Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

brownsfan019

Option plays on swing trades

Recommended Posts

Here was something in the recent Futures Magazine about a possible option play. I actually liked it so much that I made a copy. I didn't realize they also post the articles online as well. The idea is simple, which I like.

 

http://www.futuresmag.com/cms/futures/monthly%20issues/Issues/2007/10/Editorial/Options%20Strategy/OCT07OptionsStrategyJohnson

 

Stock Replacement Strategy

10/1/2007

By BILL JOHNSON

 

Most stock investors firmly believe that options are high-risk investments, only suitable for unrefined traders. But holding expensive stocks through turbulent markets can prove to be an even less civilized approach. October has historically been a dangerous month for equity investors and several analysts say this October may be historic in that regard. Using options, namely the stock replacement strategy, can tame the wildest of risks.

 

Before we describe the stock replacement strategy you must understand one critical point: Options represent tradeoffs in risk and reward. They are not superior or inferior to stock, they present a different set of risks and rewards and it is up to each investor to determine which is right for him.

 

This strategy is designed as a substitute for purchasing shares. It provides nearly the same profit if the stock price rises but only exposes you to a fraction of the downside risk. To understand the tradeoffs, you must understand the risks and rewards of each strategy.

 

Assume you are bullish on Chevron-Texaco (CVX), which is trading at $90. If you purchase 100 shares of stock, it will cost $9,000 and you will earn dollar-for-dollar if the stock rises but lose dollar-for-dollar if it falls.

 

The important point is that the profit and loss profile for a long stock position is a straight line. It shows that you continue to profit as the stock price rises but accept a large, unknown downside risk for that opportunity. While it’s true that the maximum loss is $9,000 at a stock price of zero, the chance of that happening is remote. So aside from that one known value we don’t really know what your losses could be. You’re investing in the face of uncertainty.

 

We can improve the risk-reward profile by using the stock replacement strategy. This strategy buys a deep-in-the-money call with a delta in the range of 0.80 to 0.85.

 

An option’s delta shows how sensitive an option’s price is for the next dollar move in the underlying stock. If you buy an 80-delta call for $10 and the stock immediately rises $1, the call will be worth $10.80.

 

Delta does not stay constant though. If the stock continues to rise or as expiration nears, the delta eventually rises to one, which means the option eventually behaves like shares of stock. But right now, you’re capturing 80% of the stock price increase. You have nearly “replaced†the upside potential of the stock with an option. However, your downside exposure is greatly reduced.

 

Let’s assume the March ’08 $75 call (239 days until expiration) is trading for $17.10 and has a delta of 0.80. This call gives you the right to purchase 100 shares of Chevron-Texaco for $75 at any time through expiration. Because it controls 100 shares of stock, you will pay $17.10 * 100 = $1,710 to buy the option. This is certainly much less than the $9,000 you must pay to buy the shares. By purchasing this call, your profit and loss profile looks much different as shown by the red line in “A better way.â€Â

 

For all stock prices above $75 at expiration, the profit and loss diagrams for both strategies run parallel and nearly overlap; they are separated by the small amount of time premium paid for the option. There is virtually no difference between the two strategies if the stock price is above $75.

 

But look at the difference in risk for all stock prices below $75. As the stock price falls, the long stock position continues to lose but the option’s maximum loss remains at $1,710. You have sacrificed a small amount of potential profit in exchange for a fixed maximum loss. It’s a sensible tradeoff in risk and reward.

 

What about dividends? Chevron pays 58¢ per quarter so the stock buyer collects $174 over the next eight months. By using the stock replacement strategy, you have only spent $1,710 rather than $9,000, which means you have $7,290 sitting safely in cash. At 3% interest, you’d earn $145 through the same period. Although less than $174, you didn’t spend $9,000 to get it. This strategy can therefore create synthetic dividends  even if the stock doesn’t pay one.

 

Risk creates fear, which paralyzes decisions. To improve your investment results, you must tame the risk. The stock replacement strategy is just one of many option strategies that allow your fears to escape. And this may be a particularly good time to employ added downside protection.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good article. Also, an important thing to consider is getting out of any option plays a week or so before expiry. Gamma exposure that late in the game can drive the delta way higher/lower therefor increasing your risk exposure if something terrible were to happen to the underlying.

 

Gamma basically is the strength of the delta. Delta tells you how much your option is going to move in accordance to the underlying instrument. When the gamma is bigger, the delta will move in accordance. Bigger delta, bigger move in the option when the underlying moves.

 

I got nailed on gamma exposure during Oct 2006 expiry and lost a good amount of money. Granted, I was on the wrong side of the trades to begin with (novice) and had I closed out the position a week earlier...my life would be a bit different right now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Option question - so let's say we find a good underlying to play. How/where are you going to look for the option info? Just straight from your broker, the charting software or a separate website? Where are you going to find the IV, greeks, etc.?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Option question - so let's say we find a good underlying to play. How/where are you going to look for the option info? Just straight from your broker, the charting software or a separate website? Where are you going to find the IV, greeks, etc.?

