Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

thalestrader

Reading Charts in Real Time

Recommended Posts

Hi Thales,

 

I appreciate the comments. I see your point on that nzd/usd trade. I was probably over fixated on the larger daily trend and thought that taking out a minor high on the 3 hour chart would be resumption of trend and off to the races.

 

Throughout my trading development, I have had instances where I do see the market really clear and obvious things jump out at me. I'm being patient, and just wait till I see it. Then for some reason usually after some success, I lose that clarity and things that are more obscure seem obvious. It's overconfidence. I usually need to be humbled again to regain that clarity. Hopefully as my experience continues, I can work on eradicating this cycle.

 

Good comments regarding the trade management. I will continue to experiment in this area and apply various scenarios over the weekend.

 

 

Hiya Kiwi,

 

I actually have all my trades as being with the larger time frame trend (to me that is daily chart). That's the beauty of 'trend' though, you can always find one time frame in agreement with trade direction :)

 

Thanks a lot for the comments and questions. It all helps me learn something.

 

With kind regards,

MK

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
do you tend to take trades against the next timeframe up? And if you do, do you require more range to your targets (or any other multiplier?)

 

As these are day trades that typically last a just few minutes to a few hours, I am not so much concerned with a higher degree trend. I am concerned with were price is in relation to support and reistance levels. So while I am usually on a 15 minute timeframe or lower, for entries and exits, I will check 4 hour, daily, and weekly to see if there is any nearby S/R of which I should be aware, e.g. MidK's GBPCHF short yesterday dropped to a support level that was clearly visible if one looked back a few days, but which was not shown on MK's trading chart and thus he mistook a probe to test that support as a false breakout on his trading chart.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ahhh ... ok.

 

That's where we disagree MK. To me, the reason for larger timeframes is either:

- for support and resistance and any timeframe works here (daily, weekly, 4hr etc)

- for trend and here I think you want the one in which the next level of trend exists.

 

That second part means that to me, daily would be a good higher timeframe for the overarching trend on 4 hourly and maybe hourly trades (6x and 24x respectively). But on a 15m trade I think that hourly or 4 hourly would be more appropriate (4x and 16x respectively. So I'd look at (say) the hourly and ... hmmm ... I need to do pictures or this isn't adding to anyones education, mine included. I shall come back to this in an hour with a couple of pictures for the NZD and GBP trades properly annotated.

 

Hopefully that will make my point (lol, or prove me wrong as my system trading tests have done repeatedly).

 

Note: thanks for your comment too Thales as it appears you use the 1st reason as your main driver for a higher timeframe.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OK.

 

It is interesting looking at what MK and Thales are doing at the same time as I am trying to fully automate. Increasingly it seems to me that Automations strength is in taking advantage of either trends or patterns. And the human's advantage is in taking advantage of Support and Resistance.

 

Now, a smart guy by the name of Sam Seiden, who trades pullbacks into S&R uses the concept of odds enhancers to decide which ones are worth trading. One of them is strength of the initiating move (impulse), another is the shape of the S&R the move came from, another is how far to the next Very High timeframe S&R (daily here perhaps or 4 hr min). The other major is Big picture trend.

 

I'd say that in this case the VHT S&R supported the trades but gave warning areas in the GBP case. But in both cases the trade was against the long timeframe trend. And if you look at Thales' trades with both a 15m and 4hr chart open you'll see that when there is a clear trend (move) on the 4hr then its much easier to make money out of the 15m breakouts.

 

So here are MKs ones from yesterday (with the benefit of my perfect 20/20 hindsight).

 

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=14922&stc=1&d=1257463724

attachment.php?attachmentid=14923&stc=1&d=1257463724

 

 

Warning Warning ... Kiwi is inclined to trade with the trend so he might just be pandering to his own biases. :)

5aa70f5013c97_11-6-20099-06-08AMnzd.thumb.png.58102484f96691cf2ab49ff542617084.png

5aa70f501cfab_11-6-20099-15-16AMgbp.thumb.png.00bc313f3e4534622f4b5be897617c28.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We rarely see setups that failed.

I would like to post during the next several days, setups that would have failed had one taken the trades.

Please comment as to why a setup failed and whether it was a valid setup in the first place.

 

Thanks

 

Gabe

 

PS Red is a potential short and green a potential long.

EJ_Nov_5_2009_failed.png.da0d76621181cbd65ad4435c42c0796a.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
We rarely see setups that failed.

