Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Rande Howell

Trading From Strength Rather Than Weakness

Recommended Posts

What's the gap between actual performance when the money counts and classroom knowledge? This past weekend while waiting to speak at the Options Industry Council Conference in Chicago, I was listening to a highly successful trader give a presentation. And 250 attendees were rightly riveted on his every word.

 

He made a statement about certain conditions in which he would not trade that went against the grain of conventional wisdom in options trading. The hands shot up. Why? Why? Why? Everyone wanted to dispute his reasoning -- even before they knew his reasons. They wanted to know the rule that produced the certainty of his decision. What's the theory? How is that part of a reasoned methodology?

 

His answer -- "I got tired of being bludgeoned to death, so I changed. I moved on. No big deal." That was his trading rule based on mistakes he had made over 25 years of trading. And it had served him well. He made a mistake (and lost) and learned from it. He learned how to manage his risks in his trading world and he moved on. There was not a "reason" -- there was a "learning moment" that he became open to because of the pain of his mistake.

 

It was his openness to learning from mistakes and moving on that impressed me. Meanwhile, many people in the audience were not ready to let this one go. They wanted to know the real reason. Then he asked the audience, "How many of you people keep making the same mistake over and over again? How many of you people learn when you lose from your mistakes? And how many of you people insist on being right even if it is costing you money? Then I say you don't know how to lose." Read that last sentence again.

 

There was an awkward silence, and no one raised their hand. Then he said to them, "Learning how to lose, so that you learn from your mistakes, is the biggest lesson you'll ever learn in becoming a successful trader. You have to become very comfortable with losing because if you trade, you are going to lose. And if you don't learn from losing -- then you continue losing. This is how you manage risk." You might want to imprint those sentences into your memory circuits.

 

So, how do you lose? Look to your performance when you lose, rather than the explanation you create about your losing. Have you developed a mindset that allows you to learn from your mistakes? Or do you keep hanging on to your losers -- not acknowledging that cutting your losses is simply an integral part of trading? Or do you take a preemptive strike and avoid getting in trades so you don't lose -- and forfeiting the opportunity to learn from losing?

 

How do you build a mindset like this trader's? Use this newsletter to explore this question. Even losing, when you have an effective mindset, becomes a tool for becoming an effective trader. This month's article explores this very point.

 

Speaking in NYC, Las Vegas, and Charlotte

 

Depending on where you live and/or your motivation to learn and travel, I cordially invite you to one of my live presentations this Thursday November 3 at 6 PM at 120 Wall St at the offices of Forex Club, at the Traders Expo in Las Vegas at 8 AM on Friday, November 18, or at the Market Technicians Association's Charlotte chapter in early December. Learn about the skills and tools for developing your mind for trading. It's usually forgotten as you learn to trade. But it keeps biting you until you learn to respect this need.

 

Learning to Lose Effectively

 

Become the commander of your journey into trading. Learn to walk the walk. Build the mind that you bring to your trading. It is the one thing in trading you can control. Seize the opportunity that is knocking at the door of your mind. Explore the contents of this newsletter. Go to the website. Read articles. Listen to videos. Read my book, Mindful Trading: Mastering Fear and the Inner Game. Then read it again. Sign up for one of our free webinars. Turn your mind from "fearing to lose" to the mindset that allows you to learn how to win from your losing. Step out of your comfort zone about winning and losing. Confront your complacency and fear that prevents you from taking action on developing your mind for trading. This is the game changer.

 

To your prosperity,

 

Rande Howell

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"Learning how to lose, so that you learn from your mistakes, is the biggest lesson you'll ever learn in becoming a successful trader. You have to become very comfortable with losing because if you trade, you are going to lose. And if you don't learn from losing -- then you continue losing. This is how you manage risk." You might want to imprint those sentences into your memory circuits.

 

As with so many such statements this one is useful but far from complete. It seems to imply that you should learn from each loss. But that would push the novice towards one of his greatest mistakes --- continually trying to fix each trade or series of trades that loses and thus chasing systems or system perfection.

 

The reality is that losses within the system are just losses. And there is little to learn from them except, should you not yet have it, the ability to lose without pain.

