Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

cowcool

Emini Trading on the First 30 Mintues 8:30 - 9:00

Recommended Posts

Statistically speaking,on average, how many minutes are required on market open before market (DJIA, NDQ, SPX, and all eminis) take clear direction of whther to fill or not to fill the gap ?

 

My personal experience (not statistically) is 10 mins, before first ten mins market is usually undecided of whether to go up or to go down but I am still new and learning . I might be wrong, your comments please.

 

Thx!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

zero minutes.

 

the eminis trade around the clock.

RTH price movements are just a continuation of pre-market price movements.

Edited by Tams

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Get a copy of excel (or open office). Go to yahoo finance or similar and download a bunch of historical data. Combine the two and see what you find. Ensign Software (which has a free demo) has a feature that provides rudimentary stats like when highs and lows of the day are made.

 

I wish someone would come up with an off the shelf/install and play 'data mining' package for financial time series data.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

there is a software, the name escapes me right now...

it is an institutional grade software (ie expensive ~$10k++/yr),

that can do data mining and stat/prob study.

 

eg. it will interrogate the database (thousands of stocks and decades of prices)

and come up with reports like this:

 

CAL goes up X percentage at certain time of the year, 9 times out of past 11 yrs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It would be quite doable with off the shelf 'generic' packages. I just think it would be great to have something that plugs into a data feed downloads data and lets you look at it in different ways. Preferably fairly simple and graphical though some sort of scripting would be good. I guess it would be a niche application. Something like matlab (or a free alternative) might be good. To be honest got many more pressing things to do. Dosen't help that I am in lazy mode right now. I also wonder whether it is a useful use of time....I am sure these are the sorts of edges that can get eroded quite quickly (and suddenly).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tams,

I think you're thinking of Best Choice software. And I wouldn't say that RTH are simply an extension of overnight. Afterall, institutions are trading RTH, but aren't overnight, right? And when there's a gap, that means the overnight's having been buying/selling, and if the RTH is simply an extension, it would continue and wouldn't fill, or not likely. But the reality is it fills more often than not, so obviously there's a counter pressure to what the overnight's were doing, no?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"Overnight" is a long time to make generalized conclusions.

 

I would say...

RTH is often an extension of the trading action from 6:30am to 9:30am.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your clarification re: overnight trading, as "often" is a bit different from "just a continuation", and the more recent hours may make it moreso. Nevertheless, I see that there's often a very decidedly abrupt change in action at 9:30, and not just in volatility/volume. Curious, would you not view gaps as anything special, re: being filled, either, since there really are none, since trading is 24 hours (23:45)?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay, I think I see what you're saying. I guess my point is that there is a difference between RTH and Globex. Hence, gaps mean something more than routine oscillation. If not, there wouldn't be any special action at the level of the RTH open (if it were just a continuation of Globex hours), nor anything special with filling the gap and reaching the close of the previous day, but there often is. In fact, I noticed that today's high came 2 ticks from filling a gap still open from May 8th (if you use the 4:15 close). Coincidence? I don't think so, especially since I couldn't see any other reason for it to reverse so abruptly there. I'll attach a chart, fwiw. Good discussion!

5aa70ed74aad2_ESGapfill.thumb.jpg.be34a1ba6bbee611a6ea964193beec08.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't spend any time on studying the gaps.

I found it is more productive to monitor the pre-market from 6:30am ET.

 

 

each to his own... whatever works for you is good for you.

Edited by Tams

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Tams,

I think you're thinking of Best Choice software. And I wouldn't say that RTH are simply an extension of overnight. Afterall, institutions are trading RTH, but aren't overnight, right? .......

 

'Institutions' are multinational and trade on all markets. An often quoted 'fact' is that the currency market dwarfs every other market in the world combined. Seems that a lot (maybe most) business is conducted there at the Europe open.

 

Apart from European announcements that effect peoples perception of value there are often US announcements pre-market.

