Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

UrmaBlume

Game Theory and Predictive Reasoning

Recommended Posts

As both a poker player and a trader - game theory and predictive reasoning plays a big part in what I do.

 

In the clip bleow a very smart man provides insight into basic game theory and predictive reasoning - insights that, for those that can handle it, provide a glimpse into a new dimension in trade decision support information processing.

 

 

http://digg.com/d1o9iD

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mr. de Mesquita suggests that the stock market is unpredictable, in his analysis, while the decision making process in Iran can be predicted to 90% certainty, regarding the building of the bomb.

 

Why do you think this is the case? Are there just too many players in the market and too little information on what position they hold that makes it insoluble? Does this suggests that one should isolate a sector of the market and try to analyze and influence the players in just one sector of the market? Which is apparently what the investment banks and hedge funds tried to do with the oil market and now with the gold market.

 

If this is indeed the case, shouldn't one be in sector specific markets rather than the index futures, for example?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If this is indeed the case, shouldn't one be in sector specific markets rather than the index futures, for example?

 

We believe that each instrument is a market unto itself and from there we try and discover the interests and activity of the major participants.

 

In the case of the stock index instruments we believe that the commercial speculator is the force that drives price and we make efforts to track his trade via such indicators as Trade Intensity, Buy/Sell Volume Harmonic, Net New Commercial Trade and others, most of which have been disscussed in previous posts to this board.

 

cheers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Mr. de Mesquita suggests that the stock market is unpredictable, in his analysis, while the decision making process in Iran can be predicted to 90% certainty, regarding the building of the bomb.

 

Why do you think this is the case? Are there just too many players in the market and too little information on what position they hold that makes it insoluble? Does this suggests that one should isolate a sector of the market and try to analyze and influence the players in just one sector of the market? Which is apparently what the investment banks and hedge funds tried to do with the oil market and now with the gold market.

 

If this is indeed the case, shouldn't one be in sector specific markets rather than the index futures, for example?

 

My limited perspective - His is a specialized model of game theory that requires good representations of 1) who has a stake, 2) what they say they want 3) how focused / how big a deal it is to them 4) how much clout they have if decide to act…

For exchange traded markets, in both macro/broad index and micro/sector/ individual instruments, 1) is unknown and is also too transient 2) ‘they’ always say they want the same thing, they “want it to go up” - not differentiable info 3) their focus is immeasurable (and, like 2), malleable and transient) 4) the ‘clout’ is also transient (and also prefers to keep position information secret). That’s essentially why he doesn’t (publicly) apply his model to the stock markets… Also, his model is applied to situations which ‘resolve’ at least in terms of current circumstances and conflicts. Markets never ‘resolve’… so applying other game theory models would be more appropriate and he knows it...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Doesn't game theory need a discrete (finite) number of players, moves and outcomes? Aren't continuous games much harder (if possible at all ) to model?

 

Having said that I have no formal knowledge of game theory though have been an avid gamer for a long time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In the case of the stock index instruments we believe that the commercial speculator is the force that drives price and we make efforts to track his trade via such indicators as Trade Intensity, Buy/Sell Volume Harmonic, Net New Commercial Trade and others, most of which have been disscussed in previous posts to this board.

cheers

 

You mention commercial traders/speculators a lot, but what exactly is a commercial trader?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for posting that - very interesting in the light of recent developments in Iran. Those TED talks are wonderful - and great listening when the market is moving slowly.

 

Also (and more generally), I've only just started exploring this site seriously, and came across your various threads over the weekend - thanks for those as well, they contain a lot of very suggestive material.

 

I've been trading for some time with volume bars, a velocity histogram, and cumulative delta, and have been searching for ways to measure and exploit more precisely what I've been observing. Having the computer beep when large lots are hitting the bid and the ask can alert one to all sorts of interesting activity, but quantifying it is something else. You've indicated some interesting directions...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You mention commercial traders/speculators a lot, but what exactly is a commercial trader?

 

I presume that it is the following

 

"Commercial and Non-commercial Traders. When an individual reportable trader is identified to the Commission, the trader is classified either as "commercial" or "non-commercial." All of a trader's reported futures positions in a commodity are classified as commercial if the trader uses futures contracts in that particular commodity for hedging as defined in CFTC Regulation 1.3(z), 17 CFR 1.3(z)"

 

From the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) website.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I presume that it is the following

"Commercial and Non-commercial Traders. When an individual reportable trader is identified to the Commission, the trader is classified either as "commercial" or "non-commercial." All of a trader's reported futures positions in a commodity are classified as commercial if the trader uses futures contracts in that particular commodity for hedging as defined in CFTC Regulation 1.3(z), 17 CFR 1.3(z)"From the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) website.

 

BlowFish,

 

The CFTC criteria have nothing to do with the way we classify commercial trade.

 

We don't designate trade as commercial by who is doing the trading but rather by certain characteristics of the trade.

 

Most of our work is about the timely designation of local points of price inflection which we call Trade Points. We call our little group TradePointTechnologies.com

 

There are certain measureable dynamics present at most of these local turning points. One that I have demonstrated here is our measure of the Intensity of Trade which is one of 4 primary measures that we use to designate a certain price as a TradePoint.

 

The concepts and indicators I have shown here are not our final layer of processing but merely the inputs to that final layer/level of processing/technology.