 

Only excessive mistakes, or losses that show some underlying change in the market/strategy fit need to be learned from by the trader. These are a couple of the lessons that Demming and statistical process control bought to the car industry - identify whether the process is ok or not before you try to fix everything; and don't blame the worker, improve the process.

 

The trader above fixed something that was repeatedly messing with his process. It is doubtful that he was trying to fix every losing trade as implied by "And if you don't learn from losing -- then you continue losing."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Randy,

 

From the outset, let me state that I enjoy your contributions to the forum, and I have also read your book, which I found useful.

 

But this latest article has a certain aspect (from the other presenter) which I disagree with, based upon my many years of actually being in the market, and it is even contradictory.

 

The statement made by the presenter at this conference:

"You have to become very comfortable with losing because if you trade, you are going to lose. And if you don't learn from losing -- then you continue losing"

 

This statement is accurate on one hand: You are going to lose as a trader. That is an inescapable fact --for as long as one trades.

 

On the other hand, the statement implies that if one learns from losing, one would eventually stop losing. And this is absolutely not the case.

 

In a probability game such as trading, I can do EVERYTHING perfectly: Entry, Exit, Mechanics, Setup, Rules and yes, even Psychology--and yet still lose. And what did I learn from that trade about losing? Nothing!

 

If one's edge enables on average a winning percentage of lets say 60%, then anything above and beyond that is usually just a lucky streak. In the same way, one might have a string of losers so that for awhile the winning percentage is far below that typical %60 percent.

 

This doesn't mean that the trader somehow screwed up, and needs to "learn from mistakes" so that the losing gets back to the normal ratio. It just happens in the course of trading.

 

One of the biggest myths of trading is about being " right" or "wrong", and that losing is caused by mistakes.

 

Some losses most certainly are mistakes and might be caused because one broke the rules, lost focus, was distracted by a pretty woman, was trading while exhausted, etc. These mistakes can be learned from and rectified.

 

But most of my losses over the years were "caused" by probability and nothing more.

 

And when traders really surrender to losses as an inescapable and unchangable part of the great game, they stop harming their psychology with the whole right or wrong, beating themselves up, I made a mistake mindset. And instead they just move on with the next trade, and let the probabilities work out as they will, knowing that OVER TIME the probabilities work out in their favor due to their consistent application of their edge.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

And when traders really surrender to losses as an inescapable and unchangable part of the great game, they stop harming their psychology with the whole right or wrong, beating themselves up, I made a mistake mindset. And instead they just move on with the next trade, and let the probabilities work out as they will, knowing that OVER TIME the probabilities work out in their favor due to their consistent application of their edge.

 

Right on the money Qiman, except I would add that OVER TIME current system probabilities can and will change permanently and if one is complacent and unwilling to adapt, they will end up trading a system that no longer has an edge. The rub, of course, is that there's no way to know if the system is just going through a temporary excursion or if it has permanently changed (system bust). What doesn't change, as you so eloquently stated, is the inescapable fact that losses will need to be endured even with a system that's firing on all cylinders.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
What was the successful trader selling at the Option Industry Council?

 

Nothing. He was paid by the Options Council to present. They are very serious about education. He is simply an independent trader willing to share his wisdom. Sense I did not have permission to cite him by name (the OIC is very serious about this stuff), you an contact the OIC directly and ask who the first speaker was.

 

Rande Howell

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Right on the money Qiman, except I would add that OVER TIME current system probabilities can and will change permanently and if one is complacent and unwilling to adapt, they will end up trading a system that no longer has an edge. The rub, of course, is that there's no way to know if the system is just going through a temporary excursion or if it has permanently changed (system bust). What doesn't change, as you so eloquently stated, is the inescapable fact that losses will need to be endured even with a system that's firing on all cylinders.

 

There is more to it than simply moving on. When a loss occurs, there are 3 primary domains that is associated with the loss. Methodology, psychology, or the wrong side of probability. If the first two, then you learn the lessons from the mistake in your performance. If probability, then you move on.

 

Rande Howell

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi Randy,

 

From the outset, let me state that I enjoy your contributions to the forum, and I have also read your book, which I found useful.

