Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

brownsfan019

Futures I Trade Show & Brooks Book

Recommended Posts

When the market is trending it will try to break the trend but most attempts fail and the trend resumes; that is a pullback. Sometimes the failure stops before it makes new highs/lows in the trend and it then reverses back in the direction of the breakout. In other words the failed breakout fails and becomes a breakout pullback in the new trend. Often there will be a period of uncertainty whether it is just a pullback in the old trend or a breakout pullback in a new trend until the market tips its hand by further price action.

 

Thanks, ACS. I was complicating it a bit. The explanation in Chapter 6 is pretty clear, but the definition in the glossary is baffling. But, Al Rules!

 

Basically, when a breakout fails, we don't know if it's just a failure or if it's actually a breakout pullback until we see if it has just "failed" and the prevailing move resumes, or if it makes a 3rd leg in the direction of the previous breakout, then it turns out it was a breakout pullback after all.

 

So, it's impossible to actually name that "elbow" precisely until we see what happens, right?

 

Thanks for your help.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thanks, ACS. I was complicating it a bit. The explanation in Chapter 6 is pretty clear, but the definition in the glossary is baffling. But, Al Rules!

 

Basically, when a breakout fails, we don't know if it's just a failure or if it's actually a breakout pullback until we see if it has just "failed" and the prevailing move resumes, or if it makes a 3rd leg in the direction of the previous breakout, then it turns out it was a breakout pullback after all.

 

So, it's impossible to actually name that "elbow" precisely until we see what happens, right?

 

Thanks for your help.

 

That is my very basic understanding.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks like Al has decided to pull the plug on his web site. There is a lot of really good information there and it will be missed. I hope he changes his mind and just posts end of day charts that don't interfere with his trading but if not you should save a copy of anything that is helpful to you before it disappears.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm working my way through the book, and it is incredibly worthwhile to me. Previously, for daytrading, I had subscribed to the expensive indicator philosophy which definitely works for some. It didn't for me. I was frustrated because I wasn't learning anything.

 

Anyway, some suggestions. I listened several times to the two Al Brooks audio/video presentations made through Futures Magazine. Also, I read the articles, about five, several times. I listened to a radio show. All of this acclimated me to the concepts and the lingo so that the book is decipherable. Also, I discovered it is essential for me to print out the charts in the book, because flipping pages with a magnifying glass didn't work very well.

 

Good luck!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Looks like Al has decided to pull the plug on his web site. There is a lot of really good information there and it will be missed. I hope he changes his mind and just posts end of day charts that don't interfere with his trading but if not you should save a copy of anything that is helpful to you before it disappears.

 

Yes, I hate to see that. But, it was helpful while it lasted. Especially the link to the charts in the books.

 

I would really love to see him post at the end of the day and do a post-mortem. Even a few days a week.... Or some new articles occasionally. I can't memorize everything he says, but every time I work through a chart I flex my own interpretation muscles a bit and learn to think more clearly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Blowfish

 

Think it all reflects on Al's integrity, shows that he is a genuine trader, he could have easily gone on to establish trading rooms and pulled in a crowd. Afterall he already has a large following.

The book is not particularly well written and also the layout need much to be desired, however it is packed with gems of price observations devoid of any indicators.

 

It would be great if Al could be persuaded to post some end of day charts with his comments, would prove highly educational.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Can someone tell me if there was an ES short signal @~1010.00 right near the open at 9;30EST on Fri via this method? I am trying to see if I am understanding it with any accuracy. Thx.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Can someone tell me if there was an ES short signal @~1010.00 right near the open at 9;30EST on Fri via this method? I am trying to see if I am understanding it with any accuracy. Thx.

 

Using the methods described in the book, the first trade of the day was an L1 short at 1008.25 off the 1st bear trend bar. The next trade I saw was also an L1 short at 1004.50 off the 4th & 5th double bottom bear bars. Any trade around 1010.00 was before the first 5 minute bar of the day closed and thus was not compatible with my understanding of Al's methodology since it was too early to look at a lower time frame for setups, the market not yet having proven itself in a strong trend.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with the short after the 4th bar, since it is a "twin" or double bottom, and an L1-type pause in a fast-moving bear. The 3-minute chart corroborates this.

 

I would never have placed a trade after the first bar on the 5-minute. On the 3-minute, there was a little pause made by the 3rd bull candle, but it's not a bad signal bar for a bullish gap play or H1. Actually, these initial moves often cause me confusion, and in the case of this 3rd bullish bar on the 3-minute, an entry on either side could be argued, IMHO.

 

And, all of the previous ramblings prove you don't have to be a successful trader to talk or write about it, especially after the fact!!!! :haha:

 

Just trying to claw my way out of the middle class........

