Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.


S&P Overnight Trading Model

Recommended Posts

I've written several posts on this forum highlighting simple trading models that could be the basis for a profitable trading system on the S&P market. These ideas would be suitable either for the ETF market or the Emini futures market. This article will explore yet another simple trading model. Recently I was inspired by a post at Quantifiable Strategies titled, "How To Make Money From The Close Until Tomorrow’s Open in SPY/S&P 500" by Oddmund Grotte. This brief blog post builds up the work of Rob Hanna at Overnight Edges to test another simple S&P model. I thought I would create the model in EasyLanguage and put it through my own testing.



The Overnight Edge

The overnight edge is an S&P market edge that I, along with many other people, discovered years ago. I've written about this market edge in a previous article on my website, "The Overnight Edge". This particular model is going to take advantage of that edge by going long at the close of the day and closing the trade at the next day's open. The dominate question we will be answering today is, when should we buy. Obviously buying at the close of every single day is not a realistic strategy. So, we wish to eliminate the unproductive trades in favor of finding the highest probability set-ups. That is, what types of days produce the biggest nightly returns?



Baseline Model Rules

  1. SPY closes at new 20 day low
  2. Close is above 200 day simple moving average
  3. Go long at the close
  4. Exit at tomorrow’s open

Below is a snapshot of a few trades taken on the daily chart of the S&P Emini.





Testing Environment

I coded the above rules in EasyLanguage and tested it on the E-mini S&P futures market. Before getting into the details of the results let me say this: all the tests within this post are going to use the following assumptions:

  1. Starting account size of $25,000
  2. Dates tested are from September 11, 1997*through December 31, 2012
  3. One contract was traded for each signal
  4. The P&L is not accumulated
  5. $30 was deducted per round-trip for slippage and commissions
  6. There are no stops



Baseline Results

Below is the equity graph and the performance results of the baseline model.








Testing the Robustness of the Lookback Period

The baseline rules call for a 20-day new low. Is this just an outlier? Or, is this parameter robust for a wide range of values? When looking at a trading model, it's important that the parameters demonstrate robustness across a wide range. That is, the system should remain profitable over many different values.


To test the robustness of this input, I will use TradeStation's optimization feature which will allow me to quickly test a range of values. I will test the range 2 - 30. The results of my test are below. The x-axis displays the number of days for the new low while the y-axis displays the net profit.


[caption align=aligncenter" width=607]Baseline_New_Low_Lookback_Study_Profit.png Lookback vs. Net Profit[/caption]


We can easily see a clear trend. The shorter the lookback period the more profit. Notice that a lookback period of 4*days is probably an outlier. It's enticing to simply pick a small lookback period like 3*or 5, but from experience I know more profit often comes at a price. Often*that price is deep drawdown, larger losing streaks and prolonged periods of no new equity highs.


Let's look at these results another way.


Another way to look at the results is to compare the profit factor vs. the lookback period. See the bar chart below. The x-axis displays the number of days for the new low while the y-axis displays the profit factor.




We can see that our profit factor has an opposite trend when compared to the new profit bar graph. In other words, as we make more net profit, we do so with less efficiency. Sure we are making more money when we have a lookback period of 3 when compared to a lookback period of 20. But we also have more losing trades. This can be confirmed by the next bar graph.


Let's also take a look at the number of trades. See the bar chart below. The x-axis displays the number of days for the new low while the y-axis displays the number of trades.




Once a again there is a clear trend. There are fewer trading opportunities as you increase the lookback period. This makes sense. The higher the lookback period the less likely you are to experience that new low.


So, more profit does come at a cost. It will be up to you to determine what is appropriate for your trading situation. For me, I would like to have fewer trades and less net profit. This comes with, what I consider, the benefit of fewer losing trades, more net profit per trade, and less drawdown. In short, I prefer the quality trades over the quantity of trades. It appears we can improve the*net profit of our model by reducing the lookback period for the new look. More on that later.



Testing the Robustness of the Regime Filter

The regime filter in this model is a simple moving average. We are using the "standard" 200-day*simple moving average. This is a very common period for daily charts. It's commonly understood that price is generally bullish when it's above this moving average and bearish when below it.*Again, to*test the robustness of this filter*I will use TradeStation's optimization feature.*I will test the range 60*- 250. The results of my test are below. The x-axis displays the number of days for the lookback value*while the y-axis displays the net profit.




Clearly the longer the lookback period the more net profit we generate. Our "standard" 200-day lookback value performs well, but it's not the best. The best value is 250 in this study. Many values will perform similarly. This gives me confidence the regime filter is not overly optimized and is robust.



Weak Close Filter

In the original blog post by Oddmund Grotte he introduced a price based filter that required the close of the current bar to be within the lower half of the daily range. If price closes in the lower half of the daily range it is presumed we are looking for a weak close. A strong close would be when the close is the upper half of the daily range.


