Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Sign in to follow this  
Tams

XCAP IPolyFit

Recommended Posts

XCAP iPolyFit

 

 

XCAP iPolyFit:

 

Fits a time series to Legendre (orthogonal) polynomials and thereby provides the full least squares fit to a polynomial

over a time interval.

 

Author: Paul A. Griffin

January 2, 2007

Extrema Capital, 2007

 

This indicator provides as output the least square best fit to a set of polynomials of maximum power (degree) using

discrete Legendre polynomials. This is accomplished by decomposing the time series into discrete Legendre polynomials

over the interval of orthogonality given by 2 * Width + 1 and discarding the polynomial fits degrees above some maximum degree.

The remaining smoothed series,

 

SmoothedSeries[t] = c[0] * 1 + c[1] * (t-Width) + c[2] * Power(t-Width,2) + ... c[MaximumDegree]*Power(t-Width,MaximumDegree)

 

has coefficients given by the array c that are determined such that this polynomial has the minimum least square error over

the interval. The indicator provides two outputs:

 

ShowLeadingEdge = TRUE

 

As you move forward along the time series, the fit is generated. What is displayed is the leading, rightmost bar, "[0]", for

each fit. This is also obtainable via the Savitzky Golay method, see the reference 3 below.

 

ShowLastFit = TRUE

 

This displays the entire last fit for just the last bar on the chart, so you will only see an output on the last

2*Width + 1 bars of your chart.

 

Some Comments:

 

I like this method of determining the least square fit better than the Savitzky Golay method I have posted because is

provides the entire fit, not just the leading edge, at any bar. This makes for a smoothing filter that can be thought of a

generalization of simple moving average method. In fact, it can be thought of as a progression of noise reduction, starting with no

noise reduction (MaximumDegree = 2*Width) to reduction of signal down to one degree of freedom (a moving average, MaximumDegree=0).

 

So, if your goal is to reduce existing stochastic noise in the data, then this smoothed output is of interest because it can

in principle provide smoothing with minimal lag and best reduction of noise.

 

That is, instead of smoothing a function like this:

 

Average(Function(series),Length1)

 

with lag = Length/2, one should contemplate a new method:

 

Function(SmoothedSeries(Length2,Degree))

 

as the smoothed series should have a higher signal to stochastic noise ratio than the original. Any improvement is based on the

assumption that stochastic noise exists in the chart. Since most standard models of asset pricing use a stochastic variable

model, from everything from options pricing to modern portfolio theory, it seems reasonable to apply this polynomial noise

reduction method directly to financial time series.

 

I will post some predictive indicators using this method soon, in this discussion topic. This post is to get the

foundations out of the way and to provide a basic starting point for further work.

 

For "Rocket Scientists" and as a side note: there is a beautiful history of the application of Legendre polynomials to science.

For example in the solution to the Hydrogen atom, they serve to define part of the angular dependence of the electron probability field

around the proton.

 

 

Some Plots:

 

For SPY daily chart with a width of 126 bars (126*2+1 = 253, about 1 trading year), I have created jpegs of the fits of order

0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 52. Order zero is the average over one year. Order 1 is linear regression. 2 though 8 are just interesting

low order fits. I also captured order 12 and 52 because of the number of months and weeks per year respectively.

 

References:

 

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legendre_polynomials

 

[2] Peter Seffen, "On Digital Smoothing Filters: A Brief Review of Closed Form Solutions and Two New Filter Approaches",

Circuits Systems Signal Process, Vol. 5, No 2, 1986

 

[3] https://www.tradestation.com/Discussions/Topic.aspx?Topic_ID=58534

 

 

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=14535&stc=1&d=1256433423

 

 

Note:

This indicator was written in EasyLanguage.

Please refer to your users manual for importation instructions.

 

Your comments and rating of this indicator is appreciated.

XCAP_iPolyFit_(TS).txt

XCAP_iPolyFit_(MultiCharts).pla

XCAP_iPolyFit.thumb.gif.38825f18d0bb2974231b36e7cdd4b96a.gif

Edited by Tams

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.