Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Sledge

Real Time Price Action- Clue to Puzzle?

Recommended Posts

So your scenario, I assume, is to buy support and sell resistance?

 

 

Correct, and since price opened well below resistance, the odds were higher that is going to be drawn to support first. Which is what it did, but then it went 5 points lower than 1342... and the fact that it later got back above 42 but then lower again makes it all the more confusing whether or not there actually is support there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Correct, and since price opened well below resistance, the odds were higher that is going to be drawn to support first. Which is what it did, but then it went 5 points lower than 1342... and the fact that it later got back above 42 but then lower again makes it all the more confusing whether or not there actually is support there.

 

Support is not necessarily a trampoline, but you're getting ahead of yourself. You say you understand that support is not a line but a zone. So whether price penetrates or not is irrelevant compared to the importance of what it does while it's there.

 

Which leads us to the "selling climax". Where do you see this?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Support is not necessarily a trampoline, but you're getting ahead of yourself. You say you understand that support is not a line but a zone. So whether price penetrates or not is irrelevant compared to the importance of what it does while it's there.

 

Which leads us to the "selling climax". Where do you see this?

 

About 20 minutes after the open. I've attached another chart where I annotated the bars where I paid most attention to.

es_6.thumb.GIF.0cd321b4ba73c539d4e70a2c305f51d3.GIF

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Fair enough. Now where's resistance?

 

And if you want to work with your charts, click Edit>Copy then paste them to Paint on your hard drive.

 

 

Forgot to say - when you asked me about resistance - that I posted this earlier on:

 

The S/R point comes from the low from the previous day, and the high on the 19th.

 

My prepost levels were (and are) these:

 

support 1342-1344

resistance 1357-1359

potential resistance 1349-1350

 

Pre-market plan was to go long on a re-test on support.

 

I wrote "potential" at 1349-1350, because there's an area of consolidation from overnight there. This can be provide resistance, but it doesn't have to. I'm more convinced about 1357-1359 than this area. But by the looks of it (right now) it is offering resistance... so at least I got something right.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
About 20 minutes after the open. I've attached another chart where I annotated the bars where I paid most attention to.

 

First, all selling climaxes are only potential selling climaxes. You won't know whether or not they were selling climaxes until there's been a successful retest.

 

Second, why do you consider this even a potential climax? Why is the volume any more climactic that the earlier volume?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
First, all selling climaxes are only potential selling climaxes. You won't know whether or not they were selling climaxes until there's been a successful retest.

 

Okay, you're right, there's no knowing whether it is actually thé selling climax, but I was just describing what I felt or thought in real time... obviously it's only 100% sure whether something is a selling climax or not in hindsight.

 

Second, why do you consider this even a potential climax? Why is the volume any more climactic that the earlier volume?

 

If I don't have much reference to how "high" volume is, then I look to the previous day to compare how "huge" the volume really was. That way I have a means of determining what "the average volume" looks like. Next to that, the first bar at the open is usually pretty high volume because the market just opened. Next to the down bar itself there's an upbar next on comparatively low volume. This is usually confirmation of the selling climax.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

All right. Setting aside the subject of whether you are correct in your assumptions or not, your hypothesis is that this is a selling climax, and because it's taking place at what you hypothesize to be support, you should be on the long side.

 

Now what did you see, minute by minute, that supported your hypothesis, and what did you see that did not support your hypothesis?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
All right. Setting aside the subject of whether you are correct in your assumptions or not, your hypothesis is that this is a selling climax, and because it's taking place at what you hypothesize to be support, you should be on the long side.

 

Now what did you see, minute by minute, that supported your hypothesis, and what did you see that did not support your hypothesis?