 

But this latest article has a certain aspect (from the other presenter) which I disagree with, based upon my many years of actually being in the market, and it is even contradictory.

 

The statement made by the presenter at this conference:

"You have to become very comfortable with losing because if you trade, you are going to lose. And if you don't learn from losing -- then you continue losing"

 

This statement is accurate on one hand: You are going to lose as a trader. That is an inescapable fact --for as long as one trades.

 

On the other hand, the statement implies that if one learns from losing, one would eventually stop losing. And this is absolutely not the case.

 

In a probability game such as trading, I can do EVERYTHING perfectly: Entry, Exit, Mechanics, Setup, Rules and yes, even Psychology--and yet still lose. And what did I learn from that trade about losing? Nothing!

 

If one's edge enables on average a winning percentage of lets say 60%, then anything above and beyond that is usually just a lucky streak. In the same way, one might have a string of losers so that for awhile the winning percentage is far below that typical %60 percent.

 

This doesn't mean that the trader somehow screwed up, and needs to "learn from mistakes" so that the losing gets back to the normal ratio. It just happens in the course of trading.

 

One of the biggest myths of trading is about being " right" or "wrong", and that losing is caused by mistakes.

 

Some losses most certainly are mistakes and might be caused because one broke the rules, lost focus, was distracted by a pretty woman, was trading while exhausted, etc. These mistakes can be learned from and rectified.

 

But most of my losses over the years were "caused" by probability and nothing more.

 

And when traders really surrender to losses as an inescapable and unchangable part of the great game, they stop harming their psychology with the whole right or wrong, beating themselves up, I made a mistake mindset. And instead they just move on with the next trade, and let the probabilities work out as they will, knowing that OVER TIME the probabilities work out in their favor due to their consistent application of their edge.

 

I appreciate your comments. When loss occurs, a trader will discover that a mistake has occurred in his methodology or his psychology, which need to be addressed. If not one of these two, then most likely probability is the issue -- being on the wrong side of what your preference was. And you move on.

 

I find most trader simply make more and more subtle mistakes as they gain competence. Distinguishing mistakes from probability becomes very important.

 

Rande Howell

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To all

 

I was actually surprized to see this posted. It is my opening comments in my newsletter. I am not sure if I accidentally posted it thinking that it was this month's article of if TL posted it. Makes an interesting post none the less.

 

Rande Howell

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Nothing. He was paid by the Options Council to present. They are very serious about education. He is simply an independent trader willing to share his wisdom. Sense I did not have permission to cite him by name (the OIC is very serious about this stuff), you an contact the OIC directly and ask who the first speaker was.

 

Rande Howell

 

