Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

aaa

MACD Divergence TrendLine

Recommended Posts

// Author: aaa

// from: MARKPLEX Code Divergence

// http://markplex.com/tutorial4.php

// version: 1.0

// Date: 20100501

// added:

// divergence on top +

// Line.Color.Top + Line.Color.Bot + Line.Size + Plot.MACD in inputs

[/url]

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=20838&stc=1&d=1272711737

 

PS : Stochastic Divergence TrendLine here

 

http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/f46/stochastic-divergence-trendline-7244.html

Snap1.jpg.53e5f34bc7ec8364bf117cbba667c19f.jpg

MACD DIVERGENCE TRENDLINE.ELD

MACD Divergence TrendLines.pla

MACD Divergence TrendLine.txt

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

TL_NEW

This reserved word adds the specified text string to a price chart

Text_New

This reserved word adds the specified text string to a price chart

 

I'm wondering if it's possible 2 draw divergences lines to an indicator ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
TL_NEW

This reserved word adds the specified text string to a price chart

Text_New

This reserved word adds the specified text string to a price chart

 

I'm wondering if it's possible 2 draw divergences lines to an indicator ?

 

 

do you mean trendline ?

 

TL_NEW

This reserved word adds the specified text string to a price chart

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
....

I'm wondering if it's possible 2 draw divergences lines to an indicator ?

 

sure, why not?

 

just duplicate everything...

make sure you name the variables with -1 and -2 suffix.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi TAMS

 

Always here 2 help absent-minded

 

Oups... I've forgot 2 attach my work in my last post...

 

do you mean trendline ?

 

Yes and I've tried also Text_New

 

make sure you name the variables with -1 and -2 suffix.

 

I've done it but w/o succes

 

I was wondering if it's allowed by EL 2 change iPrice by the iValue of an indicator ?

 

This reserved word adds a trendline with the specified starting and ending points to a price chart. It returns a numeric expression corresponding to the ID number of the trendline added to the chart.

 

Value1 = TL_New(iBarDate, iBarTime, iPrice, eBarDate, eBarTime, ePrice)

 

If U have Xtra time, Would U mind 2 have a look on my attachement ?

 

regards

 

aaa

MACD Divergence TrendLines Indicator.txt

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
only plot trendlines directly on the MACD indicator

 

LOL... you knew I was going to ask you to make a drawing... but...

 

 

to draw in subchart, you need TL_NEW_SELF.

 

this is a MultiCharts exclusive keyword.

 

 

in this case, you do not need to duplicate the variables and calculations...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So it's not possible in Easy Language but possible in Power Language

 

it's amazing that U know 110% of Power Language.

 

TAMS, U know what ?

 

U ARE THE BEST !!!

 

TL_New_self

Displays a trendline, with the specified starting and ending points, on the SubChart containing the study; returns a trendline-specific ID number, required to modify the trendline.

Usage

TL_New_self (sDate, sTime, sPriceValue, eDate, eTime, ePriceValue)

Edited by aaa

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is it possible to apply the same principle of divergence to a StochRSI indicator (divergence drawn on both the price and the indicator)?

 

I tried playing with it on my end but getting a ton of errors. I'm not sure if the errors are due to the 2 lines in the stochrsi versus the single line in the MACD. Below is the code that i'm using for the stochrsi:

 

input:

 

RSILength(9),

StochLength(18),

KLength(6),

DLength(3),

oversold(20),

overbought(80),

overscolor(white),

overbcolor(white);

 

Vars:

DToscK(0),

DToscD(0);

 

value1 = FastKCustomEasy(RSI(C, RSILength),StochLength);

DToscK = average(value1,KLength);

DToscD = average(DToscK,DLength);

 

plot1(DToscK,"%K" );

plot2(DToscD,"%D" );

plot3( overbought, "OverBot" ) ;

plot4( oversold, "OverSld" ) ;

 

condition1 = value1 crosses over oversold ;

if condition1 then

Alert( "Indicator exiting oversold zone" )

else

begin

condition1 = value1 crosses under overbought ;

if condition1 then

Alert( "Indicator exiting overbought zone" ) ;

end;

Edited by lonew0lf

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Is it possible to apply the same principle of divergence to a StochRSI indicator (divergence drawn on both the price and the indicator)?