 

Starting from the selling climax, this is how I observed price. Thoughts and feelings included in the analysis :)

 

(1) the next bar was an up-bar, as mentioned on lower volume and going straight up... => no supply

 

(2) at 1400 there was the news, the high volume on this bar is ignored

 

(3) at 1409 there's decent volume and a wide spread bar but price closes in the middle, looks like there is still some supply in the market left that prevents price from rising

 

(4) next candle, reasonable volume and price goes down... so I'd expect price to test the support again

 

(5) next candle, price tries to rise, but fails to do so and closes at the low, but still not lower than the previous candle: looks like there's already some buying coming in, supports the hypothesis

 

(6) the 're-test bar': higher volume than the previous two bars: but small spread => all the effort from sellers is apparently being absorbed by traders who are buying at this level, otherwise the high volume would see price fall further; instead price hardly moves and the candle closes off the lows, hypothesis very likely

 

(7) at 1421 there's an upbar, on the lowest volume of all... here we go: lift-off: no more supply left and price rises becauses there's no selling pressure, hypothesis confirmed

 

(8) at 1424 sudden rise in volume and wide spread down bar... what the hell?

 

(9) ah, another low volume upbar, perhaps sellers weren't quite flushed out completely in the previous bar and price will rise now, starting to feel some fear...

 

(10) what? how can this happen? wide spread down bar and it goes below the low of the potential selling climax... my stop was there so I'm stopped out... hypothesis apparently incorrect

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
.

I've drawn in the "potential" resistance level you mentioned earlier.

 

.

 

.

How does this change your perception of strength v weakness?

 

.

 

 

It now looks as if this:

 

"(3) at 1409 there's decent volume and a wide spread bar but price closes in the middle, looks like there is still some supply in the market left that prevents price from rising"

 

was some sort of rejection from resistance.

 

If that was a rejection, than the candles that I named a "re-test" look like weakness and no buying... :\

 

But then again, if I remove my "support", everything starts to look different.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It now looks as if this:

 

"(3) at 1409 there's decent volume and a wide spread bar but price closes in the middle, looks like there is still some supply in the market left that prevents price from rising"

 

was some sort of rejection from resistance.

 

If that was a rejection, than the candles that I named a "re-test" look like weakness and no buying... :\

 

But then again, if I remove my "support", everything starts to look different.

 

Price determines where support and resistance lie, not the trader. Finding a point here and a point there and drawing lines across them may give the trader the illusion of finding support and resistance, but that's exactly what it is: an illusion. What matters is remaining sensitive to the flow of information regarding the balance of power between buyers and sellers, not in dithering over trivia that price couldn't care less about.

 

This is not to say that you should make no attempt to locate those areas most likely to act as turning points for price, but dont succumb to nonsense. Use your head. And when price approaches those levels or enters those zones where you think turning points are most likely to occur, you must remain absolutely free of bias so that you can interpret the dance between price and volume, demand and supply accurately. Either that or adopt the biases both of those who are long and those who are short. Argue the case of each simultaneously. And if the windows don't open, stand aside.

 

If bars and closes and so forth aren't working for you, consider trading price. Just for the hell of it, try to determine where strength and weakness lie here during the same timeframe as in the earlier charts:

 

.

attachment.php?attachmentid=5686&stc=1&d=1206566565

 

.

Image6.gif.54bb0dc6caaa9c8474f7aadf97674899.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Price determines where support and resistance lie, not the trader. Finding a point here and a point there and drawing lines across them may give the trader the illusion of finding support and resistance, but that's exactly what it is: an illusion. What matters is remaining sensitive to the flow of information regarding the balance of power between buyers and sellers, not in dithering over trivia that price couldn't care less about.

.

 

True, but - as I posted in my "minute-by-minute" analysis - I had more elements to support the long case than not. And given that price reacted to my line at 1342 in the first place, it was a confirmation of support.

 

This is not to say that you should make no attempt to locate those areas most likely to act as turning points for price, but dont succumb to nonsense. Use your head. And when price approaches those levels or enters those zones where you think turning points are most likely to occur, you must remain absolutely free of bias so that you can interpret the dance between price and volume, demand and supply accurately. Either that or adopt the biases both of those who are long and those who are short. Argue the case of each simultaneously. And if the windows don't open, stand aside.

.

