Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

ranj

Targets verse Trailing stops

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

Looking for some advice in terms of profit taking for swing trades, ie 3-10 day hold ingperiod.

 

Do most people who swing trade look for target to take a profit at or just trail the position and if you trail what method do you use.

 

I have been frustrated as of late in my profit taking. I either leave too much on the table or the price falls just short of my target and I get a break even.

 

I was working a short in FBTX, financial's rallied from the 8th to the 13th.

FBTX set up with an inside, no demand bar at the top of the down going trend channel on the 13th. Short one of the weakest stocks in a weak sector.

 

http://www3.stockfetcher.com/sfchart/2124926297.png\

 

Set a profit target of at the open of 11/8 of 6.55 start of the WRB, nice R:R.

It closed today at 5.6, left almost another 2R on the table. :crap::angry::doh:

 

I need help in figuring out what is the best way to exit or adjust my psychology to live the weakness of either method.

 

Thanks

Rajiv

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm very interested in this as I have the same issue.

Understanding I'll never get bottom to peak profit, I do think some volatility model for exits perhaps might do better than my current plan.

Currently I trail my stop to the swing high/low and it either leaves good profit OR gets tagged and stopped for break even. :doh:

 

Hoping someone has some good input for us. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ahhhh the age old how to exit thread.

 

There's some floating around TL so make sure to do a search.

 

Here's the best piece of advice I can provide - as soon as you realize AND accept that you will NEVER get out at the best optimal price, you can start to craft your exit strategy. Neither of you are there yet.

 

Here's what I mean - when you are saying 'only if...' it tells me that you want to catch the monster moves AND get out when there's only a little profit available. Well, that's next to impossible. You have to decide if you are either:

 

1) Going for the large moves and will make little/nothing on the small moves

2) Looking to take realistic profits every trade

 

I don't see how you can do either consistently. In a nutshell, it's a question of trying to hit homers or singles. I would suggest sticking with the singles in the beginning.

 

I realize that some may say it's possible to do both based on XYZ or ABC or maybe some of ABC mixed with XYZ and sprinkled with 123. And maybe it can be done. But in the beginning especially, I would suggest finding one method of exiting that suits you and then work it. I personally like taking regular profits, but I mainly daytrade. I've also found in my personal trading that many times going for the larger moves and taking small gains/losses on the other trades that I make LESS by going for MORE and risk MORE to do that. :doh: That will open up your eyes real quick.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ahhhh the age old how to exit thread.

 

There's some floating around TL so make sure to do a search.

 

Here's the best piece of advice I can provide - as soon as you realize AND accept that you will NEVER get out at the best optimal price, you can start to craft your exit strategy. Neither of you are there yet.

 

Here's what I mean - when you are saying 'only if...' it tells me that you want to catch the monster moves AND get out when there's only a little profit available. Well, that's next to impossible. You have to decide if you are either:

 

1) Going for the large moves and will make little/nothing on the small moves

2) Looking to take realistic profits every trade

 

I don't see how you can do either consistently. In a nutshell, it's a question of trying to hit homers or singles. I would suggest sticking with the singles in the beginning.

 

I realize that some may say it's possible to do both based on XYZ or ABC or maybe some of ABC mixed with XYZ and sprinkled with 123. And maybe it can be done. But in the beginning especially, I would suggest finding one method of exiting that suits you and then work it. I personally like taking regular profits, but I mainly daytrade. I've also found in my personal trading that many times going for the larger moves and taking small gains/losses on the other trades that I make LESS by going for MORE and risk MORE to do that. :doh: That will open up your eyes real quick.

 

I'm not looking for homeruns at all, that would mean I'm giving no room or risk of profit for a continued move.

 

I ride 2 lots...1st target is 10 YM points and then I move the stop to break even. Well every few moves they bump it up to that level of break even just before a solid move in the other direction. That annoys me, and maybe I should move it to break even -2 for example and net $30 instead of $40 if I get stopped out then. So I need to look further into that.

 

For the runners on the 2nd lot I use swing high or swing low which depending on the structure often leaves a very large chunk on the table. I trade off the 144 tick so I'm thinkin of maybe moving to the 3 minute chart once we are in a bigger move and try those swing high/lows since they are a bit less choppy than a tick chart.

 

Not lookin for the holy grail man, just some tweaks. :o

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Should I add my two cents here...

 

I go all in, all out... have a technical entry criteria and technical exit criteria... I am more near to what Brown says... take small consistent profits,(my technical criteria is scalper exit) I dont go for the big moves that sometimes dont appear... quick scalps that put cash on my wallet over and over again... screen time is the best teacher.. also taking stops when you had a nice decent profit at some point... cheers Walter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank for the input. I am going to start to aggressively journal on this topic. I take three major type of trade. I think each has a different potential and deserves a different exit method. Looking back at my prior trade in review. Even though I left money the table the location of my profit target was sound based on how I viewed the price action.

 

Thanks Again

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I too have been frustrated with my trailing stop being way to tight. The first one I ever tried I was shooting for a 65 pip profit and trailed it with a 15 pip trail overnight.

 

My 65 target was hit- but when I looked at my account- I had a measly 5 pip profit. Why? Trail was too tight, I didn't give it enough room to run, my target was reasonable and attainable, but fear made me plop that 15 pip trail on a 65 pip target. I left 50 pips on the table that night while I slept.

 

Best method for me is if you have as an example a 50 pip target- trail it by 30 or 35 pips. GIVE THE TRADE A CHANCE- but be wise in protecting your trade.

 

If I have read my charts correctly and a 50 pip target is reasonable, I may even put a 40 pip trail on it. Wouldn't you be happy with 40 pips instead of negative pips if your 50 target isn't hit?

 

Took me quite a while to figure this out- I left bunches of $ on the table as well and beat myself up about it until I found what worked for me.

 

Hope this helps!

Sledge

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Agreed since some of the new traders usually lose money in start and some loses more while chasing their lost money and eventually ends up blaming to their brokers part.
    • The crypto market are also in phase of maturing like the forex and other trading assets so we can do much more accurate analysis than before since early days it was purely a luck if the investments in crypto bears results because most of the coins or tokens never come to fruition. Some early birds were also able to make profits on these tokens or coins. e,g., like turtle coin starts with 1 satoshi and go up to 7 sathoshis, quite good rewards. another token lmgx now hovering at 10 started from 1, 
    • How's about other crypto exchanges? Are all they banned in your country or only Binance?
    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.