Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

thalestrader

Reading Charts in Real Time

Recommended Posts

Hi Marko,

 

Good stuff! Thank you for keeping things going here in the thread. My son's birthday is tomorrow, and the party is Sunday, and I am responsible, per my wife's "request," for coming up with a suitably carnivorous menu for a dinosaur themed party. It has been far more difficult than I had anticipated, and of course, being a guy, I let it go until today.

 

I'm likely not going to be able to trade at all today, other than two demo orders I have in on CL. As I am typing this, a short has just been filled at 79.71 ... I have a buy order down below where I'll stop and reverse.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=19441&stc=1&d=1266597898

 

 

I now have to go on a search for Brontosaurus legs right now (though my son tells me they are no longer called "Brontosaurus," but have been renamed "Appatosaurus." I am not responsible for the spelling of either.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70fd5c7e75_2010-02-19CLDemo1.thumb.jpg.4db640c5426e801d1d2dcef2880a6dca.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is a 1440 minute (daily) crude chart showing the prior day's high (green hash) and low (red hash) on each bar. I use 9AM EST as the daily open (pit session open). Ceratinly one can see that it can pay, and pay handsomely, to pay attention to price when it arrives that the prior day's high/low.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=19454&stc=1&d=1266633729

 

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70fd67381c_AStudyinPriorHighsPriorLows1.thumb.jpg.285ef0ff4f110537c345806406792d15.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

...

My son's birthday is tomorrow, and the party is Sunday, ...

 

I now have to go on a search for Brontosaurus legs right now (though my son tells me they are no longer called "Brontosaurus," but have been renamed "Appatosaurus." I am not responsible for the spelling of either.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

 

Thanks,

please give my birthday greetings to your son, wishing all of you a nice party and lots of fun.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
EUR/USD ACD Long closed at 17:15

Profit +30 , .84R

...

 

From a daily chart I learn that price made it above 1.36 during the evening.

So the R-multiple "could" be much higher, had I stayed online longer; anyway ten hours are definitely enough per day.

 

I'll update that chart on Mo morning for the exact multiple, my chart programs are in the office since I don't take the markets home.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Here is a 1440 minute (daily) crude chart showing the prior day's high (green hash) and low (red hash) on each bar. I use 9AM EST as the daily open (pit session open). Ceratinly one can see that it can pay, and pay handsomely, to pay attention to price when it arrives that the prior day's high/low.

....

 

Yes it does pay. For my standard FDAX and FGBL trades I always observe the 2 day and 3 day rhythm of high and low.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thales (and others following his HH HL breakout style) might enjoy a look at two threads over at forexfactory.

 

The first is "The System II (Yes with Irony)" which is a slightly different breakout;

 

and the second is a derivative "FCR Thread" which include thales trade as an FCR 1. The derivative also has a spin off website which includes a description of the method.

 

 

An interesting thing about it from my perspective (as a set the stop and just give it room type of guy) was that both are, like thales, very aggressive in tightening. This page describes the tightening strategy rather well ... its a little different to thales (maybe??? you could comment) but I think its quite a solid approach.

 

exit descriptions (author is not a native english speaker)

 

You need to read the summary document on the FCR spin off website to understand exactly when the different exits are applied.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
... fxchateau

 

fxchateau.com : trading in the noise for >= $100 per month ?

 

I always wonder, why these people can't make money with their perfect systems in the markets.

Edited by Marko23

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello there,

 

Apologies for not posting of late but I thought I should as I was an early follower of the 'System 2' thread which was started by a former pit trader. I never really posted much there as it focused on Euro whereas I traded cable but followed it avidly. The reason for my post was Kiwi's reference to trade management as this was always my bug bear and took a while to find a way to make things work properly for me. When the system 2 thread first started the OP mentioned the 20/20 and 20/40 rules whereby one used a 20 pip hard stop and a TP at either 20 or 40 pips giving either a 1R or 2R return. This had me bemused for a while as I found that my win rate with the suggested entries was way lower than 50% which meant that one was a net loser over time. Then it dawned on me (and I think this is what you have been explaining of late Thales?) that it is fine to have a 1R or 2R return for winners if the losers are always less than -1R. In other words one's stop needs to be aggressively trailed to reduce risk. I always liked this as I have a firm belief that the only thing I have any control over in my trading is the amount of risk I have in any one trade.

