Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

thalestrader

Reading Charts in Real Time

Recommended Posts

Thales - questions on a chart, just put them directly on the screenshot.

 

thanks

 

I took the first and the 2nd trade today myself in the ES.

 

The trade you asked about as to why not a trade, IMO it doesn't look right. I've been doing the 2Test type entry Thales described for a while now.

 

On the one you listed, it seems like there wasn't 2 tests. When I look for the 2tests, I want to see an actual retracement off of the high at least some degree before the actual B.O.

 

A lot of Thales' trades don't fit that criteria and are other types of entries.

 

ALL my trades (and ALL the ones I've posted here) have an entry with the 2 Tests occuring prior to my entry. This means I watch a WHOLE lot of trades go on w/o me(a lot of which look good otherwise), but I figured I'd focus on only one setup for now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I didn't catch this one, a lot of new tv shows were on tonight, damn Fringe. ;)

 

But the G/U seems to offer something every night.

 

First picture is the micro look, second is the macro in what seems to be obvious levels of support.

17September2099_GU1.jpg.1c988b2dca9cab7e0f9d1aa2568059e0.jpg

17September2099_GU2.jpg.10c32478f96fe6a3a1a7bbd4add1b10c.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Possible breakdown on the 6B

 

Let's see if "X" marks the spot. I anticipate that 6B makes a new low below 1.6400.

 

Hi Folks,

 

X did indeed mark a spot, if not necessarily the spot.

 

5aa70f28221e3_09-17-20096BXMarkstheSpot1.thumb.jpg.e05954885dd0571222cb835d4d21fbd8.jpg

 

I also have attached a current view of the weekly GBPUSD. I'll be trading a break of the blue line at 1.6100, with first target 11 handles down at 1.500, and second target 26 handles down with a retest of the 1.3500 low. This is not a trade where I place a stop 700 ticks above the entry point above the lower high. This is a trade where I probe the market in order to attack it. I will look for a favorable short entry on 4 hour down to the 15 minute, and look for a move that moves swiftly away from entry so that risk can be minimized while allowing the move to mature.

 

5aa70f2827b41_09-17-2009GBPUSDWeeklySellStop1_6100.thumb.jpg.cafa508f2fa4470d7964112737c5691f.jpg

 

I once heard (or read ... I do not remember) another breakout trader say that, "Money is made in chunks. You can't save a million dollars. You have to make it." I will treat the potential opportunity on the weekly GBPUSD as one where I trade for chunks, not scalp for crumbs, while making sure to keep any loss(es) crumblike, rather than letting it take a chunk out of my capital.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I've been doing the 2Test type entry Thales described for a while now.

 

On the one you listed, it seems like there wasn't 2 tests. When I look for the 2tests, I want to see an actual retracement off of the high at least some degree before the actual B.O.

 

Hi Forrest,

 

I would say I feel the same way ... I want to see price try to rally or try to decline form the second test, and then breakout.

 

A lot of Thales' trades don't fit that criteria and are other types of entries.

 

I look for the second test when trading the ES, but it is the same type of entry as most of the trades I post, wouldn't you say?

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi Forrest,

I look for the second test when trading the ES, but it is the same type of entry as most of the trades I post, wouldn't you say?

 

Most yes. I could be wrong, but it seems like some trades don't meet the 'strict' criteria of the 2tests (unless you are looking on a smaller time frame than the one posted), but I figured that was just because you can tell when a breakout is going to be particularly useful since you've been doing it for a while?

 

Like THIS one. Now I wouldn't have shorted at this point.

 

Or HERE is another one I asked you about before, because I could see why you would enter before you explained it. And while they were indeed breakouts, I would say they don't fit the necessary criteria to give a newb like me the confidence to jump in.

 

Sometimes I do see what seems to be a good area to trade the BreakOut w/o meeting my criteria, and more times than not they work out, but I also get faked out quite a bit. Eventually I think it will become more obvious.

 

Does what I'm saying make sense?

Edited by forrestang

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1) Trade 1 stop loss was 1062. I mistyped it here as 1062.25. The low prior to the entry was 1062.25, so stop loss was placed 1 tick below. After trigger, price pulled back to 1062.25 and then hit 1070 target. If some had set a stop loss based upon what I typed rather than the chart, then they would have been stopped out. My stop was 1062.

 

2) Trade 2 was entered on an stop at 1062. I believe I did type the correct stop loss in that post, which was 1065.25 for that trade.

 

3) I did not think of that as a short break there in real time, Brownie. And looking at it now, I do not see it as anything special either. Now, if you are going to ask me why I don't se anything there, I can only answer that I do not see that as a favorable place either to go short or to add to a short position.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

 

RE #3: Would you agree that there was a '2 test', meaning price did test the exact same price level twice after a push off in between? If so, would that qualify as a book '2 test' or not? Just trying to see if I am missing something there.

