Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

UrmaBlume

Phantom Orders, High Frequency Bots & Latency Arbitrage

Recommended Posts

This article in "The Atlantic" describes phantom orders placed with no hope of fills in the millisecond time frame, sometimes by the tens of thousands.

 

The snapshot below shows the prices of different levels of low to almost zero latency data feeds. The $500k per month feed is about latency arbitrage.

 

I think these phantom orders are placed by the latency arb guys to lure the HFT guys (one step slower than the latency arb guys) into moves that are already being faded by the latency arb guys. What do you think?

 

 

superdata.jpg

 

UrmaBlume

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

An interesting article. Perhaps you should define 'latency arb' a bit more, otherwise it sounds a bit too star treckie for me.

 

I think money is spent on latency to be the first in the FIFO world, not to do over those who dont have the spend for co-lo & gold connectors between servers etc. If he who is fasted is always the winner, then there would only be one player in the market, and we would no longer have a market. Thus the slower guy has to be able to make money too. Speed is not everything. A solid algorithm would be a better and important asset.

 

I didn't see anywhere in the article about the fees exchanges will charge HFT's for message:fill ratio's that are frequently incurred even with high volume auto-spreading let alone HFT's. This is very common in the derivatives exchanges, but I'm not sure about stock exchanges.

 

Michael S Manley makes an interesting comment near the top of the comments list.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good find - very interesting - potentially very scary.

One explanation that did not get mention was maybe it the exchanges themselves - they are trying to get people to trade, the more trades, the more exchange fees?

 

Nah...probably not.... the exchanges are not that sophisticated.

 

If its market spoofing in order to drag out orders or likely interest - then that is nothing new, people have been doing this every since markets have been going, and market regulators need to draw the line been market manipulation and innovation.....they will probably get that wrong too.

 

Personally this sort of stuff does scare me as I hear it too often that even the programmers are not even 30% sure about what is happening with their own programs, even if there is nothing sinister about it..... sort of like the nutters running the asylum, and all the nutters are the psychiatrists.....

 

The nice thing may be the increase in external exchanges (the dark pools), OTC markets etc..... after a while people then try and game the gamers. The never ending cycle of life.

Edited by SIUYA

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good point SIUYA. I'm sure many of us remember Paul Rotter aka The Flipper on Eurex. Many were screaming foul play as his orders were there with the intention of fooling others to place orders which he would then fill. Many complained to Eurex.

 

Eurex didn't give a tinkers cuss however because:

1/ His trades alone were something like 20-30% of total Bund volume, so they were making good money from him.

2/ His orders were tradable. Sometimes he did get hit on his 'fake' orders.

 

You don't hear of him any more. I bet he's still trading though......somewhere.....some how.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Good find - very interesting - potentially very scary.

One explanation that did not get mention was maybe it the exchanges themselves - they are trying to get people to trade, the more trades, the more exchange fees?Nah...probably not.... the exchanges are not that sophisticated.If its market spoofing in order to drag out orders or likely interest - then that is nothing new, people have been doing this every since markets have been going, and market regulators need to draw the line been market manipulation and innovation.Personally this sort of stuff does scare me as I hear it too often that even the programmers are not even 30% sure about what is happening with their own programs, even if there is nothing sinister about it..... sort of like the nutters running the asylum, and all the nutters are the psychiatrists.....

 

While at present there are no retail packages that make the order book, depth of market, information available for anything other than visual reference, it is rumored that TS V9.0 will. This means that these orders are being place by entities with far greater resources than any retail and many commercial traders.

 

Again we think that these "phantoms" are placed by latency arb guys to lure the uber HFT guys. While we don't track these phantom orders we do track the HFT guys, noting every transaction in the millisecond time frame.

 

We treat these phantom orders the same way we treat time - we ignore it. We don't believe that the passage of time motivates the movement of price but rather it is the occurence of trade (order flow) and more specifically it is an imbalance in that order flow that motivates price - hence we track real transactions and not phantom orders.

 

UB

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

We treat these phantom orders the same way we treat time - we ignore it. We don't believe that the passage of time motivates the movement of price but rather it is the occurence of trade (order flow) and more specifically it is an imbalance in that order flow that motivates price - hence we track real transactions and not phantom orders.

 

UB

 

This doesnt make sense if you think about it - ignoring time. The imbalance in order flow that is motivating price as you put it will exist only for a brief amount of time. Balanced order flow (the norm) is available in a large majority of time. Thus, the 'passage of time' has a massive impact on price and it's availability.