 

I get it right from my thinkorswim platform. They've got it all laid out really nicely along with the greeks for your whole portfolio, so you can see if you're ultra short theta and collecting lots of premium, or if you've got a big gamma exposure over your entire portfolio. For instance...

 

pos_statement-20071011-125317.jpg

 

 

So i can see in an instant where my achilles heel is. In that software you can also plot your greeks against a stock or index. Beta weighting it. So for every dollar DJX moves, my BHI position will increase xxxxx theoretically.

 

We can certainly start another thread discussing all that is the greeks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh, also...I didn't really answer your whole question. If you've got a software that has access to the option chains, then it should be able to plot implied vol for that particular instrument. ToS does this right on the chart:

 

pcu_break-20071011-125122.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I used to swing etf's options before I switched to futures. Now this was just my experience, I would get into a position it would make a small correction then move in my intended direction yet do to bad fills and other factors the premium would rarely mak it back to my initial investment where as the futures prices at the same move would have made solid pfofits. Just a thought before you switch instruments, besides over the last year your insight has become respected by myself and many others. Good luck and am looking forward to the swing Thread.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure if you comments about insight being respected was directed towards me or brownsfan, but I'm gonna take it as a compliment to both of us...why not :)

 

As for what you said....yes, you're exactly correct in that an option can just erode as the instrument moves in the expected direction and you will not make money. That's why it's so important to understand the concepts of volatility and understand how much time premium you're paying for and knowing how much time you're going to give that instrument to hit it's intended target.

 

If the premium is real high (IV is way up) then you're gonna want to sell a bull put spread or something of the like. If premium is really low and you expect a move, buy the options outright. Plenty of people that do that and make money...they just know when the right time to buy is.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeh the comment was for you, no disrespect to browns fan he's top notch, and your right about option timing, thats exactly why I perfer to trade futures it a little more forgiving in my opinion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good points ck. There is an issue with options in that you can lose money even if your analysis was correct about the underlying stock/etf. That was probably the biggest reason why I stopped trading them and moved to futures as your comments have shown. And that is probably why I've always been hesitant to get back into the options game.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

But, with the right knowledge in your toolbelt, options can be a great way to make money. Just always gotta know if you're getting a good price for your options, and not just buy calls or puts based on the underlying without knowing the volatility behind them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess a discussion on Blach-Scholes would be good for options trading. Options are a complicated instrument to trade, however if used correctly can be very rewarding. I personally don't like them too much. The time wasted in searching out options on stocks is highly time consuming, even with a sniffer out there working for you. My 2c though :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's a great example of how buying calls can go wrong....

 

calls_lose-20071026-123352.jpg

 

This is all inside a spread I've been holding and I'm watching value go down when it should be going up...thinking, what the heck is going on here? Note how the calls I bought (far OTM strikes) are holding less value than the ones I sold, but the price of SPY has been going up. Interesting to note how this can happen when volatility goes down. I sold these when IV was around 22.5% and now is at about 20%. Am I currently getting hurt by that? Absolutely. But the time premium should erode here quickly on that sold call giving me what I need.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I play options all the time, but mostly to protect profits, minimize downside risk when holding long stock positions, and to fund those protective puts by being short well out of the money calls. I occassionally will play straddles into earnings if the price is right, GS straddles have been nice gains 5 of the last 6 quarters.

