Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

daedalus

Is There Any VSA Analysis I Am Missing on My Entries?

Recommended Posts

..Are tests that test for buying the same thing as upthrust?

 

There are two types of UpThrusts.

 

TYPE1: High volume UpThrust.

TYPE2: UpThrust on low volume which is an UpThrust in the form of No Demand.

 

But what you really need to understand is the purpose of an UpThrust versus a Test.

 

UpThrusts are intended to rapidly mark price up to get the herd to go long or to gun for stops. Tests are intended to rapidly mark price down to look for supply(selling) by the BBs.

 

So in other words, one is looking to create/find activity, while the other wants none. One is looking to bring in the herd, while the other is looking to see if the Smart Money is done selling.

 

I have attached a chart with a nice UpThrust. Notice the high volume as the BBs try to entice the herd to go long. In a perfect world, this candle would close up, but it does make a higher high and close near its lows. The astute among you might pick up on the fact that this is a squat also.

 

An UpThrust in the form of No Demand will have low volume (volume less than the previous two bars/candles). No Demand would mean there is no/little BB activity on the side of higher prices. If you must, you could think of this type of UpThrust as an upside test. But that is only because of the low volume. This is important, since a test on high volume will either be a failed test, or result in little upside movement (which will come back into that area for a re-test). But a high volume UpThrust remains valid as an UpThrust. It merely moves from a TYPE2 to a TYPE1.

 

..What if the close of the test bar is on its lows?

 

Simply, it is not a test.

VSA10.thumb.png.d29a7f3e0208114cbb2e2a8bf44c3bf0.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I do not see the logic behind a test bar. Why would the smart money sell a lower prices if they could sell at higher prices. If the price gets marked down rapidly and the smart money does not sell, why does that automatically mean they wont sell when the price gets a little higher?

 

A test bar on low volume that closes on its highs only shows selling is gone at the lower prices. and again, even if it were on high volume(that closed on highs) wouldn't it show there are buyers who came in and bought. Why would this test fail? It is showing support in the market. It would be the opposite of an upthrust bar imo.

 

What is the opposite to an upthrust bar? When BBs fish for stops on the downside.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest burjtjiz

VSA seems to work best when you combine it with a higher time frame, this is just basic trading 101, or when you combine it with S/R. I found that using my charts, Sierra, that ticks charts with volume would recalculate the volume so quick for the range of chart that I couldn't even make out a changes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
VSA seems to work best when you combine it with a higher time frame, this is just basic trading 101, or when you combine it with S/R. I found that using my charts, Sierra, that ticks charts with volume would recalculate the volume so quick for the range of chart that I couldn't even make out a changes.

 

 

VSA works very well when combined with higher time frames. For day trading

try using the 60-minute and higher charts (e.g., 180-minute to daily, though the 60-min usually works pretty well) to frame out the structure of the market (i.e., overall trend, S/R, areas significantly oversold/overbought, etc.). During the day, keep an eye on the 30-min or 45-minute chart. Look for typical VSA indications of SOS, SOW, No Demands & Tests, etc. on this time frame. It gives you a very good clue on how the market will be trading for the next hour to the next several hours. You can then coordinate smaller time frame VSA indications for reliable trades.

 

Support and Resistance is important. Typically reliable trades set up with VSA indications at these areas. Look at both horizontal S/R as well as trend line S/R. Pay attention to the S/R from your analysis of the structure of the market on the 60-minute chart as well as S/R that sets up during the day.

 

Don't just mindlessly buy or sell at S/R, though. Wait for a VSA indication. People seem to misinterpret Sebastian's comments on the Symposium DVD regarding S/R. He very much pays attention to S/R levels and looks in these areas for VSA setups. What he doesn't do is just buy or sell because price has reached S/R. That was the point he was making.

 

It sounds like you may be using too small a time frame with tick charts. VSA is best used on a 10-minute down to a 3-minute chart when day trading. Anything lower than that will give too much noise for VSA setups and will cause frustration and doubt. Try using the 5 & 3-minute charts during the day. VSA indications typically set up several times during the course of the trading day on these two time frames, unless, of course, the day is a low volume, narrow range, flat day.

 

Hope this is helpful for you,

 

Eiger

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

As I would also like to learn from my mistakes (or what I missed in interpreting the chart with VSA) I posted a chart from my recent trade. It’s a daily chart from the Commerzbank (CBK).

Here is what I read on this chart (see attachment):

 

A: WRB with ultra high volume and the close off the low. So there might be some buying in this bar. For confirmation: waiting next bar to see higher close.

 

B: The close is lower than the bar before and the bar is a narrow bar, so I interpreted is as: In the bar before (point A) there was buying in bar but supply overcame demand as this bar is down. However due to the fact that the bar is a narrow bar and the volume is even higher than bar A, I thought this means professional money is heavily buying (that’s why the bar is narrow adn the volume even higher). Actually I interpreted it as a squat bar. I learned in this forum here, that it is probable that -+1 bar after the squat bar there might be a trend change.

 

C: This bar is a down bar: close is lower but with much lower volume than bar B. So I thought this was a No supply bar. And here I entered the trade long (green arrow)

 

D: This bar is again a down bar on again lower volume, which I interpreted as an No Supply bar again.

 

E: Kicked out due to my Stop Loss

 

 

So I would very much appreciate if you can help showing my mistakes:

 

- Had I made some mistakes in the interpretation the points A-C / D?

- I have to admit that the interpretation of the background was quite hard for me, but I thought the areas around G, H, I were showing some accumulation?

- Was it because the week I did the trade was the option expiring trade and VSA is not very reliable in this kind of week?

