Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Mysticforex

Let's Try an Experiment

Recommended Posts

As I understand it,this thread is based on random entry based on a coin flip.Whereas the above quotes talk about random entry based on trend following,with the implication being that even trading randomly (with the trend) there is an edge in identifying a trend and trading with it.

 

Until the bit about "long term trend filters" towards the end, then it's not a random entry with the trend, it's a random entry that could be profitable if it is with the trend, or will be unprofitable if it is against the trend. No judgement regarding the direction of the trend is being made as part of the entry decision, as far as I can tell.

 

Of course, it's hard to know exactly what was tested.

 

And I personally believe that efficient entries (better than random) are possible and, if you accept that the data is largely random, then non-random entries make perfect sense.

 

And yes - this thread was just a bit of fun, I think.

 

BlueHorseshoe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Conclusion

 

Of the above trades,how many were in the direction of the main trend?

It might be interesting to compare these results to a long only entry each time (if the trend is up) Otherwise,exactly what benchmark are we comparing random to?

Without a credible and tangible benchmark this exercise seems pretty pointless to me beyond light entertainment.

 

As has been pointed out a few times, It is entertainment. If you would like to join the fun, perhaps you could count the number of trades you thought were with the trend.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The benchmark is luck. The definitive is fate. In other words, lo que será será. What is to be is to be and your lucky if you get ...what is to be. Whether you hit it via coin flips...pendulum..mathematical equations..fibs..or other technical contraptions....db's predictive boxes..patuca dipstick opinions...mightymouses mouse trap jailbreaks...bob's planetary rotations and revolutions...

 

Don't you believe in luck and fate mits?

Edited by Patuca

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Does anyone believe in trying to predict fate? Predict opens a can of worms...fate is fixed...

 

you can predict fate - you supposedly cant change it.

 

Mitts - as for a benchmark, its a theoretical benchmark based on what we would 'expect' (as in all probability) to occur.

 

and Zdo,,,,drum roll please...:)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So we have Mitsu Tails/Sell for Tues, 8/6/13 And Siuya Tails/Sell For Weds, 8/7/13.

 

I could not get to my platform at 17:00 EST to manually close an open trade. So it was closed at 18:49 EST -5.7 pips.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ok.Maybe it was mentioned and I missed it.What then,is the "theoretical benchmark"?

 

Not being overly concerned with the ideas of fate, belief and gods etc....so I will skip all that,

 

but in terms of a benchmark....

I called it a theoretical benchmark because in this unique case of flipping a coin there is no official benchmark. Whereas if comparing our results to some other index - the usual measure then there is an official benchmark (with its rules and composition) to index against.

When it comes to coin tossing, all we have is the mathematical expectation over the long run.

Otherwise, the benchmark would either be us....or anyone who flips a coin which would be rather pointless.

Even if we combined lots of different coin flippers to create a benchmark, then it should approximate to the theoretical benchmark over the long term.

 

This must surely be the idea that over the long term flipping a coin will provide no predictive edge, and hence why this is purely an experiment in tricking ourselves that it might, and hence why we can market this at a later date as a system with rules in the hope we can trick (ahem....convince) others that it works.

(Now if we introduced some money management and other forms of controls or filters we might actually have something. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thank you Mysticforex for starting this experiment, this is very interesting!

 

The adjacent thread for the "Predict" part of the experiment is to be found here http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/forex-trading-laboratory/16994-predict-experiment.html

 

I have a few questions:

1. Are the trades opened at 09:30 EST disregarding ideal entry location?

2. I created a $100,000 account for this experiment - is this the size account you wish to use? I can change it before Sunday so the 2% of the accounts will be similar in size so one is not stopped out prematurely.

3. What size contract are we entering?

 

Additional Question:

4. I was thinking risk:reward=2%:2% - doesn't that mean over the long run our expectancy is breakeven? What about having a 2% risk, but let the trade run until end of the day and not take the 2% target?

 

Thank you!

 

 

 

Since my Real Day starts at London open, and the flip occurs at NY open, I am not always available to manually close the trade at end of day.

 

Then there is always the chance of letting a winner turn into a loser.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mitsu has just pointed out to me that I have made an error.

His flip, ( Tues. 8/6 of Buy was executed as a sell. With the resultant loss of 20 pips, and 2 %

 

The error was mine. We can decide how to deal with it at the end of the contest

 

We didn;t have a flip slated for today, so I just flipped my 5 CHF coin and got Heads/Buy.

 

Thank you Mits for catching that and bring it to our attention.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.