to be an important support zone.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

 

sorry having prob with uploading

will upload a chart

Edited by india quant

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I am coding some rules in Sierra Chart (available to anyone here who uses SC, just PM me) to help visualize the breaks so that its easy not to miss them and wondered about the potential view of a 2 overshoot and 3 overshoot.

 

As you've specified them there is no overshoot though Even on 3 is ok. And for a "beginner" while trying the base method I'd imagine you'd stick with this but from my years on hsi I know that I'd see (and accept) slight overshoots as still "ok." So, here's the question: what overshoots would you suggest to be acceptable on forex at points 2 and 3?

 

Hi Kiwi,

 

First I want to thank you for your offer to share your work with other TL members, as it is very much in the spirit of this thread. If I were wearing a hat, I'd tip it to you.

 

As to the "overshoot" question, I do not have a quantifiable parameter in mind. An overshoot at point 3 in an uptrend is indicative of a basing pattern that William O'Neil refers to as a double bottom base where price rallies into a high, pulls back, rallies to a lower high, and then pulls back yet again into a lower low before rallying to a new rally high (higher high).

 

I would not want to suggest a parameter, and you will likely be better off trying to test out a few conditions on your own.

 

When is a double bottom a basing pattern and not a breakout to the downside? That is usually a matter of the structure of the support zone into which price is digging. I cannot quantify it so much as I can qualify it by saying "I know it when I see it." All this to say that I do agree with you concerning what you term overshoots, both that they exist, and that they are tradable in the context of what we have been discussing here. Also, I agree that for the beginner, it is probably best to focus on the simple L-H-HL and the H-L-LH while learning to see and trade price itself.

 

I have attached a few views of the daily Dow Indistrials. The first shot is of my Telechart screen as it appears today. There is a trendline that I drew back in July, and it is drawn at what I considered to be a buy point at that time. This was at a time when you could not turn on CNBC without hearing someone squawking about the "Head and Shoulders top" in the Dow. The next two shots show that S/R must trump any "chart pattern" trading. This "H&S top" was really just a pullback into a support zone, and the buy point was when the LH was bettered. I made the same point in a chart Browning posted of AAPL where, strictly trading the H-L-LH would have caused the trader to initiate a short, this short would have been selling into a test of prior resistance being tested as new support. a discretionary trader should not trade this approach separate from an awareness of S/R.

 

If you are programming and auto-trading this, I do not know how you would account for S/R. I think the pattern is reliable enough to trade straight away and just take your (admittedly small) lumps. Perhaps something along the lines of the old turtle strategy would be in order - if the last two trades were long and were winners, do not take the next short, and vice versa. Then again, trying to program a loss avoidance is usually the first step in sinking an otherwise profitable system.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70f5126e60_Dow30DoubleBottomBase1.thumb.jpg.74463051edcf733195c5d706abfc54de.jpg

5aa70f512af42_HeadShoulderToporDoubleBottomBase1.jpg.b41a34950b63d6eb403e34883c9993fb.jpg

5aa70f512ea09_HeadShoulderToporDoubleBottomBase2.jpg.c9e2c4dac45aa5e9435cafed6fb3bc37.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Can you elaborate on this term 'digging into' at all?

 

"Digging into support," is a phrase I learned from reading Stanley Kroll years ago, and it seemed a very apt description of what price does when it finds itself at a zone of S or R, and therefore, it stuck in my thinking.

 

In some of my charts, I use rectangles to illustrate these zones. For a breakout-type trade, I would usually require price to dig through, rather than merely into one of these zones before I'd take a position.

 

I do not draw these rectangles on my charts, but I do "see" them nnetheless. I've made no secret that Nicolas Darvas had a large impact on my approach, and I am sure these rectangles are more or less something that has evolved out of that influence.

 

I do not claim to be a very original trader. From the great many whom I have read, I have learned from but a very few - Darvas, O'Neil, Livermore, Wyckoff, Schumacher, among others. I have kept what has worked for me.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Thales,

 

So why is the short gbp/jpy not digging into resistance? At the time of entry to me, it looked like obvious R, but for some reason I don't know of, you don't seem to think so....

