Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

dandxg

Order Flow Analytics

Recommended Posts

I was wondering if anyone had any feedback on this software. I posted here because it appears related to MP and MD and this forum gets a lot of views.

http://www.orderflowanalytics.com/Home.aspx

 

http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=OrderFlowAnalytics#g/u

 

It kind of reminds me of Market Delta, but seems a bit different. I had a hard time processing MD when I looked at, at least the footprint. Just too much going on.

 

Just curious if there is any feedback on OFA?

 

Good trading to all,

 

Dan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have looked at this software in the past and in the 1st and 2nd YouTube videos they make assumptions about market dynamics that are not the reality. This companies software can be useful for a trader to continue to understand the order flow process which is always a good thing....but some of there explained set ups have nothing to do with "retail" traders stuck holding inventory that is about to go 2 points underwater (hitting stops). What they did show in the second video of three was actually a level that had an "inventory grab" event. A large group of resting LONG inventory had been neutralized (shows as HEAVY sell side action as that LONG inventory went to neutral in a small several tick range) which many times will cause a pause in the market. As sellers that had sold inventory from HIGHER pricing levels have price trade down to lower zones of resting LONG inventory, they use this resting LONG inventory as the EXIT for the held sellers inventory from higher pricing levels. Sellers DRIVE price lower to the point where they can COVER OUT into the capitulating resting LONG inventory with minimal slippage. The market is constantly trading back and forth between zones of held resting INVENTORY....once I learned this, everything then made sense to me in the "Supply & Demand" driven markets.

 

I myself watch this exact same information, but I use Cumulative Delta bars specifically so I can INDEX the Delta Thresholds or Zones of resting inventory. I ALWAYS want to know WHERE are participants holding resting inventory and WHAT will they do as price trades back to these levels of resting inventory (what I call REAL support and resistance levels BACKED by some actual significant inventory). I also use the Cumulative Delta bars to track who is in control of the order flow at all times and when "order flow transitions" take place....learning how to track the "Supply & Demand" driven markets imo IS the ultimate edge.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

'Delta' is a term that has been coined to describe the difference between volume traded at bid and volume traded at ask. You can learn more about it at marketdelta.com. Investor RT (the charting package) has some stuff on it too. Cumulative delta just means that you are not resetting the delta (you are accumulating the net value). Some people reset it each bar (and look for divergences) some reset each session and use it as a proxy for order flow on the day. Yet others (like fulcrum) run it from the start of the contract using it almost like a proxy for open interest.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
'Delta' is a term that has been coined to describe the difference between volume traded at bid and volume traded at ask. You can learn more about it at marketdelta.com. Investor RT (the charting package) has some stuff on it too. Cumulative delta just means that you are not resetting the delta (you are accumulating the net value). Some people reset it each bar (and look for divergences) some reset each session and use it as a proxy for order flow on the day. Yet others (like fulcrum) run it from the start of the contract using it almost like a proxy for open interest.

 

Any delta indicators today are lier....:roll eyes:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
"Lies, damned lies, and statistics"

Benjamin Disraeli

 

"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics."

Mark Twain

 

A couple of my favourite quotes (though always forget who to attribute them to). I guess you know 83.4% of all statistics are made up on the spot :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
In Intraday prospective (the only I can manage ...) some divergences seem not respected.

 

Divergences are not the key aspect to track for using a method to track the "Supply & Demand" in the market.....the zones of actual resting inventory are the key component to learn and then track (then you will know where and when to use Divergence set ups....regular divergence, hidden divergence, or "inventory grab" set ups).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Who would give away a working ES strategy for peanuts if he has the key to print money nearly as the FED does?

 

I show how to track zones of resting inventory and what trade set ups are the most optimal as price trades between the zones of resting inventory.....it is still up to the individual trader to create their own success. I am not giving away anything that will ever take away from my opportunities in the market each day.....too many futures instruments and too much liquidity available.

 

The charts I put up show how important it can be to track zones of resting inventory and also how to track accumulation in the market during key events....not giving anything away that is not already tracked by much bigger groups in the market.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

FulcrumTrader, I' m following your posts from months.

With UrmaBlume' s posts I think you express some of the more interesting ideas of the last months in TL forum.

Anyway in yesterday (as in some other days) market dynamics from a CumulativeDelta only prospective there are a lot of question mark.(from MY point of view).

 

Let' s try to open a little the timeframe view for the ES.

 

You talk about a grab inventory event in the UE morning.

Probably I' m on a wrong assumption, but I' think in UE session begin the FESX leads the Market till the 13.00/13.30 CET when (usually) ES take again (in term of $/timeframe)

the leadership.

I think that +5k in the ES night session (institutional market) cannot balance the FESX Cumulative Delta persistence in the morning.

:confused: .. probably I need to use renko 0.75 bar visualization and buy your delta course ....:)

 

 

 

 

Divergences are not the key aspect to track for using a method to track the "Supply & Demand" in the market.....the zones of actual resting inventory are the key component to learn and then track (then you will know where and when to use Divergence set ups....regular divergence, hidden divergence, or "inventory grab" set ups).

