Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

emg

Why Do More Than 90% of Traders Lose?

how about an informal poll of all those who make their living trading? all forms, day  

64 members have voted

  1. 1. how about an informal poll of all those who make their living trading? all forms, day

    • Yes
      40
    • No
      32
    • I don't make my living entirely from Trading, but it supplements my income.
      41


Recommended Posts

Why Do More Than 90% of Traders Lose?

 

Simple answer: They don't.

The "Traders" referred to were never Traders to begin with.

 

The question posed by the Article, and found on countless "Trading Forums" should be:

 

Why do 90% of PEOPLE who attempt Trading lose?. If 90% of people who attempted to perform surgery, without benefit of a Medical Education failed, would it be correct to say "90% of Surgeons fail"?

 

I've been wondering this same thing. I'm new to this. I just got done with my third book and have developed my own little system. So far I'm about 60% accurate, and the forty percent are usually sideways movements. But I haven't placed an actual trade yet. I am putting a lot of effort to be successful in this, before I've even started, and it doesn't seem like it's rocket science, (though I haven't actually put my money where my mouth is) but you can't just see that it's gone down and say, "well that means it should go up then." I learned that lesson when I was 18 and trying that system.

 

Anyway, in about two months, when I feel like I truly am ready to risk real money (and I still expect to loose a little bit in the "real world." That's all depending on whether or not I get my job as a financial adviser next week, but I can't imagine enjoying a sales job as much as just learning about day trading, much less doing it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The comment above is as close to the truth as can be.

 

If you don't find a way to get an education, you are going to fail (you are going to lose money)

 

If you find a way to get an education (a real challenge in this environment) you will still lose money but, you will have a way to get it back....

 

that is the difference.

 

Now the question is where do you look to get the education you need?

 

and how much should it cost?

 

You might start (at no cost) by reading my thread "an institutional look at the S&P futures"

 

Best Regards

Steve

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Trading should be simple but isn't. It will most likely be the hardest thing you ever do (and get right). The barriers to entry are none existent. A few bucks and an internet connection and heyho lets go. People spend more time deciding on which burger to buy that they do in looking at this as a business that takes time and effort to get right.

 

Goodness gracious I was looking at a thread that is clear for 4hr, lowest 1hr. Some guy bless him, when 4hr had signaled a perfect move up a few hundred pips ago and was now signaling move done, wass asking why his 15 min entry buy didn't work.

 

I could go on but my missus is :crap: suggesting i switch computer off.

 

Its a business treat it like one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Very interesting article. Losing is part of the game. The key question is knowing "How much can you lose and still be able to keep going." Have you read the biography of Jesse Livermore? He went broke 4 times and every time he was able to come back strong, not only financially strong but psychologically more aware of what the market represents. You are right!! It is not a quick get rich job. It takes years to learn and to master it. This learning process has to do a lot with human psychology. It is the process of learning about our emotions and how to control them. This is the real hard learning that takes place when fighting with ego and greed.... It is a hard path because we dont fight the market, we fight ourselves!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Very interesting article. Losing is part of the game. The key question is knowing "How much can you lose and still be able to keep going." Have you read the biography of Jesse Livermore? He went broke 4 times and every time he was able to come back strong, not only financially strong but psychologically more aware of what the market represents. You are right!! It is not a quick get rich job. It takes years to learn and to master it. This learning process has to do a lot with human psychology. It is the process of learning about our emotions and how to control them. This is the real hard learning that takes place when fighting with ego and greed.... It is a hard path because we dont fight the market, we fight ourselves!!!

 

Got my interests peaked in that biography ..... Gonna try to snag a copy ....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Concentrate on the techniques and work ethics of the 10% who do make money. Go easy, stay focused, be patient and always protect your cash.

Keep reading and learning. Think of your loses as the price of tuition. It's a tough challenge. That's why we do it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It is the process of learning about our emotions and how to control them. This is the real hard learning that takes place when fighting with ego and greed.... It is a hard path because we dont fight the market, we fight ourselves!!!

 

Have to fight our own get rich quick impulses first. Take any new method demo it until completely happen you understand it and when you can demo sufficient win % and profit % to put you ahead then go live.

 

Doing your own method, back test in trending and ranging days that it'll stand up. Then go live .................................. with confidence in your methods.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Have to fight our own get rich quick impulses first. Take any new method demo it until completely happen you understand it and when you can demo sufficient win % and profit % to put you ahead then go live.

 

Doing your own method, back test in trending and ranging days that it'll stand up. Then go live .................................. with confidence in your methods.

