Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

taotree

In Pursuit of Accurate Data

Recommended Posts

So... there have been various discussions about data feeds and I'd like to see if I can find a way to ensure I have a quality one. I've heard some recommendations but...

 

Here's why I ask. Supposedly, I would expect that CQG data factory would be of high quality. This is historical data, so there are no questions about connection issues.

 

I downloaded their sample and found this example:

 

F.US.EPM08 20080104 1 0918 144375 B N N 28

F.US.EPM08 20080104 1 0918 144375 B N N 25

F.US.EPM08 20080104 1 0918 144400 A N N 34

F.US.EPM08 20080104 1 0918 144375 T N N 9

F.US.EPM08 20080104 1 0918 144375 T N N 5

F.US.EPM08 20080104 1 0918 144375 T N N 6

F.US.EPM08 20080104 1 0918 144325 B N N 8

F.US.EPM08 20080104 1 0918 144375 A N N 19

F.US.EPM08 20080104 1 0918 144325 B N N 5

 

Bid was at 25, then there were trades of 20 total and then bid went to 8.

 

I asked them if that was normal and they said "what you see is normal and happens quite often". But we have 3 trade events in a row without any bid updates, and when we do get a bid update, it doesn't add up.

 

I guess I might be able to get data from CME directly.

http://www.cmegroup.com/market-data/datamine-historical-data/

 

It would be very interesting to see if they have the same issue of numbers not all adding up.

 

What I'm getting at is... it seems incredibly difficult to find and confirm that data is accurate and I'm starting to wonder if it's possible at all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

thats is why ultimately any back test is not necessarily going to give a 100% view of what may happen in reality.

Unfortunately collecting accurate data is costly. I used a group called CSI data for daily EOD data. They came highly recommended etc; etc; even in their data there are discrepancies and issues. We went through and investigated a few of them, did some research as to why, and then adjusted a few things.... is this hindering or helping - I dont know.

But ultimately a back test over a longer period of time a few tick differences should not make a difference. With more high frequency trading I would assume every tick can make the difference.

I guess once you get down to collecting your own data and daily reviewing it is ultimately a final resort..... I think you will unfortunately find this everywhere. It all depends on what you require it for. I have taken the view I just want data that is close enough.... and then I will take any test with a grain of salt.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I guess once you get down to collecting your own data and daily reviewing it is ultimately a final resort..... I think you will unfortunately find this everywhere. It all depends on what you require it for. I have taken the view I just want data that is close enough.... and then I will take any test with a grain of salt.

 

I'm a little confused--I would expect historical data to be more accurate than real time data. I was collecting my own data for a while, but I now know that the feed I was using is inaccurate so... collecting data doesn't do me any good unless I know the data I'm getting is good.

 

And as for "close enough"... that's what I'm struggling with. If this type of discrepancy "happens quite often" how do I assess the quality of data? If there are confusing things happening in even the best quality of data available (which I do not know if that's the case), how does one differentiate between the best, the "close enough" and the way off?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

By the way... It appears that you can get a direct internet feed to CME for $500/month but... does anyone know of a data distributor that just directly passes on CME data for less than $500/month? Then it would be easy to verify that we're getting the best data (can purchase some historical CME data directly and compare it to confirm). Comparing to data feeds that change the format and such is difficult because it requires manipulation and even interpretation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

historical data is drawn live data so now you understand why there are issues collecting data then - and why accurate data is expensive.... and all the things that can go wrong with it.....there should be no confusion.

 

There are plenty of discussions already about issues with tick data. with daily data, there should be less issues but there still are....

I go close enough as i dont have the time, resources or inclination to even wonder down the path of data collection.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

What I'm getting at is... it seems incredibly difficult to find and confirm that data is accurate and I'm starting to wonder if it's possible at all.

 

Me too. My hunch is that exchanges aggregate data at times. CME certainly reserve the right to, though I must be honest, the last time I looked for the document that mentioned it I could not find it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh, this is fun. So...

 

First of all, let me say that when I looked at the other data it took me less than a couple minutes to find data that didn't line up. So either it does happen all over the place, or I just got really lucky. Sorry... not rigorous check yet since I'm still just exploring.

 

So, I took a look at sample data direct from the CME. I spent a good deal longer finding ones that matched up--maybe 10 minutes? not sure, but then I found this:

 

From: Top of Book

 

2010011509564006628780EES F100300900 201132252A M M100115

2010011509564006628780EES F100300157 201132002B M M100115

2010011509564006628790EES F100300038 201132002 100115

2010011509564006628800EES F100300900 201132252A M M100115

2010011509564006628800EES F100300120 201132002B M M100115

 

What this is showing is:

First: ask = 900, bid = 157

Then a trade of 38

Then: ask = 900, bid = 120

 

Oops, we gained an extra one. So... there is at least one example of the CME's own data not lining up. So apparently the CME doesn't require them to match up.

 

By the way... it's not that a 1 difference in the bid is going to make or break a strategy. It's that these discrepancies are making it difficult for me to assess the accuracy of a data feed.

