Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

jperl

Trading with Market Statistics VIII. Counter Trend Trades in Symmetric Distributions

Recommended Posts

 

Why do you choose a "regular session" to start plotting your Volume Histogram and start calculations of PVP, vwap and SDs? I understand that majority of trades occur during regular session, and all institutions are then active, but statistically wouldn't it make more sense to include 24h of data?

The answer to your question is yes. In normal times (which this is not), starting the VWAP before regular trading hours usually wouldn't make much difference. Remember the VWAP is volume weighted, so including price data prior to the open would have little effect. However these are not normal times and there has been considerable volume pre-open in some markets. Under those circumstances starting the VWAP early could be helpful as you have pointed out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is only an hour and a half in (or so). Left chart is a 1 tick chart so 100% precise, right hand is 1 minute. You can see there is a wee bit of a discrepancy as you would expect (volume is assigned to the average price of the bar). I'll try and do one at the close but will be travelling later.

 

 

There is a couple of seconds between the screen grabs as stupid Multicharts wont save the whole workspace. This should let you see if you are close.

 

Cheers.

daxvwap1.thumb.png.89415a7e1188d998837bd741648e5bf3.png

daxvwap2.thumb.png.0559cfa7f03beb5c8ebe0ade35eeb4d2.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Managed to upload a file, seems slightly different le.... I am in Asia timing so i am nt sure if its accurate, anyway posted e coding i made,

 

Could u roughly check plszzzzzzz ??

 

day:= BarsSince(BarIx(@,StartOfDay) = 0,1,10000)+1;

day2:= BarsSince(BarIx(@,StartOfSession) = 0,1,10000)+1;

priceX:= IF(price = 1, Close(@), IF(price = 2, High(@), IF(price = 3, Low(@), IF(price = 4, Mid(@), IF(price = 5, HLC3(@), IF(price = 6, Avg(@), IF(price=7, Open(@), 0) ) ) ) ) ) ) ;

vol:= IF( HasVal(Vol(@)) AND Vol(@) > 0, Vol(@), 1) ;

a:= Sum(priceX* vol,day)/ Sum(vol,day);

b:= Sum(priceX* vol,day2)/ Sum(vol,day2);

c1:= Sum(priceX* vol,Period)/ Sum(vol,Period);

VWAP:= IF(DaySessionPeriod = 1, a, IF(DaySessionPeriod = 2, b, IF(DaySessionPeriod = 0, c1, a) ) );

 

DAYSES:= STDDEV(@,day)/100;

SES:= STDDEV(@,day2)/100;

ANY:= STDDEV(@,Period);

STD:=IF(DaySessionPeriod = 1, DAYSES, IF(DaySessionPeriod = 2, SES, IF(DaySessionPeriod = 0, ANY, ANY) ) );

R:=VWAP+((STD*DEV3));

untitled.thumb.JPG.32609a3b58f73f1048ae6b10ab0341ca.JPG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok here are 1 tick and 2 min vwaps for the whole days session (Friday). Note the early hour is included. Also note that the time scale is UK time (we don't change to summer time until next weekend so a confusing part of the year). I could have my session times off by an hour I am not trading the DAX right now so haven't checked. Let me know if the session dosen't look right and I'll make adjustments.

 

Things could vary a little with different data sources and on the 2 min how you decide to average the value for your 2 min bar. Importantly you can see both 'work' in so far as price tends to respect the lines. The pvp is a whole other debate, I have some reservations and observations there. That's for another time.

daxtickvwap.thumb.png.ab5a33cf4ff813c54043b4eb0189b70c.png

dax2minvwap.thumb.png.7d8a81756c557b01a6728e8aefbc5756.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
seems similiar........

 

u any idea if my coding is correct though?

 

Not really to be honest I don't know CQG script. If you follow through through the threads there is detailed descriptions of the algorithm in one of them. Did you get the same closing prices (or similar) for the VWAP and bands?

 

Edit: a cursory look would suggest that things might not be correct. Every time you have new volume you need to re calculate the weighting using the new total volume for the whole day. This is discussed at some length in one of the threads as it is a common mistake that people have made in the past. It is probably in the thread where SD is first introduced.

Edited by BlowFish

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I could be wrong! but the common mistake is that people dont go back and divide every piece of data by the new total volume. I don't know cqg well enough to tell but there is normally a loop but I don't see that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, I don't know CQG script as well, so be careful with my thoughts!