 

 

This one ended in a loss of -.50/contract.

 

Total for the day, in hindsight, wouldashouldacoulda been +8.50 points, as the second half of the first trade should have been a +1.50 stop. I kept a break even stop, so the +1.5 on the chart is theoretical, not actual. The second trade stopped its decline before my 55.25 target, and was stopped out for +1.75 on the whole position. The third trade handed me my only loss today, -.50 on the whole position. Total was a mere +7 points after a whole lot of trading (for me). I will probably not even look at the ES tomorrow.

 

 

Is that b/c this threads recent focus on the ES may have taken you away from other, easier trades? Or b/c it's Friday? Or...

 

:)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I took the first and the 2nd trade today myself in the ES.

 

The trade you asked about as to why not a trade, IMO it doesn't look right. I've been doing the 2Test type entry Thales described for a while now.

 

On the one you listed, it seems like there wasn't 2 tests. When I look for the 2tests, I want to see an actual retracement off of the high at least some degree before the actual B.O.

 

A lot of Thales' trades don't fit that criteria and are other types of entries.

 

ALL my trades (and ALL the ones I've posted here) have an entry with the 2 Tests occuring prior to my entry. This means I watch a WHOLE lot of trades go on w/o me(a lot of which look good otherwise), but I figured I'd focus on only one setup for now.

 

To me, that 3rd one did resemble a 2 test. Price was tested at the identical level 2 times, in between the 2 tests there was a push up.

tl1.jpg.5ca60fb301086261a26733f68e97281c.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I didn't catch this one, a lot of new tv shows were on tonight, damn Fringe. ;)

 

But the G/U seems to offer something every night.

 

First picture is the micro look, second is the macro in what seems to be obvious levels of support.

 

Other possible 2 tests?

tl2.png.bfb846f301ded4886ccd8469cb2003ea.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Other possible 2 tests?

 

I was responding to your last post, but I think I can convey my thouhgts based on your recent post.

 

And this is just the way I see it, I'm still getting a handle on things myself. If anyone has better ideas please post.

 

Brown,

When I look for the testing to occur, I am wanting to see actual swings, that encompass several bars. Not a 5min bar occuring at 8:30 for example(depending on what bar interval you're using), and the next bar occuring at 8:35 that matches the 8:30 bar. I want to give it time to develop, so you've got plenty of time to watch the test develop.

 

What I'm saying(for a long) is that i want to see a swing high, followed by a down retracement, followed by another swing high, followed by a retracement, THEN get ready to enter the Breakout. I have attached a chart showing this and some commentary, the chart of mine you posted with a wider tf.

 

So someone asked me yesterday with the GU short i took why I didn't get long. To me, I was worried about the possible resistance overhead. Which wasn't super solid, but to me it pushed me away. Also what I said earlier to this quote below was that if you look to the left, you'll likely see some resistance overhead, or support below where your entry might be that would make you aprehensive about taking the trade.

this is definitely a good technique thales. I have such a hard time with being patient for this kind of thing though. looking at my chart of gbp/usd i see 4 tests in a row though i expect it to break out soon

 

 

I have attached a chart showign this and some commentary.

2testexplained.thumb.jpg.9e2c3c6ee229e32159d83786c251d7ee.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I look for the second test when trading the ES

 

Most yes. I could be wrong, but it seems like some trades don't meet the 'strict' criteria of the 2tests

 

Hi Forrest,

 

I use the double test on the ES.

 

The examples you showed were of Yen futures and Pound futures. I do not need a double test to trade a breakout on a currency future.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
To me, that 3rd one did resemble a 2 test. Price was tested at the identical level 2 times, in between the 2 tests there was a push up.

 

Hi Brownie,

 

Well, yes, strictly speaking price did trade at exactly the same low.

 

But I approach it the way Forrest described: I would look for price to stop its decline, and then rally sufficiently to create an identifiable counter swing, followed by a swing back down to test the prior swing low. Now, I'd trade the break of that low on the very next bar. I would not look for yest another swing high before trading the break.

 

What you are pointing to is a double test low that occurred within one down swing, not a double test of two separate swing lows separated by at least one intervening swing high.

 

What you describe as a "push up" did not encompass a range of price movement that would qualify as a swing (it is, after all, an "inside bar," and as such it cannot be a separet swing from the prior bar, the activity of which completely encompasses the activity of the "push up" bar. Now, had there been a lateral consolidation for several bars, even if all of them were inside that first bar that printed the low, then, I would likely have traded a break. But a single inside bar does not, for the purposes of the way I approach this, sufficient to be a range unto itself. And, the whole of the particular pattern you point to is really three bars, of which the range of the second and third is each inside the initial bar of the pattern.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi Forrest,

 

I use the double test on the ES.