 

With kind regards,

MK

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I didn't mean to imply that price wasn't digging into resistance at that point. Clearly it was, and I was just adding that to the discussion of the EURUSD trade. Price, in my opinion, just did not indicate whether it was going to dig through it or whether it was going to reverse. As it was, price chewed through and then gave indications that shorts were in order. Look at Kiwi's charts in post #930. I think that might be instructive as to how price indicates where to buy & sell.

 

I know you want something more, a rule perhaps. And I am trying to come up with something that might help you. Kiwi's logic has captured something, and perhaps he might have something more concrete to add (unless he already did so in his posts surrounding your GBPJPY short.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The thing is that I think in terms of the trend giving an advantage. With trend, the extensions are longer, the counter-extensions are shorter; timing is more forgiving.

 

And to me the trend is read in some fuzzy way (that has to be quantified in systems) using some combination of hhs and hls, crossing of S&R areas and testing them (digging) before continuation, crossing and sloping of mas to indicate whats happening to the average of price, and new thrust (push of so many points in so few bars).

 

So in the 930 case we had a trend up (broke support and resistance with thrust, tested on the outside lows, were above the 50ema on a 4 hour chart). In fact we still have that longer timeframe chart pointing anemically up (but oh so weak).

 

If I was to automate this then I would be assuming longs until you had some criteria for a break down. In this case, if your system derived its information solely from the 15m timezone the three signals approach is actually surprisingly good, but could be combined with some larger breakout or an overshooting smoother like the hull ma rolling and turning down with price below. Or sufficient thrust. I'm not sure and won't know until I get a chance to test a full system (which I won't share because those little discoveries are what make the difference between profit and not and must be aligned with ones own beliefs about how the market works).

 

To the one party who did want the material, I'll drop it to you sometime in the next day.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

FWIW. Mechanical EJ ... I must define chop zone if I'm going to automate this at some point and probably define a poke and fail to be truly sophisticated.

 

I note in passing that the test of top and two lower highs or lower high and slight break of the first that doesn't reach the top is a classic failure sign in hsi. Sucks in some longs and then goes ... and the sucked in longs generate extra liquidity on the collapse that follows. The tough thing is to distinguish it from a resumption upwards :)

ej.thumb.png.74fd013cd2a3d35be28a9745c8e8d079.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I know you want something more, a rule perhaps. And I am trying to come up with something that might help you. Kiwi's logic has captured something, and perhaps he might have something more concrete to add (unless he already did so in his posts surrounding your GBPJPY short.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

 

Thanks for the reply. I'm not really looking for a rule as about 1 year ago I stopped searching for the inflexibility of absolute rules in the markets. But I thought you had some clearly defined and objective rules. This was an assumption on my part because I couldn't see how else you could have taught your daughter....my apologies for the incorrect assumption.

 

With kind regards,

MK

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
But I thought you had some clearly defined and objective rules. This was an assumption on my part because I couldn't see how else you could have taught your daughter....my apologies for the incorrect assumption.

 

Well, I did say that since we are seeing higher lows and lower highs, price has entered what I consider to be the chop zone, and that I would take my cues from the last true high and the last true low. That is fairly close to a clearly defined and objective rule or guideline.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok ok, I'll stop with the endless stream of queries. I don't know why, but for some reason I feel like an idiot for taking the trade and was just trying to make sure it didn't happen again - or at least not very often. Thanks for the replies.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ok ok, I'll stop with the endless stream of queries. I don't know why, but for some reason I feel like an idiot for taking the trade and was just trying to make sure it didn't happen again - or at least not very often. Thanks for the replies.

 

I would hope you don't feel like that over a trade. And, the thing to remember is this: If you were to take every single trade, even those such as that GBPJPY short that is bothering you, and you respect your stop loss, and play for 1:1 first target, you will be net profitable over time. Do not let that trade bother you, especially when you are doing so well. You cannot expect perfection.

 

Last week, between my daughter and I we took 20 trades in our little forex account. We had 7 losing trades and 13 winning trades. Of the thirteen winning trades, 5 were for less than +3 ticks, so those were basically breakeven. That means that the bulk of our profit for the week came from less than half of our trades. Had we taken that trade with you, we'd have still had a nice profit for the week. It is better to take a trade and lose than to not take a trade that could have run to two or three profit targets. So long as you manage your risk and trade based upon what price is indicating, you will be fine.

