Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

edabreu

Automated Trading...algorithmic Trading..system Trading

Recommended Posts

There are a lot of chart pics and videos about system performance

results floating around all over many vendor websites. Many of the

reported replay results are phenomenal. It seems every video you see is

a winner. For some magical reason the sensitivity setting was just

perfect for that day, the money management was perfect for that day, and

the results were just perfect for that day and it was the same instrument.

 

The most amazing thing, however, is that on each day the settings for system sensitivity

were different. The range chart bar or time size was different. The target and stops

were different. Gee...how did the system know which sensitivity to use

for each day, and how did it know to adjust the targets, and how did it

know to change the range bar size? Intriguing questions. Simple honest

answer is that the system did not make these decisions, the user

(vendor) did. So, how did the user know? Simple honest answer is the

user did not know. But Market Replay is a wonderful thing. With it you

already know what kind of day is was, so all you need to do is adjust

the sensitivity, adjust the targets, adjust the range bar chart size and

viola! you have another perfect day.

 

Do not be so naive and gullible to believe that a system that has $1500

to $2000 winning days trading a 2 lot is a consistently real thing. It

is a hindsight result, with a lot of adjusting gone into the settings to

make it work perfectly. Also, did you get the part about the $500 intra

day draw down? Remember you are trading a 2 lot. Do you think such a

draw down is a realistic amount for the number of contracts you are

trading? since that draw down is way over 2% of any

reasonable 2 contract trading account. Ask yourself that if at 11am you

are up $300, and then at 1:30 you are down $500, would you still be able

to continue? Would you trust the market to give it all back to you, and

get you back into profit when all you have to go by is hindsight

results? So, unless you are a hindsight trader, market replay results

are almost completely useless.

 

What you need to know you will never know. You can not know in advance

what kind of day it will be. You can guess. Or, you can have a stable

consistent sensitivity setting, use a consistent range bar chart size,

use a consistent risk reward plan, and then run the system day in and

day out and see how it performs.

 

Look for real time results posted in real time, the same day before any

replay was possible. Or better yet, look for long term consistent

results with the same instrument, same sensitivity settings, same range

chart size, same risk reward plan. Then you can gauge the realistic

potential, the realistic intra day draw down, and the realistic

performance over time, in real time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • 📁 Population in 2100, as projected by UN Population Division.   🇮🇳 India: 1,533 million 🇨🇳 China: 771 million 🇳🇬 Nigeria: 546 million 🇵🇰 Pakistan: 487 million 🇨🇩 Congo: 431 million 🇺🇸 US: 394 million 🇪🇹 Ethiopia: 323 million 🇮🇩 Indonesia: 297 million 🇹🇿 Tanzania: 244 million 🇪🇬 Egypt: 205 million 🇧🇷 Brazil: 185 million 🇵🇭 Philippines: 180 million 🇧🇩 Bangladesh: 177 million 🇳🇪 Niger: 166 million 🇸🇩 Sudan: 142 million 🇦🇴 Angola: 133 million 🇺🇬 Uganda: 132 million 🇲🇽 Mexico: 116 million 🇰🇪 Kenya: 113 million 🇷🇺 Russia: 112 million 🇮🇶 Iraq: 111 million 🇦🇫 Afghanistan: 110 million   @FinancialWorldUpdates Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/   
    • “If the West finds itself falling behind in AI, it won’t be due to a lack of technological prowess or resources. It won’t be because we weren’t smart enough or didn’t move fast enough. It will be because of something many of our Eastern counterparts don’t share with us: fear of AI.   The root of the West's fear of AI can no doubt be traced back to decades of Hollywood movies and books that have consistently depicted AI as a threat to humanity. From the iconic "Terminator" franchise to the more recent "Ex Machina," we have been conditioned to view AI as an adversary, a force that will ultimately turn against us.   In contrast, Eastern cultures have a WAY different attitude towards AI. As UN AI Advisor Neil Sahota points out, "In Eastern culture, movies, and books, they've always seen AI and robots as helpers and assistants, as a tool to be used to further the benefit of humans."   This positive outlook on AI has allowed countries like Japan, South Korea, and China to forge ahead with AI development, including in areas like healthcare, where AI is being used to improve the quality of services.   The West's fear of AI is not only shaping public opinion but also influencing policy decisions and regulatory frameworks. The European Union, for example, recently introduced AI legislation prioritizing heavy-handed protection over supporting innovation.   While such measures might be well-intentioned, they risk stifling AI development and innovation, making it harder for Western companies and researchers to compete.   Among the nations leading common-sense AI regulation, one stands out for now: Singapore.” – Chris C Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • $NFLX Netflix stock hold at 556.59 support or breakdown?  https://stockconsultant.com/?NFLX
    • $RDNT Radnet stock flat top breakout watch, https://stockconsultant.com/?RDNT
    • $GNK Genco Shipping stock narrow range breakout watch, also see $GOGL https://stockconsultant.com/?GNK
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.