 

Another one:

 

2010011509564006628980EES F100300870 201132252A M M100115

2010011509564006628980EES F100300098 201132002B M M100115

2010011509564006628990EES F100300001 201132002 100115

2010011509564006629000EES F100300870 201132252A M M100115

2010011509564006629000EES F100300096 201132002B M M100115

 

And another:

 

2010011509564006629250EES F100300083 201132002A M M100115

2010011509564006629250EES F100301185 201131752B M M100115

2010011509564006629260EES F100300001 201132002 100115

2010011509564006629270EES F100300076 201132002A M M100115

2010011509564006629270EES F100301183 201131752B M M100115

 

Found those two quickly after the first... Okay... now time to ask CME directly about this and see if I can dig into what's going on.

 

At this point, I'm going to assume then that probably the only possible way of assessing the accuracy of a data feed is to collect the data, purchase CME data for the same day, and run a check to ensure every tick was received in the same order and context.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I posted about this exact issue a month or two ago on here. I spoke with IQ feed a week or two ago and they claimed two important things:

 

1. Timestamps come from the exchange -- the exchange provides the time stamps so that prevents market events from being *logged* out of order (but it's still possible for you to *receive* events out of chronological order...not a major problem, easy to sort out.

 

2. They claim that they never filter data (at least for CME, that's all I asked about). They report the complete datafeed from CME.

 

I might be missing something, but that sounds as good as having a direct line to CME. That's probably why Fulcrum recommends IQ Feed, but then again, he's using a $2k/month feed so he's obviously getting something else too (and I'd love to know what's worth the extra $1800 / month :-)).

 

Can someone please send me just 1 day of ES data (anytime after February) from your feed. I'd be especially interested in a sample from IQ Feed as that's the vendor I am considering, but also interested in comparing against other providers and I promise to document my findings here for the benefit of everyone.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I dont collect intraday data so cant help there, but I initially collected a lot of EOD data from CSI Unfair Advantage - they have a good range of products that can be bought so you can get EOD data back from 20 years ago. they were recommended by others.

The data is generally very good, a few hiccups, but as mentioned above that might because a few days get out of sync. The real advantage they offered was a way to back adjust continuous contracts and a fair bit of flexibility to manipulate the data into the manner we required. They also offer stocks - but I did not look at them.

But as stated for me something that is close enough was all I required....so I wont be much help sorry....but would be very interested in any final conclusions of the thread.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

2. They claim that they never filter data (at least for CME, that's all I asked about). They report the complete datafeed from CME.

 

g

 

Filtering and aggregating/coalescing are not quite the same thing. They always used to reserve the right to but in the absence of current evidence I guess we can discount that. :)

 

When they where talking about 'data' was that the full order book?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I don't know of any feeds which supply the entire order book. They said that they don't filter their market depth data.

 

I assume that's all he meant by order book--market depth to the same level as the exchange gives. For eMinis that's 10 levels, for other products typically 5 or whatever.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I don't know of any feeds which supply the entire order book. They said that they don't filter their market depth data.

 

