Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Dogpile

Taylor Trading Technique

Recommended Posts

Let me provide some data to support what I am saying.

 

I took all full trading days since November 2007 and divided the market into two buckets: 1) if price made its low or high for the day (low if low first, high if high first) in first 90 minutes of trading or 2) high or low made in any other time period past the opening 90 minutes. Note that there are usually 20-22 trading days per month so I am trying to show that the Taylor Cycle 'should' kick in during those first 3 bars about 75%+ of the time. In March, it was 19/22 (higher than normal).

 

personally, I find these statistics to be quite powerful for more than just their face value. for example, if you know that the first 30-minutes often makes the low for the day, many times you can go long during that timeframe and get a nice trade on -- and price will end up reversing later on and the first 30-minutes won't be the low for the day -- but you made money on your trade anyway simply because there was enough buy-pressure to create a squeeze for those fearing that it 'could' be the low of the day.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=10147&stc=1&d=1239628525

5aa70ec3c00d3_TaylorMadeFirstPriceBar.thumb.png.b8cb31a1245b8091aca4cd0c8209b24c.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Great insight Frank,

BTW do you keep a book as per Taylor on the instruments that you trade. ie. avg. decline, avg. penetration, avg rally etc.

Presume your primary focus is on ESmini, if so what cycle are you on, I mean what is today as per your count, a Buy, Sell or SS day or you term them Day 1, Day 2 and Day 3 respectively.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the taylor day count is just a subset to how I think about it.... I may lean that way should it fit my overall concepts or I may not.

 

I prefer the framework of the market profile 'auction' --- as in, an auction CAN end when there is a high or low violation --- and I may look for that --- but the auction can also continue until a 'morning low or high' is violated.

 

so today, we came in after low made first on Thursday. therefore, the 'auction' is up -- until a good morning low is taken out.

 

But the market made its low during first 30-minutes today -- consistent with the statistics saying where it should. therefore, no matter what the day Taylor called it, I am not going to short and will try to find a spot to go long.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
the taylor day count is just a subset to how I think about it.... I may lean that way should it fit my overall concepts or I may not.

 

I prefer the framework of the market profile 'auction' --- as in, an auction CAN end when there is a high or low violation --- and I may look for that --- but the auction can also continue until a 'morning low or high' is violated.

 

so today, we came in after low made first on Thursday. therefore, the 'auction' is up -- until a good morning low is taken out.

 

But the market made its low during first 30-minutes today -- consistent with the statistics saying where it should. therefore, no matter what the day Taylor called it, I am not going to short and will try to find a spot to go long.

I can see that this is a great way to blend Market Profile with Taylor.

 

1. Hence I take it you do not keep a book.

2. How would you now set out strategies and tactics for today without calling today as a sell or ss day etc.

Say market opened up low ie. with a gap down but still above yesterday's low, what would you be looking to do, then say once it gets above yesterdays high, again what is the strategy.

 

3. OTOH, if it opened low and kept going south what is the plan of action.

 

4. Obviously if it opened high above yesterdays high, you will be looking to short.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The way I think about it is that my statistical tendencies and market profile concepts are 'my book'. Taylors book calculations allowed him freedom to go long on sell days and short buy days etc... so to Taylor, its the calculations that matter much more than the label of the day.

 

----

 

right, if price opened high today, would be a traditional ss-day --- with a penetration of the previous high or a test of the previous high (failure to penetrate) marking the location for a good short.

 

if the move instead happens overnight then the location is no longer favorable and have to re-think using the concepts:

 

1. Inside days are rare -- so market will very likely take out either Mondays High or Mondays Low at some point today. This offers a directional target to shoot for.

 

2. 3 low-first days in a row argue for a 'high-first' day --- so one bias would be for price to take out any morning low it forms by the end of the day --- which would then trigger a reversal in the market profile auction from up to down. you can anticipate this if you find a pattern that makes sense.

 

3. If the high of the first 3 30-minutes is penetrated, then the statistical odds then favor are on the side of low first.

 

4. If the high is not made in first 30 minutes -- then odds drop that you will close really far away from previous days close.

 

5. Once the morning high or low is set, you can do high-odds range calculations for a high-odds price target.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

so idea is that if you know that most of the time market is going to make a key high or low in first ~3 bars - figure out if the high or low is being made first and find a trade that is consistent with that intraday move.