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Using the methods described in the book, the first trade of the day was an L1 short at 1008.25 off the 1st bear trend bar. The next trade I saw was also an L1 short at 1004.50 off the 4th & 5th double bottom bear bars. Any trade around 1010.00 was before the first 5 minute bar of the day closed and thus was not compatible with my understanding of Al's methodology since it was too early to look at a lower time frame for setups, the market not yet having proven itself in a strong trend.

 

Thanks for the reply. I just started reviewing some of the posts and wanted to see if I had a rudimentary understanding. The difficult thing for me is knowing where he resets his count, so I saw the 1008.5 as a L2 and the next as L3. This might become clearer to me later. Thanks for the info.

AB01.png.b49ff6a5d4824cbf43a14d540fbc75c1.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thanks for the reply. I just started reviewing some of the posts and wanted to see if I had a rudimentary understanding. The difficult thing for me is knowing where he resets his count, so I saw the 1008.5 as a L2 and the next as L3. This might become clearer to me later. Thanks for the info.

 

I was a little confused because you are on the Globex chart, and I was looking at the day chart. At any rate, your numbering looks fine to me, but I think your entry may be a little confused. If the bull bar at 8:30 is the signal pullback bar that creates your L2, the entry would be at one tick below it, or 1009.25, not at one tick below the next bar, which is your entry bar.

 

I was getting confused switching between Globex and the day session chart, so I just abandoned Globex except to see where the gap may be. Al suggests imagining the gap as a trend bar, and I actually use my drawing tool to draw one in. He also takes about the charting dilemma somewhere, maybe his website.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I agree with the short after the 4th bar, since it is a "twin" or double bottom, and an L1-type pause in a fast-moving bear. The 3-minute chart corroborates this.

 

I would never have placed a trade after the first bar on the 5-minute. On the 3-minute, there was a little pause made by the 3rd bull candle, but it's not a bad signal bar for a bullish gap play or H1. Actually, these initial moves often cause me confusion, and in the case of this 3rd bullish bar on the 3-minute, an entry on either side could be argued, IMHO.

 

And, all of the previous ramblings prove you don't have to be a successful trader to talk or write about it, especially after the fact!!!! :haha:

 

Just trying to claw my way out of the middle class........

 

I took the L1 off the first 5 minute bar and it turned out to be a good trade. I'll admit I wasn't thrilled with the size of the tails, had they been even a tick bigger I would have passed but since I was selling after a gap down I decided to go with it. In the book Al says to only use 3 minutes for with trend entries in a strong trend. To me that means you would not be looking at the 3 minute chart until at least a few 5 minute bars had already passed, you knew the market was in a strong trend, and you were not seeing any 5 minute entries. Just the 5 minute is challenging enough for me!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I was a little confused because you are on the Globex chart, and I was looking at the day chart. At any rate, your numbering looks fine to me, but I think your entry may be a little confused. If the bull bar at 8:30 is the signal pullback bar that creates your L2, the entry would be at one tick below it, or 1009.25, not at one tick below the next bar, which is your entry bar.

 

I was getting confused switching between Globex and the day session chart, so I just abandoned Globex except to see where the gap may be. Al suggests imagining the gap as a trend bar, and I actually use my drawing tool to draw one in. He also takes about the charting dilemma somewhere, maybe his website.

 

Sorry, but I thought the requirement for the L2 was a high that is higher than the previous bar. (?) The low of the L2 bar-1 tick is 1008.25

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
In the book Al says to only use 3 minutes for with trend entries in a strong trend. To me that means you would not be looking at the 3 minute chart until at least a few 5 minute bars had already passed, you knew the market was in a strong trend, and you were not seeing any 5 minute entries. Just the 5 minute is challenging enough for me!

 

Busted! I agree completely, and Al states that clearly in the trend chapter, that the 3-minute is useful in runaway markets to discover pauses or pullback opportunities. I've just missed some first hour moves due to inexperience/reticence lately, and read this in Chapter 11:

 

"Although the 5-minute chart is the easiest to read and the most reliable, the 3-minute chart trades well, particularly in the first hour. However, it is prone to more losers, and if you like the highest winning percentage and don't want the negative emotion that comes from losing, you should stick to trading the 5-minute chart and work on increasing your position size."

 

Al is so right-on about the opportunities in the first hour or so, and I've not been able to always hop on the train.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

An L2 entry would be the result of a low that is lower than the deepest bar in the pullback and not higher than the high. That would be H1, H2 territory.

