Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Recommended Posts

Here is a 'very inexpensive' alternative to Juriks Moving Average contributed in Easy Language by John D. McCormick (TS handle = JDM, see jmactrader.com).

 

Moving Averages are used to remove noise. By “noise” is meant the apparently random motion up and down of the prices around their average price. This shows up on a moving average as a jagged appearance on an otherwise smooth line. The jaggedness can trigger false buy and sell signals or simply make the indicator hard to read, so we try to smooth out the average, i.e. remove the noise.

 

Lagging or lateness is the bane of moving averages. You make them longer (average in more bars) and the moving average is smoother, but now it lags way behind the actual price movement.

 

The ideal moving average should filter out noise and respond quickly – and – it would be a plus if it was fast calculating. That’s kind of like having your cake and eating it too.

 

Nevertheless, here’s one, I call it Quick MA, that seems to work as well as any I’ve seen.

 

Full thread is at https://www.tradestation.com/Discussions/Topic.aspx?Topic_ID=77583&SearchTerm=a%20better%20moving%20average&txtExactMatch=

Posted with his permission. Please retain his 'copyright' info in the code. Many thanks to JDM.

QUICK.ELD

Edited by zdo
add TS link, etc

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And here is the source in readable text

 

Indicator

 

//
//	Plots a fractional-bar Quick Moving Average 
//	with the option to select gapless daily opens.
//
//	copyright 2008 John McCormick jmactrader.com
//
//	feel free to copy and use this code royalty free
//	as long as it retains the above acknowledge
//

inputs:
Price(Close),
Quick_Length(9),
displace(0),
gapless(0);	// set gap to a non-zero value to skip over opening daily gaps

Var: Length(maxlist(1,Quick_Length));

// GapLess

Vars:			// gapless O,H,L,C where O=C[1]
RelO(0),
RelH(0),
RelL(0),
RelC(0),
gap(0),
Accum(0),
WtMean(0);

if date<>date[1] then begin
gap		=	O-C[1];
Accum	=	Accum+gap;
end;

RelO	=	O-Accum;
RelC	=	C-Accum;
RelH	=	H-Accum;
RelL	=	L-Accum;

			// Gapless bars - end

WtMean = (RelH+RelL+RelC)/3;

// End Gapless

if gapless=0 
then plot1[displace](FMA_Smooth(price,length),"FMA_Quick")
else plot1[displace](FMA_Smooth(RelC,length)+accum,"FMA_Quick");

 

 

Function

 

//  generates very smooth and responsive moving average
// 	copyright 2008 John McCormick  jmactrader.com
//	feel free to copy and use this code royalty free 
//  as long as you don't remove the above acknowledgement
//		

Inputs: 
Price(numericseries), 
Length(numericsimple);

Vars:
j(0),
workinglen(maxlist(1,absvalue(Length))),
peak(workinglen/3),
tot(0),
divisor(0);

Array:
val[100](0);

if workinglen>100 then workinglen=100;  //  use larger array to handle lengths over 100


tot=0;
divisor=0;
for j=1 to floor(workinglen+1) begin
if j<=peak then val[j]=j/peak
else val[j]=(workinglen+1-j)/(workinglen+1-peak);
tot=tot+price[j-1]*val[j];
divisor=divisor+val[j];
end;
if divisor<>0 then FMA_smooth=tot/divisor;

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is a comparison of JurikMA (cyan) and QuickMA (yellow)

 

The arrows show spots where JMA beat QMA to the turn

(Note, though, there may be instances off this chart where QMA leads JMA)

Enjoy

compareQuickVsJurik.thumb.jpg.a61a5b9f770463c292075d4b4c285b4e.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow! Here's the best I could do in that same time period (6/4 YM 1 min).

 

I'm very impressed by how smooth both of those are.

 

There's three in this pic: the light blue was my attempt at smoothing the thin pink one. The other thin pink one was another smooth attempt but it wasn't good.

 

Those up there are very, very smooth.

5aa70e8cad01c_fastmas.thumb.jpg.31b81e042922b635185619ed41e84636.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
zdo, your graph show the Quick MA as yellow, and "AMA" as cyan... not JMA. Can you post another graph that have the QuickMA, AMA and JMA on 1 graph?

