Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

brownsfan019

Option plays on swing trades

Recommended Posts

Here was something in the recent Futures Magazine about a possible option play. I actually liked it so much that I made a copy. I didn't realize they also post the articles online as well. The idea is simple, which I like.

 

http://www.futuresmag.com/cms/futures/monthly%20issues/Issues/2007/10/Editorial/Options%20Strategy/OCT07OptionsStrategyJohnson

 

Stock Replacement Strategy

10/1/2007

By BILL JOHNSON

 

Most stock investors firmly believe that options are high-risk investments, only suitable for unrefined traders. But holding expensive stocks through turbulent markets can prove to be an even less civilized approach. October has historically been a dangerous month for equity investors and several analysts say this October may be historic in that regard. Using options, namely the stock replacement strategy, can tame the wildest of risks.

 

Before we describe the stock replacement strategy you must understand one critical point: Options represent tradeoffs in risk and reward. They are not superior or inferior to stock, they present a different set of risks and rewards and it is up to each investor to determine which is right for him.

 

This strategy is designed as a substitute for purchasing shares. It provides nearly the same profit if the stock price rises but only exposes you to a fraction of the downside risk. To understand the tradeoffs, you must understand the risks and rewards of each strategy.

 

Assume you are bullish on Chevron-Texaco (CVX), which is trading at $90. If you purchase 100 shares of stock, it will cost $9,000 and you will earn dollar-for-dollar if the stock rises but lose dollar-for-dollar if it falls.

 

The important point is that the profit and loss profile for a long stock position is a straight line. It shows that you continue to profit as the stock price rises but accept a large, unknown downside risk for that opportunity. While it’s true that the maximum loss is $9,000 at a stock price of zero, the chance of that happening is remote. So aside from that one known value we don’t really know what your losses could be. You’re investing in the face of uncertainty.

 

We can improve the risk-reward profile by using the stock replacement strategy. This strategy buys a deep-in-the-money call with a delta in the range of 0.80 to 0.85.

 

An option’s delta shows how sensitive an option’s price is for the next dollar move in the underlying stock. If you buy an 80-delta call for $10 and the stock immediately rises $1, the call will be worth $10.80.

 

Delta does not stay constant though. If the stock continues to rise or as expiration nears, the delta eventually rises to one, which means the option eventually behaves like shares of stock. But right now, you’re capturing 80% of the stock price increase. You have nearly “replaced†the upside potential of the stock with an option. However, your downside exposure is greatly reduced.

 

Let’s assume the March ’08 $75 call (239 days until expiration) is trading for $17.10 and has a delta of 0.80. This call gives you the right to purchase 100 shares of Chevron-Texaco for $75 at any time through expiration. Because it controls 100 shares of stock, you will pay $17.10 * 100 = $1,710 to buy the option. This is certainly much less than the $9,000 you must pay to buy the shares. By purchasing this call, your profit and loss profile looks much different as shown by the red line in “A better way.â€Â

 

For all stock prices above $75 at expiration, the profit and loss diagrams for both strategies run parallel and nearly overlap; they are separated by the small amount of time premium paid for the option. There is virtually no difference between the two strategies if the stock price is above $75.

 

But look at the difference in risk for all stock prices below $75. As the stock price falls, the long stock position continues to lose but the option’s maximum loss remains at $1,710. You have sacrificed a small amount of potential profit in exchange for a fixed maximum loss. It’s a sensible tradeoff in risk and reward.

 

What about dividends? Chevron pays 58¢ per quarter so the stock buyer collects $174 over the next eight months. By using the stock replacement strategy, you have only spent $1,710 rather than $9,000, which means you have $7,290 sitting safely in cash. At 3% interest, you’d earn $145 through the same period. Although less than $174, you didn’t spend $9,000 to get it. This strategy can therefore create synthetic dividends  even if the stock doesn’t pay one.

 

Risk creates fear, which paralyzes decisions. To improve your investment results, you must tame the risk. The stock replacement strategy is just one of many option strategies that allow your fears to escape. And this may be a particularly good time to employ added downside protection.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good article. Also, an important thing to consider is getting out of any option plays a week or so before expiry. Gamma exposure that late in the game can drive the delta way higher/lower therefor increasing your risk exposure if something terrible were to happen to the underlying.

 

Gamma basically is the strength of the delta. Delta tells you how much your option is going to move in accordance to the underlying instrument. When the gamma is bigger, the delta will move in accordance. Bigger delta, bigger move in the option when the underlying moves.