 

First thing what I see is:

 

vol:= IF( HasVal(Vol(@)) AND Vol(@) > 0, Vol(@), 1) ;

 

My understanding is, that the IF syntax in somehow:

 

IF (

what is it,

-> true then do Vol(@),

-> false then do 1);

 

Now false would lead to a volume of 1, my question is:

 

Why not zero or "nothing"?

 

...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

R:=VWAP+((STD*DEV3));

 

I can't see how VWAP or DEV3 are calculated.

So am I missing something? Where do these values come from?

 

Without knowing it, no further conclusion is ...

 

BTW: What parameters are you using? You have to need some, maybe I just missed them (day, day2?)?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe, what I like to say is, that I can't see how you

draw the 1, 2, 3 SD bands on your charts, while I just see

that a SD is calculated. The R might be a different thing,

but without all information, how should ...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

hmmm....

 

these are the coding they gave me though.... i will go back and see if there is any more.

 

 

But u guys seem to know it better though. Is the script above considered a "code" ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is the full curves for CQG. Could any1 please take a look to see if anything is missing?

 

I noted that the std deviation are all constant from each other so there is something wrong but i do not know what.

 

HELP !!!

 

 

Deviation 3 Curve:

 

day:= BarsSince(BarIx(@,StartOf Day) = 0,1,10000)+1;

day2:= BarsSince(BarIx(@,StartOf Session) = 0,1,10000)+1;

priceX:= IF(price = 1, Close(@), IF(price = 2, High(@), IF(price = 3, Low(@), IF(price = 4, Mid(@), IF(price = 5, HLC3(@), IF(price = 6, Avg(@), IF(price=7, Open(@), 0) ) ) ) ) ) ) ;

 

vol:= IF( HasVal(Vol(@)) AND Vol(@) > 0, Vol(@), 1) ;

 

a:= Sum(priceX* vol,day)/ Sum(vol,day);

b:= Sum(priceX* vol,day2)/ Sum(vol,day2);

c1:= Sum(priceX* vol,Period)/ Sum(vol,Period);

 

VWAP:= IF(DaySessionPeriod = 1, a, IF(DaySessionPeriod = 2, b, IF(DaySessionPeriod = 0, c1, a) ) );

 

 

 

DAYSES:= STDDEV(@,day)/100;

SES:= STDDEV(@,day2)/100;

ANY:= STDDEV(@,Period);

STD:=IF(DaySessionPeriod = 1, DAYSES, IF(DaySessionPeriod = 2, SES, IF(DaySessionPeriod = 0, ANY, ANY) ) );

 

R:=VWAP+((STD*DEV3));

 

Deviation 2 Curve:

 

day:= BarsSince(BarIx(@,StartOf Day) = 0,1,10000)+1;

day2:= BarsSince(BarIx(@,StartOf Session) = 0,1,10000)+1;

priceX:= IF(price = 1, Close(@), IF(price = 2, High(@), IF(price = 3, Low(@), IF(price = 4, Mid(@), IF(price = 5, HLC3(@), IF(price = 6, Avg(@), IF(price=7, Open(@), 0) ) ) ) ) ) ) ;

 

vol:= IF( HasVal(Vol(@)) AND Vol(@) > 0, Vol(@), 1) ;

 

a:= Sum(priceX* vol,day)/ Sum(vol,day);

b:= Sum(priceX* vol,day2)/ Sum(vol,day2);

c1:= Sum(priceX* vol,Period)/ Sum(vol,Period);

 

VWAP:= IF(DaySessionPeriod = 1, a, IF(DaySessionPeriod = 2, b, IF(DaySessionPeriod = 0, c1, a) ) );

 

DAYSES:= STDDEV(@,day)/100;

SES:= STDDEV(@,day2)/100;

ANY:= STDDEV(@,Period);

STD:=IF(DaySessionPeriod = 1, DAYSES, IF(DaySessionPeriod = 2, SES, IF(DaySessionPeriod = 0, ANY, ANY) ) );

 

VWAP+((STD*DEV2));

 

Deviation 1 Curve:

 

day:= BarsSince(BarIx(@,StartOf Day) = 0,1,10000)+1;

day2:= BarsSince(BarIx(@,StartOf Session) = 0,1,10000)+1;

priceX:= IF(price = 1, Close(@), IF(price = 2, High(@), IF(price = 3, Low(@), IF(price = 4, Mid(@), IF(price = 5, HLC3(@), IF(price = 6, Avg(@), IF(price=7, Open(@), 0) ) ) ) ) ) ) ;

