Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Sign in to follow this  
TheNegotiator

Market Meltdown, QE3 and Suspicious Figs...

Recommended Posts

So we've had a bit of a move across the board over the last week or so. I was actually fairly surprised that the range was as big as it was yesterday in the ES etc. given that non-farms were due today. There were discussions going around that technically the similarities in the US indices just at the end of 2007 and up to 27th July(ish) this year were pretty clear. Some things were off here and there(I believe in 2007 we were below the 200 day ma). The markets may currently be teetering on the edge of meltdown once more. The market has been artificially pumped up with quantitative easing and other measures in the hopes that the real economy would recover. It hasn't. Numbers are still appalling, housing markets are not good at all, debt laden countries have their backs to the wall at the hands of the markets, the rich are hoarding cash and yet there is talk of a QE3 programme. Well, I think perhaps what the world needs is some economic leaders who don't have their heads in the clouds(or perhaps up their own rear ends). Stimulus by giving rich people more money(effectively) when they won't lend is going to help guess who? Rich people. This whole talk of QE3 is absolute rubbish imo and it has to stop. Otherwise what may come is an economic crisis which makes the last look like a sideshow. On a final note, call me a cynic but those nfp and jobs numbers were suspiciously good. Who would have bet against them being good I wonder given the backdrop of the week so far? If indeed these suspicions have any fact to them and I am well aware that it is speculation, but we know how this world works, what in actual fact are they expecting to gain from it? Do they believe that one good jobs report is actually going to convince 'intelligent' people that everything is really okay? Or is there someone who need to unload a position I wonder??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On a final note, call me a cynic but those nfp and jobs numbers were suspiciously good. Who would have bet against them being good I wonder given the backdrop of the week so far? If indeed these suspicions have any fact to them and I am well aware that it is speculation, but we know how this world works, what in actual fact are they expecting to gain from it? Do they believe that one good jobs report is actually going to convince 'intelligent' people that everything is really okay? Or is there someone who need to unload a position I wonder??

 

yep you are a cynic :)

those numbers are part of a huge network of monkeys collecting data that is checked and rechecked for accuracy by an elephant and then released to the markets.....if the market does not react the way they want those numbers will get adjusted and revised and re-released with the next set of numbers - this is later done by the donkeys and the goats.

Then the fund managers - the sheep - who rely on them and have knee jerk reactions to them after doing all their fundamental research and analysis use them to justify or talk up a position, and ultimately end up saying - sorry no one can outperform the market and so I have done a good job in just keeping up with it and outperforming by -0.2%

 

Later those revised numbers are collated by the economists (they are a whole other breed of animals, and even Noah only let one on the ark as no two could agree) and they then flip a coin as to if they think the previous numbers, or the revised numbers were bearish or bullish and what the market then made of them....much like historians.

In the meantime the sheepdogs (the hedge funds and traders) - some of who know what they are doing and are real kelpies, others are poodles and dont know the difference between a sheep and a gucci handbag, run around frantically trying to clip bits and pieces off an ever moving mob of sheep (the market) in the hope of being sucessful and getting fed at the end of the day.

Now thats cynical.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 months to election...

 

there is only one thing left to do -- pump up the market !

 

Then why did the market go down so hard on the president's Birthday? If there are forces that can pump up the market for the elections, then couldn't those same forces drag down the market for some reason?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I watched an interview with the head of the bls about how the jobs data is compiled. Guess what, for a large part they use an algorithm to 'estimate' figures. Wow. I don't like the jobs report. I think it sucks and just gives huge traders chance to adjust their positions!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.