 

I think you might be taking a bit of a myopic view.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Indeed, if we were talking about currencies, then the European open and its affect on currencies - which is huge - would be at issue. But re: the e-mini's and their gaps, I was simply saying that the US open was not "just a continuation of overnight movement", else you wouldn't see a big difference when the US opened, including often a filling of the gap, and extreme moves in a direction different from the overnight movement, even the 6:30-9:30 movement. Having said that, as stated I will pay more attention to that period, as Tams feels it has merit, so worth a look. Just stating that it's more than just a continuation, as the OP presumed by his question. Afterall, it appears that you feel that the European open is very important, especially to currencies (which trade before then), but would you say that the European open is just a continuation of the trading before it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Indeed, if we were talking about currencies, then the European open and its affect on currencies - which is huge - would be at issue. But re: the e-mini's and their gaps, I was simply saying that the US open was not "just a continuation of overnight movement", else you wouldn't see a big difference when the US opened, including often a filling of the gap, and extreme moves in a direction different from the overnight movement, even the 6:30-9:30 movement. Having said that, as stated I will pay more attention to that period, as Tams feels it has merit, so worth a look. Just stating that it's more than just a continuation, as the OP presumed by his question. Afterall, it appears that you feel that the European open is very important, especially to currencies (which trade before then), but would you say that the European open is just a continuation of the trading before it?

 

If you stop your charts at noon EST every day and start them again an hour later, you will have a gap then also most of the time. Would you also then think this is significant when the gap gets filled and that it is not part of normal market action?

 

This is easy to say that the gap gets filled "often", but what does "often" means? Why not run a test fading the gap every day and see if you get any statistical significant results to justify your assumption that the gap gets filled often and that you can design a trading strategy around then?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a couple of points. Indexes seem to 'back and fill' quite a lot, regardless of time. That's just an observation.

 

If you watch global markets for a while you will notice at times the ES will go through phases of making its moves overnight other times not. You might be surprised.

 

I think your perception might be from the point of view that Chicago and New York are kind of the the centre of the trading universe. Whilst undoubtedly they are important that's not the case. If you don't buy into the idea that currencies (and commodities and treasury notes) all exert an effect on (US) index prices perhaps you might see how European (and increasingly Asian) corporate results and announcemenst will directly effect global markets.

 

I found this interesting The Global 2000 - Forbes.com is the table. The World's Biggest Companies - Forbes.com has a paragraph of guff. Some of the entries surprised me a little (e.g. I thought Europe would have a higher showing for drugs and biotech).

 

Does any of this matter if you are trading opening gaps? Nope, but it can't hurt to have an appreciation of the global nature of markets.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If you stop your charts at noon EST every day and start them again an hour later, you will have a gap then also most of the time. Would you also then think this is significant when the gap gets filled and that it is not part of normal market action?

 

This is easy to say that the gap gets filled "often", but what does "often" means? Why not run a test fading the gap every day and see if you get any statistical significant results to justify your assumption that the gap gets filled often and that you can design a trading strategy around then?

 

Interesting thought... But I think the difference (and this is coming from my supposition, so a bit of circular logic) is that there's a difference (in my eyes) of the market participants from 9:25AM ET and 9:35AM ET, but no inherent change in your example of 12:00PM ET and 1:00PM ET.

 

FWIW, TTM did commission a study - admittedly of limited duration - but they did find tradeable stats. I'll attach screenshots of what they found. I started to do my own, to update them and to factor in other variables, but I didn't already know MS Access, and I'm not up to spending the time to learn it right now.

5aa70ed753a04_Gapsbyfillsize.jpg.a49d43a6b6660a07200d8d4ea669591d.jpg

5aa70ed7585b4_Gapsfilledbyallvariables.jpg.c01b3fc205474f679d1552d90fe6f6f8.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just a couple of points. Indexes seem to 'back and fill' quite a lot, regardless of time. That's just an observation.

 

If you watch global markets for a while you will notice at times the ES will go through phases of making its moves overnight other times not. You might be surprised.

 

I think your perception might be from the point of view that Chicago and New York are kind of the the centre of the trading universe. Whilst undoubtedly they are important that's not the case. If you don't buy into the idea that currencies (and commodities and treasury notes) all exert an effect on (US) index prices perhaps you might see how European (and increasingly Asian) corporate results and announcemenst will directly effect global markets.

