Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

tradingwizzard

NFP Number and Dow Jones Reaction

Recommended Posts

it seems that nobody knows how to interpret data anymore....

 

let's see TL members on NFP and Dow Jones this Friday

 

will Dow close Friday positive if NFP beats estimates or not?

 

I would say yes....

 

TW

Edited by tradingwizzard

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Technically, the market is due an oversold bounce. A beat on the NFP would certainly fuel that. If one trusts the ADP numbers, there may be some question if a beat on the NFP is likely. If market expectations are correct and the number comes in at 175 - 180K that is still just a bandaid for the horrid number in December, but it would still allow the FED to continue the reduction in QE.

 

I don't think that NFP or QE is what is driving this correction. I would also think that a rally on an NFP beat will get sold in the following week. I love trading to the downside, it may just be that's my bias raising it's ugly head (Ha!). We shall see.

 

As always, my plan is to play it as it comes... 5 minutes at a time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Technically, the market is due an oversold bounce. A beat on the NFP would certainly fuel that. If one trusts the ADP numbers, there may be some question if a beat on the NFP is likely. If market expectations are correct and the number comes in at 175 - 180K that is still just a bandaid for the horrid number in December, but it would still allow the FED to continue the reduction in QE.

 

I don't think that NFP or QE is what is driving this correction. I would also think that a rally on an NFP beat will get sold in the following week. I love trading to the downside, it may just be that's my bias raising it's ugly head (Ha!). We shall see.

 

As always, my plan is to play it as it comes... 5 minutes at a time.

 

nice answer, gave it a like .....

 

I just want to add that if the NFP is missing, won't markets jump on the long side saying Fed must do something?

 

TW

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yes. correlations and reactions are coming back more to how they were say 5 years ago.

 

actually I'm not sure about that anymore...if anything I would say correlations do not exist anymore....or, to put it more frankly, they exist or are valid until they don't....and at that moment stop losses are triggered

 

TW

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
nice answer, gave it a like .....

 

I just want to add that if the NFP is missing, won't markets jump on the long side saying Fed must do something?

 

TW

 

I think the market read is that the FED is committed to the taper. If it were a huge miss... say like December... that may drive that kind of speculation (who knows). As usual, the market would have to bring on some more misery to get the point across. Any miss on the number (seems to me) would weigh in for the sell side.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I think the market read is that the FED is committed to the taper. If it were a huge miss... say like December... that may drive that kind of speculation (who knows). As usual, the market would have to bring on some more misery to get the point across. Any miss on the number (seems to me) would weigh in for the sell side.

 

well, only one day to go and we shall see...

 

TW

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
even though I am bullish equities, I don't think it is that easy to travel.....then again, it depends of the number of course :Q)

 

TW

 

The number won't make a difference. It is going higher. The market wants you to think what you are thinking.

 

A lot of people got short today.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

like mentioned at the start of the thread, no one really know what data means anymore...good data is bad data, bad data is good data, who the heck knows...

 

so NFP missed and sent Dow +165 points higher...excellent :)

 

correlations suck :cool:

 

TW

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
like mentioned at the start of the thread, no one really know what data means anymore...good data is bad data, bad data is good data, who the heck knows...

 

so NFP missed and sent Dow +165 points higher...excellent :)

 

correlations suck :cool:

 

TW

"Bizzaro World"... trade it as it happens. Had a good day today (a good week actually)... nice to see volatility back.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
like mentioned at the start of the thread, no one really know what data means anymore...good data is bad data, bad data is good data, who the heck knows...

 

so NFP missed and sent Dow +165 points higher...excellent :)

 

correlations suck :cool:

 

TW

 

Correlations work perfectly. Unfortunately, the things you want to be correlated didn't turn out to be correlated. Sort of like concluding that your neighbor walking the dog in the morning has some causal effect on the sun rising, because they do tend to occur at the same time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Correlations work perfectly. Unfortunately, the things you want to be correlated didn't turn out to be correlated. Sort of like concluding that your neighbor walking the dog in the morning has some causal effect on the sun rising, because they do tend to occur at the same time.
:rofl: :rofl: LOL LOL

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Correlations work perfectly. Unfortunately, the things you want to be correlated didn't turn out to be correlated. Sort of like concluding that your neighbor walking the dog in the morning has some causal effect on the sun rising, because they do tend to occur at the same time.

 

excellent response :(...instead of explaining something that I miss, you just blah blah some stuff.....you must be a great trader sharing your knowledge like that

 

TW

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
excellent response :(...instead of explaining something that I miss, you just blah blah some stuff.....you must be a great trader sharing your knowledge like that

 

TW

 

I know how to take money from the market. I am not a great trader and wasn't trying to be smug.

