Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

blackball

E-mini's As "long Term Investments"

Recommended Posts

Hi:

 

I have heard that futures trading is a zero sum game but is this true? In the long run (I mean at least 10+ yrs) stock indices have a tendency to go up so if one were to supposedly open long futures positions and roll them over every 3 months (or longer) could you not capture the long term gains in the stock market (minus the dividends)? I was thinking of a basket of diversified e-mini futures to start (S&P500, Russell2000, Emerging Markets, Commodities, etc).

 

Taking it one step further might possibly be using a simple trading system like double crossovers on moving averages (i.e. 50 and 200 day) as buy/sell indicators. I've done some prelim back testing on this and it seems to work (yes we all love how backtesting results always turn out great :D )

 

I'm not talking about hitting a homerun so it would involve using "only" 3x leverage.

 

Thoughts?

 

Thx

 

Blackball

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe the term "zero sum" refers to the fact that there are fees associated with entering and exiting a position. Therefore, the price paid to the seller, from the buyer, will never equal the actual value of the product (the sum is less than zero). Direct costs associated with each trade might include your platform (brokerage) fee, commissions, data feeds, and the spread (between the bid and ask). And of course there are also indirect costs, such as internet fees, subscriptions, education, etc.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Zero sum means for every person that gains in the futures markets on a contract another person/party has an equivalent loss. The net change in total wealth is "o". Just shifted from one party to the other.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In the long run compound interest plus dividends is really what propels account growth something futures doesn't provide. Along with the fact that you have expiration, futures is looked at as more of a hedging vehicle versus a long term investment.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Managed futures as part of a diverse portfolio makes sense, and some funds do very well with these. I guess it all depends on how you define "long term". For me month is pretty long term! ;-)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you want to trade them long term, then buy spy and hold. You'll get dividends ant not have to incur transaction costs since there is no roll. Zero sum is actually negative sum when you take into account transaction costs that are seen and unseen.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Managed futures as part of a diverse portfolio makes sense, and some funds do very well with these. I guess it all depends on how you define "long term". For me month is pretty long term! ;-)

 

Ya managed futures is a whole other topic in itself, but managed futures vs owning futures is a viable option. if you want to invest I look to spot forex.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Gotta say I have never run across anyone who approaches let's say the ES or TF with a long-term buy and hold approach. I agree with the above - there's other ways to accomplish this without all the trading costs that would be involved (not to mention the potential crazy leverage you might need to take) -- ETF's, etc.. .seem to be a more grounded approach. I'd even argue options on ETF's I think before I looked at holding an emini future as a long term investment.....short term trading and hedging - another story.

 

MMS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Gotta say I have never run across anyone who approaches let's say the ES or TF with a long-term buy and hold approach. I agree with the above - there's other ways to accomplish this without all the trading costs that would be involved (not to mention the potential crazy leverage you might need to take) -- ETF's, etc.. .seem to be a more grounded approach. I'd even argue options on ETF's I think before I looked at holding an emini future as a long term investment.....short term trading and hedging - another story.

 

MMS

 

Spy's are cleaner in the set it and forget it sense, but you'll never beat the leverage that es or the big sp will provide you if you have enough equity to carry overnight. Hell, if you were fortunate to catch the low in march 2009 and add and add and add and add you'd be pretty well off. That is the type of trading that some of the legends in "Market Wizards" did.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • #forex #forexnews #Brexit #GBPUSD is trading at 1.2867, having breached key support on Tuesday, courtesy of Brexit delay. The pound fell below the 50-hour moving average, confirming a bearish reversal on short duration charts. The key MA had consistently reversed pullbacks throughout the rally from 1.22 to 1.30 and may work as stiff resistance henceforth.  The GBP was offered as #PrimeMinister #Johnson's #BrexitBill won parliamentary support, but the government’s timetable of just 3 days debate on the bill was rejected.  With the parliamentary defeat, the probability of Britain leaving the European Union (#EU) before the Oct. 31 deadline has dropped sharply.  Further, a source in Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s office said on Tuesday that a new election would be the only way to move on from Britain’s Brexit crisis if the European Union agrees to a delay until January.  On a daily chart, the uptrend in GBP/USD appears to have stalled. Signs of indecision loom as a #Bearish Harami candlestick pattern risks paving the way for a reversal. Prices are eyeing near-term support which is a range between 1.2773 and 1.2798. A close under this barrier could open the door to testing former highs from September. Otherwise, clearing resistance at 1.3001 prolongs the uptrend. Expectation for GBP to “retest the 1.3010/15 level” was incorrect as GBP rose briefly to 1.3000 before plummeting to 1.2862 during NY hours. Upward pressure has dissipated and the short-term risk is for a deeper pullback. That said, any weakness is viewed as a lower trading range of 1.2810/1.2920 and a sustained decline below 1.2810 appears unlikely for now. Next 1-3 weeks:  #GBP tried to break clearly above 1.3000 for the second straight day yesterday (22 Oct) but slumped after touching 1.3000. For now, there is no change to our view from Monday (21 Oct, spot at 1.2880) wherein “GBP has to ‘punch’ above 1.3000 and register a NY closing above this level in order to indicate that the current rally has enough ‘ammunitions’ to extend to 1.3050, possibly as high as 1.3150”. While there is no change to our view, severely overbought conditions suggest GBP could ill afford to dither below 1.3000 or the risk of a short-term top would increase rapidly. From here, unless GBP cracks and stays above 1.3000 within these 1 to 2 days, a break of 1.2770 (no change in ‘strong support’ level) would indicate that the positive phase that started more than a week ago (see annotations in the chart below) has run its course. Looking ahead, a breach of 1.2770 would suggest that GBP is ready to ‘take a breather’ after the steep rally over the past couple of weeks.  
    • good news indeed, recognized in latin america as well. good job
    • CWM FX was a foreign exchange trading firm located at the Heron Tower at 110 Bishopsgate, otherwise known as Salesforce Tower. Dealing at the firm was suspended in March 2015 following a police raid on the firm and 13 arrests. There have been no convictions relating to these arrests as of 15 June 2015. CEO Anthony Constantinou was convicted in 2016 of sexual assault and sentenced to serve 12 months in jail.[1] London Police later revealed that most of the company's revenue came from a £50m alleged Ponzi scheme which promised returns of 5% per month Real charmer this conman..no? Now sit back and watch how he either fx off or trys to play the victim. Adults don't need moderators.
    • I know a parrott that has a higher IQ than you.
    • Feel free to copy and paste every time mr constipation posts. Do not be deterred by anything he says because he's a lying conning crook who can sue me for slander anytime
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.