 

I tried playing with it on my end but getting a ton of errors. I'm not sure if the errors are due to the 2 lines in the stochrsi versus the single line in the MACD. Below is the code that i'm using for the stochrsi:

 

...end;

 

mmm... let me check my crystal ball for your error messages....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Man you work fast. Here's what I threw together:

 

//----------------------------------------------------

inputs:

//----------------------------------------------------

 

RSILength(9),

StochLength(18),

KLength(6),

DLength(3),

LeftStrength(3),

RightStrength(3),

Line.Color.Top(magenta),

Line.Color.Bot(magenta),

Line.Size(2),

Plot.stochrsi(1);

 

//----------------------------------------------------

variables:

//----------------------------------------------------

 

DToscK(0),

DToscD(0),

 

var0(0),

var1(0),

var2(0),

oPivotPrice1(0),

oPivotBar1(0),

oPivotPrice2(0),

oPivotBar2(0),

oPivotPrice11(0),

oPivotBar11(0),

oPivotPrice12(0),

oPivotBar12(0);

 

value1 = FastKCustomEasy(RSI(C, RSILength),StochLength);

DToscK = average(value1,KLength);

DToscD = average(DToscK,DLength);

 

var0 = StochRSI( Close, RSILength, StochLength, KLength, DLength );

 

Condition1 = Pivot( var0, RSILength, LeftStrength, RightStrength, 1, -1, oPivotPrice1, oPivotBar1 ) <> -1

AND ( oPivotBar1 - RightStrength ) = 0 ;

 

Condition11 = Pivot( var0, RSILength, LeftStrength, RightStrength, 1, 1, oPivotPrice11, oPivotBar11 ) <> -1

AND ( oPivotBar11 - RightStrength ) = 0 ;

 

Condition2 = Pivot( var0, RSILength, LeftStrength, RightStrength, 2, -1, oPivotPrice2, oPivotBar2 ) <> -1;

 

Condition12 = Pivot( var0, RSILength, LeftStrength, RightStrength, 2, 1, oPivotPrice12, oPivotBar12 ) <> -1;

 

If

Condition1 and Condition2 // added condition2 = referecne future data

AND L[oPivotBar2] >= L[oPivotBar1]

AND var0[oPivotBar2] < var0[oPivotBar1] then

Begin

Value2 = TL_New(D[oPivotBar2], T[oPivotBar2], L[oPivotBar2], D[oPivotBar1], T[oPivotBar1], L[oPivotBar1]);

TL_SetColor( Value2, Line.Color.Bot );

TL_SetSize( Value2, Line.Size );

End;

 

If

Condition11 and Condition12 // added condition12 referecne future data

AND H[oPivotBar12] <= H[oPivotBar11]

AND var0[oPivotBar12] > var0[oPivotBar11] then

Begin

Value12 = TL_New(D[oPivotBar12], T[oPivotBar12], H[oPivotBar12], D[oPivotBar11], T[oPivotBar11], H[oPivotBar11]);

TL_SetColor( Value12, Line.Color.Top );

TL_SetSize( Value12, Line.Size );

End;

 

if Plot.stochrsi <> 0 then

begin

Plot1( var0 );

end;

Edited by lonew0lf

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

tagged code should look like this:

 

//----------------------------------------------------
inputs:
//----------------------------------------------------

RSILength(9),
StochLength(18),
KLength(6),
DLength(3),
LeftStrength(3),
RightStrength(3),
Line.Color.Top(magenta),
Line.Color.Bot(magenta),
Line.Size(2), 
Plot.stochrsi(1);

 

 

just highlight the code (ie select the text),

then press the # key on the top of the message window.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Is it possible to apply the same principle of divergence to a StochRSI indicator (divergence drawn on both the price and the indicator)?