 

today, the market traded up FIRST for its key high and then went directionally to take out the morning low and previous day low.

 

so you usually have 2-3 pivots to think about -- the previous days close and the previous days high and low. the market does 'usually' like to trade towards the previous days close for a few bars at some point... so if it does this, don't be fooled that it has chosen its direction for the day -- this is normal action.

 

so its like a puzzle every day. the last 2 days (prior to today), the correction that lasted a few bars towards the previous close still wasn't enough to take out the opening 30-min bar low and did not really threaten the previous days low --- when that happens the previous days high (or the morning high) now becomes a directional pivot for the remainder of the days direction. today, the market corrected towards the previous days close (at 854) but never really threatened to take out the previous days high... thus, the previous days low became a target --- which lined up because we were due to take out the morning low after so many consecutive days of NOT taking out the morning low (3 straight low made first's -- where a morning high is set and then subsequently taken out -- today the opening 3-bar high was set and never again violated)

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=10172&stc=1&d=1239748887

5aa70ec4c3fe6_20090414.thumb.png.d031b1be3ce15332b8a4dff26819ddf3.png

Edited by Frank

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Frank,

Would you say yesterday 15th April, the market opened low, traded towards the close of the previous day, and then took out the morning High later in the session.

 

OTOH today the market has opened higher as the high was made Last yesterday, and then traded towards yesterdays close. Infact this would be a classic Buy Day short on a High made Last on SS day as per Taylor

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

..... i don't understand what you meant....

 

....are you saying a short on BUY DAY....

... or are you saying a short on a SS day ?

 

.... if a buy day .... any short would have to be made first .... and it could only be for a reaction play

.... if a short sell day .... the high would still have to be made first in order to take the short....

 

.... maybe i misread what you wrote....

Frank,

OTOH today the market has opened higher as the high was made Last yesterday, and then traded towards yesterdays close.

 

Infact this would be a classic Buy Day short on a High made Last on SS day as per Taylor

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Frank,

Wonder if you have made a study of failure to penetrate Buying or Selling Objectives, for in Taylor's time they occurred 40% of the time.

 

Part of my statistics say that in the last 19 months, since this bear market began, We have more Violations than Penetrations. This fluctuates based on the day of the cycle, however 55% of the time we had Violations of the previous day's low , compare to 45% of the days we had a Penetration of the previous day's high.

 

That makes sense considering that we have been in a bear market.

 

I would anticipate the opposite to occur in Bull markets and I can see that holds true if I use only the last 20 cycles.

 

PS: these stats are based on ES day session only

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

elovemer,

Frank does not employ terms Buy Day, Sell day etc,

however as per the count in here 16th April would be Buy Day and on my chart, the market opened above previous day high, hence first play was a short as per taylor albeit a reaction play

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

...thanks for your explanation... i wasn't following....

 

... man this thread has come a ways... too bad dogpile ain't around to see his baby grow up....

elovemer,

Frank does not employ terms Buy Day, Sell day etc,

however as per the count in here 16th April would be Buy Day and on my chart, the market opened above previous day high, hence first play was a short as per taylor albeit a reaction play

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

...monday high made first....

... tuesday ... low made first

 

.... wednesday ... ??

 

.... on friday .... full swing size was reached .... compared to last two swings...

.... full swing retracement size is at about 816.5 ... which was not reached...

....3rd day in a row....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

.... pivot occurred at noon.... which tends to happen rarely.....

.... tuesday ..... is my buy day .....

 

.... looking for a low made first anytime before 10.30 am

..... although a few times the pivot has occurred around 11.15 am ... it does not happen as much .....

 

.... another occurrence which has happened quite a bit is that the low is made last ... but that price action is so stretched out .... that it is almost like a low being made first for the following day .....

 

...another possible play on a buy day is a high made first for a reaction short.... where at some point the more important play is to switch to long in order to play the much stronger up trend.....

 

.... it has been interesting recently when considering Frank's new perspective...

.... to see when and if the market can take out the previous LOW-MADE-FIRST....

 

.... a few times we have seen where the pivot time stretched out to be very late in the session .... in which cases there have been snap-backs to the main trend which continue the next session....

