Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

walterw

Playing with the VMAR`s open research

Recommended Posts

Now here is the nicer version of the bands

 

Enjoy

 

yes, very nice Sparrow very good looking indicator... had been testing ccit3 and works ok as well...

 

So now I will get inspired and prepare the final template for this...

 

The nice edge we get on NT apart of this nice variations on the vma`s is the tick charts... can make timing very competitive... also nice for scalping on some volatile pairs like eur/jpy...

 

Thanks for this contributions Sparrow ¡¡ cheers Walter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sparrow

 

will you please elaborate in the form:

 

signal vmar_2(ema_periods, adx_periods, stoch_periods);

and

rainbow base vmar_2(ema_periods, adx_periods, stoch_periods);

 

Unicorn.

 

Maybe I did not phrase my question clearly.

Please explain the quantities that the question marks refer to.:confused:

 

by the way,

;)"nice chart, what are the parameters of the adx_periods, the stoch_periods and the ema_periods?" ;) hehehe

 

cheers

Unicorn.

5aa70e186455d_ninja2.png.cc872f9497f24802def00d12950859ff.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Maybe I did not phrase my question clearly.

Please explain the quantities that the question marks refer to.:confused:

 

by the way,

;)"nice chart, what are the parameters of the adx_periods, the stoch_periods and the ema_periods?" ;) hehehe

 

cheers

Unicorn.

 

Difficult one except for the FantailVMA1: ADX:5, EMA:3, MA:2, Stoch:5

Usually the parameters are arragended alphabetically so i'd go with:

 

ADX:5, BandIncrement: 4, BandEMAMin:2, BandEMAMax:100, EMA:5, MA:2, Stoch:5

 

When I'm debugging I am usually not in the best mood, so take it easy on me.

 

Would have been easier to ask Walter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Great job Sparrow ¡¡

 

 

now the rainbow doesnt plot anything... maybe I am not using the correct inputs to it... no hurry on that Sparrow as I am also creating a rainbow out of the bands indicator... thanks so much for this ¡¡ cheers Walter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Could be that the rainbow has a bug, if so could you please go to the main control of NT

->Tools->Output Window

On the chart open the indicator list.

If you get a lot of stuff on the window, please send it to me.

 

If it's just a configuration thing, here's how it work, in the Plot's section of the indicator there are values like this:

 

Band01

Band01Color

Band02

.

.

.

.

.

 

It draws a band when at least a value in band01 and band02 is present, and band2 must be higher than band1.

Btw you can disable the price markers in the indicator configuration, if you're using lines to print the rainbow.

 

Maybe my explanation isn't necessary, posted it just in case.

 

You could also try to change the FillType to Line, which will less likely produce an error.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks familiar walter, great that it works :D.

I hope the calculations are correct, which is the more important part.

 

Removing the price markers will make the chart even a bit better, easily done as described before.

 

Cheers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Looking good there Walter, would you be able to put it onto a template?

 

Cheers

 

Blu-Ray

 

Flash ¡¡

 

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=3758&stc=1&d=1193960649

 

 

jejejje.... flash flash ¡¡

 

 

 

I will post a template when I get an argument arround this....

 

It stimulates pure net scalping.... thats what circulates on my veins ¡¡

 

Cheers from the on high dopamine Chimp... jejeje pure inspiration ¡¡

flash.thumb.png.a8c93e1373f53636788e048d63422399.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I will post a template when I get an argument arround this....

 

It stimulates pure net scalping.... thats what circulates on my veins ¡¡

 

Cheers from the on high dopamine Chimp... jejeje pure inspiration ¡¡

 

 

Cheers Walter, much appreciated, Nice work Sparrow and Unicorn :cool:

 

Just an observation, the candle formations are much clearer on the 11 tick compared to the 1 min chart.

 

 

Cheers

 

Blu-Ray

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Cheers Walter, much appreciated, Nice work Sparrow and Unicorn :cool:

 

Just an observation, the candle formations are much clearer on the 11 tick compared to the 1 min chart.

 

 

Cheers

 

Blu-Ray

 

 

well 11 tick is really a great edge for scalping.... on this chart its similar too the 55t on currency futures like Unicorns chart...

 

my ultimate wish eventually would be to have adxvma6 from Pyenner coded into NT... as I believe it has been the greatest masterpiece Bruce has developed so far... I imagine that line on a 11T chart here would be simply awesome...

 

Now what I see here its a scalpers haven... will probably need to start a new thread for what I see here... I dont want to mix aproaches... but its just great...

 

clean cristal clear charts... cheers Walter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's also my first attempt of the sniper fx cci, i dunno if it is correct, hope someone can verify it. I used someone else's T3, dunno how well the results match up.

Sparrow

The MT4 version of sniper malfunctions on live ticks.

Sniper ran into the 8 array limit that MT4 imposes so he used variables for e1 to e6 (I think thats it) when he should have used arrays e1 etc.

Without arrays it does bar by bar okay but does not handle life ticks.

I think he used a repaint loop to correct the bar data. The live tick problem showed up when I removed the repaint step.

I think if you use arrays for e1 etc as for normal emas, it should fix the live tick problem and remove the need to repaint the most recent bar.

I still need to get past the 8 array limit before I can fix it in MT4.

Good luck

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sparrow

The MT4 version of sniper malfunctions on live ticks.

Sniper ran into the 8 array limit that MT4 imposes so he used variables for e1 to e6 (I think thats it) when he should have used arrays e1 etc.

Without arrays it does bar by bar okay but does not handle life ticks.