I think of them as another arrow in my quiver. I do not believe the risk reward sets up well for most swing trades. If the trade goes against you it can result in a bigger loss than holding the stock, and the time constraints can work against you as well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • 1. A person who disguises insults as jokes.   2. A person who will never take accountability but has no problem always blaming you.   3. A person who says they want the best for you, but then works against you.   4. A person's whose words and actions don't match.   5. You can't trust a person who puts seeds of doubt in you, disguised as something else, like concern for you.   6. You can't trust a person who always tries to sabotage you, or make things harder for you. But always has an excuse for everything. Source: https://mentalhealthpsychology2.quora.com/6-TYPES-OF-PEOPLE-YOU-SHOULD-NOT-TRUST   
    • Date: 15th May 2024. Market News – Treasuries rallied, NASDAQ at new high, DXY lower after PPI pop.   Trading Leveraged Products is risky Economic Indicators & Central Banks: *JGB yields slipped, as markets paused amid a recent bond sell-off, awaiting a crucial US inflation report expected to influence the Fed’s short-term interest rate decisions. Remember, that typically yields move inversely to bond prices. *US: Stronger than expected prints on PPI did not have the textbook effects on the markets. Interestingly, Treasuries and Wall Street rallied, while the US Dollar slipped. The guts of the report were not as worrisome as the headlines suggested, and the CPI is viewed as more important. *Global equities are set for a fresh record after a big tech-led rally in US gauges. Financial Markets Performance: *The USDIndex slumped to 104.7, EURUSD rose to 1.0830 and USDJPY drifted at the EU open below 156. *Gold rose almost 1% to $2358.12 per ounce, while USOIL advanced to $78.18 after shrank US stockpiles, and as traders looked ahead to a report from the International Energy Agency that’ll shed light on market balances into the second half. *Copper spiked to a fresh record high at $5.12 a pound after a squeeze partly due to traders playing the arbitrage between futures on Comex and the Shanghai Futures Exchange.   Market Trends: *Big tech climbed, however, boosting the NASDAQ 0.75% to a new all-time high of 16,511. The S&P500 rose 0.48% to 5246. The Dow advanced 0.3%. *Sony shares jumped by 12% after strong earnings, a stock split and a share buyback of ¥250bn ($1.6bn). *Tesla gained 3.3%. Tencent Holdings surged after the company’s revenue beat estimates , while Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.’s slid on a profit plunge, highlighting the growing divergence between China’s twin Internet powerhouses. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business. Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar. Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding on how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE! Click HERE to READ more Market news. Andria Pichidi Market Analyst HFMarkets Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in FX and CFDs products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • Recessions are weird.   The more you think about them, the weirder they become.   Yes, the economy is cyclical. Downturns aren’t just inevitable, they’re healthy.   BUT   Economic cycles, including recessions, are not just determined by clean and predictable financial indicators but also by psychological and sociological factors.   Collective mood, media reporting, and public sentiment play a substantial role in shaping economic realities.   And they can be manipulated.   A.] The Fear Factory   Every time the media starts shouting "recession," what happens?   Panic. Fear.   It's like Halloween but for adults.   And this fear isn't just innocent fun – it moves markets, influences decisions, and causes real harm.   Give me an example of when the media saw a chance to scare the crap out of you and didn’t take it?   I’ll wait.   B.] Recessions are Relative   Consider this – what's called a recession in one country is a day in paradise in another.   Economic conditions are relative.   If the standards are so skewed, can we really trust this whole concept?   C.] The Recession Whisperers   Imagine a secretive group, not in some government bunker, but in a quiet office in Cambridge, Massachusetts. That's the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), the recession referee.   But here's the twist: By the time the NBER declares a recession, it's like announcing rain when you're already soaked.   Their method involves a retroactive look, meaning they wait for six months of data, plus a one-month lag.   So, when they finally declare a recession, it's old news, a story you've been living in, not just reading about. In the world of economic predictions, the official-unofficial referees are not the early birds; they're the historians.   Also…   D.]The GDP Puppet Show   GDP.   It’s supposed to be a “health check” for the economy.   BUT   It's like going to a doctor who only measures your height and ignores your blood pressure, cholesterol, and heart rate.   It counts every dollar spent, regardless of what it's spent on.   That means disasters, wars, and environmental destruction all pump up the GDP. If a hurricane hits and we spend billions on reconstruction, guess what? GDP goes up.   Celebrating a GDP increase is like throwing a party because your house burned down and you had to rebuild it.   It’s also the main indicator the NBER uses to measure a recession.   The real problem with this is…   GDP is a broad measure and can be influenced by short-term fluctuations that don't necessarily reflect long-term economic trends.   It’s a useful indicator, but far from comprehensive.   E.] The Self-Fulfilling Prophecy   Here's the kicker – by declaring a recession, we make them more likely.   It's a classic self-fulfilling prophecy.   Businesses pull back on investment, consumers close their wallets, and just like that, the economy slows down.   But what if we didn't buy into the narrative? I have no idea.   F.] Rage Against Determinism   Economies aren’t deterministic. They’re dynamic.   Economies don’t follow a predetermined path.   Human agency and perception play a significant role in shaping economic realities.   Predictions are usually wrong for this reason.   Also, there’s this…   G.] The Hidden Agenda   Tin foil hat time.   Think about who benefits from recession talk.   The media gets a juicy story.   Politicians get a scapegoat.   Certain investors get to buy low.   It’s a game, and the average person isn't the one winning. You’re always being sold a narrative that serves others, not you.   And Yet, a Recession is HERE   Of course, recessions exist. Because prolonged downturns exist.   But all of this calls into question what we think we know about the word “recession” and how we talk about it.   It’s not as clear a concept as we think.   Nevertheless, it’s probably here already.” – Chris Campbell (AltucherConfidential)  
    • QCOM Qualcomm stock great breakout follow through, https://stockconsultant.com/?QCOM
    • JPM JPMorgan Chase stock breakout, https://stockconsultant.com/?JPM
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.