 

Hello

I will have a look this WE

rgds

aa

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

*************************

 

If someone else is interested with others indicators divergence trendline like

 

RSI

Mom

CCI

etc...

 

I could post one each WE

 

If U have a preferred one, please post it here

 

It should B fun 2 mix them on a chart ?!

 

************************************

Edited by aaa

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

AAA - thanks for undertaking this endeavor. I've come to like the stochrsi as a good test against my signals. The ability to see divergence would be quite nice.

 

I'm running the MACD divergence on my charts right now and it looks good, hopefully the same will hold true for stochrsi.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd be interested in the ability to add a moving average or linear moving average to define trend, and only show divergences in the direction of the trend.

 

Greatly cuts down on the signals... but increases the probability of continuation.

 

snowbird

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was able to apply divergence to both the price and indicator. Thank you AAA for putting the original together. The below modification applies to the stochrsi:

 

// StochRSI Divergence TrendLine
// Author: MARKPLEX
// http://markplex.com/tutorial4.php
// version: 1.0

// Author: aaa
// version: 2.0
// Date: 20091129
// added: 
// divergence on top +
// Line.Color.Top + Line.Color.Bot + Line.Size + Plot.Sto in inputs

//----------------------------------------------------
inputs:
//----------------------------------------------------


RSILength(9),
StochLength(18),
KLength(6),
DLength(3),
OverSold(20),
OverBought(80),
Length(20),
LeftStrength(3),
RightStrength(3),
Line.Color.Top(red),
Line.Color.Bot(blue),
Line.Size(3),
Plot.stochrsi(1);

//---------------------------------------------------- 
variables:
//----------------------------------------------------

DToscK(0), 
DToscD(0),

oPivotPrice1(0),
oPivotBar1(0),
oPivotPrice2(0),
oPivotBar2(0),

oPivotPrice11(0),
oPivotBar11(0),
oPivotPrice12(0),
oPivotBar12(0);

value1 = FastKCustomEasy(RSI(C, RSILength),StochLength);
DToscK =  average(value1,KLength);
DToscD = average(DToscK,DLength);

Condition1 = Pivot( DToscK, Length, LeftStrength, RightStrength, 1, -1, oPivotPrice1, oPivotBar1 ) <> -1 
	AND ( oPivotBar1 - RightStrength ) = 0 ;

Condition11 = Pivot( DToscK, Length, LeftStrength, RightStrength, 1, 1, oPivotPrice11, oPivotBar11 ) <> -1 
	AND ( oPivotBar11 - RightStrength ) = 0 ;

Condition2 = Pivot( DToscK, Length, LeftStrength, RightStrength, 2, -1, oPivotPrice2, oPivotBar2 ) <> -1;

Condition12 = Pivot( DToscK, Length, LeftStrength, RightStrength, 2, 1, oPivotPrice12, oPivotBar12 ) <> -1;

If 
	Condition1 and Condition2 // added condition2 = referecne future data
	AND L[oPivotBar2] >= L[oPivotBar1] 
	AND DToscK[oPivotBar2] < DToscK[oPivotBar1] then 
Begin
	Value2 = TL_New(D[oPivotBar2], T[oPivotBar2], L[oPivotBar2], D[oPivotBar1], T[oPivotBar1], L[oPivotBar1]); 
	TL_SetColor( Value2, Line.Color.Bot );
	TL_SetSize(  Value2, Line.Size  );
End;