I would like to post during the next several days, setups that would have failed had one taken the trades.

Please comment as to why a setup failed and whether it was a valid setup in the first place.

 

Thanks

 

Gabe

 

PS Red is a potential short and green a potential long.

 

Just had an idea about the above.

If one looks at a pair that behaves largely like the EJ - GJ in this case - one can see a divergence between the two.

Maybe that would alert the trader that things are not as they seem to be.

 

Gabe

EJ_Nov_5_2009_failed_GJ.thumb.png.2f98b730b02d275172183ee3438b7e3a.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good post Kiwi, the pictures help. I'm starting to become more inclined to just trade off the 15m chart but look at the 240m as a target and scale-out (even adding?) size adjustment factor. My hunch is this side of it can end up more mechanical, but I really need to knuckle down and get some study behind me on this part.

 

The nzd/usd trade I took was based off the 3 hour chart, so that is why the entry was so high up from it's recent range and the stop was much wider than the others I have been doing.

 

With kind regards,

MK

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just got short gbp/jpy. Entry was 150.27 with a stop at 150.60, 33pip risk. First target for 1/2 is at 149.87, with the next target for 1/4 at 149.27.

 

LOL. You really don't want to go with the trend do you :)

 

I'm going to critique it (helpfully I hope) applying Seiden's critera.

 

 

kw8.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What can I say? :) I'm not trying to disprove the simplicity of what Thales is showing. But if just selling lows and buying highs is all that's required and I end up with more losses then winners, hopefully it will serve to vet some the filtering he is using. If it really is that simple, than I should come out on top like his daughter has :D

 

Recently Thales has been mentioning about a certain look of which I also mentioned in prior posts. I wonder how he conveyed that look to his daughter as this sounds like something experience based??

 

All my best,

MK

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just got short gbp/jpy. Entry was 150.27 with a stop at 150.60, 33pip risk. First target for 1/2 is at 149.87, with the next target for 1/4 at 149.27.

 

I only just remembered that today it is an NFP number tomorrow morning in the USA. Often the FX waits. Not the best backdrop when looking for a decent move :(

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just got short gbp/jpy. Entry was 150.27 with a stop at 150.60, 33pip risk. First target for 1/2 is at 149.87, with the next target for 1/4 at 149.27.

 

Hi MidK,

 

I just wanted to refer back to the chart that Gabe fixed for me (see his attachment in post 891). The same story told on that chart can be cut and past to this chart.

 

Your short may be profitable, but price is squarely in the middle of nowhere.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70f502dd74_LowerHighsHigherLowsChop1.thumb.jpg.b5229ca36d217ff2bb7f36a78415f738.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
We rarely see setups that failed. I would like to post during the next several days, setups that would have failed had one taken the trades. Please comment as to why a setup failed and whether it was a valid setup in the first place ... Red is a potential short...

 

Hi Gabe,

 

I tried that short myself today and cut it loose for a 10 tick loss. As you can see, it is not surprising that price found buyers at that level. I try to post trades either before or soon after they trigger, and if I am unable to post them while price is still reasonably close to entry, I typically do not post the chart. This was a short worth trying, but you have to keep in mind that there are times that price is breaking out, while other times, price is simply digging into support or resistance. In this case, I exited at -10 ticks. I'd have been willing to re-short new lows, but I wasn't going to hold a short and let it hit new highs.

 

As Kenny Rogers sang, "You have to know when to hold them, know when to fold them ..." Losses can and will happen. You take them and move on to the next opportunity.

 

So, that was a good opportunity to try a short. It was also a good opportuntiy to practice cutting your losses quickly.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70f503303b_11-05-2009EURJPYSRZones1.thumb.jpg.513ce0649fd095bf6f527169d28cf387.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi MidK,

 

I just wanted to refer back to the chart that Gabe fixed for me (see his attachment in post 891). The same story told on that chart can be cut and past to this chart.

 

Your short may be profitable, but price is squarely in the middle of nowhere.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

 

OK, I can see what you mean, but it doesn't look so dissimilar to your post here does it?

 

All my best,

MK

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
but it doesn't look so dissimilar to your post here does it?

 

I'd be curious to hear what others think about the comparison before I answer. Would any one else have any comments comparing the current GBPJPY to the EURUSD in my post?

