Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

tmbaru

Why Successful Traders Use Fibonacci Retracements

Recommended Posts

Updating the thinking outside the box and moving off first base..

 

Prev week low 1626.7

 

1626.7 +3.618%= 1685.5 Actual= 1687.1

 

There were xxx no of waves from low to high.To recognize that,one would have to think outside the Elliott wave box......naturally.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
DB,

 

I would really be interested in checking that out. Would you mind telling me where those posts are?

 

thanks a lot

 

Question-

How do you know when a problem is too big to solve for yourself?

When you need someone else to help solve it for you..........?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Question-

How do you know when a problem is too big to solve for yourself?

When you need someone else to help solve it for you..........?

 

DB has more than 3200 posts over 7 years. I don't have any way of knowing when he made those posts or in which thread.

 

You really think it's unforgivable laziness for me to ask for help finding a needle in a haystack?

 

It's quite possible you're a jerk dude.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
$14 billion dollar hedge fund with 800 employees which was started in 1992 takes an awful lot of insider info to get to that level and a long time before being discovered - if it was all an illusion and not some substance behind it.

 

Cohen Gets Subpoena in SAC Capital Trading Inquiry - NYTimes.com

 

 

Even Madoff was legitimate for a time if even for a fleeting moment. I suppose too that SAC was legitimate for a period. Likely, a longer period of time than Madoff. But, then the need for yield, the lure of easy money, and uncontrolled pride came together and formed the perfect storm. I know I am convicting him prematurely, but when SAC and RICO are in the same article, it is not good. Rico is generally used with criminal organizations.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Cohen Gets Subpoena in SAC Capital Trading Inquiry - NYTimes.com

 

 

Even Madoff was legitimate for a time if even for a fleeting moment. I suppose too that SAC was legitimate for a period. Likely, a longer period of time than Madoff. But, then the need for yield, the lure of easy money, and uncontrolled pride came together and formed the perfect storm. I know I am convicting him prematurely, but when SAC and RICO are in the same article, it is not good. Rico is generally used with criminal organizations.

 

You convinced me.I'm gonna stick him in my "Guilty As Charged" thread.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

RICO suave hmmm. Yea he's guilty for sure. Throw away the key.

 

Wait, what about me? I went to the same high school (Far Rockaway High) as Madoff.

 

True but just not at the same time. Phew!, might be safe. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
RICO suave hmmm. Yea he's guilty for sure. Throw away the key.

 

Wait, what about me? I went to the same high school (Far Rockaway High) as Madoff.

 

True but just not at the same time. Phew!, might be safe. :)

 

What about you? You can't get into my thread that easily.You gotta clearly demonstrate that you're a sociapath.Nothin' you ever wrote here suggests to me that you're a scumbag.

 

Still,as you well know,being one of the most open minded members here,i'm willing to be convinced.Usually though,these types prefer to remain under the radar like slugs under a rock...

Hell,i'm usually wrong..you probably are a sociapath..oh well,looks like you're sharing a cell with Oscar:)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Question-

How do you know when a problem is too big to solve for yourself?

When you need someone else to help solve it for you..........?

 

DB has 3200 posts over 7 years. I don't have any way of knowing when those posts were made or in which thread they were made. I spent some time searching for them but didn't have any luck. I really don't think I'm being lazy or expecting others to do my work for me.

 

If anybody can direct me to the aforementioned posts, it'd be greatly appreciated.

 

Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Given the number of levels, and how far the "bounce" can be from them and still "count", it would be next to impossible not to be successful trading them.

 

Of course, it's also possible to trade successfully by putting on a tinfoil hat and receiving trading signals from Mars.

 

Damn DB...don't give away my system. I am about to open up the Tinfoil Hat Academy of Trading.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

YertleTurtle gazillion thanks for the clarification. It has made me to dig deeper about Fibonacci Retracement and now has an in-depth understanding on the topic.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Re Static or dynamic

 

 

If moving a data point from a larger timeframe to a smaller timeframe results in converting what might have been dynamic on the larger frame into a series of non updating values for multiple bars then transposing that value to the smaller timeframe assures it is static even if it is dynamic in the larger frame. Any number that remains constant while OHLC are dynamic is going to be static relative to the current timeframe.

 

I appreciate that you gave this idea some thought. It was intended to make everyone think. It's not the subject of numerous other threads. It's been suggested in this thread that there aren't enough ideas filling the void created by running out the scammers. It's also been said we shouldn't be critical of others unless we understand the specific nature of what they're doing.

 

This is my attempt to share an alternative view. It's ok to judge the methods of others and dismiss those methods as weak. When comparing apples to apples, all other things being equal, choose dynamic. Not all horizontal numbers are invalid. But given this is a competitive endeavor why consider anything static?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fibonacci analysis has become an essential tool to the modern trader. Some traders may be skeptical regarding the unique and slightly abstract way Fibonacci retracements and extensions analyze the market but ultimately all a trader needs to be aware of is whether they are reliable and accurate.