If 
	Condition11 and Condition12 // added condition12  referecne future data
	AND H[oPivotBar12] <= H[oPivotBar11] 
	AND DToscK[oPivotBar12] > DToscK[oPivotBar11] then 
Begin
	Value12 = TL_New(D[oPivotBar12], T[oPivotBar12], H[oPivotBar12], D[oPivotBar11], T[oPivotBar11], H[oPivotBar11]); 
	TL_SetColor( Value12, Line.Color.Top );
	TL_SetSize(  Value12, Line.Size  );
End;

if Plot.stochrsi <> 0 then	
Plot1( DToscK );


condition3 = Pivot( DToscK, Length, LeftStrength, RightStrength, 1, -1, oPivotPrice1, oPivotBar1 ) <> -1 
	AND ( oPivotBar1 - RightStrength ) = 0 ;

condition32 = Pivot( DToscK, Length, LeftStrength, RightStrength, 1, 1, oPivotPrice11, oPivotBar11 ) <> -1 
	AND ( oPivotBar11 - RightStrength ) = 0 ;

condition4 = Pivot( DToscK, Length, LeftStrength, RightStrength, 2, -1, oPivotPrice2, oPivotBar2 ) <> -1;

condition42 = Pivot( DToscK, Length, LeftStrength, RightStrength, 2, 1, oPivotPrice12, oPivotBar12 ) <> -1;

If 
	Condition3 and condition4 
	AND L[oPivotBar2] >= L[oPivotBar1] 
	AND DToscK[oPivotBar2] < DToscK[oPivotBar1] then 
Begin
	Value2 = TL_New_SELF(D[oPivotBar2], T[oPivotBar2], DToscK[oPivotBar2], D[oPivotBar1], T[oPivotBar1], DToscK[oPivotBar1]); 
	TL_SetColor( Value2, Line.Color.Bot );
	TL_SetSize(  Value2, Line.Size  );
End;

If 
	Condition32 and Condition42
	AND H[oPivotBar12] <= H[oPivotBar11] 
	AND DToscK[oPivotBar12] > DToscK[oPivotBar11] then 
Begin
	Value12 = TL_New_SELF(D[oPivotBar12], T[oPivotBar12], DToscK[oPivotBar12], D[oPivotBar11], T[oPivotBar11], DToscK[oPivotBar11]); 
	TL_SetColor( Value12, Line.Color.Top );
	TL_SetSize(  Value12, Line.Size  );
End;

Plot1( DToscK, "stochrsi",      white );
plot2( 20,    "oversold", white);
plot3(80, "overbought", white);