Divergence2_ES.thumb.jpg.d1d8d710908c942e458459696bb3ec38.jpg

Divergence_FESX27112009.thumb.jpg.609af847baa13ea212fbcbce8bd21f34.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I show how to track zones of resting inventory and what trade set ups are the most optimal as price trades between the zones of resting inventory.....it is still up to the individual trader to create their own success. I am not giving away anything that will ever take away from my opportunities in the market each day.....too many futures instruments and too much liquidity available.

 

The charts I put up show how important it can be to track zones of resting inventory and also how to track accumulation in the market during key events....not giving anything away that is not already tracked by much bigger groups in the market.

Another legendary paper trading vendor.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
.BTW, there are MANY who know me personally in the trading community that will refute your false assumptions.

I suppose your videos are also false assumptions.

 

10 contracts in SIM. :roll eyes:

 

Carry on Mr. Vendor.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
No false assumptions at all....they show various set ups perfectly and FULLY WITHIN all NFA/CFTC current guidlines. ;)

I love when a vendor tries to explain why they never show real trades.

 

There is absolutely NOTHING in the CFTC/NFA regs that prevents anyone from showing live trades in a real, not sim, account. But, of course, you know that.

 

Good luck with your sim trading.

 

P.S. I think you should step up your sim size to 100 contracts. Be a heavy hitter. :haha:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

FulcrumTrader can you add some words to my questions?

 

i)Can you confirm FESX leads UE morning Market?

ii)An "inventory grab" event is more important than a persistent divergence of a different sign?

 

Thanks

 

P.S.Please ZOSO let the Vendor and the Buyer continue the conversation.

 

 

FulcrumTrader, I' m following your posts from months.

With UrmaBlume' s posts I think you express some of the more interesting ideas of the last months in TL forum.

Anyway in yesterday (as in some other days) market dynamics from a CumulativeDelta only prospective there are a lot of question mark.(from MY point of view).

 

Let' s try to open a little the timeframe view for the ES.

 

You talk about a grab inventory event in the UE morning.

Probably I' m on a wrong assumption, but I' think in UE session begin the FESX leads the Market till the 13.00/13.30 CET when (usually) ES take again (in term of $/timeframe)

the leadership.

I think that +5k in the ES night session (institutional market) cannot balance the FESX Cumulative Delta persistence in the morning.

:confused: .. probably I need to use renko 0.75 bar visualization and buy your delta course ....:)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
FulcrumTrader can you add some words to my questions?

 

i)Can you confirm FESX leads UE morning Market?

ii)An "inventory grab" event is more important than a persistent divergence of a different sign?

 

Thanks

 

P.S.Please ZOSO let the Vendor and the Buyer continue the conversation.

 

When the EU markets are trading live the DAX will frequently have the most impact on the ES movements during that period (in the after hours session for the ES market). Once the US pre-market "news release" time periods trade then at times you can see ES price movements lead other instruments according to the news reaction. There are also times when you will see the ES trade directionally while the Asian markets are trading flat (but the EU markets are not yet trading).....this will happen when some commercials are driving price to levels where they are willing to add more inventory to positions they have already started building previously. There are multiple ES behaviors/patterns in the after hours session possible according to the recent context of price/volume action.

 

Inventory Grab events can be greater or less prominant than an intraday or multi-day Delta Divergence....it usually comes down to the amount of inventory neutralized and how that held inventory zone was developed prior to getting fully neutralized. Before a trade day even starts, I already know what zones of resting inventory if neutralized will be very significant inventory grab events to trade from.

 

As far as compliance issues go, there are definitely guidlines that need to be followed when trading funds for others or for those who are a CTA (and who also provide trading education to included live trading of funds demonstrations for clients). Just last week I was talking with NFA reps in Las Vegas at the Online Trade Expo...I always like to know what their current "hot" issues are for compliance.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Are you a CTA? If so, what is your NFA number?

 