 

I have no idea how to determine what you might have missed, because I have no idea how you arrived at your conclusion. In my mind we were looking at the same market, so we must have been looking at the same things. You might need someone like Rande Howe to help you arrive at different conclusions and not someone like me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I know how to take money from the market. I am not a great trader and wasn't trying to be smug.

 

I have no idea how to determine what you might have missed, because I have no idea how you arrived at your conclusion. In my mind we were looking at the same market, so we must have been looking at the same things. You might need someone like Rande Howe to help you arrive at different conclusions and not someone like me.

 

the idea was about correlations between NFP and Dow....your answer was about dogs and Sun if I remember correctly....I may not remember correctly though, because I read it and find it so lame I moved on to something else

 

regards,

 

TW

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
the idea was about correlations between NFP and Dow....your answer was about dogs and Sun if I remember correctly....I may not remember correctly though, because I read it and find it so lame I moved on to something else

 

regards,

 

TW

 

I'll help you out.

 

You thought the direction of the dow would be impacted, somehow, by the nfp number.

 

I thought the market would go higher no matter what the NFP number was.

 

Benevolence ended.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'll help you out.

 

You thought the direction of the dow would be impacted, somehow, by the nfp number.

 

I thought the market would go higher no matter what the NFP number was.

 

Benevolence ended.

 

Help me out... like I need it (ha).

 

Certainly there was a technical bounce due. It may well be that this is not a correction but just another BTFD situation (it's really too soon to call this a correction). I trade the TF contract. It was clear that the sell side was exhausted (for a time). I'm sure that was evident in the ES and the YM as well. The TF buy side was not impressive... I would've liked to have seen it trade into the 1117 area (from a technical perspective, it was lack luster). The YM and the ES were a little more aggressive. I must say... I don't know (nothing new for me).

 

What do you think... "a correction" is in the works, or do we turn and go higher? I'll even give you an out... "does it matter?"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Help me out... like I need it (ha).

 

Certainly there was a technical bounce due. It may well be that this is not a correction but just another BTFD situation (it's really too soon to call this a correction). I trade the TF contract. It was clear that the sell side was exhausted (for a time). I'm sure that was evident in the ES and the YM as well. The TF buy side was not impressive... I would've liked to have seen it trade into the 1117 area (from a technical perspective, it was lack luster). The YM and the ES were a little more aggressive. I must say... I don't know (nothing new for me).

 

What do you think... "a correction" is in the works, or do we turn and go higher? I'll even give you an out... "does it matter?"

 

I think it corrected. I think the low was tested. I think es will resume it's climb to newer highs. Most or all other indices will follow or lead as the case may be.

 

It seems to be that there was a lot of buying below and there continues to be a lot of shorting which will lead to low volume upmoves which tend to be misleading and confounding.

 

There is no known good reason for the market to continue lower. Tapering is not a good reason for the market to go down. I would argue just the opposite.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I think it corrected. I think the low was tested. I think es will resume it's climb to newer highs. Most or all other indices will follow or lead as the case may be.

 

It seems to be that there was a lot of buying below and there continues to be a lot of shorting which will lead to low volume upmoves which tend to be misleading and confounding.

 

There is no known good reason for the market to continue lower. Tapering is not a good reason for the market to go down. I would argue just the opposite.

 

I would agree... "the taper" makes no difference. Everyone has known that the taper was coming, evident and necessary (actually relieved that it happened). I watched the tepid low volume buying on Friday afternoon... no sellers. Interesting to see how next week shapes up. I think we will have some contention at higher levels (what else is new... that's what makes a market).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I would agree... "the taper" makes no difference. Everyone has known that the taper was coming, evident and necessary (actually relieved that it happened). I watched the tepid low volume buying on Friday afternoon... no sellers. Interesting to see how next week shapes up. I think we will have some contention at higher levels (what else is new... that's what makes a market).

 

tend to agree with you here.....equities seem to be supported by good GDP numbers in Europe.....supposedly

 

TW

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
tend to agree with you here.....equities seem to be supported by good GDP numbers in Europe.....supposedly

 

TW

 

Looks like the good GDP numbers not only supported the market, but it pushed the market to a new high too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Looks like the good GDP numbers not only supported the market, but it pushed the market to a new high too.

 

I am quite curious to see next week's NFP and equities reaction...it seems that whatever the fundamental news, equities are being bought anyways....so coming to the Dow 100,00 thread :)

 

TW

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.