The calculation to determine if the close is within the lower half of the daily range looks like this:


Weak Close=(c-l)/(h-l) < 0.5


With this additional filter we are confirming weakness before opening a new long position. The results of our trading model with the new filter are below.








Overnight-Low-Baseline-With-Filter-Results.pngThe filter did a fantastic job of removing unproductive trades. You can see this because we are making more net profit with fewer trades. This pushes up the average profit per trade. We also reduce our drawdown which increases our profit factor. The only thing concerning is our trade size is small. The baseline had 61 trades, which is not very many trades. With our filter we reduce the trades to 55. But we know how to increase the number of trades by reducing the lookback period of the "new low". We'll do that later. For now, there is one other input value I want to test.



Testing the Robustness of the Close Filter

Once again let's take a detailed look at the percent range used in the Close Filter. If you will recall, we are looking for a close in the lower half of the daily range. But is this just a fluke value? Will other values produce similar results?


The bar graph below depicts taking trades at or above the given x-axis value. For instance, the far left bar*produces a net profit around $4,700. The value on the x-axis at this bar is 0.1. This states that all this profit is accumulated above this value. By the time we reach 0.45 there is no more profit to accumulate. Thus, we can see the accumulated*profitable trades occur when the daily close falls within the lower 40% daily range. Put another way, we want to open a long position when the daily close is within the lower 2/5 of the daily range.







Combining Our Findings

Let's now combine a couple of our findings. First, let's increase the number of trades by reducing the lookback period on locating a new low. Let's try to keep the profit factor around 2.0, so we'll use a lookback period of 5*instead of the default 20. I will then change the weak close filter to a value of 0.40 from the default 0.50. I will make no change to the*simple moving average regime filter which is at 200. Below are the results.








Not too bad for a few lines of code. Remember this model does not have any stops nor does in reinvests profits. In short, this is not a trading system but an interesting model which could evolve into a complete trading system with some work.





You can download the EasyLanguage code and TradeStation Workspace for this strategy here.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

I really like the detail you put in the post. Thanks!


One question, you're not a little concerned that the back-test only provided you with 60 trades. I know when I back-test I commonly like to have the system trade 200+ times, especially given the time period that the test is covering.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
I really like the detail you put in the post. Thanks!


One question, you're not a little concerned that the back-test only provided you with 60 trades. I know when I back-test I commonly like to have the system trade 200+ times, especially given the time period that the test is covering.


