Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

ValueTrader

HFT from a Central Bank Perspective

Recommended Posts

interesting - good find.

 

I did find it interesting that their idea of price discovery was meant to be fundamentally based and that those applying technicals or other ideas might not be welcome (a general summary)

When you think most markets need speculators to take the opposite positions to people it does make you wonder..... next time you look at the charts - have a fundamental reason why as well just to be sure! :)

I think the person nailed it - while HFT has many forms, HFT in some predatory disruptive forms will likely be banned, moderated, regulated. Trader IDs might make them more accountable and hence might be all that is needed.

Maybe they had best look at the culprits that allow this - the exchanges.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
interesting - good find.

 

I did find it interesting that their idea of price discovery was meant to be fundamentally based and that those applying technicals or other ideas might not be welcome (a general summary)

.

 

My personal view on technicals is that they (the levels) are created by opinions on fundamentals. But that's a discussion for another time!

 

When they Author lists & defines all the underhanded goings on, It really does show trading up for what it is...Swimming with sharks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
My personal view on technicals is that they (the levels) are created by opinions on fundamentals. But that's a discussion for another time!

 

yes....but then you kind of get into the Efficient markets debate - totally unrelated to HFT and speculation......personally I am happy to be wrong in my opinion of the fundamentals but right in how i trade other opinions. :) - another thread topic.

 

When they Author lists & defines all the underhanded goings on, It really does show trading up for what it is...Swimming with sharks.

 

always has been - technology has changed, the participants have changed the underlying drivers remain the same!

It has always amazed me that people in the markets often think that other participants are there as a charity - While many may end up giving that is certainly not their intention.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Kittyraj

Stocks haven’t done anything in several days. Although this may seem like an overall neutral event, I see it as bearish. The S&P made a new intraday high while most other major indices did not. Instead of resolving this divergence with a surge higher to bring the other indices to new highs as well, the market has instead gone flat. It’s not good to reach a critical level, diverge, then go flat. In addition, there is no volume at these levels. I can’t calculate government tinkering, but on the surface, the evidence I just listed combined with the daily MACD, and other momentum indicators, rolling over and a subtle reversal candle that has held for over a week tell me the next big move in stocks should be down.

 

regards

kitty

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • 📁 Population in 2100, as projected by UN Population Division.   🇮🇳 India: 1,533 million 🇨🇳 China: 771 million 🇳🇬 Nigeria: 546 million 🇵🇰 Pakistan: 487 million 🇨🇩 Congo: 431 million 🇺🇸 US: 394 million 🇪🇹 Ethiopia: 323 million 🇮🇩 Indonesia: 297 million 🇹🇿 Tanzania: 244 million 🇪🇬 Egypt: 205 million 🇧🇷 Brazil: 185 million 🇵🇭 Philippines: 180 million 🇧🇩 Bangladesh: 177 million 🇳🇪 Niger: 166 million 🇸🇩 Sudan: 142 million 🇦🇴 Angola: 133 million 🇺🇬 Uganda: 132 million 🇲🇽 Mexico: 116 million 🇰🇪 Kenya: 113 million 🇷🇺 Russia: 112 million 🇮🇶 Iraq: 111 million 🇦🇫 Afghanistan: 110 million   @FinancialWorldUpdates Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/   
    • “If the West finds itself falling behind in AI, it won’t be due to a lack of technological prowess or resources. It won’t be because we weren’t smart enough or didn’t move fast enough. It will be because of something many of our Eastern counterparts don’t share with us: fear of AI.   The root of the West's fear of AI can no doubt be traced back to decades of Hollywood movies and books that have consistently depicted AI as a threat to humanity. From the iconic "Terminator" franchise to the more recent "Ex Machina," we have been conditioned to view AI as an adversary, a force that will ultimately turn against us.   In contrast, Eastern cultures have a WAY different attitude towards AI. As UN AI Advisor Neil Sahota points out, "In Eastern culture, movies, and books, they've always seen AI and robots as helpers and assistants, as a tool to be used to further the benefit of humans."   This positive outlook on AI has allowed countries like Japan, South Korea, and China to forge ahead with AI development, including in areas like healthcare, where AI is being used to improve the quality of services.   The West's fear of AI is not only shaping public opinion but also influencing policy decisions and regulatory frameworks. The European Union, for example, recently introduced AI legislation prioritizing heavy-handed protection over supporting innovation.   While such measures might be well-intentioned, they risk stifling AI development and innovation, making it harder for Western companies and researchers to compete.   Among the nations leading common-sense AI regulation, one stands out for now: Singapore.” – Chris C Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • $NFLX Netflix stock hold at 556.59 support or breakdown?  https://stockconsultant.com/?NFLX
    • $RDNT Radnet stock flat top breakout watch, https://stockconsultant.com/?RDNT
    • $GNK Genco Shipping stock narrow range breakout watch, also see $GOGL https://stockconsultant.com/?GNK
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.