Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

blackball

E-mini's As "long Term Investments"

Recommended Posts

Hi:

 

I have heard that futures trading is a zero sum game but is this true? In the long run (I mean at least 10+ yrs) stock indices have a tendency to go up so if one were to supposedly open long futures positions and roll them over every 3 months (or longer) could you not capture the long term gains in the stock market (minus the dividends)? I was thinking of a basket of diversified e-mini futures to start (S&P500, Russell2000, Emerging Markets, Commodities, etc).

 

Taking it one step further might possibly be using a simple trading system like double crossovers on moving averages (i.e. 50 and 200 day) as buy/sell indicators. I've done some prelim back testing on this and it seems to work (yes we all love how backtesting results always turn out great :D )

 

I'm not talking about hitting a homerun so it would involve using "only" 3x leverage.

 

Thoughts?

 

Thx

 

Blackball

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe the term "zero sum" refers to the fact that there are fees associated with entering and exiting a position. Therefore, the price paid to the seller, from the buyer, will never equal the actual value of the product (the sum is less than zero). Direct costs associated with each trade might include your platform (brokerage) fee, commissions, data feeds, and the spread (between the bid and ask). And of course there are also indirect costs, such as internet fees, subscriptions, education, etc.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Zero sum means for every person that gains in the futures markets on a contract another person/party has an equivalent loss. The net change in total wealth is "o". Just shifted from one party to the other.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In the long run compound interest plus dividends is really what propels account growth something futures doesn't provide. Along with the fact that you have expiration, futures is looked at as more of a hedging vehicle versus a long term investment.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Managed futures as part of a diverse portfolio makes sense, and some funds do very well with these. I guess it all depends on how you define "long term". For me month is pretty long term! ;-)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you want to trade them long term, then buy spy and hold. You'll get dividends ant not have to incur transaction costs since there is no roll. Zero sum is actually negative sum when you take into account transaction costs that are seen and unseen.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Managed futures as part of a diverse portfolio makes sense, and some funds do very well with these. I guess it all depends on how you define "long term". For me month is pretty long term! ;-)

 

Ya managed futures is a whole other topic in itself, but managed futures vs owning futures is a viable option. if you want to invest I look to spot forex.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Gotta say I have never run across anyone who approaches let's say the ES or TF with a long-term buy and hold approach. I agree with the above - there's other ways to accomplish this without all the trading costs that would be involved (not to mention the potential crazy leverage you might need to take) -- ETF's, etc.. .seem to be a more grounded approach. I'd even argue options on ETF's I think before I looked at holding an emini future as a long term investment.....short term trading and hedging - another story.

 

MMS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Gotta say I have never run across anyone who approaches let's say the ES or TF with a long-term buy and hold approach. I agree with the above - there's other ways to accomplish this without all the trading costs that would be involved (not to mention the potential crazy leverage you might need to take) -- ETF's, etc.. .seem to be a more grounded approach. I'd even argue options on ETF's I think before I looked at holding an emini future as a long term investment.....short term trading and hedging - another story.

 

MMS

 

Spy's are cleaner in the set it and forget it sense, but you'll never beat the leverage that es or the big sp will provide you if you have enough equity to carry overnight. Hell, if you were fortunate to catch the low in march 2009 and add and add and add and add you'd be pretty well off. That is the type of trading that some of the legends in "Market Wizards" did.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In the US , is this the most “important” election ever or the least important election ever? Donald, is this what happens when you don’t keep your promises - like to drain the swamp? And  https://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/the-adults-in-the-room-with-trump-werent-adults-at-all/ and he declassifies all kinds of stuff and they still won't let it out... and ... ...  swamp ain't drained     Of course, if he did drain the swamp, then would we get to see the deep state dirt below it in action ?... like a mostly fake plandemic engineered a to accelerate plans to remake the world economy by burning it down... while up here on TL it seems we quietly don’t care who’s behind all that...   Have a great weekend all
    • Ruthless plagiarisms just for you  We do have a pandemic, but it’a plandemic  of fear - based on ginned up pseudo-science masquerading as unbiased fact. Here’s a list of equally valid ‘factualizations’ , with many items from the CDC itself, that paint a very different picture from the fear and dread being relentlessly drummed into the brains of unsuspecting citizens. 1) The PCR test is practically useless 2) A positive test is NOT a CASE 3) The Centers for Disease Control dramatically lowered the Covid-19 Death Count 4) CDC reports Covid-19 Survival Rate over 99% 5) CDC reveals 85% of Positive Covid cases wore face masks Always or Often 6) There are inexpensive, proven therapies for Covid-19 7) The US Death Rate is NOT spiking 😎 Most Covid-19 Deaths Occur at the End of a normal Lifespan 9) CDC Data Shows Minimal Covid Risk to Children and Young Adults In other words - wake the fuck up people!  
    • Long long ago I worked in the brokerage business and for a time was a principle in a brokerage where I networked with and recruited  from brokerage firms of all sizes and types... I can categorically state that if you trust your broker you are a rube at best.  If you have all you funds at one broker or even two diff brokers, you're an idiot.  Brokerages and the people they attract from the top to the bottom are everything fiduciary is not.   While it's perfectly fine to be satisfied with the costs, fills, and service you receive from a brokerage... it is not perfectly fine to let that cross the line into 'trust'.  As a client, you need to stay vigilant and ALWAYS be ready to jerk your money at the very first hint of trouble.     as vaguely as possible, zdo
    • "The whole point is that the press loses its way when it cares more about who benefits from information than whether it's true." https://greenwald.substack.com/p/article-on-joe-and-hunter-biden-censored  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.