Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

torero

Texas Hold 'em in Casino Royale

Recommended Posts

I just saw the latest Bond movie and I was very impressed with the elaborate coverage of the poker game in the plot. Since I'm a newbie at poker, I had a few questions about the scenarios and of course about facts about poker.

 

In poker, what percentage play more an important role: reading the player or ability to calculate the probability that the hand is better than the opponent?

 

As for the reading the opponents' habits and movements to discover his weakness, if someone who can read the opponent but has little knowledge about probability in getting different outcomes? Are there tricks to not let the opponent read you like a book?

 

This is related to trading when the player says "All In". Technically in trading only newbies do this, but in poker this is common? Or are there many hands where the player do not have to resort to "All In"?

 

The last piece I thought was when Bond blew out his account, his EGO was at fault (just like in trading), does this apply to poker as well? Does ego part of bluffing? Don't know how it all fits in.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Glad you brought this up Torero :). I myself also saw the new James Bond movie a week ago.

 

Here are some of the secrets of poker. You can not say that cards do not matter. But the ability to read your opponent is a vital key to success. Observation is a must... within 30 minutes one should clearly understand the style of their opponent. Does he like to bluff? Does he bet small when he catches a card on the flop? Does he like to reraise often? Does he fish for the river? Is he reckless and will call anything?

 

Once you understand your opponents style, the next step is to come up with strategies that can exploit his style. If he likes to trap, play your hands strong preflop but play carefully after the flop. If he likes to reraise, trap him. If he likes to play recklessly, wait for a decent hand and then bust him in one hand. These are some of the things I keep in mind when playing.

 

I play more online now which is why I focus more on the psychology of the opponent and try to identify his style through the way he bets. On the tables, however, I always always watch my opponent look at his cards first before looking at mine. Watch the opponents eyes... they say alot. Does his become silent on a good hand? Does he look down? Why did he take a deeper drag of his cigarette? Why is he taking longer than usual to place a bet? Did he just twitch? And on and on....

 

One trick to avoid the opponent from reading you is to act unpredictable. Mix poker styles.. bluff, play tight, play strong, and sometimes even show weakness. All you need is one hand that can take your opponent down completely. One of my favorite quotes from the poker movie "Rounders" is, "Throw in your cards the moment you know you cant win. Fold your hands."

 

The question of "All In"

 

I try to avoid an all-in situation as much as possible. My odds of winning are far better grinding my chips rather than gambling even with a 60% favorite. However, all-in is a must in poker. In a heads up tournament, all-in is a powerful move. Another situation I will usually go all-in is preflop when holding pocket Kings or Aces. If your opponent is holding an Ace-Jack, Ace-Queen preflop.... why give him the chance to catch an ace? If youre holding AA.... I never allow my opponent to catch a lucky 2 pair. Another situation would be on the turn when you know your opponent is fishing for a river. All-in equals pressure. An all-in bluff can be used depending on the cards on the table and if your opponent shows weakness. But generally speaking, my poker style is a pure grinder... not a gambler.

 

Playing on a Tilt

 

In many tournaments, players try to go at each other with EGO. I do not play like this... I play to make money and not to feel good about myself. I usually catch these ego mania type players... they love to raise with nothing and will reraise you with nothing. I love making them look like a fool by calling with a low pair or Ace high.

 

A string of losses and players can go on a tilt. Now tilt is your worse enemy. Playing on a tilt is the same thing as emotional trading. You are no longer trying to make money... but instead you are hoping to win a huge pot. Players will often call with rags (crap cards) or call all-ins to fish for the river card. Most of them go home broke.

 

One last quote from Rounders, "Some players forget the cardinal rule of poker.... leaving no outs."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent insight James. So how does one know he's up against a good if not great poker player in front of him? Are there that many EGOs walking around in tournaments? Are they easy victims like in trading?