 

I've found that hard to do when trading. Easy when you're not trading perhaps and just standing aside, but when you're actually putting a trade on and you're focusing on elements to contradict your trade, one can always find some. If I look hard enough, there'll always be signals that invalidate a trade, but by doing so, I probably never put a trade on.

 

If bars and closes and so forth aren't working for you, consider trading price. Just for the hell of it, try to determine where strength and weakness lie here during the same timeframe as in the earlier charts:

 

I'm not quite sure what I'm supposed to do with the chart, but I gave it a try... but I'm not sure if this even comes close to what you had in mind.

sw.GIF.d877c7af2a5bf2d87e2b28d3211cba46.GIF

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
True, but - as I posted in my "minute-by-minute" analysis - I had more elements to support the long case than not. And given that price reacted to my line at 1342 in the first place, it was a confirmation of support.

 

You had more elements to support the long case because you weren't sensitive to those that spoke against it.

 

As to the reaction at 42, that's fine. But you traded off 44.5.

 

If I look hard enough, there'll always be signals that invalidate a trade, but by doing so, I probably never put a trade on.

 

No, you'd take only the best ones. You have to decide whether you want to trade or you want to make money.

 

As for the chart, I imagine at least a couple of people have been following this. I'll let them take a whack at it, if they can do so without being contaminated by hindsight.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No, you'd take only the best ones. You have to decide whether you want to trade or you want to make money.

 

I suppose don't need to answer that one...

 

As for the chart, I imagine at least a couple of people have been following this. I'll let them take a whack at it, if they can do so without being contaminated by hindsight.

 

Okay, we can continue this tomorrow or later then. Thanks again for taking the time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1320,1332,1340, and 1358. chart attached......

erie

 

my levels for today:

 

1347-1349 (given yesterday's action)

1358-1360 (obvious resistance)

1337-1339 (yesterday's low)

1323-1325 (from the 15th and the 19th)

 

 

Why as low as 1320 erie? and where does the 1332 come from exactly?

 

and do you take the overnight action into consideration when analyzing a chart?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Why as low as 1320 erie? and where does the 1332 come from exactly?

 

and do you take the overnight action into consideration when analyzing a chart?

 

The 1320 is an important area from earlier on ( you can go back to previous posts and see the charts as well )

The 1332 area, look at the chart, from back to early March the area above the 1332 was an area of price rejection , this may now be potential support. The overnite action is on the chart from previous days and I look at my levels the night before.

erie

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
my levels for today:

 

1347-1349 (given yesterday's action)

1358-1360 (obvious resistance)

1337-1339 (yesterday's low)

1323-1325 (from the 15th and the 19th)

 

Ok, looking at your figures, why 1347? The others I can see your point as they are reasonably close to mine and one has to allow for a difference in eyesight :)

erie

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ok, looking at your figures, why 1347? The others I can see your point as they are reasonably close to mine and one has to allow for a difference in eyesight :)

erie

 

1347 to 1349 is the high of a congestion area from pre-market yesterday. Also, late last night it peaked into that area up to 1349.50 before reversing sharply. So I guess you could say 1349 is the level to beat, but I always define "zones" instead of fixed lines.

 

I hope the difference in eyesight doesn't spoil things for me again...

 

-> Question: given the premarket action at 1344-1345 (price reversed after hanging around there for quite some time), would you now consider that level to be resistance? It's awfully close to 1349 though :\

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

-> Question: given the premarket action at 1344-1345 (price reversed after hanging around there for quite some time), would you now consider that level to be resistance? It's awfully close to 1349 though :\

 

No , I think it's more important to note where price opens , in regards to yesterday's close, there is a lot of price above us here right up to 1358.

erie

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
my levels for today:

 

1347-1349 (given yesterday's action)

1358-1360 (obvious resistance)

1337-1339 (yesterday's low)

1323-1325 (from the 15th and the 19th)

 

Like I said in a previous post, support was at 1337-1339. These are the horizontal blue lines drawn across the chart.

