Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

TheNegotiator

Delta Volume in Intraday Trading

Recommended Posts

Unicorn, it's a 5333 volume chart.

 

I am a little confused by your post. :confused: What you are showing is hidden divergence, as opposed to regular divergence. There is a higher low in price, and a lower low in the delta momentum. This can be a sign of continuation in a trend move. However, there really wasn't a trend established yet. If you are trying to demonstrate regular divergence to demonstrate a turning point, this would be seen by lower lows in price in a down move combined with higher lows in the delta divergence, implying a possible trend reversal.

 

What I believe your chart post illustrates, in hindsight, is more sellers getting trapped at or near the lows, contributing to a more powerful subsequent upmove.

 

Regards,

PT

 

You may view it this way. However, to me the big guys don't tend to do their business at market. They buy weakness and sell strength. So if the volume delta cumulative or not is showing more activity in one direction and yet price is moving in another, it certainly gets my attention. Especially when it occurs in an area where I am expecting interest to increase. I think there was enough of a trend there. But I am really not too bothered by trend being present as such or not. The market has been moving one way and trading activity was TRENDING down at that point. I'd also like to say that I have never really liked regular divergence as you describe as a reversal signal. To me, it says for example in a move down, a further price move has occurred and required LESS selling volume to trade and so buyers are relenting. Yes that could mean a capitulation move or that the dynamic is shifting, but often you do see more of a price move before trend changes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your reply Negotiator. I find regular divergence to be a very accurate indicator, when taken in the proper context at the right areas on a chart. Most indicators are lagging, however divergence uniquely tends to be a leading indicator.

 

Cumulative delta computation and display will vary, depending on where you choose to start your count of delta from.

 

What you are trying to describe in your post above is sellers getting trapped, adding fuel to a reversal. It is always advantageous to have trapped traders fueling your reversal position move, when you can identify it.

 

Your use of the term divergence is not a standard usage, and therefore confusing. I am glad that you have found something that works for you.

Regards,

PT

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I see from a post that you use 5333 volume. My CQG chart is identical to yours but it looks like there could be small differences in the positive or negative size of the deltas created but not anything worthy of note. Must be a good feed that you have.

 

I display delta as a positive or negative histogram centred on zero. My display was exactly as expected on both the up and down moves but with the positive delta being so small on the upswing, I am not surprised that a chart created form the run of positives and negatives would give weight to the second negative set and push the chart lower. I would find that counter-intuitive because the divergence is reverse logic. Different strokes for different folks:)

 

I am surprised that you think that the big guys do not use market orders. IMO they use them all the time. I remember years ago when the e-mini was in its infancy that a regular complaint was that the big guys were blocking activity by placing a few thousand lots on the bid\ask and leaving them. Little guys can batter away at the order book from now until eternity and they will never get movement because the only way to flip a bid\ask pair is to strip out all at say the ask and leave enough to soak up any market selling against the bid. Only dealers who can hit with thousands in a clip can do that and in my book anybody who can hit with a couple of thousand plus is a big guy. There are times when the big guys are not playing and that is when prices flip\flop between two\three ticks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When I said market orders, I did mean orders that are filled immediately at best price and not limit orders. The guys who stacked up several thousand on the bid/ask as you described were using limit orders. Unless I missed your point?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The thread on structural reference got me thinking about delta again and some of the ways in which I use it and others use it. At important structural reference points, imo delta readings have more significance, large or small. So does anyone use any particular tools or indicators to filter out or highlight delta around either automatic or user defined prices? It's certainly not an essential thing and simple price alerts can be set up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.