 

Id agree that in this day in age it makes more sense to track LTP's and their size than quotes.

 

Out of interest, if you operate on the microsecond time frame (see, you're talking of time again!!), surely you will get your butt kicked by those in the nanosecond time frame? How about those on the giggliwiggli time frame? (sorry, I made that last one up :) )

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This doesnt make sense if you think about it - ignoring time. The imbalance in order flow that is motivating price as you put it will exist only for a brief amount of time. Balanced order flow (the norm) is available in a large majority of time. Thus, the 'passage of time' has a massive impact on price and it's availability.Id agree that in this day in age it makes more sense to track LTP's and their size than quotes.Out of interest, if you operate on the microsecond time frame (see, you're talking of time again!!), surely you will get your butt kicked by those in the nanosecond time frame? How about those on the giggliwiggli time frame? (sorry, I made that last one up :) )

 

If a unit of time passes without the occurnece of trade, how does that motivate price movment as compared to when a unit of trade that is imbalanced 2 to 1 on the buy side occurs?

 

The passage of time by itself does nothing to motivate price movement where as the occurence of imbalanced trade is the PRIME motivator of pirce movement.

 

It is not about tick-tock it is about buy/sell and more specifically - more of one than the other - imbalanced trade.

 

UrmaBlume

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Have to agree with you UB - the only really relevant thing is an actual trade, not just a bunch of phantom trades. This shows up when markets have pre-market and post market orders which often show a lot of phantom orders that never actually trade. Some of these are based off other spreads, arbitrages etc. eg; there are always option market makers making markets....these are live and not phantom orders, but are generally waiting for one end to get filled.

 

However it does raise an interesting question about the technicalities of these phantom trades. If they are miles away from the market then its less relevant, however, if they are feeding off each other, and some other 'flash crash' or fat finger, or plane into a building occurs, then these out of the money orders can very easily start to transact.

If they are not just quote requests, and actual orders then they can be filled, will this potentially start a domino effect? Especially given the thousands + of orders that can be sent.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
While at present there are no retail packages that make the order book, depth of market, information available for anything other than visual reference, it is rumored that TS V9.0 will. This means that these orders are being place by entities with far greater resources than any retail and many commercial traders.

 

Hi there,

 

There are and have been retail packages (at least 1 that I know of) for some years with the ability to use the order book in a programmatic fashion. Check out Neoticker - this has been available for quite some time.

 

With kind regards,

MK

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If a unit of time passes without the occurnece of trade, how does that motivate price movment as compared to when a unit of trade that is imbalanced 2 to 1 on the buy side occurs?

 

The passage of time by itself does nothing to motivate price movement where as the occurence of imbalanced trade is the PRIME motivator of pirce movement.

 

It is not about tick-tock it is about buy/sell and more specifically - more of one than the other - imbalanced trade.

 

UrmaBlume

 

Thanks for the explanation. I see where you are coming from.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi there,

 

There are and have been retail packages (at least 1 that I know of) for some years with the ability to use the order book in a programmatic fashion. Check out Neoticker - this has been available for quite some time.

 

With kind regards,

MK

 

You are right MK, I had forgotten about Neoticker and next will be TS V9

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
While at present there are no retail packages that make the order book, depth of market, information available for anything other than visual reference, it is rumored that TS V9.0 will. This means that these orders are being place by entities with far greater resources than any retail and many commercial traders.

 

 

As MK pointed out Neoticker always has had the order book available programmatically, Ninjatrader has for ages too, perhaps not that robust a platform for 'serious' work but its available. I'd take the chart in the original post with a pinch of salt btw. You can get 'tier 2' (yellow) performance for as little as 500 odd bucks a month (by 'sub letting' virtual machine space from a broker that is already collocated at the same facility as the exchange).

 

Whilst getting 'tier 1' (green) performance does require technical expertise having suitable commercial arrangements is all that is important, (programs like Advanced Look, Enhanced Liquidity Provider, Supplemental Liquidity Provider etc.) Exchanges are not going to allow you to graft your hardware into theirs at a low enough level to get that sort of performance if you are not part of one these programs. You need a 'license' to print money and these are not handed to all and sundry :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • How's about other crypto exchanges? Are all they banned in your country or only Binance?
    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.