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
LOL. You really don't want to go with the trend do you :)

 

I'm going to critique it (helpfully I hope) applying Seiden's critera.

 

 

 

Who is Seiden and what is his criteria?

 

Thanks

 

Gabe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi Gabe,

 

I tried that short myself today and cut it loose for a 10 tick loss. As you can see, it is not surprising that price found buyers at that level. I try to post trades either before or soon after they trigger, and if I am unable to post them while price is still reasonably close to entry, I typically do not post the chart. This was a short worth trying, but you have to keep in mind that there are times that price is breaking out, while other times, price is simply digging into support or resistance. In this case, I exited at -10 ticks. I'd have been willing to re-short new lows, but I wasn't going to hold a short and let it hit new highs.

 

As Kenny Rogers sang, "You have to know when to hold them, know when to fold them ..." Losses can and will happen. You take them and move on to the next opportunity.

 

So, that was a good opportunity to try a short. It was also a good opportuntiy to practice cutting your losses quickly.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

 

Thanks for the answer.

As I said in my post, It would help if people would post failed as well as siccessful trades for the learning experience.

 

Gabe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'd be curious to hear what others think about the comparison before I answer. Would any one else have any comments comparing the current GBPJPY to the EURUSD in my post?

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

 

The difference is that there is more "separation" between the highs and the lows in Thales's chart.

I think that this "separation" issue is subjective and cannot be numerically quantified. Only by experience which comes from screen time.

 

Gabe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'd be curious to hear what others think about the comparison before I answer. Would any one else have any comments comparing the current GBPJPY to the EURUSD in my post?

 

 

 

There is no lower high in your EUR post, also there is a clean shot at the target with no basing in the way.

 

Steve

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just got short gbp/jpy. Entry was 150.27 with a stop at 150.60, 33pip risk. First target for 1/2 is at 149.87, with the next target for 1/4 at 149.27.

 

Once the market failed to take out the previous low, I 1/2'd my stop. Got taken out at 150.43 for a 16 pip loss.

5aa70f503867f_MK02_06_Nov_2009.png.d500881ed3a0119b24103a63deb65369.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OK. Here's another cut at what the two differences are and thus how we might qualify when to stop trading and then start again.

 

kw8.png

 

if the image doesn't show

http : // charts.dacharts. net /2009-11-05/kw8.png

Edited by Kiwi

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello, everyone. I've been following this thread since i discovered TL a couple of months ago and wanting to join in. Thanks for starting this great thread to teach, Thales, and everyone here who is contributing to my learning.

 

I'm planning to mark up charts as Thales suggested and post when i can :) I'm just months old at this, so please bear with me if i'm slow on the uptake.

 

If i may begin with a question to Thales or anyone else who cares to answer, why was 1.4664 a buy setup when there was no BO? :confused: Forgive me if the answer should be terribly obvious ..

 

Thanks very much!

5aa70f50486a2_whyabuysetup.thumb.png.0f09b83e0563e0bce26953d685ec68af.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There was a breakout at the point I marked 14 .

 

It went Low at 1, high at 7, higher low 10 bars from the low and then the high at 7 was finally broken (briefly) at 14.

 

 

 

Whoops, sorry the next one.

 

Low above 11:45, then a high is made after one white bar and a black bar. then a higher low is made by the 1 bar pullback with the last red line touching it. Thats L ... H ... HL ... and the breakout is above 1.4664

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
it doesn't look so dissimilar to your post here does it?

 

If i may begin with a question to Thales or anyone else who cares to answer, why was 1.4664 a buy setup when there was no BO?

 

 

Low above 11:45, then a high is made after one white bar and a black bar. then a higher low is made by the 1 bar pullback with the last red line touching it. Thats L ... H ... HL ... and the breakout is above 1.4664

 

I would add to Kiwi's comment that that low was clearly digging into what proved to be an important support zone.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70f505a52f_EURUSDSupportExample1.thumb.jpg.9b42ef71dd0b7488e91682c9253ce6c6.jpg

5aa70f506040e_GBPJPYExample1.thumb.jpg.51850aab7644eb27a98866c7ecf11191.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice short signal on GC.

Got in twice but did not trust it because the futures were moving up.

THis where what Thales wrote should be adhered to. ie Trade what you see, not what you think. :(

 

Gabe

GC_Nov_6_2009_15min.thumb.PNG.d153f356a010159bcce13235185c8255.PNG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.