- Was it because the “signal” was not within the WRB and thus not so reliable?

- …because I didn’t look on the higher timeframe (weekly bar)?

 

 

Thanks a lot for any kind of help learning to read this (and in general) chart better!

mcfotos

COMMERZBANK.thumb.png.592961a4c810f7243e79aa8ecabcafd3.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

mcfotos,

Perhaps you jumped in too early IMO, or entry could have been made via a buy stop order above that no supply bar as you call it. At that point it just means that sellers are not meeting any resistance ie. support from buyers and are able to push prices down with ease. I would keep my mind free of big boys and small boys and just focus on supply and demand. It is not important at all to know who is buying and why. movement of price is what matters. In this respect knowledge of both VSA and Wyckoff is desirable.

 

However far better entry depending on your risk tolerance and albeit not right at the bottom where everybody prefers to enter, would be to wait for a slight rally after a high vol down bar and then a test via down bar on a narrow range with low vol. In other words allow a cause to be built for a rally. A buy stop order above that would be the place where I would enter. That is what I do intraday. no reason why same principles will not operate on day charts or weekly charts.

 

It may work or not but the odds are in your favor that way.

 

You can ofcource wait for prices to rise above the moving average or above previous swing high and then a test on low supply. That would be more conservative.

:2c:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

.. As I would also like to learn from my mistakes (or what I missed in interpreting the chart with VSA) I posted a chart from my recent trade... mcfotos

 

Hi Mcfotos,

 

Thanks for posting this chart & trade. You have the exact right attitude about learning from losses. A friend who is a trader used to play the pro circuit in tennis always remarks on how the best players were always trying to make improvements in their game. When they made some error, they didn't get down on themselves (like so many do). Instead, they became excited at the potential for now learnng something new about their game and a chance to improve. It's a very useful attitude.

 

I think this may have been difficult because of the background. It didn't really favor the long side. It started out favoring the long side, but it didn't pan out.

 

I say it started out favoring the long side because of the Shortening of the Thrust, meaning that the legs down I, H, G, F showed less and less downside movement. SOT is one (early) way to identify a potential trend change. It also broke the trend channel (upper, or Supply Line). All of this is potentially bullish.

 

It didn't pan out, however, because we got no good rally after the SOT and breaking of the trend line. Note that the market contiuned to put in lower lows. If you look carefully at the bars in this congestion area, you see no real evidence of buying going on. You would want to see the up bars in the two small rallies that occured to have wider spreads, closes near the highs, and some volume come in. Instead, you got narrow spreads and light volume - No Demand.

 

A great clue for the future is to look for a rally that breaks an old top or high and puts in the first higher high (reverse this for changes in up trends). Had this market rallied well, it would have taken out the high made after G. The odds would then be very favorable for more upside progress had that rally occurred. So, one good thing to remember is to look for the largest rally to occur in the downtrend to indicate demand has entered the market before deciding that the trend has changed from down to up.

 

On the bars at A-E: As A is approaching the support area at F (red line), both spread and volume pick up - not a good sign. The close at A is in the lower half - more bearish than bullish. B is narrow and has a lot of volume, but look carefully. Bar B is a down bar closing on its lows and closing under the support line at F. Same with the next bars. THis market was unable to rally away from the support level. This support level was the danger point for this market. If it can't rally away from the danger point, it will fall through it, which is what happened here.

 

I drew what more bullish bars would look like to the left. Note that the closes would generally be clustered near one another, even though price was popping down lower. This would say that there is a price level that is tending to hold on the closes. Also, the closes are near the highs, and they are closing above the danger point or the support line from F.

 

Hope this is helpful, and don't lose that good atttude of learning!

 

Eiger

Chart.png.96b8c6a9d99473b864df001a804185c4.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When describing the lack or rally power after breaking the downtrend channel in the post above, I said that the market made lower lows. It should be lower highs - i.e., the market continued to make lower highs. Same with the chart - i.e., it should show LH rather than LL. Sorry for any confusion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Now there is an explanation and a half:)

 

Great stuff Eiger. plus a marvellous attitude, courtesy, respect and politeness., treating others like mature adults and not kids. Wish some would take lessons.;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Eiger,

 

thanks a lot for taking time to post this detailed analysis and helping to improve ...

can only add myself to the comment of Hakuna

 

...great "helpful" stuff

 

mcfotos

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I've been focused heavily on trying to improve my win rate in the system I trade.

 

I think the key to a lot of this might be found in adding volume analysis to my entries. However, I have been unable to find a consistent way of using volume to filter a winning entry from a losing entry.

 

The arrows are trade entry signals that I have taken. 2 Winners, 2 Losers. Is there anything you guys can see using VSA or any other Volume analysis that is apparent that might be able to filter the losers and retain the winners?

 

Is there any key tell tale signs in the volume histogram as the swing is made before my entry off the retracement?

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=7620&stc=1&d=1219770877

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=7621&stc=1&d=1219770877

 

Thanks for your help in advance! :)

 

Sorry to bump this thread.

I think the Wide Range Body (WRB) is an important indicator. Often after such wide down bar, minor retracements are seen due to reduction in selling pressure. even in this case, if you observe, the open price of the WRB bar serves as the resistance just before the price plummets again.

 

There are mnay who use such WRB as primary indicators in trading.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello,

Many times I read about traders looking at the background if they are using VSA. I'm not sure what they mean by background, would someone please explain what they mean by this term? Thank you.

 

 

Tim

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm warning all to not give CC# to TradeGuider or VSA club as they will never stop charging you. And refunds dont come... lots of talk but then I dont know why that happens is retort. I had to get visa involved and 3 months charges still havent been returned. Just FYI

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.