I think he used a repaint loop to correct the bar data. The live tick problem showed up when I removed the repaint step.

I think if you use arrays for e1 etc as for normal emas, it should fix the live tick problem and remove the need to repaint the most recent bar.

I still need to get past the 8 array limit before I can fix it in MT4.

Good luck

 

Tough nut to crack Bruce,

 

the NT code uses 7, funny the fxst3cci doesn't use EMAs on the es.

On NT some things are incredibly easy to do, you won't be burdened by many restriction. The language is more complex but also more powerful.

 

And sometimes I could just hit my head against the next wall:crap:, because something doesn't perform as expected, it's not all a piece of cake.

 

Hope you'll have a great idea and that code will work like a charm :D.

 

Cheers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Sparrow... there is one little glitch on the rainbow indi and also happens with the bands one, that may require eventually some consideration... when I load template again.. he doesnt remember the colors... kind of fancy glitch.. lines dont get ploted until you asign a color and fills look all gray...

 

sorry about that... apart from that glitch, everything is ok... cheers Walter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi guys (and the rare woman ),

 

Sorry, I wasn't aware of the problem, even coded an indicator some time ago that that has the same bug. Using colors in NT without lines/bars is very uncommon and it really takes some effort to get the colors saved.

Fortunately a guy at NT already did this before, otherwise it would have taken me days.

 

Hope everything is fine now, happy researching/trading.

VMABand_v1.3.zip

VMARainbow_v1.1.zip

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

CCI_T3_1.mq4

This is a version of Sniper using arrays for e1 to e6 instead of variables.

It confirms that arrays should have been used for the emas although the difference will only show up on live ticks.

 

This left the MT4 version without enough arrays to show the histogram lines, so what you get instead is a rainbow sequence of lines showing how the cci input signal gets progressively smoothed and delayed by the emas.

 

If NT has only 7 arrays then it looks like some of the later emas might be omitted, freeing up enough arrays to allow use of histo bars, same goes for an MT4 version, but is a more leading version of Sniper needed as it will also have more noise?

 

Judge from the rainbow lines...

Black line is the regular Sniper output.

Red line is e1 input, yellow is e2 etc thru to black.

 

If Sniper is going to get ported to other platforms, it might be worth going for arrays to guarantee stability on ticks, but reducing the number of arrays so that the common platforms can all still do histo bars.

Sniper.thumb.PNG.557ce1a2ca51f0116e795d26699a4ec6.PNG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bruce, Congrats on solving the tough problems with the Sniper CCI.

I might have not phrased my NT stuff clearly, NT has an unlimited amount of arrays.

 

I did a 1:1 translation of Bruce's code of the ADXVMA to NT.

Things could be simplified using more NT indicators, Bruce should be much better at that.

 

Hope I got it right, have fun.

 

Cheers

ADXVMA_v1.0.zip

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Bruce, Congrats on solving the tough problems with the Sniper CCI.

Hope I got it right, have fun.

Looks like I didn't get it right...

Got the line sequence mixed up somehow.

So I will pull the attachment and have another go.

Back to the drawing board...

Cheers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

CCI_T3_2.mq4

This time..

I am trying to avoid having MT4 diseases passed on to other platforms.

Sniper ran out of arrays so he cheated and used variables for the T3 ema's.

Result was that it malfunctions on live ticks, so he used a repaint step to correct the bars, but not the ticks.

 

If Sniper is going to be ported to other platforms then it has to use arrays for the emas. But then MT4 is unable to do arrays plus histo bars.

 

One option is to do without histo bars on MT4.

This is the other option, drop e6 which is the slowest of the ema's.

Result is a bit more leading than sniper and a bit more noise.

But if b=0.4 is used (default is 0.618) then you get something close to sniper but with no MT4 foulups to be passed on to other platforms.

It also won't be exactly T3 anymore... so you don't exactly win.

 

Whatever goes down, I hope other platforms will stick to using arrays so that the tick problem does not spread beyond MT4.

 

Another option would be to leave the MT4 version of sniper as it is, with tick problems, but just make sure that other platforms do it properly with arrays.

 

So, this version has arrays, but with e6 deleted in order to have histo bars.

 

If other people see other options then now might be a time to sort it out.

 

Whatever

Cheers all.

CCI_T3_2.mq4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Bruce

If you are thinking of moving over to Ninja Trader, the language looks very similar to MT4, so it might not be as much of this :bang head:

Cheers

Blu-Ray

Blu I have a foot in both camps now and you know :confused:

I like MT4 a lot but the diy indicator stuff seriously sucks and lack of English documentation is a major part of the problem.

 

There are some seriously good looking MT4 things coming out of Russia, like fast fourier transforms but again, no english versions, :confused::doh:

 

I seem to be the only twit trying to program in MT4.

I'm not a whiz bang programmer, just a hacker, slow poke whatever.

I could surely have used some company from someone who knew something about MT4. But I don't even know how many people even want to stick with MT4.

 

I do want to look at volume and volume based charts.

So that means either NT or excel. Bought excel to do analysis, havn't used it yet. Just got NT demo going, I think:confused: At least it has better documentation than MT4 at first glance.

 

I don't think Sparrow will need help from me, I'm too slow.

So, maybe I can take a holiday anyway.

I would be happy to see the bulk of the development being done on NT or whatever fills the need.

 

I lost a week chasing around for an answer to the array shortage, googling programs to see how to do subroutines etc basic stuff but where is it documented? Cant be repeating overheads like that. If it can't be done in MT4 in a realistic "competitive" fashion, then I'm inclined to vote with my feet and move to NT or excel.

Cheers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.