Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

OldGrantonian

When is Margin Not Margin?

Recommended Posts

I've been buying Dow stocks for about 2 years now, and doing OK considering the economic climate.

 

With the markets so low, I want to try trading with a margin account, using only Dow stocks for safety (initially).

 

I live in the UK. As preparation, I have set up a separate bank account in the UK to ensure that I can meet margin calls even if the prices of all my stocks drop to $zero.

 

I would be grateful if someone could answer the following question.

 

Scenario 1:

 

1) Assume that I open a margin account with $2,500 cash. I believe that this gives a "margin buying power" of $5,000.

 

2) I then buy $5,000 of stock.

 

3) Assume the stock doubles in value, and I sell all the stock.

 

4) According to all the web articles on margin, I make a profit of 4 times the initial cash outlay. Because I receive $10,000, but I only paid $2,500 in cash.

 

Scenario 2:

 

1) Assume that I open a margin account with $5,000 cash (double the amount of Scenario 1). This now gives a "margin buying power" of $10,000.

 

2) I then buy $5,000 of stock (as before).

 

3) Assume the stock doubles in value, and I sell all the stock.

 

4) As before, I receive $10,000.

 

So, my question is. Do I still make a profit of 4 times? Or is it only a profit of 2 times, because there was enough available cash initially to buy the stock?

 

In other words, does the broker take the entire $5,000 in cash out of my account? Or does he only take $2,500 cash and lends me the other $2,500?

 

I'm sorry if I've used a lot of words to ask one question, but I want to be absolutely sure.

.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Scenario 1:

 

1) Assume that I open a margin account with $2,500 cash. I believe that this gives a "margin buying power" of $5,000.

 

2) I then buy $5,000 of stock.

 

3) Assume the stock doubles in value, and I sell all the stock.

 

4) According to all the web articles on margin, I make a profit of 4 times the initial cash outlay. Because I receive $10,000, but I only paid $2,500 in cash.

 

Scenario 2:

 

1) Assume that I open a margin account with $5,000 cash (double the amount of Scenario 1). This now gives a "margin buying power" of $10,000.

 

2) I then buy $5,000 of stock (as before).

 

3) Assume the stock doubles in value, and I sell all the stock.

 

4) As before, I receive $10,000.

 

So, my question is. Do I still make a profit of 4 times? Or is it only a profit of 2 times, because there was enough available cash initially to buy the stock?

 

In other words, does the broker take the entire $5,000 in cash out of my account? Or does he only take $2,500 cash and lends me the other $2,500?

 

I'm sorry if I've used a lot of words to ask one question, but I want to be absolutely sure.

.

 

you have switched what you are comparing in the two scenarios.

1....you are using the base of the margin requirement to calculate your PL multiple

2....you are using the amt deposited with the broker to calculate your PL multiple.

 

which leads to your next question.....

the answer here is it depends on the broker, and the type of account.

I would say that generally if you are buying on margin then yes the broker will wish to lend it to you (this maximises their profit in general), whereas with a cash funded account there is no lending.

Think of it this way - you can borrow from the broker, with in the account, OR you can borrow from a third party before depositing with the broker.

 

there are many ways to do this and you need to understand which your broker does as it can greatly affect the costs over the long term.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I've been buying Dow stocks for about 2 years now, and doing OK considering the economic climate.

 

With the markets so low, I want to try trading with a margin account, using only Dow stocks for safety (initially).

 

I live in the UK. As preparation, I have set up a separate bank account in the UK to ensure that I can meet margin calls even if the prices of all my stocks drop to $zero.

 

I would be grateful if someone could answer the following question.

 

Scenario 1:

 

1) Assume that I open a margin account with $2,500 cash. I believe that this gives a "margin buying power" of $5,000.

 

2) I then buy $5,000 of stock.

 

3) Assume the stock doubles in value, and I sell all the stock.

 

4) According to all the web articles on margin, I make a profit of 4 times the initial cash outlay. Because I receive $10,000, but I only paid $2,500 in cash.

 

Scenario 2:

 

1) Assume that I open a margin account with $5,000 cash (double the amount of Scenario 1). This now gives a "margin buying power" of $10,000.

 

2) I then buy $5,000 of stock (as before).

 

3) Assume the stock doubles in value, and I sell all the stock.

 

4) As before, I receive $10,000.

 

So, my question is. Do I still make a profit of 4 times? Or is it only a profit of 2 times, because there was enough available cash initially to buy the stock?

 

In other words, does the broker take the entire $5,000 in cash out of my account? Or does he only take $2,500 cash and lends me the other $2,500?

 

.

if you buy on margin, the broker takes $2,500 from your account and lends you $2,500. The rest of the cash in your account is on standby... for you to purchase MORE stocks, so that the broker can lend you MORE money.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks to SIUYA and Tams for their helpful responses :)

 

It seems to me that both are saying the same thing.

 

SIUYA says:

 

which leads to your next question.....

the answer here is it depends on the broker, and the type of account.

I would say that generally if you are buying on margin then yes the broker will wish to lend it to you

 

Tams says:

 

if you buy on margin, the broker takes $2,500 from your account and lends you $2,500.

 

I think both are saying that if I have a MARGIN account with $1,000,000 in cash, then my "margin cash available" is $1,000,000, and my "buying power" is $2,000,000.

 

If I now buy $10 of stock, the broker takes $5 in cash and lends me the other $5. (I'm deliberately using ridiculously high and low values.)

 

This is the way that I would want my MARGIN account to operate. Because I think the market is low, I want to use margin for upside leverage, not because I need to borrow money. (As I said in my original post, I'll make damned sure in advance that I can meet any margin calls right down to zero.)

 

However, I was waiting quite a long time for a reply on this forum, so I made an identical post to:

 

When is margin not margin? - Trade2Win Forums

 

The reply was from John Forman, who wrote "The Essentials of Trading".

 

He says that if there's enough cash to buy the required stock WITHOUT margin, then the broker takes out the cash, and lends you nothing. And that's exactly what I DON'T want.

 

So, with the greatest respect, it seems to me that SIUYA and Tams are agreeing with each other, but disagreeing with John Forman.

 

Maybe I'll experiment by opening a margin account with a tiny amount, say $500, then buy $100 of stock to see what happens. (My broker says I can open a margin account any time.)

 

Thanks for all the help :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

as mentioned before - it all depends on the broker and type of account you are dealing with.

If its a swap account (spread bet/margin account), i would bet the broker is generally trying to lend you the money and charge you for it.

If its a cash account with margin - when and if required, then they may only take out margin when you then need it.

The broker should be able to give you worked examples.

....and personally I would always wish to use my own cash first rather than a brokers - they will pay you 3% on your cash balances and lend to you at 5% - so why not maximise your broker balance first before borrowing

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Agreed since some of the new traders usually lose money in start and some loses more while chasing their lost money and eventually ends up blaming to their brokers part.
    • The crypto market are also in phase of maturing like the forex and other trading assets so we can do much more accurate analysis than before since early days it was purely a luck if the investments in crypto bears results because most of the coins or tokens never come to fruition. Some early birds were also able to make profits on these tokens or coins. e,g., like turtle coin starts with 1 satoshi and go up to 7 sathoshis, quite good rewards. another token lmgx now hovering at 10 started from 1, 
    • How's about other crypto exchanges? Are all they banned in your country or only Binance?
    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.