 

.... in this case.... being in on the reaction trade.... gives one the confidence to take risk of reversing to be on the side of the main trend....

.... even when the price action of most all of the session has been against the direction of the main trend....

 

..... just in case anyone forgot..... i wrote a condensed version of Taylor's book on here.... which only occupies about one paragraph.... :0) ... but which... of course... is no substitute for slogging thru the (entire) actual work at least a few times....

 

.... yesterday can still be considered a valid short day .... as the low was made last... even if ever-so-slightly....

.... not bad now...

.....................

.....................

Edited by elovemer

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

today traded to high in middle of day, attempted down and petered out. this is rare occurence -- but how rare? (btw, today was also narrow range day at 15.25 pts -- equaling the lowest range in past 7 days)

 

elovemer, don't want you to be the only guy keeping this thread alive so I will show some data.

 

1) this shows how often a high of day and low of day is made using data for ES up to today (starting 12/31/97)

 

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_5h-SWVGx6Ms/SfZqrfdC-hI/AAAAAAAABA0/qYjxxPvs568/s1600-h/April+2009+30-Min+Bars+2.png

 

(today was just 12th time in last 329 trading days that the high was made during that 30-min 'time slot')

 

2) this breaks out just when the 'made first' part occurs (if low first day, when was low made -- if high first day, when is high made). coming into today, this month had seen the key pivot 'made first' in opening 30-mins 9 times and during the next 2 30-min bars 7 times --- for a combined 16 of 18. today made it 16-3.

 

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_5h-SWVGx6Ms/SfZqxKI6IKI/AAAAAAAABA8/Ib6p_0VoSbU/s1600-h/April+2009+30-Min+Bars.png

 

So although we've had a few days that didn't make hight first in first 90 minutes this month (ie, today high was made during 6th bar), the number of days that do this is running 'normal' this month --- usually get about 5 or 6 of those a month, currently running at 3.

Edited by Frank

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

.... thanks Frank.... great to read your contributions....

 

... one more thing i forgot to add to my post.... with monday as my short day .... it was a failure to penetrate the high of middle day (sell day) .....

.... has a bearish implication......

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
..

..... just in case anyone forgot..... i wrote a condensed version of Taylor's book on here.... which only occupies about one paragraph.... :0) ... but which... of course... is no substitute for slogging thru the (entire) actual work at least a few times....

.......

 

Could not find your condensed version, perhaps you could point it out or paste it again, would be of interest as I have plodded through Taylor over 20 times and more now.

 

Frank's take on the subject is always of interest, so was his initial detailed version on Taylor with PowerBuy and PowerSell concepts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
today traded to high in middle of day, attempted down and petered out. this is rare occurence -- but how rare? (btw, today was also narrow range day at 15.25 pts -- equaling the lowest range in past 7 days)

 

elovemer, don't want you to be the only guy keeping this thread alive so I will show some data.

 

1) this shows how often a high of day and low of day is made using data for ES up to today (starting 12/31/97)

 

April+2009+30-Min+Bars+2.png (image)

 

(today was just 12th time in last 329 trading days that the high was made during that 30-min 'time slot')

 

2) this breaks out just when the 'made first' part occurs (if low first day, when was low made -- if high first day, when is high made). coming into today, this month had seen the key pivot 'made first' in opening 30-mins 9 times and during the next 2 30-min bars 7 times --- for a combined 16 of 18. today made it 16-3.

 

April+2009+30-Min+Bars.png (image)

 

So although we've had a few days that didn't make hight first in first 90 minutes this month (ie, today high was made during 6th bar), the number of days that do this is running 'normal' this month --- usually get about 5 or 6 of those a month, currently running at 3.

 

Great post Frank,

It was also an INSIDE DAY. With a weak close envisage a weak market at least in the Globex session to start with.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

here are a few power buy examples that have shown up lately.

 

the idea is that if the market doesn't gap in the direction of the previous days high to low/low to high move --- there is a strong tendency to continue early the next morning in same direction. if the market gaps, then the location is not good and instead the overnight hold was the right play so don't chase the trade.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=10337&stc=1&d=1240922361

5aa70ec941e95_PowerBuyExamples.thumb.png.c5814fac84ced75e51d41cfa3a7bdb5a.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.