Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

parliament718

Identifying a Price Action Pattern - Examples Included

Recommended Posts

Hi,

Im trying to code a system based on a specific price action pattern. However Ive been trying a few days to accurately identify this pattern in code with little success. I can spot them out with the eye without a problem but I cant seem to figure out how to spot them in code because they come in slightly different shapes. Can somebody help out, some pseudo code or suggestions on how to approach is would really help.

 

Basically, the tunnel lines are just SMA's of the high and the low. Im looking for price to form this pattern and then close below the lower SMA for a short, or above the higher SMA for a long. The swings have to be well-defined (rather than "flat" waves, characteristic of consolidation zones). One of my attempts was to filter out these "flat" waves from the well-defined ones was by using an ADX filter.

 

Its most reliable when (for a short) during the 2nd wave the price comes out of the tunnel at the top (doesnt have to close above it) and then retreats back into the tunnel towards the bottom, and then closes below the bottom SMA.

 

There are of course other conditions and filters but this is somewhat the base of the system and Im having much trouble. Here's a compilation of examples.

 

uiLov.png

 

Thanks so much

Edited by parliament718

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi,

Im trying to code a system based on a specific price action pattern. However Ive been trying a few days to accurately identify this pattern in code with little success. I can spot them out with the eye without a problem but I cant seem to figure out how to spot them in code because they come in slightly different shapes. Can somebody help out, some pseudo code or suggestions on how to approach is would really help.

 

Basically, the tunnel lines are just SMA's of the high and the low. Im looking for price to form this pattern and then close below the lower SMA for a short, or above the higher SMA for a long. The swings have to be well-defined (rather than "flat" waves, characteristic of consolidation zones). One of my attempts was to filter out these "flat" waves from the well-defined ones was by using an ADX filter.

 

Its most reliable when (for a short) during the 2nd wave the price comes out of the tunnel at the top (doesnt have to close above it) and then retreats back into the tunnel towards the bottom, and then closes below the bottom SMA.

 

There are of course other conditions and filters but this is somewhat the base of the system and Im having much trouble. Here's a compilation of examples.

 

uiLov.png

 

Thanks so much

 

 

We can make this a community project.

 

can you pick one pattern,

 

then, use point form, name 5 characteristics about this pattern?

 

they should be the 5 critical characteristics of this pattern

ie they are your trigger pullers.

use arrows and lines and poiinters and notes to supplement your descriptions

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your reply.

 

I think part of my problem is its hard to quantify the pattern, maybe this is actually where I need help rather than the code itself. The schematic below of some solid characteristics. Please keep in mind this particular occurance is basically a perfect setup and they rarely happen like this.

 

ZeKPa.png

 

1) L-H-HL for buy H-L-LH for sell

2) second wave typically retraces to 38%-78% fib before reversing again in the initial direction and closing over the SMA.

3)SMA crossing bar is "strong" but not so strong that it causes to miss much of the move. A range of the crossing candle's body of between 7-14 pips is a sufficient condition)

 

Since it comes in many shapes as seen in the previous compilation its hard to say other solid characteristics about the actual waves without making the definition so rigid that it misses perfectly valid setups. Perhaps theyre just less obvious. Here are some observations:

 

I just tried for the first time to run Fibonacci time retracements of the first wave. After looking back at 50-100 occurances that my eye spots out as having a good structure it seems that:

 

1) if the initial first wave is 7-15 (15M) bars of time, then the low/high of the following wave is usually in the 2nd - 3rd Fibonacci time zone

2) if the initial first wave is 16- 24 (15M) bars of time, then the low/high of the following wave is usually in the 1st - 2nd Fibonacci time zone.

 

3) if first wave is less than 7 (15M) bars of time, the pattern is usually too small

4) if the first wave is more than 25 (15M) bars of time, the pattern tends to be too big.

 

Perhaps a range for the initial first wave is also called for since without such a condition the code can be vulnerable to signal on "flat" consolidation waves. As I mentioned, I had some success filtering these out by ignoring signals with ADX < 20. Perhaps ATR might be useful in this regard too.

 

Thoughts?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
We can make this a community project.