 

Thanks

 

rurimoon,

 

Yellow is QuickMA

Cyan is really Jurik

(through the 90's it was the only adaptive mov avg I considered, hence the indicator label of "AMA" … (and obviously) it uses JMA function)

TS has an AdaptiveMovingAverage built in (Kaufman’s) but I would be afraid to even allow it to open on my screen …seriously and ;)

If you have TS you can try it... if not let me know and I will take some serious pain medication ;) and put up a comparison. Keep in mind though that the kaufman effectively just 'dynamically' varies the length parameter via a stochastic rather than actually doing the 'phasing and whatever' that more recent ama do...

hth

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

zdo or any other who has QuickMA with Tradestation, can you post a chart of the recent ES or YM with QuickMA(9) and possibly HMA(9) on it?

I translated the code to ninjascript but I don't have tradestation to vertify if my code is right or not. I don't think my code is right.

 

It would be great if you post a recent chart so that I can compare my QuickMA in Ninjatrader with yours. Please tell me if below value match.

 

ES0309 on Jan23,5min chart,

11:00amCT: Price close: 815.50, QMA(9) 819.87

11:05amCT: Price close: 817.25, QMA(9) 819.15

11:10amCT: Price close: 816.50, QMA(9) 818.36

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is my chart:

 

es030912320095mintg2.jpg

 

The blue line is my QuickMA and red line is HMA. As you can see, my QuickMA is nowhere as fast as HMA, so I think I may be coding it wrong.. and I need to make sure...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Rurimoon,

I don't have TradeStation anymore, but I've converted the QuickMA code from EL and got the exact numbers as you did for the 5min ES. Here's a scrrenshot with my conversion of the QuickMA along with HMA and a conversion I did from what is "supposed to be" JMA converted from Metatrader.

 

Magenta is HMA

Blue is the converted QuickMA

Black is the converted JMA

 

 

VT

MAcomparison.thumb.png.69216c8e1ac856d586cb885f07930b6d.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks to verifying for me. I have always though that QuickMA should be at least on pair with HMA so I don't believe in my coding skill when I see that it lag behind so much. I am in the process of converting JMA from metatrader to ninjascript also. The problem is I have find at least 5 different version of JMA in Metatrader and I have no idea which one produce more accurate result with the real JMA. Can you tell me which version of JMA from metatrader that you are using? (Of course it would be best if you can share your code :)

 

P.S. I have a version of JMA in metatrader that is so cheesy, it has at least 50 variable defined. Basically it change its formula base on which period it used... the code has so many if then else statement that I wonder how long it takes the coder to fine tune all those numbers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Find attached screenshot with

Red = Hull

White = Quick

Blue = Jma

 

All set to 4 periods

 

Hull definitely turns faster

Jma definitely goes flat faster and more smoothly than the other two (and that is about the only utility for mov avgs I have)

Quick came along for free so I shared it for ppl who don’t like to buy closed source products etc.

 

ie best one depends on your own distinctive needs.

 

hth

 

PS rurimoon re "Basically it change its formula base on which period it used"

That particular one is not it... :hmpf:

compareQuikJmaHull.thumb.jpg.3eb8b195d38ebca04c65b69dc8268e43.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Find attached screenshot with

Red = Hull

White = Quick

Blue = Jma

 

All set to 4 periods

 

Hull definitely turns faster

Jma definitely goes flat faster and more smoothly than the other two (and that is about the only utility for mov avgs I have)

Quick came along for free so I shared it for ppl who don’t like to buy closed source products etc.

 

ie best one depends on your own distinctive needs.

 

hth

 

PS rurimoon re "Basically it change its formula base on which period it used"

That particular one is not it... :hmpf:

 

Thanks for posting that chart. Would you mind posting another one with the MAs overlaid over the candles, too? I want to see how price bars interact with the MAs.

 

Thanks!

 

btw did something happen to this thread? I got like 50 emails that there were new replies but there was really only one new reply.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thanks for posting that chart. Would you mind posting another one with the MAs overlaid over the candles, too? I want to see how price bars interact with the MAs.

 

 

1st one approx same as time shown above.