StochRSI Divergence.pla

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • $VKTX Viking Therapeutics stock attempting to move higher off the 64.24 support area, volume 47% above normal, https://stockconsultant.com/?VKTX
    • Date: 26th April 2024. Alphabet Easily Beat Earnings Predictions But Focus Shifts to Today’s PCE Data. Microsoft and Alphabet’s earnings reports beat expectations pushing the NASDAQ to the top of the charts. The Bank of Japan keep interest rates unchanged applying pressure on the Japanese Yen. The Yen Index declines 0.36% and is down 40% against the USD over the past 5 years. The US GDP growth rate falls below its 2.5% expectations, reading 1.6%, but economists advise the Fed may only cut once in 2024! The market turns its attention to the Core PCE Price Index which analysts expect to fall from 2.8% to 2.6%. USA100 – Alphabet Easily Beat Analysts’ Earnings Predictions and Sees its P/E Ratio Fall! The price of the NASDAQ ended the day higher and rose to a slightly higher high. As a result, the index is close to forming a traditional bullish trend and making Wednesday’s decline a retracement or medium-term correction. In terms technical analysis, indicators are mainly indicating a reverting price condition where the asset cannot maintain longer term momentum. However, momentum indications provide a slight bullish bias. The upward price movement is being driven by earnings reports from Microsoft and Alphabet which beat earnings expectations. Microsoft is the most influential stock for the NASDAQ while Alphabet is the third most influential. Alphabet’s earnings beat expectations by 21.61% and revenue rose more than $6 billion. As a result, the price of the stock rose 11.56% after market close. Furthermore, Microsoft’s Earnings Per Share beat Wall Street’s expectations by 3.40% and revenue by 1.50%. The stock rose by 4.30% after market close and is close to trading at the all-time high. However, investors should note that from the “magnificent 7”, Alphabet and Meta have the lowest Price to Earnings ratio. Meaning these stocks are the most likely to be trading below their intrinsic value. However, investors should note that negatives for the stock market in general remain. This also supports the bias shown by technical analysis. The GDP growth rate fell considerably below expectations while inflation data continues to show signs of rising prices. Investors will closely be monitoring today’s Core PCE Price Index which is the most watched index by the Federal Reserve. Analysts expect the Core PCE Price Index to fall from 2.8% to 2.6%. If the index reads more than 0.3%, a rate cut will become unlikely making stocks less attractive. Whereas, if the PCE Price Index is not as high as expectations, Bond Yields will likely decline, as will the US Dollar and a rate cut will be put back on the table. As a result, investors may look to take advantage of the strong earnings and continue purchasing stocks. USDJPY – BOJ Hold Interest Rates Unchanged! The price of the USDJPY exchange rate again rose to an all-time recent high after increasing in value for 3 consecutive days. Trend and momentum-based indicators point towards a higher price. However, the exchange rate is trading within the overbought range of most oscillators and is also showing a divergence pattern. Both are known to indicate a decline, but not necessarily a complete change of trend. The Bank of Japan’s statement from earlier this morning was largely “dovish” and gave no clear indication that the central bank wishes to keep rising interest rates. However, shortly the Governor will answer questions from journalists and may give a more hawkish tone. Either way, investors are mainly concentrating on if the Federal Government will again opt to intervene within the currency market. Most economists believe the intervention will only come if the USD continues to rise and it will not be before the Core PCE Price Index. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business. Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar. Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding on how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE! Click HERE to READ more Market news. Michalis Efthymiou Market Analyst HFMarkets Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in FX and CFDs products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • 📁 Population in 2100, as projected by UN Population Division.   🇮🇳 India: 1,533 million 🇨🇳 China: 771 million 🇳🇬 Nigeria: 546 million 🇵🇰 Pakistan: 487 million 🇨🇩 Congo: 431 million 🇺🇸 US: 394 million 🇪🇹 Ethiopia: 323 million 🇮🇩 Indonesia: 297 million 🇹🇿 Tanzania: 244 million 🇪🇬 Egypt: 205 million 🇧🇷 Brazil: 185 million 🇵🇭 Philippines: 180 million 🇧🇩 Bangladesh: 177 million 🇳🇪 Niger: 166 million 🇸🇩 Sudan: 142 million 🇦🇴 Angola: 133 million 🇺🇬 Uganda: 132 million 🇲🇽 Mexico: 116 million 🇰🇪 Kenya: 113 million 🇷🇺 Russia: 112 million 🇮🇶 Iraq: 111 million 🇦🇫 Afghanistan: 110 million   @FinancialWorldUpdates Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/   
    • “If the West finds itself falling behind in AI, it won’t be due to a lack of technological prowess or resources. It won’t be because we weren’t smart enough or didn’t move fast enough. It will be because of something many of our Eastern counterparts don’t share with us: fear of AI.   The root of the West's fear of AI can no doubt be traced back to decades of Hollywood movies and books that have consistently depicted AI as a threat to humanity. From the iconic "Terminator" franchise to the more recent "Ex Machina," we have been conditioned to view AI as an adversary, a force that will ultimately turn against us.   In contrast, Eastern cultures have a WAY different attitude towards AI. As UN AI Advisor Neil Sahota points out, "In Eastern culture, movies, and books, they've always seen AI and robots as helpers and assistants, as a tool to be used to further the benefit of humans."   This positive outlook on AI has allowed countries like Japan, South Korea, and China to forge ahead with AI development, including in areas like healthcare, where AI is being used to improve the quality of services.   The West's fear of AI is not only shaping public opinion but also influencing policy decisions and regulatory frameworks. The European Union, for example, recently introduced AI legislation prioritizing heavy-handed protection over supporting innovation.   While such measures might be well-intentioned, they risk stifling AI development and innovation, making it harder for Western companies and researchers to compete.   Among the nations leading common-sense AI regulation, one stands out for now: Singapore.” – Chris C Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • $NFLX Netflix stock hold at 556.59 support or breakdown?  https://stockconsultant.com/?NFLX
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.