He wasn't selling anything but he got paid. That is interesting. I suppose I can assume that not everyone who gets paid is selling something.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Date: 15th May 2024. Market News – Treasuries rallied, NASDAQ at new high, DXY lower after PPI pop.   Trading Leveraged Products is risky Economic Indicators & Central Banks: *JGB yields slipped, as markets paused amid a recent bond sell-off, awaiting a crucial US inflation report expected to influence the Fed’s short-term interest rate decisions. Remember, that typically yields move inversely to bond prices. *US: Stronger than expected prints on PPI did not have the textbook effects on the markets. Interestingly, Treasuries and Wall Street rallied, while the US Dollar slipped. The guts of the report were not as worrisome as the headlines suggested, and the CPI is viewed as more important. *Global equities are set for a fresh record after a big tech-led rally in US gauges. Financial Markets Performance: *The USDIndex slumped to 104.7, EURUSD rose to 1.0830 and USDJPY drifted at the EU open below 156. *Gold rose almost 1% to $2358.12 per ounce, while USOIL advanced to $78.18 after shrank US stockpiles, and as traders looked ahead to a report from the International Energy Agency that’ll shed light on market balances into the second half. *Copper spiked to a fresh record high at $5.12 a pound after a squeeze partly due to traders playing the arbitrage between futures on Comex and the Shanghai Futures Exchange.   Market Trends: *Big tech climbed, however, boosting the NASDAQ 0.75% to a new all-time high of 16,511. The S&P500 rose 0.48% to 5246. The Dow advanced 0.3%. *Sony shares jumped by 12% after strong earnings, a stock split and a share buyback of ¥250bn ($1.6bn). *Tesla gained 3.3%. Tencent Holdings surged after the company’s revenue beat estimates , while Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.’s slid on a profit plunge, highlighting the growing divergence between China’s twin Internet powerhouses. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business. Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar. Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding on how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE! Click HERE to READ more Market news. Andria Pichidi Market Analyst HFMarkets Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in FX and CFDs products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • Recessions are weird.   The more you think about them, the weirder they become.   Yes, the economy is cyclical. Downturns aren’t just inevitable, they’re healthy.   BUT   Economic cycles, including recessions, are not just determined by clean and predictable financial indicators but also by psychological and sociological factors.   Collective mood, media reporting, and public sentiment play a substantial role in shaping economic realities.   And they can be manipulated.   A.] The Fear Factory   Every time the media starts shouting "recession," what happens?   Panic. Fear.   It's like Halloween but for adults.   And this fear isn't just innocent fun – it moves markets, influences decisions, and causes real harm.   Give me an example of when the media saw a chance to scare the crap out of you and didn’t take it?   I’ll wait.   B.] Recessions are Relative   Consider this – what's called a recession in one country is a day in paradise in another.   Economic conditions are relative.   If the standards are so skewed, can we really trust this whole concept?   C.] The Recession Whisperers   Imagine a secretive group, not in some government bunker, but in a quiet office in Cambridge, Massachusetts. That's the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), the recession referee.   But here's the twist: By the time the NBER declares a recession, it's like announcing rain when you're already soaked.   Their method involves a retroactive look, meaning they wait for six months of data, plus a one-month lag.   So, when they finally declare a recession, it's old news, a story you've been living in, not just reading about. In the world of economic predictions, the official-unofficial referees are not the early birds; they're the historians.   Also…   D.]The GDP Puppet Show   GDP.   It’s supposed to be a “health check” for the economy.   BUT   It's like going to a doctor who only measures your height and ignores your blood pressure, cholesterol, and heart rate.   It counts every dollar spent, regardless of what it's spent on.   That means disasters, wars, and environmental destruction all pump up the GDP. If a hurricane hits and we spend billions on reconstruction, guess what? GDP goes up.   Celebrating a GDP increase is like throwing a party because your house burned down and you had to rebuild it.   It’s also the main indicator the NBER uses to measure a recession.   The real problem with this is…   GDP is a broad measure and can be influenced by short-term fluctuations that don't necessarily reflect long-term economic trends.   It’s a useful indicator, but far from comprehensive.   E.] The Self-Fulfilling Prophecy   Here's the kicker – by declaring a recession, we make them more likely.   It's a classic self-fulfilling prophecy.   Businesses pull back on investment, consumers close their wallets, and just like that, the economy slows down.   But what if we didn't buy into the narrative? I have no idea.   F.] Rage Against Determinism   Economies aren’t deterministic. They’re dynamic.   Economies don’t follow a predetermined path.   Human agency and perception play a significant role in shaping economic realities.   Predictions are usually wrong for this reason.   Also, there’s this…   G.] The Hidden Agenda   Tin foil hat time.   Think about who benefits from recession talk.   The media gets a juicy story.   Politicians get a scapegoat.   Certain investors get to buy low.   It’s a game, and the average person isn't the one winning. You’re always being sold a narrative that serves others, not you.   And Yet, a Recession is HERE   Of course, recessions exist. Because prolonged downturns exist.   But all of this calls into question what we think we know about the word “recession” and how we talk about it.   It’s not as clear a concept as we think.   Nevertheless, it’s probably here already.” – Chris Campbell (AltucherConfidential)  
    • QCOM Qualcomm stock great breakout follow through, https://stockconsultant.com/?QCOM
    • JPM JPMorgan Chase stock breakout, https://stockconsultant.com/?JPM
    • ALLY Financial stock breakout, good volume. from Stocks To Watch, https://stockconsultant.com/?ALLY
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.