This is really a market study, not necessarily a complete trading system. I would encourage system developers to take this idea and see if they can build it into a complete system. However, you will notice the final strategy code generates a 167 trades which is a good number in my opinion.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Date : 14th October 2019. MACRO EVENTS & NEWS OF 14th October 2019.No-deal Brexit risks are looking more real than ever, with reports suggesting that talks will officially break down this week ahead of the upcoming EU summit on 17 and 18 October. Elsewhere, further US data and Fedspeak could provide more clues about the possibility of a Fed rate cut. Tuesday – 15 October 2019 Consumer Price Index (CNY, GMT 01:30) – September’s Chinese CPI is seen unchanged at 0.7% while the PPI figure is expected to decline further to -1.2%. The overall reading for CPI is estimated to post a gain up to 2.9% y/y. ILO & Average Earnings Index 3m/y (GBP, GMT 08:30) – UK Earnings with the bonus-excluded figure are expected to slip to 3.7% y/y in the three months to August, down from 3.8%y/y. UK ILO unemployment is expected steady at 3.8%, which was the lowest rate seen since December 1974. ZEW Economic Sentiment (EUR, GMT 09:00) – Economic Sentiment for October is projected at -27 from the -22.5 seen last month, as the current conditions indicator for Germany turned negative. The overall Eurozone reading though expected to declne further to -33.0 slightly from -22.4. A lower than expected outcome, ties in with the stagnation in market sentiment at the start of the month. Consumer Price Index (NZD, GMT 21:45) – One of the most important figures for FX markets, the y/y CPI for Q3 is expected to come out at 1.4%, compared to 1.7% in the previous quarter. Wednesday – 16 October 2019 Consumer Price Index (GBP, GMT 08:30) – The UK CPI is expected to rebound to a 1.8% y/y rate in September after dipping to 1.7% in August from 2.1% in July. Weakness in sterling from year-go levels should impact some offset to disinflationary forces. Consumer Price Index (EUR, GMT 09:00) – The Euro Area CPI is expected to be confirmed at just 0.9% y/y in the final release for September, although the deceleration in the headline rate over the month was largely due to base effects from energy prices, with core inflation actually moving up to 1.0% y/y from 0.9% y/y in August. Consumer Price Index (CAD, GMT 12:30) – The Canadian CPI index is expected to have increased to 2%y/y compared to 1.9%y/y in August. The core CPI measures remained near 2.0%. Retail Sales (USD, GMT 12:30) – Retail Sales are an important determinant of consumer spending thus making it a leading indicator for overall economic growth. Consensus expectations suggest that we should have increased by 0.2% in September, for both the retail sales headline and the ex-auto figure, following a 0.4% August headline rise with a flat ex-auto figure. Fedspeak: Fed Brainard (USD, GMT 19:00) Thursday – 17 October 2019 European Council Summit on Brexit Employment Data (AUD, GMT 01:30) – While the Unemployment Rate is projected to have flipped at 5.3% in September, Employment change is expected to have eased, increasing by 10K compared to 34.7K last month. Retail Sales ex Fuel (GBP, GMT 08:30) – Retail Sales in the UK are anticipated to increase in September, reaching 3.0% on a y/y basis, and 0.5% on a m/m basis, from the 2.7% and -0.2% respectively Housing Data and Building Permits (USD, GMT 12:30) – Housing starts should drop back to a 1.282 mln pace in September, after a sharp rise to a 1.364 mln clip in August with the help of lower mortgage rates. Permits similarly are expected to slow to 1.370 mln in September, after popping to 1.425 mln in September. Permits have shown a solid growth path into Q3 despite a July starts set-back. Philadelphia Fed Manufacturing Survey (USD, GMT 12:30) – The Philly Fed index is seen falling to 7.0 from 12.0 in September, versus a 1-year high of 21.8 in July and a 33-month low of -4.1 in February. The late-September producer sentiment surveys deteriorated significantly after firmness in the early-September reports, and the early-October data will be closely scrutinized to see if this pull-back continued. The “soft data” surveys are at risk of a possible impact from the UAW-GM strike, alongside the ongoing headwind from troubles abroad. Fedspeak: Fed Bowman and Fed Williams (USD, GMT 18:00 and 20:20) Friday – 18 October 2019 European Council Summit on Brexit China Gross Domestic Product (CNY, GMT 02:00)- Chinese GDP is projected to see additional moderation to a 6.1% y/y pace in Q3, from 6.2% in Q2. Industrial Production and Retail Sales (CNY, GMT 02:00) – The September industrial production is forecast at 4.5% y/y from 4.4% previously, while September retail sales likely improved to 7.7% y/y from 7.5%. Fedspeak: Fed Kaplan and Fed Clarida (USD, GMT 15:00 and 15:30) Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business. Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HotForex Economic calendar. Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding on how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE! Click HERE to READ more Market news. Andria Pichidi Market Analyst HotForex Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in FX and CFDs products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • This should really be very easy, but I can't find an article or video to walk me through it. I picked 20 ticker symbols where the stocks are in a tight trading range. I got them all into one list I call "Channel". I'd like to add several indicators that apply to all, such as MACD, volume, 3 moving averages. Then I'd like to scroll through the list, adding trendlines, or horizontal lines to mark the top & bottom of the price channel for each. Then set an alarm for a breakout in each direction that indicates a breakout. Could you point me to an article or video that walks me through how to do this? ...or give me the steps? Thank you, RichardV2, Experienced stock trader back before the Internet was invented.😁
