Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

dalby

for Monday 0305

Recommended Posts

One of the things i look for is confluence - key price areas that are important on several timeframes and/or with different methodologies (market profile, floor trader pivots. etc.

 

I have attached a 2 day MP chart with the key price level 12167 highlighted.

 

This is the VPOC (Volume based POC) from Friday. It is also the daily floor trader pivot level for Monday.

 

The time based POC is just below it at 12159.

 

If we make a composite chart of the new balance area since our big selloff, we also see that 12160 area is the lower edge of the volume based value area.

 

 

And when I draw a time based value area on that composite, I get the exact same #'s

 

What this says to me is pay attention to this level.

 

If price does not gap above it on monday, I will be looking for shorts as price approaches this level, if consistent with market internals (bid/ask pressure, tape, etc.)

 

Just my thoughts

composite.thumb.png.78fc9f26437d898308bda77459eb5965.png

5aa70dc99230d_last2days.thumb.png.7b77dc9c095194380df52a657cca9a33.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dalby,

 

Great post, how do you like to judge the degree of confluence? Such as If you have a sample of 12200,12225,12201,12250 etc. How do you define the confluence? Chart them all and use the mini clusters? Or just the ones that are within X amount of points from each other?

 

I keep my cluster levels to a max of 3.5 point separation on the Russell.

 

:cool:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks .

 

I don't have a hard and fast rule about how close a price level has to be to another to be confluent, but I will take notice if it is within 10 pts on the dow.

 

as volatility has risen these last few days, my response has/will be to ratchet down size and increase stop size somewhat, to compensate for the greater range.

 

the price levels i use are very basic - single prints, globex low, globex hi, daily low, daily high, val, vah, poc and floor trader pivots (day, week, month).

 

it is a bonus if i can get some added confluence on price action, like a tick extreme on a relatively neutral day, into an area of resistance and seeing some follow through with heavy selling on the bid. another example would be when price makes new highs into a resistance area, but the Adv/Decl is not making new highs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent stuff, dalby. This is exactly how I trade, too.

 

One thing that I took special note of in yesterdays action was the single prints inside the profile of Thursday. Note how the POC (both time and volume) are right there. Price loves that spot as well as where C came down to the B period and stopped. Those two were great levels yesterday afternoon. I never had really put importance on single prints until yesterday.

 

12117 as well as 12254 will be important levels to watch. 12254 is the area that stopped price in 2 auction rotations and and 117 is a single print area.

singles.thumb.png.fecbbbbccd6fb734e5ab1a66ad536975.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

yes. i agree. i have that single print area filled in from thur as well.

 

is that investor R/T's Market profile? I am currently using MarketDelta's, but looked at their website per the recommendation (thanx) and see that they use the EXACT same format, one even licensing the same to the other.

 

Im probably switching to Investor RT for my MP next week. Ill get TS to use the tickdelta indicator here . I think that is pretty robust in replicating the data in MD's footprint charts.

 

I do a lot of replay function in my MP charts, and I agree that single prints are to be noted. Even if you don't use one for an entry, they are often logical place to set price targets if already in a trade and price is stampeding towards that level.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

dalby,

 

yes, IRT MP charts :) They are the exact same charting platform. The same guy writes the code. And I'm excited to watch more on the single print action. I love learning new things!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.