 

Here, the bullish bar at 8:30 should really have a low that is higher than the low of the previous bar, but it is an "implied" pullback.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The glossary refers to these as reversal patterns, particularly after an over-extended market, and the first chapter basically says that they often develop during flags, and to be alert to trading them either way.

 

How's this different from any other flag? Seems to be an implication that flags with ii or iii formations may fail more often.

 

Am I missing something?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyone who has spent time with Al's book knows Wiley did an awful job of editing and proofreading. There are many typos in the book. Some are just grammatical and do not affect the content value but there are some that do. On his web site Al says he will correct them in any second edition. I feel that IF there is a second edition it will only be because people bought the first edition and they should not be penalized for doing so. Therefore I am listing the known errors I have found so far and encourage others to add to this list.

 

Page 34 3rd Paragraph:

“not the Bar 6” number should be 8

 

Page 123 3rd Paragraph:

"but Bar 17 was a bear" the chart was mislabeled Bar 17 should have been the bar before

 

Page 158 1st Line:

"but at least its close was above" should be "above the midpoint"

 

Page 205 2nd Paragraph

"bar 10, was above" should be Bar 9

 

Page 238

“Bar 12 was a bad bull reversal” should be bar 11

 

Page 245 2nd Paragraph

“countertrend bar (bar 9)” Should be (the bar before bar 9)

2nd to last Paragraph:

"bar 3 in figure 9.24 was a huge bear trend bar that followed four "

last word should be three

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Anyone who has spent time with Al's book knows Wiley did an awful job of editing and proofreading. There are many typos in the book. Some are just grammatical and do not affect the content value but there are some that do. On his web site Al says he will correct them in any second edition. I feel that IF there is a second edition it will only be because people bought the first edition and they should not be penalized for doing so. Therefore I am listing the known errors I have found so far and encourage others to add to this list.

 

Page 34 3rd Paragraph:

“not the Bar 6” number should be 8

 

Page 123 3rd Paragraph:

"but Bar 17 was a bear" the chart was mislabeled Bar 17 should have been the bar before

 

Page 158 1st Line:

"but at least its close was above" should be "above the midpoint"

 

Page 205 2nd Paragraph

"bar 10, was above" should be Bar 9

 

Page 238

“Bar 12 was a bad bull reversal” should be bar 11

 

Page 245 2nd Paragraph

“countertrend bar (bar 9)” Should be (the bar before bar 9)

2nd to last Paragraph:

"bar 3 in figure 9.24 was a huge bear trend bar that followed four "

last word should be three

 

So frustrating to be trying to learn new concepts and have to be constantly filtering every sentence for possible errors - "Did he really mean what he is saying here or is this another mistake"

 

BTW, Al says he is discontinuing his web site - too much distraction from trading.

 

Al: "I will therefore be shutting this site down in a week or so and return to my trading cave to work on my trading goals."

 

Makes me wonder if he is having problems with his trading. Seems like he was looking for another source of income from his web site, why would he do that if he was successful trading.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Makes me wonder if he is having problems with his trading. Seems like he was looking for another source of income from his web site, why would he do that if he was successful trading.

 

I conclude the opposite: why would a successful trader allow themselves to be distracted? I take it at face value and appreciate what Al offered there.

 

Definitely a tricky book, but by the time it gets a better edit, I'll be rich beyond caring..........:)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Makes me wonder if he is having problems with his trading. Seems like he was looking for another source of income from his web site, why would he do that if he was successful trading.

 

He could have easily gone the route of a paid website/chatroom, tutoring, DVDs, etc but instead decided to go back to just trading his account. He says he wants to trade institutional size which he describes in the book as 100 contracts. I wish him luck and hope he changes his mind enough to just post end of day charts; something that will not interfere with trading during the day but would be of immense help to the many people who bought the book.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
He could have easily gone the route of a paid website/chatroom, tutoring, DVDs, etc but instead decided to go back to just trading his account. He says he wants to trade institutional size which he describes in the book as 100 contracts. I wish him luck and hope he changes his mind enough to just post end of day charts; something that will not interfere with trading during the day but would be of immense help to the many people who bought the book.