 

I found this interesting The Global 2000 - Forbes.com is the table. The World's Biggest Companies - Forbes.com has a paragraph of guff. Some of the entries surprised me a little (e.g. I thought Europe would have a higher showing for drugs and biotech).

 

Does any of this matter if you are trading opening gaps? Nope, but it can't hurt to have an appreciation of the global nature of markets.

 

I think my original point has gotten misconstrued. It wasn't that those traders/hours don't matter; simply that the switchover to the NY open was more than a simple continuation, that there's a marked difference in activity at that time. That's all... Thanks for all the input; good discussion!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Interesting thought... But I think the difference (and this is coming from my supposition, so a bit of circular logic) is that there's a difference (in my eyes) of the market participants from 9:25AM ET and 9:35AM ET, but no inherent change in your example of 12:00PM ET and 1:00PM ET.

 

FWIW, TTM did commission a study - admittedly of limited duration - but they did find tradeable stats. I'll attach screenshots of what they found. I started to do my own, to update them and to factor in other variables, but I didn't already know MS Access, and I'm not up to spending the time to learn it right now.

 

Be careful to look too much into stats like that. For example looking at the 1 point stat showing a 93% probability. I am pretty sure if you pick a random point during the day, that the ES will have very high probability to move 1 point in a specific direction before the end of the day also. Also, just calculating that there is a 54% chance to fill half the gap before the end of the day is just looking at one side of the equation. It doesn't help much if this move twice that much in the opposite direction first. That mean you will risk 2 to make 1 which in my mind is not a very tradable strategy. You cannot just look at reward and ignore risk.

 

However, if you feel that is a tradable strategy, go for it. This is not for me to tell you how to trade. I'd just be careful to trade something based on stats calculated by someone else without verifying it myself. I'd also be careful trading on my assumptions and what something look like based on a couple of casual observations without verifying them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the caveats; all good points. One of the things you mentioned was going to be one of the things I wanted to track on my own, and that's how much a drawdown do you have prior to that fill/partial fill. And I think goes to the question of the OP; when should I expect it to have filled by, if it's going to. Legitimate question and concern, and indeed, absent some good, reliable stats... And I think that's what he was asking, thinking someone might have some.

As it is, I do play it partly on those stats. That is, a larger gap is less likely to fill. And I'll usually wait for a break of the RTH highs/lows to enter (towards the fill). So this morning, with a large gap, I waited until it did break the RTH highs, then entered, but also took profits at a 50% fill for the TF. Last week there were a couple the other way, where it gapped up, and not as large of gaps. Those times, the pre-market action had established highs, and then price had come down some and opened a bit lower than that. Instead of waiting for the break, when price started up, and figuring that it would attempt a fill if it didn't take out the pre-market highs, I sold on a test of those highs. Have a tight stop in, and it did retreat from there. I already had profits by the time it went back to the open, and then it did break and fill. There are no guarantees; it's all percentages and management. And no, I'm not perfect at it :) Just pointing out how one can trade it. Thanks again for the thoughts, and good trading.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I tend to agree with Tams. I don't think you can find any number that can be used to determine 'clear market direction' from the open due to many noise from news before the bell and noise from comming news after the bell. I haved tested many opening price therories and came up with none. Opening gap is a noise like any other noise. It is hard to filter out without compromise other possibilities.

Tinson

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, Tinson. I actually agree, that there isn't likely a hard number. Again, my only point was his initial comment that the US open was simply a continuation of pre-market. That I still wouldn't agree with. But I think we've adequately beaten this horse to death :) Thanks again for the inputs!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Gaps are an interesting discussion IMO. I'm sure most have looked at them and I personally have never found a tradable system. Some days look so easy to just buy/sell the candle pattern that is on your chart and ride till it closes the gap.

 

Other days, not so much.

 

Actually, I think I'll start a thread and we'll see if anyone using gaps could contribute.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • How's about other crypto exchanges? Are all they banned in your country or only Binance?
    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.