 

vol:= IF( HasVal(Vol(@)) AND Vol(@) > 0, Vol(@), 1) ;

 

a:= Sum(priceX* vol,day)/ Sum(vol,day);

b:= Sum(priceX* vol,day2)/ Sum(vol,day2);

c1:= Sum(priceX* vol,Period)/ Sum(vol,Period);

 

VWAP:= IF(DaySessionPeriod = 1, a, IF(DaySessionPeriod = 2, b, IF(DaySessionPeriod = 0, c1, a) ) );

 

DAYSES:= STDDEV(@,day)/100;

SES:= STDDEV(@,day2)/100;

ANY:= STDDEV(@,Period);

STD:=IF(DaySessionPeriod = 1, DAYSES, IF(DaySessionPeriod = 2, SES, IF(DaySessionPeriod = 0, ANY, ANY) ) );

 

VWAP+((STD*DEV1));

 

Vwap:

 

day:= BarsSince(BarIx(@,StartOf Day) = 0,1,10000)+1;

day2:= BarsSince(BarIx(@,StartOf Session) = 0,1,10000)+1;

priceX:= IF(price = 1, Close(@), IF(price = 2, High(@), IF(price = 3, Low(@), IF(price = 4, Mid(@), IF(price = 5, HLC3(@), IF(price = 6, Avg(@), IF(price=7, Open(@), 0) ) ) ) ) ) ) ;

 

vol:= IF( HasVal(Vol(@)) AND Vol(@) > 0, Vol(@), 1) ;

 

a:= Sum(priceX* vol,day)/ Sum(vol,day);

b:= Sum(priceX* vol,day2)/ Sum(vol,day2);

c1:= Sum(priceX* vol,Period)/ Sum(vol,Period);

 

VWAP:= IF(DaySessionPeriod = 1, a, IF(DaySessionPeriod = 2, b, IF(DaySessionPeriod = 0, c1, a) ) );

 

DAYSES:= STDDEV(@,day)/100;

SES:= STDDEV(@,day2)/100;

ANY:= STDDEV(@,Period);

STD:=IF(DaySessionPeriod = 1, DAYSES, IF(DaySessionPeriod = 2, SES, IF(DaySessionPeriod = 0, ANY, ANY) ) );

 

VWAP

 

- Deviation 1:

 

day:= BarsSince(BarIx(@,StartOf Day) = 0,1,10000)+1;

day2:= BarsSince(BarIx(@,StartOf Session) = 0,1,10000)+1;

priceX:= IF(price = 1, Close(@), IF(price = 2, High(@), IF(price = 3, Low(@), IF(price = 4, Mid(@), IF(price = 5, HLC3(@), IF(price = 6, Avg(@), IF(price=7, Open(@), 0) ) ) ) ) ) ) ;

 

vol:= IF( HasVal(Vol(@)) AND Vol(@) > 0, Vol(@), 1) ;

 

a:= Sum(priceX* vol,day)/ Sum(vol,day);

b:= Sum(priceX* vol,day2)/ Sum(vol,day2);

c1:= Sum(priceX* vol,Period)/ Sum(vol,Period);

 

VWAP:= IF(DaySessionPeriod = 1, a, IF(DaySessionPeriod = 2, b, IF(DaySessionPeriod = 0, c1, a) ) );

 

DAYSES:= STDDEV(@,day)/100;

SES:= STDDEV(@,day2)/100;

ANY:= STDDEV(@,Period);

STD:=IF(DaySessionPeriod = 1, DAYSES, IF(DaySessionPeriod = 2, SES, IF(DaySessionPeriod = 0, ANY, ANY) ) );

 

VWAP - ((STD*DEV1));

 

-Deviation 2:

 

day:= BarsSince(BarIx(@,StartOf Day) = 0,1,10000)+1;

day2:= BarsSince(BarIx(@,StartOf Session) = 0,1,10000)+1;

priceX:= IF(price = 1, Close(@), IF(price = 2, High(@), IF(price = 3, Low(@), IF(price = 4, Mid(@), IF(price = 5, HLC3(@), IF(price = 6, Avg(@), IF(price=7, Open(@), 0) ) ) ) ) ) ) ;

 

vol:= IF( HasVal(Vol(@)) AND Vol(@) > 0, Vol(@), 1) ;