    • The Economic Proscription of U.S. Farmers by China Maybe Forever   Similar to a black eye on the face, it’s placing an indelible imprint. The retaliatory levies by China over U.S. commodity producers, such as soybeans, which seem to be forever. The moment such happens for the market it becomes irreversible.   It’s a dread numerous farmers from North Dakota to Mississippi have recognized for as far back as last year. They worry that they’ve put millions in soybean development on account of China. Since Chinese focus is now transferred towards Brazil rather, that market might be gone forever.   Once the confidence merchants have in the U.S. declines as a steady provider because of the trade dispute, the more vital its important for them to support and further broaden other avenues.   The developing danger for American agribusiness presently is that a great part of the piece of the overall industry lost throughout the year will be hard or difficult to win back at any point shortly, the Boston Consulting Group said in a detailed analysis discharged on Wednesday.   This is for the most part because of long term contracts that are regularly recorded among purchasers and sellers, contingent upon the item. The lesson from the analysis shows that U.S. farmers need to turn out to be less reliant on China, and simply trust in the best concerning those customers organizing a rebound sooner or later.   For the time being, China is going to Australia, Brazil, New Zealand, Russia, and also for its domestic producers as an option in contrast to American developed crops and animal proteins.   From the detailed analysis: “The risk that U.S. agribusinesses may for all time lose foreign market share of the overall industry isn’t only hypothetical. In past trade disputes, for example, one with China including beef, the US has not recaptured its lost share. As a result of the increase of U.S. crops and food materials more costly than other choices, high duties bring down the price to merchants who plan to expand. Also, the fewer confidence merchants have in the US as a steady provider, in perspective on the potential for future trade disputes, the more important it progresses toward becoming for them to support and further expand. After some time, merchants could loosen up complex associations with suppliers from the U.S.”   China Receives Blames for the Pressure And this is so because China is important to American farmers. China purchased $19.5 billion in U.S. agricultural items as of 2017, representing 14% of exports of farm produce, in light of BCS analysis. In July 2018, China slammed a 25% levy on U.S. agricultural items.   Exports at that point declined by an incredible 53% for the year. While exports to China have declined also for this year, over past years free fall.   There is another motivation behind why some China customers may not come back to the U.S. China is extending its very own crop acreage, particularly for soybeans. After some time, China will turn out to be progressively independent. Except if request increases generously, China will purchase its very own soybeans, regulating export development and under control in any case.   “Individuals in the business were in a condition of cheerfulness, believing that a bargain would soon be reached,” says Michael McAdoo, associate, and related executive for BCS in Montreal. “Our analysis demonstrates that regardless of whether there is a bargain, there is worry that a similar volume won’t return. They need to try different markets,” he declared.   Source: https://learn2.trade 
    • Trade Dispute Responsible for China’s Overwhelming Gold Purchase Rate   China has included more than 100 tons of gold to its stores since it continued purchasing in December, fortifying its position as one of the significant authority collectors as national banks load up on the valuable metal.   The People’s Bank of China grabbed progressively gold a month ago, raising reserves to 62.64 million ounces in September from 62.45 million in August, as per information on its site. In tonnage terms, the most recent inflow sums 5.9 tons and comes in as an expansion of about 99.8 tons over the earlier nine months.   Bullion hit the most noteworthy in over six years in September as more slow development, the trade dispute and rate reductions prodded financial specialist request. National banks have been significant purchasers as well, particularly in developing markets. Administrative demands will probably proceed as protectionist strategies and geopolitical concerns add to the request, as forecasted by Suki Cooper, the valuable metals investigator at Standard Chartered Bank.   “With the stressed partnerships with the U.S., China requires support against its enormous possessions of the dollar, and gold serves that capacity,” said Howie Lee, a financial specialist at Singapore-based Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp. “As China turns into a superpower in its very own right, I anticipate progressively gold-purchases.”   China’s High Gold Appetite The PBOC’s continuos running of bullion-purchasing has come against the difficult setting of the trade dispute with the U.S. furthermore, a stamped lull in development at home. While high-level discussions are set to continue in Washington this week, Chinese authorities are flagging they’re progressively hesitant to consent to an expansive bargain.   Spot gold spiked to as much as 0.4% to $1,511.31 an ounce on Monday and exchanged at $1,505.84 in early London exchange. While the value declined 3.2% in September, they remain high at 17% this year. The PBOC information was discharged at the end of the week. Alongside China, Russia has additionally been including generous amounts of bullion. In the initial half-year, national banks overall got 374.1 tons, supporting the overall gold request to a three-year high, the World Gold Council declared.   While a tenth straight month of amassing, shows an unfaltering purchasing trend for the PBOC, China has in the past gone for significant stretches without uncovering moves for its gold possessions. At the point the national bank declared a 57% bounce in savings to 53.3 million ounces in mid-2015, that was the first update in quite a while.   Source: https://learn2.trade   
    • GBPJPY Reverses Its Sell-Off Around the Level at 130.75  OCTOBER 9, 2019  Azeez Mustapha  No Comments   GBPJPY Price Analysis – October 9 In the prior session, the pair closed lower for the second day in a row, but currently, the GBPJPY displays a weakness further downside of the pair while retaining its wider medium-term outlook by temporal reversal on the level at 130.75.   Key Levels Resistance Levels: 148.66, 137.80, 135.774 Support Levels: 130.75, 128.68, 126.54   GBPJPY Long term Trend: Bearish In the bigger picture, the GBPJPY consolidation structure is still forming from the technical support zone on the level at 126.54 low.   A further upward move may be recorded towards the level at 146.57 and 148.66 in an extension where its resistance is glaring before completing the structure. However, the overall trend remains bearish while displaying an intact downtrend in the medium and long-term.   GBPJPY Short term Trend: Bearish On the 4-hour time frame, its price is trading narrowly between the moving average 5 and 13 close to the key technical support level at 130.44.   As it is presently, the intraday bias in GBPJPY remains on the downside at this point where a corrective rebound from the level at 126.54 low should have completed. Meanwhile, its 4-hour RSI is bearish and pointing lower suggesting further weakness.   Source: https://learn2.trade 
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.