 

I got nailed on gamma exposure during Oct 2006 expiry and lost a good amount of money. Granted, I was on the wrong side of the trades to begin with (novice) and had I closed out the position a week earlier...my life would be a bit different right now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Option question - so let's say we find a good underlying to play. How/where are you going to look for the option info? Just straight from your broker, the charting software or a separate website? Where are you going to find the IV, greeks, etc.?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Option question - so let's say we find a good underlying to play. How/where are you going to look for the option info? Just straight from your broker, the charting software or a separate website? Where are you going to find the IV, greeks, etc.?

 

I get it right from my thinkorswim platform. They've got it all laid out really nicely along with the greeks for your whole portfolio, so you can see if you're ultra short theta and collecting lots of premium, or if you've got a big gamma exposure over your entire portfolio. For instance...

 

pos_statement-20071011-125317.jpg

 

 

So i can see in an instant where my achilles heel is. In that software you can also plot your greeks against a stock or index. Beta weighting it. So for every dollar DJX moves, my BHI position will increase xxxxx theoretically.

 

We can certainly start another thread discussing all that is the greeks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh, also...I didn't really answer your whole question. If you've got a software that has access to the option chains, then it should be able to plot implied vol for that particular instrument. ToS does this right on the chart:

 

pcu_break-20071011-125122.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I used to swing etf's options before I switched to futures. Now this was just my experience, I would get into a position it would make a small correction then move in my intended direction yet do to bad fills and other factors the premium would rarely mak it back to my initial investment where as the futures prices at the same move would have made solid pfofits. Just a thought before you switch instruments, besides over the last year your insight has become respected by myself and many others. Good luck and am looking forward to the swing Thread.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure if you comments about insight being respected was directed towards me or brownsfan, but I'm gonna take it as a compliment to both of us...why not :)

 

As for what you said....yes, you're exactly correct in that an option can just erode as the instrument moves in the expected direction and you will not make money. That's why it's so important to understand the concepts of volatility and understand how much time premium you're paying for and knowing how much time you're going to give that instrument to hit it's intended target.

 

If the premium is real high (IV is way up) then you're gonna want to sell a bull put spread or something of the like. If premium is really low and you expect a move, buy the options outright. Plenty of people that do that and make money...they just know when the right time to buy is.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeh the comment was for you, no disrespect to browns fan he's top notch, and your right about option timing, thats exactly why I perfer to trade futures it a little more forgiving in my opinion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good points ck. There is an issue with options in that you can lose money even if your analysis was correct about the underlying stock/etf. That was probably the biggest reason why I stopped trading them and moved to futures as your comments have shown. And that is probably why I've always been hesitant to get back into the options game.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

But, with the right knowledge in your toolbelt, options can be a great way to make money. Just always gotta know if you're getting a good price for your options, and not just buy calls or puts based on the underlying without knowing the volatility behind them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess a discussion on Blach-Scholes would be good for options trading. Options are a complicated instrument to trade, however if used correctly can be very rewarding. I personally don't like them too much. The time wasted in searching out options on stocks is highly time consuming, even with a sniffer out there working for you. My 2c though :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's a great example of how buying calls can go wrong....

 

calls_lose-20071026-123352.jpg

 

This is all inside a spread I've been holding and I'm watching value go down when it should be going up...thinking, what the heck is going on here? Note how the calls I bought (far OTM strikes) are holding less value than the ones I sold, but the price of SPY has been going up. Interesting to note how this can happen when volatility goes down. I sold these when IV was around 22.5% and now is at about 20%. Am I currently getting hurt by that? Absolutely. But the time premium should erode here quickly on that sold call giving me what I need.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I play options all the time, but mostly to protect profits, minimize downside risk when holding long stock positions, and to fund those protective puts by being short well out of the money calls. I occassionally will play straddles into earnings if the price is right, GS straddles have been nice gains 5 of the last 6 quarters.

I think of them as another arrow in my quiver. I do not believe the risk reward sets up well for most swing trades. If the trade goes against you it can result in a bigger loss than holding the stock, and the time constraints can work against you as well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Agreed since some of the new traders usually lose money in start and some loses more while chasing their lost money and eventually ends up blaming to their brokers part.
    • The crypto market are also in phase of maturing like the forex and other trading assets so we can do much more accurate analysis than before since early days it was purely a luck if the investments in crypto bears results because most of the coins or tokens never come to fruition. Some early birds were also able to make profits on these tokens or coins. e,g., like turtle coin starts with 1 satoshi and go up to 7 sathoshis, quite good rewards. another token lmgx now hovering at 10 started from 1, 
    • How's about other crypto exchanges? Are all they banned in your country or only Binance?
    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.