 

Happy not happen!!!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The answer sir or madam, is that retail (amateur) traders lack education, aptitude, skills, experience and are usually under capitalized....In addition, they are often guilty of simply visiting sites like this one, asking everyone around them how to trade and then throwing money down the drain on approaches that utilize lagging indicators. Clearly you can't learn to fly jets by watching "Top Gun" and then pretending to be Tom Cruise...and generally speaking you won't become a special forces soldier by watching Sylvester Stallone in Rambo....what is needed is education, guidance and time...otherwise the odds are in favor of failure and loss of capital...

 

This was posted a while ago, but what's wrong with lagging indicators, and why do they have them if they aren't meant to be utilized?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This was posted a while ago, but what's wrong with lagging indicators, and why do they have them if they aren't meant to be utilized?

 

 

Whats wrong with lagging indicators?

 

Ok I'll play...theres nothing wrong with lagging indicators, however if you rely on them for your entry you are always late.....thats one

 

#2 they have no predictive ability. What you need is the ability to predict continuation or reversal of trend and then continuation...indicators can't do it consistently....thats 2

 

#3 They "HAVE THEM" so that naive newbies will use the software thinking that they have a way to make money....I believe thats 3 strikes.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The third one isn't really against lagging indicators. That's like saying, "high school kids drink beer, so beer is terrible," when in fact, beer is awesome. However, I get your point. But you do not utilize them at all?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Here is an interesting article i came across.

 

http://articles.latimes.com/2011/ap...rading-20110403

 

Think real real real hard if you want to pursue trading. Your dream of making money, your dream of getting rich quick, your dream of driving a Ferrari are all a myth. Movies u watched how traders get rich quick are all a myth.

 

The reality is, more than 90% of small traders lose!! They just lose!!!

 

I am looking for the best answers

 

To successfully trade 2 types of capital are needed:

 

- risk capital

- intangible capital (intelligence)

 

This combination is relatively rare. So you have:

 

:haha: Pr ( risk capital > 500K AND intelligence > chimpanzee iq | trader ) << 10%

 

 

T

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Whats wrong with lagging indicators?

 

Ok I'll play...theres nothing wrong with lagging indicators, however if you rely on them for your entry you are always late.....thats one

 

#2 they have no predictive ability. What you need is the ability to predict continuation or reversal of trend and then continuation...indicators can't do it consistently....thats 2

 

#3 They "HAVE THEM" so that naive newbies will use the software thinking that they have a way to make money....I believe thats 3 strikes.....

 

#3 is the most glaring to me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Use indi's don't use them. If you go with them make sure you understand their +'s and -'s. If I told you of a trader that trades gu 4hr macd divergence only 30-50 full lots at a time (not piddling 5 digit broker stuff) would you reconsider indi's.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Seems pretty straightforward.

 

Everybody looses the bid-ask spread and commisions on average.

 

Anybody taking more risk than is sensible for their account will loose because they will hit the point where they are broke. (Basic position sizing).

 

Whether that corresponds to 90% of traders or not I don't know.

 

Anyone with zero edge who places appropiate betsizes will gradually drift down at a rate determined by the bid ask spread and commissions with noise superimposed.

 

I assume then as people blow up their account they then look for things to blame (e.g. wrong indicator etc) rather than just admitting they have no edge yet.

 

-- DM

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Do as others do and you'll end up like everyone else. You're better off in doing your own thinking trading your own methods and being different.

 

 

You have hit it in a nutshell Tim.

 

90% of Traders fail because they listen, read and learn from the 90% of failed Traders that have gone before them.

 

Sadly, this truism is why Sites like this one are breeding grounds for failure.

 

All the ingredients for success lie within this Site wrapped up in a handful of posts and carefully hidden in plain view ...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyone that has an edge that is real, the more you play the better your odds given that you're trading the way you're supposed to.

 

The best theory that applies to the market is game theory because this is ultimately gambling. A gambler that counts cards at the blackjack table, the more he plays, the more his edge kicks in. If he keeps losing, its because he's not counting the cards right. The same applies to trading. If you're doing everything right and you're not consistently profitable on a weekly/monthly basis, then your edge is not real but imagined, or you're not adhering to the way you're supposed to trade.

 

The macro thesis of your method needs to be sound, then you just need a way to capture the edge that your thesis assumes in the micro details on how you're supposed to trade.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Here is an interesting article i came across.

 

http://articles.latimes.com/2011/ap...rading-20110403

 

Think real real real hard if you want to pursue trading. Your dream of making money, your dream of getting rich quick, your dream of driving a Ferrari are all a myth. Movies u watched how traders get rich quick are all a myth.

 

The reality is, more than 90% of small traders lose!! They just lose!!!

 

I am looking for the best answers

 

Most traders, like many people in life, refuse to examine their lives and themselves. These people, when in trading, are faced with their self delusion and insist and maintaining it. Steve46 is quite accurate.