Yeah that's me being sloppy what I meant was there limit order book to however many levels are reported (or market depth data).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am also in Pursuit of Accurate Data for the purpose of order book analysis and I am seriously considering to go with CQG. taotree, do you have any updates?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • Date: 11th July 2025.   Demand For Gold Rises As Trump Announces Tariffs!   Gold prices rose significantly throughout the week as investors took advantage of the 2.50% lower entry level. Investors also return to the safe-haven asset as the US trade policy continues to escalate. As a result, investors are taking a more dovish tone. The ‘risk-off’ appetite is also something which can be seen within the stock market. The NASDAQ on Thursday took a 0.90% dive within only 30 minutes.   Trade Tensions Escalate President Trump has been teasing with new tariffs throughout the week. However, the tariffs were confirmed on Thursday. A 35% tariff on Canadian imports starting August 1st, along with 50% tariffs on copper and goods from Brazil. Some experts are advising that Brazil has been specifically targeted due to its association with the BRICS.   However, the President has not directly associated the tariffs with BRICS yet. According to President Trump, Brazil is targeting US technology companies and carrying out a ‘witch hunt’against former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro, a close ally who is currently facing prosecution for allegedly attempting to overturn the 2022 Brazilian election.   Although Brazil is one of the largest and fastest-growing economies in the Americas, it is not the main concern for investors. Investors are more concerned about Tariffs on Canada. The White House said it will impose a 35% tariff on Canadian imports, effective August 1st, raised from the earlier 25% rate. This covers most goods, with exceptions under USMCA and exemptions for Canadian companies producing within the US.   It is also vital for investors to note that Canada is among the US;’s top 3 trading partners. The increase was justified by Trump citing issues like the trade deficit, Canada’s handling of fentanyl trafficking, and perceived unfair trade practices.   The President is also threatening new measures against the EU. These moves caused US and European stock futures to fall nearly 1%, while the Dollar rose and commodity prices saw small gains. However, the main benefactor was Silver and Gold, which are the two best-performing metals of the day.   How Will The Fed Impact Gold? The FOMC indicated that the number of members warming up to the idea of interest rate cuts is increasing. If the Fed takes a dovish tone, the price of Gold may further rise. In the meantime, the President pushing for a 3% rate cut sparked talk of a more dovish Fed nominee next year and raised worries about future inflation.   Meanwhile, jobless claims dropped for the fourth straight week, coming in better than expected and supporting the view that the labour market remains strong after last week’s solid payroll report. Markets still expect two rate cuts this year, but rate futures show most investors see no change at the next Fed meeting. Gold is expected to finish the week mostly flat.       Gold 15-Minute Chart     If the price of Gold increases above $3,337.50, buy signals are likely to materialise again. However, the price is currently retracing, meaning traders are likely to wait for regained momentum before entering further buy trades. According to HSBC, they expect an average price of $3,215 in 2025 (up from $3,015) and $3,125 in 2026, with projections showing a volatile range between $3,100 and $3,600   Key Takeaway Points: Gold Rises on Safe-Haven Demand. Gold gained as investors reacted to rising trade tensions and market volatility. Canada Tariffs Spark Concern. A 35% tariff on Canadian imports drew attention due to Canada’s key trade role. Fed Dovish Shift Supports Gold. Growing expectations of rate cuts and Trump’s push for a 3% cut boosted the gold outlook. Gold Eyes Breakout Above $3,337.5. Price is consolidating; a move above $3,337.50 could trigger new buy signals. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report.   Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Michalis Efthymiou HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • Back in the early 2000s, Netflix mailed DVDs to subscribers.   It wasn’t sexy—but it was smart. No late fees. No driving to Blockbuster.   People subscribed because they were lazy. Investors bought the stock because they realized everyone else is lazy too.   Those who saw the future in that red envelope? They could’ve caught a 10,000%+ move.   Another story…   Back in the mid-2000s, Amazon launched Prime.   It wasn’t flashy—but it was fast.   Free two-day shipping. No minimums. No hassle.   People subscribed because they were impatient. Investors bought the stock because they realized everyone hates waiting.   Those who saw the future in that speedy little yellow button? They could’ve caught another 10,000%+ move.   Finally…   Back in 2011, Bitcoin was trading under $10.   It wasn’t regulated—but it worked.   No bank. No middleman. Just wallet to wallet.   People used it to send money. Investors bought it because they saw the potential.   Those who saw something glimmering in that strange orange coin? They could’ve caught a 100,000%+ move.   The people who made those calls weren’t fortune tellers. They just noticed something simple before others did.   A better way. A quiet shift. A small edge. An asymmetric bet.   The red envelope fixed late fees. The yellow button fixed waiting. The orange coin gave billions a choice.   Of course, these types of gains are rare. And they happen only once in a blue moon. That’s exactly why it’s important to notice when the conditions start to look familiar.   Not after the move. Not once it's on CNBC. But in the quiet build-up— before the surface breaks.   Enter the Blue Button Please read more here: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/netflix-amazon-bitcoin-blue  Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • What These Attacks Look Like There are several ways you could get hacked. And the threats compound by the day.   Here’s a quick rundown:   Phishing: Fake emails from your “bank.” Click the link, give your password—game over.   Ransomware: Malware that locks your files and demands crypto. Pay up, or it’s gone.   DDoS: Overwhelm a website with traffic until it crashes. Like 10,000 bots blocking the door. Often used by nations.   Man-in-the-Middle: Hackers intercept your messages on public WiFi and read or change them.   Social Engineering: Hackers pose as IT or drop infected USB drives labeled “Payroll.”   You don’t need to be “important” to be a target.   You just need to be online.   What You Can Do (Without Buying a Bunker) You don’t have to be tech-savvy.   You just need to stop being low-hanging fruit.   Here’s how:   Use a YubiKey (physical passkey device) or Authenticator app – Ditch text message 2FA. SIM swaps are real. Hackers often have people on the inside at telecom companies.   Use a password manager (with Yubikey) – One unique password per account. Stop using your dog’s name.   Update your devices – Those annoying updates patch real security holes. Use them.   Back up your files – If ransomware hits, you don’t want your important documents held hostage.   Avoid public WiFi for sensitive stuff – Or use a VPN.   Think before you click – Emails that feel “urgent” are often fake. Go to the websites manually for confirmation.   Consider Starlink in case the internet goes down – I think it’s time for me to make the leap. Don’t Panic. Prepare. (Then Invest.)   I spent an hour in that basement bar reading about cyberattacks—and watching real-world systems fall apart like dominos.   The internet going down used to be an inconvenience. Now, it’s a warning.   Cyberwar isn’t coming. It’s here.   And the next time your internet goes out, it might not just be your router.   Don’t panic. Prepare.   And maybe keep a backup plan in your back pocket. Like a local basement bar with good bourbon—and working WiFi.   As usual, we’re on the lookout for more opportunities in cybersecurity. Stay tuned.   Author: Chris Campbell (AltucherConfidential) Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/   
    • DUMBSHELL:  re the automation of corruption ---  200,000 "Science Papers" in academic journal database PubMed may have been AI-generated with errors, hallucinations and false sourcing 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.