Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Recommended Posts

Is anyone familiar with the wolfe wave?

 

The YM and NQ are showing pretty classic examples.

 

Here is a daily chart of YM, the up-trending blue line is the target line.

 

This is a high probability pattern in a ranging market, which YM certainly is in after the expanding pattern over the past 2 months.

 

If you are not familiar with the wolfe wave, google it - it is an effective pattern that happens frequently.

 

Any comments?

Wolfe.jpg.13c84a291f51726862ff5d5c88f3f5d1.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

nice, compare this chart to the bottom of pg 123 of Street Smarts book... they are basically identical. buy the reversal with a stop under this low is the trading strategy associated with it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah it's a 12345 with the target line connecting 1 and 4. I think Rasche called it 3 indians, but bill wolfe coined the pattern originally. His site might be the best place to investigate it.

Understanding how this pattern works, the dynamics behind it, can spark some really interesting insights on how markets work.

This is a killer trade when it sets up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I still don't get it, the pivot 3-4 from the chart must be in the channel. There is no channel unless 2 lows and 2 highs are made. So 1 & 3 must exist to draw a line, so does 2 & 4. I got this rule from investopedia but does't make sense. I think this pattern is classified are broadening pattern in the classical TA.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Torero, google "wolfe wave" to learn the pattern. Technically I would call it a descending wedge.

 

Point 2 is the recent high. Point five is the bar from friday, which penetrated the 1-3 line.

 

The target line is 1-4. Sorry, I should have labeled this chart better.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
When you start looking for these, they appear all over. ER2 just completed one, check it out....

 

Line 1-4 is the target line

 

Ok, I see it. In classical TS, this is a rising wedge which usually means a quick bearish drop is imminent (if you draw the line from point 2 through point 4 along with 1 through 3, you'll see the wedge). This wedge has a target of going back to point 2. This is all in Edwards and Magee's book, very well explained.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Torero, you are correct about the rising wedge. Wolfe goes deeper than the wedge though. What happens is that the rising wedge is rejected and the market creates a target for itself when the geometry gets skewed.

 

I am not the best instructor, but there is info out there on this pattern. If you are a visually oriented trader, this is a very valuable pattern to know.

Guarantee you the professionals see this, it is a contrarian pattern so creates a quick and powerful move.

 

The trick is to be able to see it developing as it happens.

 

Here is another guy who sees it and understands. Bill Wolfe doesn't use fibs, and I don't think you need to either.

http://blog.fxinstructor.com/august-1-2007-ny-live-trading-room-summary/

 

Go to Bill Wolfe's site to learn the pattern, if you google you will find it.

 

If YM holds this morning's lows (and the 1-3 line), then this pattern is set to run. The target is a good 800 points higher. Closing above today's open would be a good first confirmation, above Friday's high would be another.

 

The weekly ER2 chart I posted shows the power of this pattern as it is completed! Target hit perfectly. In consolidation patterns you start seeing these all over the place...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ok, I see it. In classical TS, this is a rising wedge which usually means a quick bearish drop is imminent (if you draw the line from point 2 through point 4 along with 1 through 3, you'll see the wedge). This wedge has a target of going back to point 2. This is all in Edwards and Magee's book, very well explained.

 

 

And if you want to sprinkle in some Elliott Wave into this...

 

the rising wedge will only appear at the end of the 5th wave. If you're in the 5th wave and you start seeing overlapping subwaves, this is where doing the Wolfe projections can really pay off. These subwaves will only be 3 wave patterns...thus all the overlapping. Like you said, the drop that occurs after a rising wedge can be very sharp and quick.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It really only works in a consolidation phase of the market. I believe point one is supposed to be the first pivot in the range, then point 2 is an attempt at a new high/low, which would fail (confirming range), then point 3 is a low below point 1 which also fails....

 

Basically it is a pattern whipsawing a lot of people, the more the better.

 

When there is momentum in a market, like there is here, the range is broken and price inverts into a larger wave rather than staying in a range.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's another one that I was watching in the RUT. Pretty shallow but effective.

 

There are some important rules for this trade, but if they are satisfied the % profitable is very good. Best used in a non trending market.

 

#5 was the fakeout/failure

 

Connecting a line between #1 and #4 gave the target

5aa70e01bb89f_WWRussell2k.jpg.85df35c2a16bc484f6f0836b30b6a53d.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If my understanding is correct point 5 can be outside the 1-3 line (even preferable). If that is the case do you wait for some trigger (reversal bar or something) to confirm point 5 and enter?

 

Cheers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's one I just took in ES. This is a 3 min chart.