 

The principle use of Fibonacci retracements and extensions is to project strong lines of resistance and support for a security. Armed with these indications a trader can employ a basic but often successful trading technique by placing pending entries into the market.

 

When deployed properly the Fibonacci retracements and extensions predict significant lines of support and resistance of any security being analyzed. The retracements and extensions are laid over the top of a candlestick chart and if done accurately the resistance and support can be clearly seen. The price of a security is likely to either rebound when it hits one of these lines or pass it and if it breaks the support or resistance it is likely to keep on going. This is valuable knowledge for a trader and with a basic technique large profits can be made by playing the market with this information.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The price of a security is likely to either rebound when it hits one of these lines or pass it and if it breaks the support or resistance it is likely to keep on going. This is valuable knowledge for a trader and with a basic technique large profits can be made by playing the market with this information.

 

You might want to rephrase this since your statement can be changed only slightly and provide as much information about price action as the the original version.

 

The price of a security is likely to either rebound when it hits a bunny rabbit or pass the bunny rabbit and if it breaks the support or resistance it is likely to keep on going. This is valuable knowledge for a trader and with a basic technique large profits can be made by playing the market with this information

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Support and resistance levels can offer strong Forex entry signals when the price breaks through an established level, as when this happens the price has a tendency to continue moving in that direction.

Though, S&R levels and Fib retracements are both powerful trading tools individually, when you combine them together the trading signals become much stronger and more reliable

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Article can be rated as informative But the topic is misleading. I wonder why some senior forum members are debating and writing long essays on it. All debate so far is ....... :spam:.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think a lot of people *including myself at first) get caught up in entering the trade. Finding the perfect indicator or retracement when really all of those indicators are just signals. Getting in the trade is the easy part. Adhering to an exit method that is consistent regardless of what the market does I've found to be much more important.

 

Knowing your expectancy is the most valuable calculation you can make.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Fibonacci levels are idiotic as depends from where you want to measure the retracements.

 

You always find a fib level which fits your trade.

 

You have a choice.Either you study this far more deeply,or steer well clear.Further study will answer the problem you posed here,namely where (in time and price) to make your calculations from.

It's actually sequential,therefore starting in the correct place is what works,whereas starting in the wrong place produces haphazard results and that is why many conclude Fibonacci doesn't work.

Naturally,this statement could also apply to other TA methods

 

Your statement is idiotic.I guess you're a beginner so it is understandable.But the word idiotic has also been used by a more experienced trader in this thread.That doesn't reflect well on that poster and it's not much appreciated by those who are expert at this (fibs).

 

Because to say fibs are idiotic to those who know better is actually saying those people are idiots.Some of those people include giants in the TA world such as Elliott btw.

I've spent years taming my ego...I highly recommend it.

It is this level of "debate" that has driven many long term posters here away.If Fibonacci is not your thing then why feel the need to insult others?

 

Normally,i would post a chart or 2 and show some of what I know.I've decided after much thought that I am never going to post a chart on here or anywhere else again.

Several reasons,in order of importance-

 

1) There is nothing in it for me.Strangely,as I get older,helping my fellow man slips ever lower down my agenda and has ever less appeal for me.:)

 

2) It only annoys the pigs.

 

3) Most of you on here are going to ultimately move on to more productive things (that's what the statistics say) so why should I bother?

 

4) Showing some examples will only be cherry picked examples for most people who will demand more "proof" - well,i'm a poor performer when it comes to others making demands on my time.What do you want me to do,post the entire history of the market here.?:doh:

 

5) This used to be a good forum.Apparently i'm not alone in thinking it's increasingly not worth bothering with.Personally i'm no longer interested in attempting to redress the balance.Those who know and like me here over the years are welcome to stay in touch privately...otherwise..

 

6) Goodbye

 

For the neutrals,when finding/calculating the fibs bear this in mind-

 

HAL 9000:--"Well, I don't think there is any question about it. It can only be attributable to human error. This sort of thing has cropped up before and it has always been due to human error."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

The market is not a seashell.

 

Most things that occur in nature that are commonly used as examples by these charlatans don't actually conform to Fibonacci ratios either !

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Most things that occur in nature that are commonly used as examples by these charlatans don't actually conform to Fibonacci ratios either !

Can you provide specific examples -

 

such as which are not found in nature and which charlatans are making the claim?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Fibonacci Flim-Flam. should get you started

I'm not looking to get started.

 

The link only points out some of the false claims. I could pick apart some of the points made there if I wanted to kill some time.

 

BTW both fundamental and technical studies are full of false claims as well.

 

Science itself has had many things once thought to be true that are no longer or were outright exaggerations.