 

I think that doing a post mortem of losing efforts can be helpful. But do not let one losing effort gain such significance that it can damage your confidence. After all, technically your entry was correct. Based upon preceding price action, it was perhaps not the most favorable opportunity. But, you have to be in it to win it, so do not allow this one trade to feed your fear or to discourage you.

 

Do not compare yourself to what my daughter has accomplished. If I were to compare her experience to my own, I'd have to question what was wrong with me for so long. I am not kidding you. I bounced around, marginally profitable, with a few fortunate big wins for years before I finally settled down and focused upon trading the way that you are now. Even then, it took me far longer than it has taken her to really settle in to my approach.

 

Give this some time. Do not get discouraged. Do not give up. I am convinced that if you diligently apply yourself to the approach we are sharing here that the time remaining until you achieve your trading goal will be measured in weeks and months, not years. But you do have to keep your heart and your head straight,

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Edited by thalestrader

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just wanted to say a quick thanks to everyone participating in this thread and especially thales!

 

A year ago I was trading successfully using a logic very similar to this just looking for the L, H, HL patterns and over time my edge eroded as I added indicators and other crap to try and "filter" swings.

 

This thread in the last 20 or so pages has breathed some life back into me and got me focused back on the real truth in the markets. They repeat these same patterns time and time again and without Thales posting up that initial chart it wouldn't have got me back on the right track.

 

I just wanted to say thank you and tell you that you have quite literally made a huge impact on another trader. Keep it up!

 

Cheers!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This thread in the last 20 or so pages has breathed some life back into me and got me focused back on the real truth in the markets. They repeat these same patterns time and time again and without Thales posting up that initial chart it wouldn't have got me back on the right track.

 

I just wanted to say thank you and tell you that you have quite literally made a huge impact on another trader. Keep it up!

 

Cheers!

 

Great to hear, daedalus! I hope that you will share some of your charts here with us as well.

 

 

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I couldn't see how else you could have taught your daughter

 

Pictures. If you read this thread from the beginning, I have said over and over that "beautiful pictures paint themselves."

 

Here is a look at the GBPJPY. Take a look at the price activity within the ellipse. That is a picture - a pattern that happens everyday. The hashed lines represent the chop zone we discussed. The dark blue represents short entry, the red line is the initial stop loss. Taking cues from the boundaries of the chop zone, this is the first trade opportunity (unless one were to have used a buy stop to buy the breakout).

 

I taught my daughter by pointing these patterns out, and then having her watch for them as well.

 

As daedalus said:

 

the real truth in the markets ... [t]hey repeat these same patterns time and time again

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70f51b2218_GBPJPYChopPopandDrop1.thumb.jpg.795f43c174a4d52db5f72a1273a924ff.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, everyone. Sorry i'm late with my weekend homework. Here's my marked out EJ chart. Please correct my understanding where i'm wrong .. many thanks! :)

 

Here goes ..

(1) so that's 5 trades?

(2)1-3 is a long trade, with adds at 2 & 3?

(3) 4-6 is a short trade, with adds at 5 & 6?

(4) 7 is a short that would have been stopped out for a loss

(5) 8 is a long that would have been stopped out for a loss

(6) 9 is a nice big short that was almost stopped out?

 

Haven't done the math to work out the P/L. Will attempt to do that next time.

 

Learning lots doing this. Thanks for the suggestion. Will mark out S/R zones when i become more adept.

 

:missy:

EurJpy06Nov09.PNG.1b56801aca3cf73147edcf1a506b0ac7.PNG

Edited by hunnybunny
typos

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi, everyone. Sorry i'm late with my weekend homework. Here's my marked out EJ chart. Please correct my understanding where i'm wrong .. many thanks! :)

 

Here goes ..:missy:

 

Just thought that it would be easier if the annotation would be on the chart.

I hope you don't mind.

 

BTW Shouldn't #2 be SHORT trades and #3 LONG trades?

 

Gabe

EurJpy06Nov09.PNG.bff0cc53593764227c921bd759d5e401.PNG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

and here is today's EG chart. Looks like 4 B/E trades if one isn't quick to take profits? Throw in a chop zone, 1 long and 1 short trade that i couldn't spot for lack of a HL and LH respectively ... and :confused: is the state i would be in :)

EG9nov09.png.99bff351c69523be3fd59f8a00328a7b.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.