I do not currently utilize the CTA (setting that up for myself at this time though) but I do and have traded funds other than my own over the years. I am currently going through the set up process to trade funds in a manged futures arrangement as a CTA with a new fully automated system (based on Cumulative Delta).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Date: 26th April 2024. Alphabet Easily Beat Earnings Predictions But Focus Shifts to Today’s PCE Data. Microsoft and Alphabet’s earnings reports beat expectations pushing the NASDAQ to the top of the charts. The Bank of Japan keep interest rates unchanged applying pressure on the Japanese Yen. The Yen Index declines 0.36% and is down 40% against the USD over the past 5 years. The US GDP growth rate falls below its 2.5% expectations, reading 1.6%, but economists advise the Fed may only cut once in 2024! The market turns its attention to the Core PCE Price Index which analysts expect to fall from 2.8% to 2.6%. USA100 – Alphabet Easily Beat Analysts’ Earnings Predictions and Sees its P/E Ratio Fall! The price of the NASDAQ ended the day higher and rose to a slightly higher high. As a result, the index is close to forming a traditional bullish trend and making Wednesday’s decline a retracement or medium-term correction. In terms technical analysis, indicators are mainly indicating a reverting price condition where the asset cannot maintain longer term momentum. However, momentum indications provide a slight bullish bias. The upward price movement is being driven by earnings reports from Microsoft and Alphabet which beat earnings expectations. Microsoft is the most influential stock for the NASDAQ while Alphabet is the third most influential. Alphabet’s earnings beat expectations by 21.61% and revenue rose more than $6 billion. As a result, the price of the stock rose 11.56% after market close. Furthermore, Microsoft’s Earnings Per Share beat Wall Street’s expectations by 3.40% and revenue by 1.50%. The stock rose by 4.30% after market close and is close to trading at the all-time high. However, investors should note that from the “magnificent 7”, Alphabet and Meta have the lowest Price to Earnings ratio. Meaning these stocks are the most likely to be trading below their intrinsic value. However, investors should note that negatives for the stock market in general remain. This also supports the bias shown by technical analysis. The GDP growth rate fell considerably below expectations while inflation data continues to show signs of rising prices. Investors will closely be monitoring today’s Core PCE Price Index which is the most watched index by the Federal Reserve. Analysts expect the Core PCE Price Index to fall from 2.8% to 2.6%. If the index reads more than 0.3%, a rate cut will become unlikely making stocks less attractive. Whereas, if the PCE Price Index is not as high as expectations, Bond Yields will likely decline, as will the US Dollar and a rate cut will be put back on the table. As a result, investors may look to take advantage of the strong earnings and continue purchasing stocks. USDJPY – BOJ Hold Interest Rates Unchanged! The price of the USDJPY exchange rate again rose to an all-time recent high after increasing in value for 3 consecutive days. Trend and momentum-based indicators point towards a higher price. However, the exchange rate is trading within the overbought range of most oscillators and is also showing a divergence pattern. Both are known to indicate a decline, but not necessarily a complete change of trend. The Bank of Japan’s statement from earlier this morning was largely “dovish” and gave no clear indication that the central bank wishes to keep rising interest rates. However, shortly the Governor will answer questions from journalists and may give a more hawkish tone. Either way, investors are mainly concentrating on if the Federal Government will again opt to intervene within the currency market. Most economists believe the intervention will only come if the USD continues to rise and it will not be before the Core PCE Price Index. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business. Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar. Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding on how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE! Click HERE to READ more Market news. Michalis Efthymiou Market Analyst HFMarkets Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in FX and CFDs products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • 📁 Population in 2100, as projected by UN Population Division.   🇮🇳 India: 1,533 million 🇨🇳 China: 771 million 🇳🇬 Nigeria: 546 million 🇵🇰 Pakistan: 487 million 🇨🇩 Congo: 431 million 🇺🇸 US: 394 million 🇪🇹 Ethiopia: 323 million 🇮🇩 Indonesia: 297 million 🇹🇿 Tanzania: 244 million 🇪🇬 Egypt: 205 million 🇧🇷 Brazil: 185 million 🇵🇭 Philippines: 180 million 🇧🇩 Bangladesh: 177 million 🇳🇪 Niger: 166 million 🇸🇩 Sudan: 142 million 🇦🇴 Angola: 133 million 🇺🇬 Uganda: 132 million 🇲🇽 Mexico: 116 million 🇰🇪 Kenya: 113 million 🇷🇺 Russia: 112 million 🇮🇶 Iraq: 111 million 🇦🇫 Afghanistan: 110 million   @FinancialWorldUpdates Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/   
    • “If the West finds itself falling behind in AI, it won’t be due to a lack of technological prowess or resources. It won’t be because we weren’t smart enough or didn’t move fast enough. It will be because of something many of our Eastern counterparts don’t share with us: fear of AI.   The root of the West's fear of AI can no doubt be traced back to decades of Hollywood movies and books that have consistently depicted AI as a threat to humanity. From the iconic "Terminator" franchise to the more recent "Ex Machina," we have been conditioned to view AI as an adversary, a force that will ultimately turn against us.   In contrast, Eastern cultures have a WAY different attitude towards AI. As UN AI Advisor Neil Sahota points out, "In Eastern culture, movies, and books, they've always seen AI and robots as helpers and assistants, as a tool to be used to further the benefit of humans."   This positive outlook on AI has allowed countries like Japan, South Korea, and China to forge ahead with AI development, including in areas like healthcare, where AI is being used to improve the quality of services.   The West's fear of AI is not only shaping public opinion but also influencing policy decisions and regulatory frameworks. The European Union, for example, recently introduced AI legislation prioritizing heavy-handed protection over supporting innovation.   While such measures might be well-intentioned, they risk stifling AI development and innovation, making it harder for Western companies and researchers to compete.   Among the nations leading common-sense AI regulation, one stands out for now: Singapore.” – Chris C Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • $NFLX Netflix stock hold at 556.59 support or breakdown?  https://stockconsultant.com/?NFLX
    • $RDNT Radnet stock flat top breakout watch, https://stockconsultant.com/?RDNT
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.