 

Price opened above support and just went straight lower, like a knife through butter. It stopped around 1332 before going back to the support area, which should now act as resistance. I'm observing how the volume drops off gradually, so this looks typically like a low volume retracement after a breakout, right?

 

Then there's a volume peak that pierces the support level but the bar closes right down, and this is the 'shooting star' short signal I was looking for. The volume is much higher then before, so everything is according to plan.

 

However - and I can't get my head around why this is happening so often lately - price continues higher. I would almost get paranoid, but this would have been the 14th losing trade in a row. I stopped trading for real after 7 though. Perhaps I need to go short when I go long and the other way around. Certainly looks like that could work :roll eyes:

es_march27.thumb.GIF.b24e1a78005f324a65615e210457c04f.GIF

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Like I said in a previous post, support was at 1337-1339. These are the horizontal blue lines drawn across the chart.

 

Price opened above support and just went straight lower, like a knife through butter. It stopped around 1332 before going back to the support area, which should now act as resistance. I'm observing how the volume drops off gradually, so this looks typically like a low volume retracement after a breakout, right?

 

Then there's a volume peak that pierces the support level but the bar closes right down, and this is the 'shooting star' short signal I was looking for. The volume is much higher then before, so everything is according to plan.

 

:

 

Support is at 1332........... resistance is now at 1346.... forget 1337.

 

erie

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Support is at 1332........... resistance is now at 1346.... forget 1337.

 

erie

 

Yes I can see why support is NOW at 1332... after price reversed from that level it's easy to say. But before the day opened I hadn't written this level on my map. Instead I was focusing on price action around 1337-1339...

 

as for 1346, how come you suddenly have that as resistance? couple of hours ago you asked me where I got my 1347 from?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yes I can see why support is NOW at 1332... after price reversed from that level it's easy to say. But before the day opened I hadn't written this level on my map. Instead I was focusing on price action around 1337-1339...

 

as for 1346, how come you suddenly have that as resistance? couple of hours ago you asked me where I got my 1347 from?

 

1346 is where price stopped going up today, so far the high for today. It is where price recently turned . That's what real time is all about.One can't see that until it happens. Don't worry keep it up and you will get it......But that doesn't mean price will stop there, it is only potential resistance.

erie

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1346 is where price stopped going up today, so far the high for today. It is where price recently turned . That's what real time is all about.One can't see that until it happens. Don't worry keep it up and you will get it......But that doesn't mean price will stop there, it is only potential resistance.

erie

 

Okay, fair enough. I can definitely see price reacting to that level: there's a rise in volume and the bar closes off the highs. But this probably happens all the time when price approaches resistance, because it's very likely that other traders are seeing this area as resistance too.

 

