Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

jpennybags

Questions - Short Selling Stocks

Recommended Posts

I have questions, but a little backfill is required before I get to it…

 

Over the past 9 months I've made the transition to day trading. I was a "long only" swing trader, and to date, I'm a "long only" day trader. I would now like to include the short side. I've spent the last 3 months sim trading on the weekends… it's pretty much all I've gotten done. For the past 4 weeks, I've set aside 1 day per week to sim trade real time. I'm to the point that I feel comfortable with the mechanics of shorting and my trading rules. I would like to take it live with reduced position sizes, and I don't expect to get beat up too badly (we shall see). I realize the pitfalls that go with sim trading, but I'm "strapped in" during a sim session the same way that I am trading live… I take it seriously. It may be that I'm over thinking the process, but it seems to me that there will be some differences in trading short that one would never see while sim trading.

 

1. Having shares called away… does this happen frequently?

 

2. What would be a reasonable expectation for the availability of shares?

 

As an example: The brokerage lists 600,000 shares available for a stock that trades an average volume of 4,500,000 shares per day. I want to short 1000 shares… would it be reasonable to think my order would get filled? Is there a percent of daily volume on shares available, or some other formula that would indicate a likely fill?

 

I realize there may be price levels when everyone wants to get short… 600,000 shares could be gone in seconds (less), but it seems there may be a general rule that could be applied.

 

3. Is slippage on a market order greater for short trades than long trades? It seems reasonable that there may be a slight difference. The difference that I've noticed in sim trading and live trading (long only) is something I've taken into account, but I'm wondering if I need to allow for more on a short fill.

 

If there's anything else that I need to consider, please give it up… Thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1. Having shares called away… does this happen frequently?

 

2. What would be a reasonable expectation for the availability of shares?

 

As an example: The brokerage lists 600,000 shares available for a stock that trades an average volume of 4,500,000 shares per day. I want to short 1000 shares… would it be reasonable to think my order would get filled? Is there a percent of daily volume on shares available, or some other formula that would indicate a likely fill?

 

I realize there may be price levels when everyone wants to get short… 600,000 shares could be gone in seconds (less), but it seems there may be a general rule that could be applied.

 

3. Is slippage on a market order greater for short trades than long trades? It seems reasonable that there may be a slight difference. The difference that I've noticed in sim trading and live trading (long only) is something I've taken into account, but I'm wondering if I need to allow for more on a short fill.

.

 

A lot will depend on the broker you use, their available short book inventory (the whole prime brokerage area of short borrowing is largely built around relationships and inventory)

This will also likely determine their process.

 

Additionally after the recent witch hunts to make the shorters pay, various countries have different rules and issues regards the process involved.....and at a guess brokers will treat retail differently to wholesale/professional clients.

 

So in an attempt to answer after saying that....

 

1...it should not happen a lot -, but a lot will depend on the stock, its free float liquidity etc; if you are sticking to the main stocks it should not be an issue. Most brokers should give you a list showing whats is "tight" and hard to borrow. Plus if you really want to keep on top of it, you often need to watch this and make a judgement call. It can happen that you are called back while others are not.....preferential treatment.

 

2...share availability again depends largely on the stock and the broker you use. For your example it should be no problem --- however check with the broker as usually you have to pre-arrange available short. ie; they will say there is 600,000 available you ask to reserve some of this, alternatively you will no straight away if its rejected and not everyone will form a rush on it....so dont fret too much.

Just be aware of the exact process of how they will allocate you availability and how quickly you need to secure its loan before hand. This will explain more.

 

3...I have never noticed, except to repeat the often quoted mantra of stocks fall quicker than they rise, so i guess it depends on if you are shorting into strength or weakness.

 

Other issues off the top of the head you need to think about are....

...costs of borrowing, different brokers and different stocks apply different charges

sometimes these are passed along as a % cost per annum plus maybe a minimum charge.

....be very careful of dividends and certain countries have franking issues (eg; Australia) with regards different tax rates

....be careful about corporate events - eg; takeovers, people playing convertibles int hose stocks etc. Not only can you get hit on a short squeeze but also a short covering squeeze.

There is nothing worse than having to be the only one buying stock back as you have to cover and you know you are the only one buying it. For your size this might not be an issue, but it can happen and you just become part of the same crowd.

.......talk to the stock lenders, they are probably some guys in the back office who never talk to traders and are treated poorly by some. If you can take them out buy them a drink, its amazing how that might go along way when they need to do you a favour.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Agreed since some of the new traders usually lose money in start and some loses more while chasing their lost money and eventually ends up blaming to their brokers part.
    • The crypto market are also in phase of maturing like the forex and other trading assets so we can do much more accurate analysis than before since early days it was purely a luck if the investments in crypto bears results because most of the coins or tokens never come to fruition. Some early birds were also able to make profits on these tokens or coins. e,g., like turtle coin starts with 1 satoshi and go up to 7 sathoshis, quite good rewards. another token lmgx now hovering at 10 started from 1, 
    • How's about other crypto exchanges? Are all they banned in your country or only Binance?
    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.