2nd one from today... hth

masOverLaid0127.thumb.jpg.ae12a194527ee33f4ecbc2f41f66604d.jpg

masOverPrice.thumb.jpg.c09b41b4568f30cea1195019fa115644.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • also ... and barely on topic... Winners (always*) overpay. Buying the dips is a subscription to the belief that winners win by underpaying - when in actuality winners (inevitably/always*) win by overpaying... it’s amazing the percentage of traders who think winners win by underpaying ... “Winners (always*) overpay.” ...  One way to implement this ‘belief’ is to only reenter when prices have emphatically resumed the 'trend' .   (Fwiw, While “Winners (always*) overpay.” holds true in most endeavors (relationships, business, sports, etc...) - “Winners (always*) overpay.”  is especially true for auctions... continuous auctions included.)
    • re:  "Does it make sense to always buy the dips?  “Buy the dip.”  You hear this all the time in crypto investing trading speculation gambling. [zdo taking some liberties] It refers, of course, to buying more bitcoin (or digital assets) when they go down in price: when the price “dips.” Some people brag about “buying the dip," showing they know better than the crowd. Others “buy the dip” as an investment strategy: they’re getting a bargain. The problem is, buying the dip is a fallacy. You can’t buy the dip, because you can't see the total dip until much later. First, I’ll explain this in a way that will make it simple and obvious to you; then I’ll show you a better way of investing. You Only Know the Dip in Hindsight When people talk about “buying the dip,” what they’re really saying is, “I bought when the price was going down.” " ... example of a dip ... 
    • Date: 19th April 2024. Weekly Commodity Market Update: Oil Prices Correct and Supply Concerns Persist.   The ongoing developments in the Middle East sparked a wave of risk aversion and fueled supply concerns and investors headed for safety. Hopes for imminent rate cuts from the Federal Reserve diminish while attention is now turning towards the demand outlook. The Gold price hit a high of $2417.89 per ounce overnight. Sentiment has already calmed down again and bullion is trading at $2376.50 per ounce as haven flows ease. Oil prices initially moved higher as concern over escalating tensions with the WTI contract hit a session high of $85.508 per barrel overnight, before correcting to currently $81.45 per barrel. Oil Prices Under Pressure Amid Middle East Tensions Last week, commodity indexes showed little movement, with Oil prices undergoing a slight correction. Meanwhile, Gold reached yet another record high, mirroring the upward trend in cocoa prices. Once again today, USOil prices experienced a correction and has remained under pressure, retesting the 50-day EMA at $81.00 as we moving into the weekend. Hence, despite the Israel’s retaliatory strike on Iran, sentiments stabilized following reports suggesting a measured response aimed at avoiding further escalation. Brent crude futures witnessed a more than 4% leap, driven by concerns over potential disruptions to oil supplies in the Middle East, only to subsequently erase all gains. Similarly with USOIL, UKOIL hovers just below $87 per barrel, marginally below Thursday’s closing figures. Nevertheless, volatility is expected to continue in the market as several potential risks loom:   Disruption to the Strait of Hormuz: The possibility of Iran disrupting navigation through the vital shipping lane, is still in play. The Strait of Hormuz serves as the Persian Gulf’s primary route to international waters, with approximately 21 million barrels of oil passing through daily. Recent events, including Iran’s seizure of an Israel-linked container ship, underscore the geopolitical sensitivity of the region. Tougher Sanctions on Iran: Analysts speculate that the US may impose stricter sanctions on Iranian oil exports or intensify enforcement of existing restrictions. With global oil consumption reaching 102 million barrels per day, Iran’s production of 3.3 million barrels remains significant. Recent actions targeting Venezuelan oil highlight the potential for increased pressure on Iranian exports. OPEC Output Increases: Despite the desire for higher prices, OPEC members such as Saudi Arabia and Russia have constrained output in recent years. However, sustained crude prices above $100 per barrel could prompt concerns about demand and incentivize increased production. The OPEC may opt to boost oil output should tensions escalate further and prices surge. Ukraine Conflict: Amidst the focus on the Middle East, markets overlooking Russia’s actions in Ukraine. Potential retaliatory strikes by Kyiv on Russian oil infrastructure could impact exports, adding further complexity to global oil markets.   Technical Analysis USOIL is marking one of the steepest weekly declines witnessed this year after a brief period of consolidation. The breach below the pivotal support level of 84.00, coupled with the descent below the mid of the 4-month upchannel, signals a possible shift in market sentiment towards a bearish trend reversal. Adding to the bearish outlook are indications such as the downward slope in the RSI. However, the asset still hold above the 50-day EMA which coincides also with the mid of last year’s downleg, with key support zone at $80.00-$81.00. If it breaks this support zone, the focus may shift towards the 200-day EMA and 38.2% Fib. level at $77.60-$79.00. Conversely, a rejection of the $81 level and an upside potential could see the price returning back to $84.00. A break of the latter could trigger the attention back to the December’s resistance, situated around $86.60. A breakthrough above this level could ignite a stronger rally towards the $89.20-$90.00 zone. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business. Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar. Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding on how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE! Click HERE to READ more Market news. Michalis Efthymiou Market Analyst HMarkets Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past perfrmance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in FX and CFDs products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • Date: 18th April 2024. Market News – Stock markets benefit from Dollar correction. Economic Indicators & Central Banks:   Technical buying, bargain hunting, and risk aversion helped Treasuries rally and unwind recent losses. Yields dropped from the recent 2024 highs. Asian stock markets strengthened, as the US Dollar corrected in the wake of comments from Japan’s currency chief Masato Kanda, who said G7 countries continue to stress that excessive swings and disorderly moves in the foreign exchange market were harmful for economies. US Stockpiles expanded to 10-month high. The data overshadowed the impact of geopolitical tensions in the Middle East as traders await Israel’s response to Iran’s unprecedented recent attack. President Joe Biden called for higher tariffs on imports of Chinese steel and aluminum.   Financial Markets Performance:   The USDIndex stumbled, falling to 105.66 at the end of the day from the intraday high of 106.48. It lost ground against most of its G10 peers. There wasn’t much on the calendar to provide new direction. USDJPY lows retesting the 154 bottom! NOT an intervention yet. BoJ/MoF USDJPY intervention happens when there is more than 100+ pip move in seconds, not 50 pips. USOIL slumped by 3% near $82, as US crude inventories rose by 2.7 million barrels last week, hitting the highest level since last June, while gauges of fuel demand declined. Gold strengthened as the dollar weakened and bullion is trading at $2378.44 per ounce. Market Trends:   Wall Street closed in the red after opening with small corrective gains. The NASDAQ underperformed, slumping -1.15%, with the S&P500 -0.58% lower, while the Dow lost -0.12. The Nikkei closed 0.2% higher, the Hang Seng gained more than 1. European and US futures are finding buyers. A gauge of global chip stocks and AI bellwether Nvidia Corp. have both fallen into a technical correction. The TMSC reported its first profit rise in a year, after strong AI demand revived growth at the world’s biggest contract chipmaker. The main chipmaker to Apple Inc. and Nvidia Corp. recorded a 9% rise in net income, beating estimates. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business. Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar. Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding on how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE! Click HERE to READ more Market news. Andria Pichidi Market Analyst HFMarkets Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in FX and CFDs products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • Date: 17th April 2024. Market News – Appetite for risk-taking remains weak. Economic Indicators & Central Banks:   Stocks, Treasury yields and US Dollar stay firmed. Fed Chair Powell added to the recent sell off. His slightly more hawkish tone further priced out chances for any imminent action and the timing of a cut was pushed out further. He suggested if higher inflation does persist, the Fed will hold rates steady “for as long as needed.” Implied Fed Fund: There remains no real chance for a move on May 1 and at their intraday highs the June implied funds rate future showed only 5 bps, while July reflected only 10 bps. And a full 25 bps was not priced in until November, with 38 bps in cuts seen for 2024. US & EU Economies Diverging: Lagarde says ECB is moving toward rate cuts – if there are no major shocks. UK March CPI inflation falls less than expected. Output price inflation has started to nudge higher, despite another decline in input prices. Together with yesterday’s higher than expected wage numbers, the data will add to the arguments of the hawks at the BoE, which remain very reluctant to contemplate rate cuts. Canada CPI rose 0.6% in March, double the 0.3% February increase BUT core eased. The doors are still open for a possible cut at the next BoC meeting on June 5. IMF revised up its global growth forecast for 2024 with inflation easing, in its new World Economic Outlook. This is consistent with a global soft landing, according to the report. Financial Markets Performance:   USDJPY also inched up to 154.67 on expectations the BoJ will remain accommodative and as the market challenges a perceived 155 red line for MoF intervention. USOIL prices slipped -0.15% to $84.20 per barrel. Gold rose 0.24% to $2389.11 per ounce, a new record closing high as geopolitical risks overshadowed the impacts of rising rates and the stronger dollar. Market Trends:   Wall Street waffled either side of unchanged on the day amid dimming rate cut potential, rising yields, and earnings. The major indexes closed mixed with the Dow up 0.17%, while the S&P500 and NASDAQ lost -0.21% and -0.12%, respectively. Asian stock markets mostly corrected again, with Japanese bourses underperforming and the Nikkei down -1.3%. Mainland China bourses were a notable exception and the CSI 300 rallied 1.4%, but the MSCI Asia Pacific index came close to erasing the gains for this year. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business. Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar. Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding on how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE! Click HERE to READ more Market news. Andria Pichidi Market Analyst HFMarkets Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in FX and CFDs products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.vvvvvvv
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.