Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Guest Tresor

Please Help Me Understand E-minis' Leverage

Recommended Posts

Guest Tresor

Hello Guys,

 

I am trying to understand the concept of leverage and I am getting a bit confused. I made some miscellaneous readings about e-minis.

 

It is claimed that, e.g. YM has lower leverage than ES, therefore YM is recommended for beginners while ES is recommended for experienced traders.

 

I have made a small spreadseet which shows that YM's leverage is almost twice as high as that of ES. Either guys on the Internet are wrong or I misunderstand the concept of ''leverage'' :crap:

 

My understanding is that as of 31 Dec 2008 with daytrade margin of $500 (the same for YM and ES), I would control $86,610 with 1 YM and only $44,587.50 with 1 ES.

 

With 1% movement, in my direction, of the price action I could earn $866.10 with 1 YM and only $445.88 with 1 ES. Therefore my earnings with this 1% move in price action would be:

(i) 1.73 of the margin with YM, and

(ii) 0.89 of the margin with ES,

 

ergo leverage on YM is much higher than on ES.

 

 

Can you please have a look at the attached spreadsheet and see if my computations are okay?

contract specs.rar

contract specs.xls

Edited by Tresor

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's why the YM is recommended for beginners:

 

1 pt = $5

 

1 pt on ES = $50

 

In other words, you can lose 10 pts on the YM and have lost the same as 1 pt on the ES. A 1 pt move on the ES (esp in recent memory) can be rather quick at times, meaning watching a 2-3 pt move flash before your eyes is not uncommon.

 

Therefore, a 2-3 ES pt move = $100-$150 move.

 

That same move on the YM would require 20-30 pts. While the YM can in fact move 20-30 pts quickly at times as well, it's much easier to hit the flatten button when you have a 10 pt 'cushion' vs a 4 tick / 1 pt on the ES.

 

Basically, the YM gives beginners a little bigger 'oh sh*t' ability when compared to the ES. A 1 pt or 4 tick move on the ES is not much at all, esp during volatile times.

 

That's why the YM is recommended over the ES to beginners. Has nothing to do w/ actual leverage numbers you are trying to calculate.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Tresor

Ok, Now I understand why YM rather than ES is recommended for beginners. Thank you brownsfan019 :beer:

 

Could someone please have a look at xls and tell me if I calculated the leverage ratio properly? You know I am just trying to build up my money management system.

 

Regards

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Tresor

Please ignore this thread. I screwed up and applied a multiplier of 10 to YM, where I should have applied 5. In fact YM is slightly less leveraged than ES, but still almost twice as leveraged as NQ.

 

Regards

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Please ignore this thread. I screwed up and applied a multiplier of 10 to YM, where I should have applied 5. In fact YM is slightly less leveraged than ES, but still almost twice as leveraged as NQ.

 

Regards

 

Having a look at the average true range can also help determine which market suits you best. It's true that the YM is "only" 5$ per point, but it will move around 20 points at the same time the ES will move around 2 points, which in the end means the same amount of money lost or gained.

 

If you want to take a safe route, you might want to check out the ETF's first, instead of the futures. The DIA, SPY en QQQQ all show the same price action, but you'd have to mess up pretty badly to lose a lot of money. While if you start on the futures, you better have a solid plan tested and worked out before putting real money on the line. Just my :2c:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree about ETFs instead of e-minis. I first started with uncovered SPY options, and they were much more beginner friendly (much less leverage at the time) than trading even 1 contract lots of ES. SPY or QQQQ are good places to start if you're brand new.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • How's about other crypto exchanges? Are all they banned in your country or only Binance?
    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.