 

I have watched a poker show late night after CNBC is done with their business programs. It's very interesting because it shows the online poker and there's an expert analyzing and commenting on each game. It's good learning experience I think. The expert can give analysis on who would be the likely candidate to move to the next round.

 

I'm starting to get hooked. Any books to recommend? I'm going to have to cash out my gift certificate soon!;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Excellent insight James. So how does one know he's up against a good if not great poker player in front of him? Are there that many EGOs walking around in tournaments? Are they easy victims like in trading?

 

I have watched a poker show late night after CNBC is done with their business programs. It's very interesting because it shows the online poker and there's an expert analyzing and commenting on each game. It's good learning experience I think. The expert can give analysis on who would be the likely candidate to move to the next round.

 

I'm starting to get hooked. Any books to recommend? I'm going to have to cash out my gift certificate soon!;)

 

Watch out for the quiet ones with the big stack. They know how to sit tight and win monster pots. Also watch out for the ones that appear reckless but are actually just setting you up. They like to frustrate their opponents and when their shots comes they will take it all.

 

On any table you sit, watch out for the big stacks and be quick to know who you plan to take money from. A stack can be built faster by preying on the weaker players.

 

The easiest players by far are players on a tilt or those who are frustrated. I mean.. they are so pissed off that they will just throw their money away. Emotions is the worse enemy.

 

Surprisingly I have never read a single book on poker. I started playing when I was around 10. At first it was the arcade poker games which turned into friendly poker game betting cigerettes. Soon it was betting a little money, going to poker games, going to casinos, and then running a poker room in the basement.

 

Alot of my poker is pure intuition. I can figure out my opponents hands a good amount of times. Just like trading, I dont think poker is something that can be learned through a book. It requires years and years of experience. Im pretty sure the perecentage of winning poker players (who actually make a living off poker) are also similar to the 5% trading estimate.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If you have a table of 4-6 players, so how do target one specific weak player?

 

I play alot of 6 player tournaments in which the payouts only go out to 1st and 2nd place. The less people in the game, the easier poker gets. This is because it becomes a game of pure skill.

 

I dont like to push aggressively in the beginning in a 6 person game. Instead, I let the other players make all the mistakes. There are many occasions in which 2-3 players will get eliminated before I play a single hand. If you can double up early, this is great. Because all you have to do now is to protect your chips and bully the small stacks. In a tournament, the size of your chips mean everything.

 

If you are catching a string of cold cards, I just sit tight and fold most of my hands. By the time there is 2-3 players left, I will start pushing..... a small table is my bread and butter.

 

You'll notice early in the game the players who keep limping in the blinds without raising. These players are the weak players. They love playing every single hand. I also, take notes on every player I encounter (online as well). I'll rank them from a scale of 1-10 and jot down some of their poker styles.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Its sort of like reading tape, internals, different sectors, volume, etc... and trying to make sense out of it all.

 

Not that hard.. just need to get used to playing. The only thing I truly hate about poker is the bunch of amateurs who gamble with a 10-18% chance of winning and catching the card on the river.

 

It happens... hence poker. Trading is a little more skill rather than luck.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is where poker and trading rules become different. In trading, we don't need to do "ALL IN" to stay in the game. In poker, if this happens and I've noticed toward the end of the match when there are maybe 2-3 players left, there tend to be ALL IN showdowns. If I fold too often and resisting putting ALL IN to match this bluff or cards, I'd get wiped out through losing it slowly right?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When the table gets smaller in a tournament, all-ins are fairly common. It really becomes a game of pyschology and balls. Alot of professional poker players can not handle the emotional swings of no-limit texas holdem. Therefore they may choose to play limit holdem or other poker related games like omaha or stud.

 

In a small table or a heads up battle, folding too much is a sure way to lose. You need to be agressive and make absolutely no errors. One error can cost you the entire match in heads up. Take a stab at the right moments if you sense weakness but be careful of the traps.

 

Its definitely not an easy game to play.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.