 

From memory the OP's own method of trade management was to trail his stop 1 pip at a time up to b/e. I tried this but it didn't feel logical enough for me. Anyway after a lot of experimentation I ended up using the method that hopefully these 2 charts that I posted elsewhere last year explain.

 

5aa70fd6b4005_gbpusd-09113m1h.thumb.gif.6378af159b85e22aa8473a33b12a9256.gif

 

5aa70fd6bcb65_gbpusd-091118m1a.thumb.gif.eb80e4c9898fd0cc623eedf7174b0cea.gif

 

In essence I used M5 levels (set-ups) but, when the trade triggered, I would drop to M1 and trail above / below M1 swings up to a level where I could put my stop at b/e. The reasoning behind this being that, when price breaks through a level, I 'expect' it to break hard and fast. Any pullbacks or hesitation suggest to me that the trade might not work out as I am 'expecting' it to. My mindset is firmly of the belief that my job is to manage / reduce risk - the winners simply win, but it's how I manage the losers that defines whether I make money or not. I'm pretty sure Thales mentioned a similar method a few weeks ago when describing an ES trade?

 

Anyway, hope this isn't too off topic. As an aside I am now using a very similar system trading M15 'a la Thales'. It makes for an awful lot of losers (approx. 70%) but these losers are on average around -0.25R whereas the winners are a large multiple of this.

 

Kind regards

BT

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Have a look at the derivative material from fxachillies as well BT.

 

I noticed that many people seemed to struggle to really get a handle on Thale's trade management and suspect that thinking about this material might help quite a bit. I think that fxachilies struggled with the system ii stops for the same reason you did and thus created a more logical structure to remove doubt.

 

His definition of a multiple stop strategies that evolve depending on 1. the entry pattern used and 2. what happens afterwards addresses the sort of uncertainty you describe above. To my surprise I realized that I too can trigger more aggressive exits to my benefit and will be experimenting with that tomorrow - and also that the exit is not a stop but a reduced limit order.

 

It also makes me wonder about the use of the absolute first exposed R in both R multiples and in expectancy calculations. If one is able to consistently manage a much lower loss then perhaps the average loss should sometimes be used rather than the maximum - or at least two measures should be considered when evaluating system quality.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It also makes me wonder about the use of the absolute first exposed R in both R multiples and in expectancy calculations. If one is able to consistently manage a much lower loss then perhaps the average loss should sometimes be used rather than the maximum - or at least two measures should be considered when evaluating system quality.

 

I think that's an extremely interesting point and possibly hinges on one's personal attitude to risk. By that I mean that, given the way I manage my trades now, I could use a single digit hard stop for each entry but the danger for me in doing this is that I would see up to 70% of my trades get taken out at 1R which I personally couldn't handle, no matter how good the overall R/R on winning trades is, but that's just me!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When I look back at my trades I actually compare the original stop level v the actual stop level and record a brief reason for why it was less (or more) eg; nervous, did not feel right, poor trade, no acceleration. This usually results in a large majority of stops being smaller than the original loss based on me being nervous - or not feeling right about the trade (I have never quantified why - maybe I should). I think this is a more accurate measure as its real trading on a discretionary basis v fully systematic.

Interestingly enough on about half of these should I have kept the original stop loss level as they then turned into profits. It has never made much difference to the PL overall (as lots of little losses do add up, compared to lots of even smaller losses) but I prefer the feeling of discretionary control suits me better at the moment, plus I use more context.

 

The most important thing I have been concluding lately that suits me, is that longs and shorts based on the context of the market behave differently. (I dont care about robustness and purity of a system that treats everything the same - I want one that will allow me to consistently make money in a way that suits me, plus different markets definatley react and trade differently).

eg; if in a downtrend and a nervous market the reactions are likely to be quicker and more shallow, while in an uptrend reactions seem to take longer, and pullback further. Currencies trade differently to crude to equities. So in each case the things to watch for are slightly different.

So for some markets I give more leeway to stops others less. The downside to this is that it can get confusing. too many choices are not necessarily always a good thing.:)

 

The one consistent thing that I find continually rises its head from profitable traders ---- is you have to give yourself the opportunity to participate in the runners. Just aiming to make money day in day out with little scalps (while it does work for some and I am not knocking it) is tough work.(good for the brokers). I have always found that myself and others I know make the majority of the money on a small percentage of the trades. (I only I knew which ones in hindsight)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Choppy trade most of the day on Friday showing a reversal in the USA session. The break down from the recent multi-day range has been fierce. Any re-test of the lower edge of that range is obvious for working into a short position.