 

 

 

Seems like there's no interest in a community project like this. If anyone is interested to work privately with me to build a system based on this feel free to message me.

 

Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pattern identification is extremely hard and algorithms that do that efficiently are at the core of some commercial systems. In general, TA patterns are difficult to identify because of the imbedded randomness in the main pattern. Thomas Bulkowski has developed a program that does this and he offers it for free. You may want to contact him for general guidelines if he is available:

 

http://thepatternsite.com/patternz.html

 

Another guy who has developed an identification algorithm but for price patterns is Michael Harris. Although his program doesn't do what you are looking for his ideas have broader application:

 

The Most Advanced Tool for Analyzing Price Action and Discovering Trading Systems

 

I have seen some other programs but their identification ability is very poor. Check this website for an example of a screener where you can include TA patterns and indicators. Maybe you can contact them and get some direction:

 

Stock Screener - Overview

 

To summarize, what you are looking for is not very easy. A professional programmer of trading systems may charge up to $5,000 for the code. I paid much more for much simpler things 10 years ago.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Pattern identification is extremely hard and algorithms that do that efficiently are at the core of some commercial systems. In general, TA patterns are difficult to identify because of the imbedded randomness in the main pattern. Thomas Bulkowski has developed a program that does this and he offers it for free. You may want to contact him for general guidelines if he is available:

 

http://thepatternsite.com/patternz.html

 

Another guy who has developed an identification algorithm but for price patterns is Michael Harris. Although his program doesn't do what you are looking for his ideas have broader application:

 

The Most Advanced Tool for Analyzing Price Action and Discovering Trading Systems

 

I have seen some other programs but their identification ability is very poor. Check this website for an example of a screener where you can include TA patterns and indicators. Maybe you can contact them and get some direction:

 

Stock Screener - Overview

 

To summarize, what you are looking for is not very easy. A professional programmer of trading systems may charge up to $5,000 for the code. I paid much more for much simpler things 10 years ago.

 

Checking back on this post now your comment helped me find two very useful articles for pattern recognition. One uses an algorithm called the PXtract algorithm:

 

PXTract Algo:

http://www.cse.ust.hk/~leichen/courses/comp630p/collection/reference-4-6.pdf

 

http://www.olsen.ch/fileadmin/Publications/Client_Papers//200405-Omrane-PredictiveSuccessProfitabilityChartPatterns.pdf

 

 

If somebody is interested to develop a pattern recognition system based on the pattern I described, then contact me. I now develop in a .NET-based Complex Event Processing (CEP) framework and software suite by Deltix. I prefer to work on systems in collaboration and besides, those articles are a bit much to digest because my math is a bit rusty these days. Hope to hear!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Checking back on this post now your comment helped me find two very useful articles for pattern recognition. One uses an algorithm called the PXtract algorithm:

 

PXTract Algo:

http://www.cse.ust.hk/~leichen/courses/comp630p/collection/reference-4-6.pdf

 

http://www.olsen.ch/fileadmin/Publications/Client_Papers//200405-Omrane-PredictiveSuccessProfitabilityChartPatterns.pdf

 

 

If somebody is interested to develop a pattern recognition system based on the pattern I described, then contact me. I now develop in a .NET-based Complex Event Processing (CEP) framework and software suite by Deltix. I prefer to work on systems in collaboration and besides, those articles are a bit much to digest because my math is a bit rusty these days. Hope to hear!

 

The first article talks about the accuracy of the identification algorithm but not about the pattern performance. Also the authors state something peculiar that "We have demonstrated how to automate the process of chart pattern extraction and recognition, which has not been discussed in previous studies." but such software is available for at least 15 years! Then they refer to Thomas Bulkowski as Thomas! "According to Thomas [14], there are totally 47 different chart patterns, which can be extracted from the time series data". This is very strange. I doubt their algorithm will work because they do not sound familiar with this subject. Bulkowski has done much more work than them long time ago for chart patterns and Harris has done the same for price patterns:

 

http://thepatternsite.com/chartpatterns.html

The Most Advanced Tool for Analyzing Price Action and Discovering Trading Systems

