Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Soultrader

Goldman Global Alpha Fund Fell 22 Percent in August

Recommended Posts

Article here: http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aNuaC.IG9pWs&refer=home

 

"We still hold our fundamental investment beliefs that sound economic investment principles coupled with a disciplined quantitative approach can provide strong uncorrelated returns over time,'' Goldman said in the unsigned report.

 

Wait... didnt they say this about the Global Equity Opportunities quant fund when it lost 28%?

 

"Goldman blamed its losses on too many quantitative funds making the same trades, and said in mid-August it would have to develop new strategies."

 

You would expect Goldman to figure this out before losing money. Ive had it with funds blaming liquidity problems, other quant funds, etc... Didnt we all learn in trading that we must be reponsible for our actions?

 

Alot of hedge funds seem to be still losing money. Bank and securities numbers are coming out this month with fed rates next week. Are we likely to see further decline if these funds start unwinding their positions? Expect a volatile week next week. Should be a whole lot of fun for private traders. You get to take the big boys (funds) money!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You should rename this thread...When Automated Systems go Wrong during Income Distribution Quarters!

 

Those guys got hit hard when the markets turned against them and their rigid systems couldn't cope. Then on top of that they are up for income distribution payments to investors at the start of the September quarter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You would expect Goldman to figure this out before losing money. Ive had it with funds blaming liquidity problems, other quant funds, etc... Didnt we all learn in trading that we must be reponsible for our actions?

.......... Should be a whole lot of fun for private traders. You get to take the big boys (funds) money!

If only if it is that easy, GS had one of the best quarters ever .... the press has a way of reporting at a time when it is the worst to take a position based on the reporting .. that is by the time the retail reader gets the news and acts, it is usually the time to fade (trade against) the retail. The only thing you should do is to trade the price action and not what some press or guru says is the news.

 

Commentary: Goldman Sachs textbook case of contrarian analysis in action

By Mark Hulbert, MarketWatch

Last Update: 12:01 AM ET Sep 21, 2007

ANNANDALE, Va. (MarketWatch) -- The time to buy, Nathan Rothschild famously said, is when the blood is running in the streets.

But how to put this apocryphal advice to actual use? What does it look like in practice?

For an answer you need look no further than what Goldman Sachs Group Inc. did in mid August, when it looked like the capital markets might dry up completely and the stock market appeared to many to be on the verge of a meltdown.

The blood most definitely was running in the streets.

So what did Goldman do? It invested $2 billion (that's billion with a "b") of its own money in one of its hedge funds that was hemorrhaging. See Aug. 13 story

The payoff? Its $2 billion investment has grown by a cool $320 million in the short time that has elapsed since then a 16% return in just one month.

In the newsletter arena, the closest analogy to Goldman's contrarian coup, at least that I can think of, is what the late Al Frank did on Oct. 20, 1987. Frank was the editor of The Prudent Speculator, and his letter's model portfolio, like most hedge funds today, was highly leveraged. (The newsletter is edited today by John Buckingham, who employs much less leverage than did Frank.)

And Oct. 20, 1987, of course, was the day after Black Monday, the worst single-day crash in U.S. stock market history, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average falling some 22%. Frank's highly leveraged portfolio fell 57% on that day alone, according to the Hulbert Financial Digest's calculations.

That's a whole lot of blood.

What did Frank do? Far from running for the hills, which was what almost everyone else was doing, he urged subscribers to buy.

That took guts, and his newsletter's ranking was amply rewarded for having them.

Since then, the Prudent Speculator is far and away in first place for performance among the newsletters tracked by the Hulbert Financial Digest. Over the nearly 20 years since Frank's post-Crash buy advice, the newsletter's portfolios have gained 3,857%, in contrast to "just" 825% for the Dow Jones Wilshire 5000 index On an annualized basis, this is the difference between 20.4% and 11.9%.

To be sure, opportunities such as the one facing Al Frank in October 1987, or the one facing Goldman Sachs last month, don't come along every day. An integral part of the job of being a contrarian is being patient, waiting for those occasions in which panic has come to dominate investor emotions and brought prices down to fire sale levels.

Being a contrarian is not for the faint of heart. But outsized profits can be earned by those who have the fortitude. End of Story

Mark Hulbert is the founder of Hulbert Financial Digest in Annandale, Va. He has been tracking the advice of more than 160 financial newsletters since 1980.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

<<So basically they just robbed Bear Stearns >>

 

The Goldman Sachs prop traders also basically robbed the Goldman Sachs Alpha Fund. Alpha Fund was -30% and Goldman Sachs trading desk kicked serious arse. Feasting on your own -- a Wall Street tradition.

 

I really have to think there is more to the story of the Alpha Fund than meets the eye. It really doesn't make sense to have 2 very, very smart guys running many different strategies and they all go bad at the same time.

The fund was designed to have uncorrelated strategies and they somehow ALL got correlated. These guys either totally dropped the ball in execution of their top-down strategy -- in which case they should be fired -- or something very major happened here that is non-public, material information. This one just doesn't add up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Unexpected events do happen. I don't think they saw the subprime problem and hasn't happened in a long long time (I may be mistaken here) due to laxed legislation over the industry. I think credit liability has never been this extended. Be that as it may, even it comes to crashes or mini-crashes, many strategies don't take this into consideration to minimize the damage. LTCM was caught in a tech bubble burst, something that's happen before but not 9/11 to push it down further. The other issue is size, elephants can't drop pop without others smelling it, especially dung bettles. It takes a while to unload else others will catch on and make the situation worse. So instead of 30%, could be 50% or more.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.