 

Rather then complaining you should focus on your own trading. If you can't read the signals end of day you should re-read the book.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Date: 7th June 2024. ECB closer look: All options open for the second half of the year! ECB officials continue to dampen rate cut speculation, following on from Lagarde’s hawkish comments yesterday. Officials have been out in force this morning to continue stressing that the inflation outlook remains uncertain and that the central bank is not committing to a particular rate path for the rest of the year. The ECB cut rates by 25 basis points, but as we expected it was a “hawkish” cut that left all options open for the second half of the year. Lagarde repeatedly stressed that future decisions will be data dependent, and even refused to confirm that yesterday’s move was the first step of an easing cycle. Rate cuts in September and December are still a possibility, but not cast in stone. Simkus admitted that there may be more than one rate cut this year, but on the whole, the comments were designed to keep a lid on speculation that the central bank kicked off a rate cut cycle yesterday. Austria’s central bank head Holzmann went on record yesterday to confirm that he was the sole dissenter objecting to a cut yesterday, and so far the doves have been quiet, which is helping to affirm Lagarde’s hawkish message yesterday.   Details of the Rate Cut The ECB delivered the first rate cut in five years and lowered key rates by 25 basis points. The deposit rate is now at 3.75% and the main refinancing rate at 4.25%. It was a “hawkish cut,” as near term inflation forecasts were revised higher, and Lagarde flagged that domestic inflation remains high. The statement stressed that the ECB is not pre-committing to a particular rate path, and the comments leave all options on the table for the second half of the year.   Economic Activity and Forecasts  The ECB noted the improvement in economic activity through the first quarter of the year. Lagarde also highlighted that manufacturing is showing signs of stabilization, with stronger exports expected to support growth in coming quarters. At the same time, monetary policy should be less of a drag on demand over time, according to the ECB. The new set of forecasts show GDP rising 0.9% this year, which is more than the 0.6% expected back in March. The forecast for 2025 has been revised slightly down to 1.4% from 1.5% previously, and the ECB still expects a slight acceleration to 1.6% for 2026. The inflation forecast for this year was raised to 2.5% from 2.3%, and the projection for 2025 was hiked to 2.2% from 2.0%. As such, inflation will fall toward the target later than previously anticipated, though the forecast for 2026 was left unchanged at 1.9%. This means the headline rate is still expected to fall below the target at the end of the forecast horizon.   Upside Risks to Inflation The statement noted upside risks to the inflation outlook from wages and profits, which could be higher than currently anticipated. Geopolitical tensions and extreme weather events could also push up prices once again, according to the ECB. At the same time, the ECB acknowledged that inflation could come in lower than anticipated if monetary restrictions have more of a dampening effect than currently anticipated, or if global growth weakens more than projected.   The press conference was mainly dedicated to driving home the point that future decisions will depend on data available at the time of the respective meeting. Lagarde even refused to confirm that the central bank has effectively kicked off an easing cycle, and said in response to a question that she wouldn’t necessarily say that the ECB started a “dialing-back process”. She suggested it is likely, but refused to confirm it, which in theory means rates could actually go up again. This seems unlikely, given that this move was a near unanimous decision, but its makes clear that the ECB will not cut rates at every meeting and that the outlook for the rest of the year is still very much open. The ECB still thinks that monetary policy needs to remain restrictive for the foreseeable future against the backdrop of high domestic inflation. However, as chief economist Lane suggested recently, officials will have to debate at every meeting whether the data allows the central bank to dial back the degree of restrictiveness.   Employment and Inflation Dynamics Wage growth, profits, and services price inflation will remain the key numbers to watch through the rest of the year. Lagarde pointed to data on the compensation of employees, due to be released tomorrow, but also flagged that current wage agreements are often still backward looking, as they reflect attempts to compensate for the sharp rise in prices since the start of the Ukraine war. As we flagged previously, the multi-year wage agreements in Germany are a prime example of that. However, as Lagarde highlighted, the deals on the table so far show sharp increases for this year, but also imply a slowdown in wage growth in coming years. However, unemployment is at a record low and the number of vacancies has dropped only slightly. At the same time, service price inflation remains stubbornly high, which suggests that companies have sufficient room to pass on higher labor costs. With real disposable income rising, thanks to lower inflation and higher wages, companies could find it even easier to hike prices in the second half of the year, and yesterday’s rate cut is also likely to boost demand. In the current situation, this could add to domestic price pressures. Looking ahead, the only thing that is clear is that Lagarde did her best to keep expectations of back-to-back cuts under control. The chances still are that the ECB will deliver two more 25 basis point cuts in September and December, but at this point, nothing is cast in stone. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business. Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar. Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding on how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE! Click HERE to READ more Market news. Andria Pichidi Market Analyst HFMarkets Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in FX and CFDs products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • TRGP Targa Resources stock narrow range breakout watch above 119.02, https://stockconsultant.com/?TRGP
    • ROOT stock, short term downtrend break, bullish stats , https://stockconsultant.com/?ROOT
    • CVNA Carvana stock great setup at 101.16 support area, high trade quality, target 128-136, https://stockconsultant.com/?CVNA
    • IBM stock attempting to move higher off lower support area, https://stockconsultant.com/?IBM
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.