 

The one point was a little tricky to notice. The important thing to note is that the 1 pt. occurred in congestion. It was actually an inverse point, the momentum that broke out of the contracting pattern started wave 1.

 

The target line was drawn between pts. 1 and 4. The trigger line was drawn using pts. 1 and 3. Entry was near pt. 5. If you just took a breakout it was worth 2 pts.

 

I took this trade because of a variety of factors; Lack of intraday trend, ER2 under-performance indicated that an uptrend was unlikely, range would continue. If you look at the volume on the bars I circled, you can tell the story and see where people got psyched out.

 

Probably would have been good to watch the TICK or TIKI to look for extremes.

 

Again, you had to have a trained eye to catch that pt. #1. Looking at balance and wave dynamics helps.

Wolfe1029.jpg.8acab460b007ed7ad1542492c49e4c89.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think I have had a mini :lightbulb: moment. (Where's the bulb emoticon when you need it). Just kind of ties in with a couple of things that I had observed for myself and had even started to trade. I love market geometry its just so cool (when it works). Wouldn't mind seeing the odd failure too, lots to be leant from them.

 

Cheers.

 

EDIT: Yes the 1 point is kind of tricky

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just for fun I drew a couple of lines from what to my eye where more obvious potential one points. (bear in mind I am a chanell man at heart) Both 'work' but give an overshoot on 5. Am I right in thinking overshooting 5 is allowable and actually quite desirable?

 

Any comments on the other potential 1's?

 

Cheers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah ha! you have a pretty good grasp on market geometry! What you have identified is a balance point that those lines are shooting through.

Your point #1 is equally valid, I was being conservative with my point#1. In essence, my point#1 gave the first target, the other 2 you had were the next targets.

Personal preference note:

My 1-3 line was downward sloping for a bullish target. I like these wedge failures.

 

Do you use Andrew's lines, Blowfish?

 

Also - there's a great book on channelling by a guy named M. Parsons called Channel-Surfing. A cheesy cover but very good book.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

hey guys,

 

I am new to this posting thing so please bear with me if I don't get it quite right the first time (trying to become a reformed 'lurker').

 

I am very intrigued by Wolfe Waves, and been trying to learn about them for the past few days. I would like to post a 4 minute chart on todays YM. The 4 minute TF is new for me (usually use 1 & 2 min), but wanted to try something new - swings instead of scalps maybe. I drew this WW in real time on the 1120 (central) bar. As indicated on the chart, 13840 looked like a good entry so I entered a limit order at that level. Based on the WW that I drew, I realize that looks to be a bit early/high, however, it looked like I would only take about 9-10 ticks of heat on the failure of this pattern. As it turned out, it missed me by 2 ticks, no big deal as I was happy that I was able to see this in real time and it appeared to be a valid pattern to me, UNLESS....my perceptions on this particular chart are completely wrong.

 

I have some limited experience with various markets but I consider myself a beginner at trading and I would be grateful for any feedback on this.

 

Thank you very much,

VV

5aa70e17b98e2_YM12-0710_30_2007(4Min).thumb.jpg.2baed54413f15aa1eed65d77864ff25a.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There was a pattern here, but unfortunately you didn't see it according to the chart you posted.

 

If you use a conservative entry, the trade was not activated since the cyan line went unbroken. If you fade the entry this was a pattern failure.

 

It was a pretty ugly one all around. If point 5 would have appeared a little earlier it probably would have worked. The target line was the line connecting 1 and 4.

 

I advise you to go to wolfe's website and study the pattern again.

5aa70e17be18c_YMon1030.jpg.c1bb2230c525ec64fc5ed8e46fb631c3.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I used to use pitchforks a year or two back they are a phenomenal tool. In the end I went back to using plain old hand drawn lines - channels in particular. They just 'speak to me' more i think.

 

Vae I wont comment on Wolfe as all I know is what I have read that is freely available. The thing is once you start to see geometry its everywhere, Then the tools don't matter so much its just a question of using them consistently.

 

You mention balance points Wave, ....ever come across a guy called Michael Parsons?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Parsons is an good guy and hard working teacher. He has an excellent book on channel trading which I would recommend to any visual type trader...

 

Potential pattern developing in ER2. A volatile reversal off of the magenta line would spell a move to the yellow line. Lowered volatility and drifting lower means the pattern is not valid and a move lower to about 772. Blue line is currently support. I'll post this same chart later to see how it all works out.

 

The lines below are just volume and a jurik MA of volume.

5aa70e1887722_ER2potentialWW.thumb.jpg.6e3b50b35f0a02ab6d62d7d29f391fa7.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.