 

Only longs to be had will be scalps unless there is a very very clear capitulation. Should it capitulate I will aim to be out of 1/2 by the time we trade the recent multi-day range low and attempt to trail the rest and scaling out the remaining 1/2 into 2 separate exits.

 

The obvious short to look for is in the recent multi-day range low area, ideally in the 1.5660 - 1.5620 area. Shorts there will be aiming for a new low but will be out of 1/2 before making that new low. I'll attempt to trail the other 1/2 with successive LHs from the 60 min chart.

MK_2010-02-22_105622.thumb.png.078e5196ab535e1fecbf1f6a0f988576.png

MK_2010-02-22_105801.thumb.png.fb2a4c9e6df5e32de02ca46e3a7be05e.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
... Based on the daily charts, I anticipate high prices for equities and gold, lower dollar...

 

I've been long the ES and Gold, and see no reason to change my view. While a pulback at some point is to be expected, I am never one to argue with one way prices so long as I am driving the right way on that one way street.

 

I am looking to take a position in the dollar index, but in spite of the push to new highs on Friday, I am still looking at the dollar as a coin spinning on its edge, and I do not yet know which way it shall fall. C now exceeds A, but still falls within a proportion that allows for a terminal movement to the upside, while still, of course, allowing for a continued rally.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70fd6e9e51_2010-02-19DJ-301.thumb.jpg.409695e5b303cc0fb026bb79eafc7d63.jpg

5aa70fd6ee854_2010-02-19GLD1.thumb.jpg.389cde3be632e2bd1191655d2645b338.jpg

5aa70fd6f302f_2010-02-19DXYO1.thumb.jpg.26a2e7ed2eaef94d379ac8f03853638c.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Anyway, hope this isn't too off topic. As an aside I am now using a very similar system trading M15 'a la Thales'. It makes for an awful lot of losers (approx. 70%) but these losers are on average around -0.25R whereas the winners are a large multiple of this.

 

It also makes me wonder about the use of the absolute first exposed R in both R multiples and in expectancy calculations. If one is able to consistently manage a much lower loss then perhaps the average loss should sometimes be used rather than the maximum - or at least two measures should be considered when evaluating system quality.

 

I had a rough first week of February, during which I had a nearly -4R draw down, and for a while, my average loss was stuck above -.70R. After last week, I am now up +23.76R MTD, and my average loss is down to -.52R. During a more typical month, my results are fairly close to BT's, if I were to count BE trades as losses. That has always been my point - I keep taking my swings, cutting my losers, and letting my profits run to target(s). So, while my average win is currently +1.56R, it is actually +3R as measured by by average actual loss for the month. Again, during a typical month (it is unusual for me to have a -4R draw down, but it happens a couple of times each year) my average profit is around 1.5R as measured against my initial risk point. But measured against my average actual loss point, my average profit is about +6R.

 

For what its worth, I believe I could win a very high rate % of my trades, probably close to 90% or better, as almost every one of my trades foes into a small profit at some point soon after entry. However, I'd likely be exchanging profits for the sake of not losing as often. I really cannot imagine doing this day in and day out for +2 or +3 ticks/trade, especially when the inevitable full stop loss takes out the profits of 5 or more "winning" efforts.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am looking to take a position in the dollar index, but in spite of the push to new highs on Friday, I am still looking at the dollar as a coin spinning on its edge, and I do not yet know which way it shall fall. C now exceeds A, but still falls within a proportion that allows for a terminal movement to the upside, while still, of course, allowing for a continued rally.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

 

I'm a bit jealous, I spent ages writing on my USD chart and yours is so much clearer than mine.

Sorry I haven't been contributing more ...

5aa70fd7042e5_dollarindexdaily.jpg.7c9c6d04a30b21c86662ff25af1c53b4.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
For what its worth, I believe I could win a very high rate % of my trades, probably close to 90% or better, as almost every one of my trades foes into a small profit at some point soon after entry. However, I'd likely be exchanging profits for the sake of not losing as often. I really cannot imagine doing this day in and day out for +2 or +3 ticks/trade

 

I guess this is an example of 'gnothi seauton'? I think this is / was always an issue for me as I didn't believe that I liked losing. It's taken me a long time to realise that I don't mind having lots of losing trades but I do mind losing big!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.