 

cheers

 

UrmaBlume

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So you're basically call those guys commercials traders that are responsible for these local points of price infliction or what you call Trade Points. Or one could say you call those commercial traders that cause local highs or lows?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ahh OK personally I try and use terms that have been adopted in emerging works on market microstructure, Harris in particular (I have not read O'Hara). He deals with who trades how and why. Different types of trader have quite different modus operandi, though of course they all leave 'footprints' across the tape. Might interest you actually if you have not read it already.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ahh OK personally I try and use terms that have been adopted in emerging works on market microstructure, Harris in particular (I have not read O'Hara). He deals with who trades how and why. Different types of trader have quite different modus operandi, though of course they all leave 'footprints' across the tape. Might interest you actually if you have not read it already.

 

I have Harris and even my students find him a bit pedestrian. Lots of pages to describe "informed speculator," "bluffer," or "dealer" with nothing much we could find as useful from the standpoint of practical application at a level anywhere near what we find effective.

 

I don't mean to talk down to either you or the book but I come from 30 yrs on trading floors, in dealing rooms and among market makers and Harris comes off to me and those I teach as a bit ABC in a whole lot of pages.

 

My next book is "Practical Short Term Trading - Techniques & Technologies" and I hope to do a better job of covering the material and provide more practical, accessible and useable information.

 

cheers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I have Harris and even my students find him a bit pedestrian. Lots of pages to describe "informed speculator," "bluffer," or "dealer" with nothing much we could find as useful from the standpoint of practical application at a level anywhere near what we find effective.

 

I agree, I had the same criticism when I read his book.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My next book is "Practical Short Term Trading - Techniques & Technologies" and I hope to do a better job of covering the material and provide more practical, accessible and useable information.

 

Pad, when do you plan to publish this book and is it possible to preorder it? I'd even offer you to proof-read it ;-).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Pad, when do you plan to publish this book and is it possible to preorder it? I'd even offer you to proof-read it ;-).

 

Thanks. While my publisher is always after more cash flow, our primary focus is to grow our little company.

 

Books help to train and to clarify thoughts but no matter how many you sell its not much money when compared to the revenue from 2 more traders or 2 more bots.

 

Thanks for the kind words.

 

cheers

 

Pat

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is rather 'text book' and text books tend to be dry...you might go as far as saying hard work. I agree is not really that 'practical' a book (well it might be if you are a regulator or design exchanges). I guess if your sole interest is practical applications and strategies it won't hold much for you.

 

I found certain sections (quite a few) pretty interesting I just re-read about liquidity and bilateral search issues again no real practical use to me but who knows one day maybe one day maybe finding liquidity will be an issue :D interesting none the less. I guess people see things like 'The Glosten-Harris spread estimation model' and their eyes glaze over. I though hmmm maths...Im not very good at that maybe I'll learn something here.

 

I do think his definitions are far more useful than 'smart money' 'big boys' etc. I wonder exactly what you do mean by commercial? Size? Without a common lexicon communication becomes hit and miss at best.

 

I'd be up for proof reading too ;-)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Books help to train and to clarify thoughts but no matter how many you sell its not much money when compared to the revenue from 2 more traders or 2 more bots.

 

This is true, but unfortunately you have not answered my question with regards when you intend to publish it and if I can preorder it? I am probably one of the few who could translate your information into something practical for myself since I develop my own software...while others will probably read your book and wish their favorite trading platform vendors would implement your information in the future which is obviously unlikely.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So, I've seen Harris and O'Hara books mentioned but not in the form of a recommendation. What's the best book for studying market microstructure?

 

I'm also looking for a recommendation for a solid book on game theory. I don't know/care about poker, so would rather have one that's just focused on game theory, but if the best one is about poker, I'm ok with that. I'm not afraid of math, so heavy in math/theory is fine--just looking for the most informative/useful. I've read some about game theory before, but I would like to read through a good solid formal approach.

 

Oh, and I should say: book that I can get right now :) I also look forward to a certain unpublished book mentioned on this thread, but I'd like to pick one up right away. (Unless that someone needs any help reviewing/editing/proofreading/etc. for which I would gladly volunteer)

 

Thanks!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
So, I've seen Harris and O'Hara books mentioned but not in the form of a recommendation. What's the best book for studying market microstructure?

 

I'm also looking for a recommendation for a solid book on game theory. I don't know/care about poker, so would rather have one that's just focused on game theory, but if the best one is about poker, I'm ok with that. I'm not afraid of math, so heavy in math/theory is fine--just looking for the most informative/useful. I've read some about game theory before, but I would like to read through a good solid formal approach.

 

Oh, and I should say: book that I can get right now :) I also look forward to a certain unpublished book mentioned on this thread, but I'd like to pick one up right away. (Unless that someone needs any help reviewing/editing/proofreading/etc. for which I would gladly volunteer)

 

Thanks!

 

Thank you for the kind words.

 

I haven't read O'Hara but I found Harris to be very pedestrain, usless for the kind of trading we do and that it said very little that is of practical use in over 600 pages.

 

As to Game Theory I would recommend "An Introduction to Game Theory" by Osborne and "Game Theory" by Meyerson.

 

In addition here are a couple of links I found useful:

 

A collection of articles:

Combinatorial Game Theory

 

Some course notes:

Lectures

 

Enjoy

 

cheers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.