If I may ask, do you focus only on the ES? or do you look at other things to?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • INO Inovio Pharmaceuticals stock low volume pullback to 9.77 support area, watch for local breakout above 10.5, https://stockconsultant.com/?INO
    • GOOG Alphabet stock good trend, top of range breakout watch above 180.55, https://stockconsultant.com/?GOOG
    • Date: 7th June 2024. ECB closer look: All options open for the second half of the year! ECB officials continue to dampen rate cut speculation, following on from Lagarde’s hawkish comments yesterday. Officials have been out in force this morning to continue stressing that the inflation outlook remains uncertain and that the central bank is not committing to a particular rate path for the rest of the year. The ECB cut rates by 25 basis points, but as we expected it was a “hawkish” cut that left all options open for the second half of the year. Lagarde repeatedly stressed that future decisions will be data dependent, and even refused to confirm that yesterday’s move was the first step of an easing cycle. Rate cuts in September and December are still a possibility, but not cast in stone. Simkus admitted that there may be more than one rate cut this year, but on the whole, the comments were designed to keep a lid on speculation that the central bank kicked off a rate cut cycle yesterday. Austria’s central bank head Holzmann went on record yesterday to confirm that he was the sole dissenter objecting to a cut yesterday, and so far the doves have been quiet, which is helping to affirm Lagarde’s hawkish message yesterday.   Details of the Rate Cut The ECB delivered the first rate cut in five years and lowered key rates by 25 basis points. The deposit rate is now at 3.75% and the main refinancing rate at 4.25%. It was a “hawkish cut,” as near term inflation forecasts were revised higher, and Lagarde flagged that domestic inflation remains high. The statement stressed that the ECB is not pre-committing to a particular rate path, and the comments leave all options on the table for the second half of the year.   Economic Activity and Forecasts  The ECB noted the improvement in economic activity through the first quarter of the year. Lagarde also highlighted that manufacturing is showing signs of stabilization, with stronger exports expected to support growth in coming quarters. At the same time, monetary policy should be less of a drag on demand over time, according to the ECB. The new set of forecasts show GDP rising 0.9% this year, which is more than the 0.6% expected back in March. The forecast for 2025 has been revised slightly down to 1.4% from 1.5% previously, and the ECB still expects a slight acceleration to 1.6% for 2026. The inflation forecast for this year was raised to 2.5% from 2.3%, and the projection for 2025 was hiked to 2.2% from 2.0%. As such, inflation will fall toward the target later than previously anticipated, though the forecast for 2026 was left unchanged at 1.9%. This means the headline rate is still expected to fall below the target at the end of the forecast horizon.   Upside Risks to Inflation The statement noted upside risks to the inflation outlook from wages and profits, which could be higher than currently anticipated. Geopolitical tensions and extreme weather events could also push up prices once again, according to the ECB. At the same time, the ECB acknowledged that inflation could come in lower than anticipated if monetary restrictions have more of a dampening effect than currently anticipated, or if global growth weakens more than projected.   The press conference was mainly dedicated to driving home the point that future decisions will depend on data available at the time of the respective meeting. Lagarde even refused to confirm that the central bank has effectively kicked off an easing cycle, and said in response to a question that she wouldn’t necessarily say that the ECB started a “dialing-back process”. She suggested it is likely, but refused to confirm it, which in theory means rates could actually go up again. This seems unlikely, given that this move was a near unanimous decision, but its makes clear that the ECB will not cut rates at every meeting and that the outlook for the rest of the year is still very much open. The ECB still thinks that monetary policy needs to remain restrictive for the foreseeable future against the backdrop of high domestic inflation. However, as chief economist Lane suggested recently, officials will have to debate at every meeting whether the data allows the central bank to dial back the degree of restrictiveness.   Employment and Inflation Dynamics Wage growth, profits, and services price inflation will remain the key numbers to watch through the rest of the year. Lagarde pointed to data on the compensation of employees, due to be released tomorrow, but also flagged that current wage agreements are often still backward looking, as they reflect attempts to compensate for the sharp rise in prices since the start of the Ukraine war. As we flagged previously, the multi-year wage agreements in Germany are a prime example of that. However, as Lagarde highlighted, the deals on the table so far show sharp increases for this year, but also imply a slowdown in wage growth in coming years. However, unemployment is at a record low and the number of vacancies has dropped only slightly. At the same time, service price inflation remains stubbornly high, which suggests that companies have sufficient room to pass on higher labor costs. With real disposable income rising, thanks to lower inflation and higher wages, companies could find it even easier to hike prices in the second half of the year, and yesterday’s rate cut is also likely to boost demand. In the current situation, this could add to domestic price pressures. Looking ahead, the only thing that is clear is that Lagarde did her best to keep expectations of back-to-back cuts under control. The chances still are that the ECB will deliver two more 25 basis point cuts in September and December, but at this point, nothing is cast in stone. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business. Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar. Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding on how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE! Click HERE to READ more Market news. Andria Pichidi Market Analyst HFMarkets Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in FX and CFDs products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • TRGP Targa Resources stock narrow range breakout watch above 119.02, https://stockconsultant.com/?TRGP
    • ROOT stock, short term downtrend break, bullish stats , https://stockconsultant.com/?ROOT
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.