 

Rande Howell

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Anyone that has an edge that is real, the more you play the better your odds given that you're trading the way you're supposed to.

 

The best theory that applies to the market is game theory because this is ultimately gambling. A gambler that counts cards at the blackjack table, the more he plays, the more his edge kicks in. If he keeps losing, its because he's not counting the cards right. The same applies to trading. If you're doing everything right and you're not consistently profitable on a weekly/monthly basis, then your edge is not real but imagined, or you're not adhering to the way you're supposed to trade.

 

The macro thesis of your method needs to be sound, then you just need a way to capture the edge that your thesis assumes in the micro details on how you're supposed to trade.

 

 

Another Truism Tradezilla, I wholeheartedly agree with you.

 

If you have the strength and courage to move yourself beyond a state of self delusion as Rande mentions, you are then in a position to view price with an OPEN MIND.

 

Then and only then, the obvious will become obvious ..crystal clear in fact to a point where you wonder what all the fuss is about...

If you think you have moved beyond delusion but you still cannot see the puzzle then you have simply deluded yourself yet again... so back to square one.

 

But when you suddenly see Price in an entirely different light and your view of price does not shift from one day to the next or one month/year to the next then ...

 

This is your EDGE.

 

This is what you can count on all day and everyday if you are day trading ES and others.

All you have to do is to maintain your state of OPEN MINDEDNESS all day and every day and your edge will do the work.

 

Is this possible ... and if so, is this difficult.

The answer is no and yes if you are inclined to think this way.

Or the answer is yes and no if you are prepared to commit yourself to change ... radial life altering change.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
there is not one good single answer on why more than 90% of small traders lose.

 

I think it can all be summed up in 2 answers, either the trader has not found a reliable edge that is comprehensive or their psychology/discipline does not allow them to give their edge a chance to kick in.

 

I believe the biggest delusion many traders have is that they believe the market allows for a big edge. Any edge that can be found will be slight, but its the trust in this slight edge that will do wonders for your results. However, your edge needs to be comprehensive and not just entries, meaning good probability in both entries and exits, R/R, risk management and etc..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Another Truism Tradezilla, I wholeheartedly agree with you.

 

If you have the strength and courage to move yourself beyond a state of self delusion as Rande mentions, you are then in a position to view price with an OPEN MIND.

 

Then and only then, the obvious will become obvious ..crystal clear in fact to a point where you wonder what all the fuss is about...

If you think you have moved beyond delusion but you still cannot see the puzzle then you have simply deluded yourself yet again... so back to square one.

 

But when you suddenly see Price in an entirely different light and your view of price does not shift from one day to the next or one month/year to the next then ...

 

This is your EDGE.

 

This is what you can count on all day and everyday if you are day trading ES and others.

All you have to do is to maintain your state of OPEN MINDEDNESS all day and every day and your edge will do the work.

 

Is this possible ... and if so, is this difficult.

The answer is no and yes if you are inclined to think this way.

Or the answer is yes and no if you are prepared to commit yourself to change ... radial life altering change.

 

John,

I think what you're describing is a realization and not necessarily an edge. An edge has to put the odds in your favor everytime you take a risk. Knowing that price moves the same everyday does not in itself increase your odds of trading in the right direction or not getting stopped out. I don't think price moves the same every day because markets have different types of days, trend/bracket/congestion and etc.. In addition, mixed in there is a lot of random behavior.. It is possible but certainly difficult because the slight edge that is available is almost always very well hidden..

TZ

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
John,

I think what you're describing is a realization and not necessarily an edge. An edge has to put the odds in your favor everytime you take a risk. Knowing that price moves the same everyday does not in itself increase your odds of trading in the right direction or not getting stopped out. I don't think price moves the same every day because markets have different types of days, trend/bracket/congestion and etc.. In addition, mixed in there is a lot of random behavior.. It is possible but certainly difficult because the slight edge that is available is almost always very well hidden..

TZ

 

Hi TZ,

 

Yes, I am describing a realisation and yes it flows directly into an 'edge' that exists each and every day.

You appear to me to be thinking of the overall behaviour of the day when you write 'trend/bracket/congestion and etc..'

 

I have no interest in this behaviour until the day becomes yesterday, in which case it may have some influence on how today trades out....

 

Primarily I am only interested in each Price Wave and that is what I trade.

Some days present more trade-able PWs to me than others, but on days that present fewer PWs, they tend to be longer in duration.

 

TZ, please consider me as a simple person who tries to relax into simplicity each day

by seeing the simplicity in the things I do.

 

This attitude neither makes me right now wrong ... it just keeps me simple.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.