 

a:= Sum(priceX* vol,day)/ Sum(vol,day);

b:= Sum(priceX* vol,day2)/ Sum(vol,day2);

c1:= Sum(priceX* vol,Period)/ Sum(vol,Period);

 

VWAP:= IF(DaySessionPeriod = 1, a, IF(DaySessionPeriod = 2, b, IF(DaySessionPeriod = 0, c1, a) ) );

 

DAYSES:= STDDEV(@,day)/100;

SES:= STDDEV(@,day2)/100;

ANY:= STDDEV(@,Period);

STD:=IF(DaySessionPeriod = 1, DAYSES, IF(DaySessionPeriod = 2, SES, IF(DaySessionPeriod = 0, ANY, ANY) ) );

 

VWAP - ((STD*DEV2));

 

-Deviation 3:

 

day:= BarsSince(BarIx(@,StartOf Day) = 0,1,10000)+1;

day2:= BarsSince(BarIx(@,StartOf Session) = 0,1,10000)+1;

priceX:= IF(price = 1, Close(@), IF(price = 2, High(@), IF(price = 3, Low(@), IF(price = 4, Mid(@), IF(price = 5, HLC3(@), IF(price = 6, Avg(@), IF(price=7, Open(@), 0) ) ) ) ) ) ) ;

 

vol:= IF( HasVal(Vol(@)) AND Vol(@) > 0, Vol(@), 1) ;

 

a:= Sum(priceX* vol,day)/ Sum(vol,day);

b:= Sum(priceX* vol,day2)/ Sum(vol,day2);

c1:= Sum(priceX* vol,Period)/ Sum(vol,Period);

 

VWAP:= IF(DaySessionPeriod = 1, a, IF(DaySessionPeriod = 2, b, IF(DaySessionPeriod = 0, c1, a) ) );

 

DAYSES:= STDDEV(@,day)/100;

SES:= STDDEV(@,day2)/100;

ANY:= STDDEV(@,Period);

STD:=IF(DaySessionPeriod = 1, DAYSES, IF(DaySessionPeriod = 2, SES, IF(DaySessionPeriod = 0, ANY, ANY) ) );

 

VWAP - ((STD*DEV3));

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Jerry,

 

I haven't seen you mention the following scenario:

 

For long:

 

The VWAP is above the PVP and lower SD1, SD2, etc. is also above the PVP.

 

I know you mention bounces off of the upper SD1 and VWAP are high probability trades.

 

But I watched you video on the symmetrical YM trade and obviously price was not above VWAP on that trade.

 

Would it be a high probability trade to take bounces off of the lower SD1 and SD2?. I realize that price is not above VWAP.

 

Also in that YM trade, you mentioned that you were using no stop loss. I assume that you were using a “stop” based on your full risk tolerance. If the trade had not worked out and the VWAP went below PVP, would you have exited the trade immediately?

 

Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • $VKTX Viking Therapeutics stock attempting to move higher off the 64.24 support area, volume 47% above normal, https://stockconsultant.com/?VKTX
    • Date: 26th April 2024. Alphabet Easily Beat Earnings Predictions But Focus Shifts to Today’s PCE Data. Microsoft and Alphabet’s earnings reports beat expectations pushing the NASDAQ to the top of the charts. The Bank of Japan keep interest rates unchanged applying pressure on the Japanese Yen. The Yen Index declines 0.36% and is down 40% against the USD over the past 5 years. The US GDP growth rate falls below its 2.5% expectations, reading 1.6%, but economists advise the Fed may only cut once in 2024! The market turns its attention to the Core PCE Price Index which analysts expect to fall from 2.8% to 2.6%. USA100 – Alphabet Easily Beat Analysts’ Earnings Predictions and Sees its P/E Ratio Fall! The price of the NASDAQ ended the day higher and rose to a slightly higher high. As a result, the index is close to forming a traditional bullish trend and making Wednesday’s decline a retracement or medium-term correction. In terms technical analysis, indicators are mainly indicating a reverting price condition where the asset cannot maintain longer term momentum. However, momentum indications provide a slight bullish bias. The upward price movement is being driven by earnings reports from Microsoft and Alphabet which beat earnings expectations. Microsoft is the most influential stock for the NASDAQ while Alphabet is the third most influential. Alphabet’s earnings beat expectations by 21.61% and revenue rose more than $6 billion. As a result, the price of the stock rose 11.56% after market close. Furthermore, Microsoft’s Earnings Per Share beat Wall Street’s expectations by 3.40% and revenue by 1.50%. The stock rose by 4.30% after market close and is close to trading at the all-time high. However, investors should note that from the “magnificent 7”, Alphabet and Meta have the lowest Price to Earnings ratio. Meaning these stocks are the most likely to be trading below their intrinsic value. However, investors should note that negatives for the stock market in general remain. This also supports the bias shown by technical analysis. The GDP growth rate fell considerably below expectations while inflation data continues to show signs of rising prices. Investors will closely be monitoring today’s Core PCE Price Index which is the most watched index by the Federal Reserve. Analysts expect the Core PCE Price Index to fall from 2.8% to 2.6%. If the index reads more than 0.3%, a rate cut will become unlikely making stocks less attractive. Whereas, if the PCE Price Index is not as high as expectations, Bond Yields will likely decline, as will the US Dollar and a rate cut will be put back on the table. As a result, investors may look to take advantage of the strong earnings and continue purchasing stocks. USDJPY – BOJ Hold Interest Rates Unchanged! The price of the USDJPY exchange rate again rose to an all-time recent high after increasing in value for 3 consecutive days. Trend and momentum-based indicators point towards a higher price. However, the exchange rate is trading within the overbought range of most oscillators and is also showing a divergence pattern. Both are known to indicate a decline, but not necessarily a complete change of trend. The Bank of Japan’s statement from earlier this morning was largely “dovish” and gave no clear indication that the central bank wishes to keep rising interest rates. However, shortly the Governor will answer questions from journalists and may give a more hawkish tone. Either way, investors are mainly concentrating on if the Federal Government will again opt to intervene within the currency market. Most economists believe the intervention will only come if the USD continues to rise and it will not be before the Core PCE Price Index. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business. Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar. Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding on how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE! Click HERE to READ more Market news. Michalis Efthymiou Market Analyst HFMarkets Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in FX and CFDs products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • 📁 Population in 2100, as projected by UN Population Division.   🇮🇳 India: 1,533 million 🇨🇳 China: 771 million 🇳🇬 Nigeria: 546 million 🇵🇰 Pakistan: 487 million 🇨🇩 Congo: 431 million 🇺🇸 US: 394 million 🇪🇹 Ethiopia: 323 million 🇮🇩 Indonesia: 297 million 🇹🇿 Tanzania: 244 million 🇪🇬 Egypt: 205 million 🇧🇷 Brazil: 185 million 🇵🇭 Philippines: 180 million 🇧🇩 Bangladesh: 177 million 🇳🇪 Niger: 166 million 🇸🇩 Sudan: 142 million 🇦🇴 Angola: 133 million 🇺🇬 Uganda: 132 million 🇲🇽 Mexico: 116 million 🇰🇪 Kenya: 113 million 🇷🇺 Russia: 112 million 🇮🇶 Iraq: 111 million 🇦🇫 Afghanistan: 110 million   @FinancialWorldUpdates Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/   
    • “If the West finds itself falling behind in AI, it won’t be due to a lack of technological prowess or resources. It won’t be because we weren’t smart enough or didn’t move fast enough. It will be because of something many of our Eastern counterparts don’t share with us: fear of AI.   The root of the West's fear of AI can no doubt be traced back to decades of Hollywood movies and books that have consistently depicted AI as a threat to humanity. From the iconic "Terminator" franchise to the more recent "Ex Machina," we have been conditioned to view AI as an adversary, a force that will ultimately turn against us.   In contrast, Eastern cultures have a WAY different attitude towards AI. As UN AI Advisor Neil Sahota points out, "In Eastern culture, movies, and books, they've always seen AI and robots as helpers and assistants, as a tool to be used to further the benefit of humans."   This positive outlook on AI has allowed countries like Japan, South Korea, and China to forge ahead with AI development, including in areas like healthcare, where AI is being used to improve the quality of services.   The West's fear of AI is not only shaping public opinion but also influencing policy decisions and regulatory frameworks. The European Union, for example, recently introduced AI legislation prioritizing heavy-handed protection over supporting innovation.   While such measures might be well-intentioned, they risk stifling AI development and innovation, making it harder for Western companies and researchers to compete.   Among the nations leading common-sense AI regulation, one stands out for now: Singapore.” – Chris C Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • $NFLX Netflix stock hold at 556.59 support or breakdown?  https://stockconsultant.com/?NFLX
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.