 

those two are all you need.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Checking back on this post now your comment helped me find two very useful articles for pattern recognition. One uses an algorithm called the PXtract algorithm:

 

PXTract Algo:

http://www.cse.ust.hk/~leichen/courses/comp630p/collection/reference-4-6.pdf

 

http://www.olsen.ch/fileadmin/Publications/Client_Papers//200405-Omrane-PredictiveSuccessProfitabilityChartPatterns.pdf

 

 

If somebody is interested to develop a pattern recognition system based on the pattern I described, then contact me. I now develop in a .NET-based Complex Event Processing (CEP) framework and software suite by Deltix. I prefer to work on systems in collaboration and besides, those articles are a bit much to digest because my math is a bit rusty these days. Hope to hear!

 

Would like to share idea on fractal pattern recognition. A lot of good traders are trading it at twitter

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • #forex #forexnews #Brexit #GBPUSD is trading at 1.2867, having breached key support on Tuesday, courtesy of Brexit delay. The pound fell below the 50-hour moving average, confirming a bearish reversal on short duration charts. The key MA had consistently reversed pullbacks throughout the rally from 1.22 to 1.30 and may work as stiff resistance henceforth.  The GBP was offered as #PrimeMinister #Johnson's #BrexitBill won parliamentary support, but the government’s timetable of just 3 days debate on the bill was rejected.  With the parliamentary defeat, the probability of Britain leaving the European Union (#EU) before the Oct. 31 deadline has dropped sharply.  Further, a source in Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s office said on Tuesday that a new election would be the only way to move on from Britain’s Brexit crisis if the European Union agrees to a delay until January.  On a daily chart, the uptrend in GBP/USD appears to have stalled. Signs of indecision loom as a #Bearish Harami candlestick pattern risks paving the way for a reversal. Prices are eyeing near-term support which is a range between 1.2773 and 1.2798. A close under this barrier could open the door to testing former highs from September. Otherwise, clearing resistance at 1.3001 prolongs the uptrend. Expectation for GBP to “retest the 1.3010/15 level” was incorrect as GBP rose briefly to 1.3000 before plummeting to 1.2862 during NY hours. Upward pressure has dissipated and the short-term risk is for a deeper pullback. That said, any weakness is viewed as a lower trading range of 1.2810/1.2920 and a sustained decline below 1.2810 appears unlikely for now. Next 1-3 weeks:  #GBP tried to break clearly above 1.3000 for the second straight day yesterday (22 Oct) but slumped after touching 1.3000. For now, there is no change to our view from Monday (21 Oct, spot at 1.2880) wherein “GBP has to ‘punch’ above 1.3000 and register a NY closing above this level in order to indicate that the current rally has enough ‘ammunitions’ to extend to 1.3050, possibly as high as 1.3150”. While there is no change to our view, severely overbought conditions suggest GBP could ill afford to dither below 1.3000 or the risk of a short-term top would increase rapidly. From here, unless GBP cracks and stays above 1.3000 within these 1 to 2 days, a break of 1.2770 (no change in ‘strong support’ level) would indicate that the positive phase that started more than a week ago (see annotations in the chart below) has run its course. Looking ahead, a breach of 1.2770 would suggest that GBP is ready to ‘take a breather’ after the steep rally over the past couple of weeks.  
    • good news indeed, recognized in latin america as well. good job
    • CWM FX was a foreign exchange trading firm located at the Heron Tower at 110 Bishopsgate, otherwise known as Salesforce Tower. Dealing at the firm was suspended in March 2015 following a police raid on the firm and 13 arrests. There have been no convictions relating to these arrests as of 15 June 2015. CEO Anthony Constantinou was convicted in 2016 of sexual assault and sentenced to serve 12 months in jail.[1] London Police later revealed that most of the company's revenue came from a £50m alleged Ponzi scheme which promised returns of 5% per month Real charmer this conman..no? Now sit back and watch how he either fx off or trys to play the victim. Adults don't need moderators.
    • I know a parrott that has a higher IQ than you.
    • Feel free to copy and paste every time mr constipation posts. Do not be deterred by anything he says because he's a lying conning crook who can sue me for slander anytime
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.