 

Fibs are just numbers after all but as I think I have posted previously numerous times on TL a Dow chart from the 1920's showing their effectiveness long before the crowd "discovered" them.

 

And others criticize them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

The mind is trapped in form.

If those ratios weren’t there, it’s not likely ‘we’ (Leonardo Pisano (who wasn’t really the first to discover fibs, etc), et al) would have ever ‘seen’ them…

 

Probably never realizing it - even to this day - Donald E. Simanek did not write a paper about the ratios. He wrote a paper about misguided ‘mystics’ still looking for the ‘formless’ in form… desperately looking for a language in the 'numbers' …

and they find it… but they find in it an incomplete symbology – like all languages …

He wrote a paper to desperately make sure he didn’t make the same mistake…

 

...and you might just be using that link to 'throw the baby out with the bath water'… ;)

 

 

In the markets, pure fibs sequences are the exception... exclusively focusing on 'fibs' , instead of the current dominant ratio 'cluster' (which is transitory and lasts... until it ends)

yields tradable 'precision' about 5% of the 'time'...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm not looking to get started.

 

The link only points out some of the false claims. I could pick apart some of the points made there if I wanted to kill some time.

 

BTW both fundamental and technical studies are full of false claims as well.

 

Science itself has had many things once thought to be true that are no longer or were outright exaggerations.

 

Fibs are just numbers after all but as I think I have posted previously numerous times on TL a Dow chart from the 1920's showing their effectiveness long before the crowd "discovered" them.

 

And others criticize them.

 

You could go back to a 1920's chart of the DOW and say buy and hold is pretty effective too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You could go back to a 1920's chart of the DOW and say buy and hold is pretty effective too.

If you hold ............ long enough anything works.

 

