Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Is Britain Best in or out of the EU?  

15 members have voted

  1. 1. Is Britain Best in or out of the EU?

    • Should remain in EU and integrate further.
      3
    • Abandon the sinking ship(or just better out of EU!).
      10
    • Not really sure, let me think about that...
      2


Recommended Posts

Today, PM David Cameron faces MP questioning over his veto on new financial changes to the EU Treaty. Mr Cameron said no because there were no safeguards for Britain's financial services industry(lol, you gotta love the irony!) which accounts for a big chunk of British GDP. London in particular is currently a global financial hub and a severe clampdown on the industry would be a big problem for Britain - especially if it was Europe and not the British government who are in charge of implementing the changes. Merkel wants to protect the German economy and constitution from having to up front more money for inevitable future bailouts(and possibly current ones) and Sarkozy I suspect more than anything would love to see the UK on a Euro leash so to speak. But political wranglings aside, is it good for Britain to be in or out of Europe? There is no current Monetary integration and voters have already been promised a referendum on EU membership. I suspect that being totally out might see the pound strengthen but I don't know. Britain contributes large sums of cash to support European Union. But is there a strength in numbers aspect to this? Well my idea is yes, but not when the numbers are made up of all sorts of different countries and economies with very different agendas.

 

What do you think?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I kind of viewed it this way.....

he is taking a massive punt on the Europeans not begin able to fix the problems. If they dont which he must suspect they wont and hence does not want to get dragged down, then he has sidestepped a problem for the future....smart move.

 

Either that or it was just a massive blunder on his behalf and he became stroppy over something small walked out and like most politicians will not admit they f...d up and ask for a seat back at the table due to the apparent loss of face.

 

Either way its very hard to have influence at the table if you are not there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

we have a globally integrated economy...

it is like a rubik's cube... you move one side, all the color relationships change.

no country can stand on its own;

even China, which had a long history of closed border,

will not be able to sustain its economy if Europe or USA goes bust.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He says that the treaty wasn't in the best interests of Britain so he didn't sign. I'd really like to know what he thinks those "best interests" are?

 

Is it in Britains best interest to be left out of the economic decision making process of our closest neighbour?

 

.....I don't think you wanted to do that Dave did you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
He says that the treaty wasn't in the best interests of Britain so he didn't sign. I'd really like to know what he thinks those "best interests" are?

 

Is it in Britains best interest to be left out of the economic decision making process of our closest neighbour?

 

.....I don't think you wanted to do that Dave did you.

 

 

It's always best not to waste one's time in interminable meetings that result in nothing of value.

 

As traders in the markets we have learned that its more valuable to spend ones time evaluating the probabilities of what could happen next and how we'd respond than to try to change the unchangeable. Britain might do well by a similar approach.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It's always best not to waste one's time in interminable meetings that result in nothing of value.

 

Oh yes I was forgetting how efficient the British government are in respect to that.

 

Never thought i'd back Cameron on anything but it was a great day in history for Britain

Looking forward to telling Europe to get off our backs on a regular basis

 

Vote UKIP they'll give you exactly what you want, as for negotiation you'll find that Britain has negociated itself out of many things it didn't agree with, Schengen being one of the major ones and the good old Maastricht treaty. Britain is a big 'opt-outer' and yet again it's 'opting out'.

 

Makes me wonder why they bother at all with Europe if they are so skeptical, just sink the tunnel and pull up the drawbridge, easy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

'run by Europe, but not in Europe' seems to be UKIP's accusation at Cameron.

 

The world always seems fed up, when was that perfect time when we weren't fed up?

 

Sometimes we've had reason to be really fed up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm fed up with getting exactly what I deserved.

I am fed up with being over paid, underworked, and a good for nothing layabout.

bring back the Empire

 

Best start speculating again

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.