But fibs are about price and .............. time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This should really be very easy, but I can't find an article or video to walk me through it. I picked 20 ticker symbols where the stocks are in a tight trading range. I got them all into one list I call "Channel". I'd like to add several indicators that apply to all, such as MACD, volume, 3 moving averages. Then I'd like to scroll through the list, adding trendlines, or horizontal lines to mark the top & bottom of the price channel for each. Then set an alarm for a breakout in each direction that indicates a breakout. Could you point me to an article or video that walks me through how to do this? ...or give me the steps? Thank you, RichardV2, Experienced stock trader back before the Internet was invented.😁
    • The Economic Proscription of U.S. Farmers by China Maybe Forever   Similar to a black eye on the face, it’s placing an indelible imprint. The retaliatory levies by China over U.S. commodity producers, such as soybeans, which seem to be forever. The moment such happens for the market it becomes irreversible.   It’s a dread numerous farmers from North Dakota to Mississippi have recognized for as far back as last year. They worry that they’ve put millions in soybean development on account of China. Since Chinese focus is now transferred towards Brazil rather, that market might be gone forever.   Once the confidence merchants have in the U.S. declines as a steady provider because of the trade dispute, the more vital its important for them to support and further broaden other avenues.   The developing danger for American agribusiness presently is that a great part of the piece of the overall industry lost throughout the year will be hard or difficult to win back at any point shortly, the Boston Consulting Group said in a detailed analysis discharged on Wednesday.   This is for the most part because of long term contracts that are regularly recorded among purchasers and sellers, contingent upon the item. The lesson from the analysis shows that U.S. farmers need to turn out to be less reliant on China, and simply trust in the best concerning those customers organizing a rebound sooner or later.   For the time being, China is going to Australia, Brazil, New Zealand, Russia, and also for its domestic producers as an option in contrast to American developed crops and animal proteins.   From the detailed analysis: “The risk that U.S. agribusinesses may for all time lose foreign market share of the overall industry isn’t only hypothetical. In past trade disputes, for example, one with China including beef, the US has not recaptured its lost share. As a result of the increase of U.S. crops and food materials more costly than other choices, high duties bring down the price to merchants who plan to expand. Also, the fewer confidence merchants have in the US as a steady provider, in perspective on the potential for future trade disputes, the more important it progresses toward becoming for them to support and further expand. After some time, merchants could loosen up complex associations with suppliers from the U.S.”   China Receives Blames for the Pressure And this is so because China is important to American farmers. China purchased $19.5 billion in U.S. agricultural items as of 2017, representing 14% of exports of farm produce, in light of BCS analysis. In July 2018, China slammed a 25% levy on U.S. agricultural items.   Exports at that point declined by an incredible 53% for the year. While exports to China have declined also for this year, over past years free fall.   There is another motivation behind why some China customers may not come back to the U.S. China is extending its very own crop acreage, particularly for soybeans. After some time, China will turn out to be progressively independent. Except if request increases generously, China will purchase its very own soybeans, regulating export development and under control in any case.   “Individuals in the business were in a condition of cheerfulness, believing that a bargain would soon be reached,” says Michael McAdoo, associate, and related executive for BCS in Montreal. “Our analysis demonstrates that regardless of whether there is a bargain, there is worry that a similar volume won’t return. They need to try different markets,” he declared.   Source: https://learn2.trade 
    • Trade Dispute Responsible for China’s Overwhelming Gold Purchase Rate   China has included more than 100 tons of gold to its stores since it continued purchasing in December, fortifying its position as one of the significant authority collectors as national banks load up on the valuable metal.   The People’s Bank of China grabbed progressively gold a month ago, raising reserves to 62.64 million ounces in September from 62.45 million in August, as per information on its site. In tonnage terms, the most recent inflow sums 5.9 tons and comes in as an expansion of about 99.8 tons over the earlier nine months.   Bullion hit the most noteworthy in over six years in September as more slow development, the trade dispute and rate reductions prodded financial specialist request. National banks have been significant purchasers as well, particularly in developing markets. Administrative demands will probably proceed as protectionist strategies and geopolitical concerns add to the request, as forecasted by Suki Cooper, the valuable metals investigator at Standard Chartered Bank.   “With the stressed partnerships with the U.S., China requires support against its enormous possessions of the dollar, and gold serves that capacity,” said Howie Lee, a financial specialist at Singapore-based Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp. “As China turns into a superpower in its very own right, I anticipate progressively gold-purchases.”   China’s High Gold Appetite The PBOC’s continuos running of bullion-purchasing has come against the difficult setting of the trade dispute with the U.S. furthermore, a stamped lull in development at home. While high-level discussions are set to continue in Washington this week, Chinese authorities are flagging they’re progressively hesitant to consent to an expansive bargain.   Spot gold spiked to as much as 0.4% to $1,511.31 an ounce on Monday and exchanged at $1,505.84 in early London exchange. While the value declined 3.2% in September, they remain high at 17% this year. The PBOC information was discharged at the end of the week. Alongside China, Russia has additionally been including generous amounts of bullion. In the initial half-year, national banks overall got 374.1 tons, supporting the overall gold request to a three-year high, the World Gold Council declared.   While a tenth straight month of amassing, shows an unfaltering purchasing trend for the PBOC, China has in the past gone for significant stretches without uncovering moves for its gold possessions. At the point the national bank declared a 57% bounce in savings to 53.3 million ounces in mid-2015, that was the first update in quite a while.   Source: https://learn2.trade   
    • GBPJPY Reverses Its Sell-Off Around the Level at 130.75  OCTOBER 9, 2019  Azeez Mustapha  No Comments   GBPJPY Price Analysis – October 9 In the prior session, the pair closed lower for the second day in a row, but currently, the GBPJPY displays a weakness further downside of the pair while retaining its wider medium-term outlook by temporal reversal on the level at 130.75.   Key Levels Resistance Levels: 148.66, 137.80, 135.774 Support Levels: 130.75, 128.68, 126.54   GBPJPY Long term Trend: Bearish In the bigger picture, the GBPJPY consolidation structure is still forming from the technical support zone on the level at 126.54 low.   A further upward move may be recorded towards the level at 146.57 and 148.66 in an extension where its resistance is glaring before completing the structure. However, the overall trend remains bearish while displaying an intact downtrend in the medium and long-term.   GBPJPY Short term Trend: Bearish On the 4-hour time frame, its price is trading narrowly between the moving average 5 and 13 close to the key technical support level at 130.44.   As it is presently, the intraday bias in GBPJPY remains on the downside at this point where a corrective rebound from the level at 126.54 low should have completed. Meanwhile, its 4-hour RSI is bearish and pointing lower suggesting further weakness.   Source: https://learn2.trade 
    • USDCHF Breaks Below Its near Term Support Zone on the Level at 0.9926 but Recovers Abruptly USDCHF Price Analysis – October 8 The FX pair breaks below the horizontal zone on the level at 0.9926 but reverses again after recovering from its early selling pressure. The USDCHF was able to find buyers again around the level at 0.9908.   Key Levels   Resistance Levels: 1.0231, 1.0126, 1.0015   Support Levels: 0.9897, 0.9870, 0.9843   USDCHF Long term Trend: Ranging The price of the pair has moved back towards the moving average of 5 and 13 areas on the level at 0.9950. This area requires to be broken to give buyers more upside potential to move higher.   However, the decisive break of the level at 1.0231 is required to indicate bullish resumption. Meanwhile, the medium and longer-term may remain neutral first.   USDCHF Short term Trend: Bearish After trending downwards to about 50 pips lower after the open, the forex pair managed to reverse during the session as bulls took control and may exit the day above its opening price.   The USDCHF’s pull back from the level at 1.0015 extends lower today but stays well above the lower horizontal zone on the level at 0.9843 support. While still in a long-term uptrend, the short trends have turned bearish already.   Source: https://learn2.trade   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.