 

The examples you showed were of Yen futures and Pound futures. I do not need a double test to trade a breakout on a currency future.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

 

Good morninh

 

Why are currency pairsd different as far as the x2 test is concerned?

 

Thank you

 

Gabe

 

PS. Thank you for your patience and detailed explanations.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Is that b/c this threads recent focus on the ES may have taken you away from other, easier trades? Or b/c it's Friday? Or... :)

 

I just felt like it was a lot of work yesterday. Friday's have been just as good for me as any other day, though during the summer, I tend not to trade them because I like to do other things on summer Fridays. In general, if I am flat at 11:30-12:00 on a Friday, I will not initiate new positions, even though I will sometimes watch through the close. Today I will flatten at 11:30-12:00 regardless, as I have things to do this afternoon.

 

As far as the focus of the thread, most of my trading is stocks, but it seems that folks are more interested in futures, and so I have decided that I would share futures rather than stock trades here.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I just felt like it was a lot of work yesterday. Friday's have been just as good for me as any other day, though during the summer, I tend not to trade them because I like to do other things on summer Fridays. In general, if I am flat at 11:30-12:00 on a Friday, I will not initiate new positions, even though I will sometimes watch through the close. Today I will flatten at 11:30-12:00 regardless, as I have things to do this afternoon.

 

As far as the focus of the thread, most of my trading is stocks, but it seems that folks are more interested in futures, and so I have decided that I would share futures rather than stock trades here.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

 

Statistically intraday stock swings are larger than index swings. Is that the reason you prefer stocks to index futures?

 

Gabe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Why are currency pairs different as far as the x2 test is concerned?

 

Hi Gabe,

 

I do not know why it is so - size of markets? relative percentage of retail vs professional traders? number of highly liquid hours/day? I do not know. If you are asking me why I trade that way, I do it because it works best for me.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Statistically intraday stock swings are larger than index swings. Is that the reason you prefer stocks to index futures?

 

Gabe

 

I just ran some numbers on the ATR(20) of stocks > $50 devided by the closing price for yesterday.

SPY representing ES.

>> there were 523 stocks in the group.

>> SPY was #434 meaning that close to 83% of Stocks have a daily range larger than that of SPY=ES.

>> ~24% of the stocks have an ATR(20)/Close double that of SPY-ES

 

The above does not take daily volune into account.

 

My point is that if one catches a move in a stock he/she will make more $ than trading index futures. (margin requirements not factored in)

 

Doing the above analisys for stocks >$10 with trading volume > 1million, SPY=ES is out performed by 97.8% of the stocks that meet the criteria.

58% of the stocks move x2 compared with SPY=ES

 

Gabe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
What you describe as a "push up" did not encompass a range of price movement that would qualify as a swing (it is, after all, an "inside bar," and as such it cannot be a separet swing from the prior bar, the activity of which completely encompasses the activity of the "push up" bar. Now, had there been a lateral consolidation for several bars, even if all of them were inside that first bar that printed the low, then, I would likely have traded a break. But a single inside bar does not, for the purposes of the way I approach this, sufficient to be a range unto itself. And, the whole of the particular pattern you point to is really three bars, of which the range of the second and third is each inside the initial bar of the pattern.

 

If I were to trade the break of a three bar pattern, this is what it would look like.

 

5aa70f2856816_09-18-2009ESTTBShort10631.thumb.jpg.19ce933268f96e5d87c6a25068dcb593.jpg

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Edited by thalestrader
spelling/typo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If I were to trade the break of a three bar pattern, this is what it would look like.

 

[ATTACH]13570[/ATTACH]

 

The way I would have managed this, it would have been a -.50 (-2 ticks) loss.

 

I always prefer to short into the abyss and buy into open sky, rather than acting in the middle of a current or recent.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70f285ca9a_09-18-2009ESTTBShort10632.thumb.jpg.ff9d376ed630f80fcdd1984bc80c6675.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I just ran some numbers on the ATR(20) of stocks > $50 devided by the closing price for yesterday.

SPY representing ES.

>> there were 523 stocks in the group.

>> SPY was #434 meaning that close to 83% of Stocks have a daily range larger than that of SPY=ES.

>> ~24% of the stocks have an ATR(20)/Close double that of SPY-ES

 

The above does not take daily volune into account.

 

My point is that if one catches a move in a stock he/she will make more $ than trading index futures. (margin requirements not factored in)

 

Doing the above analisys for stocks >$10 with trading volume > 1million, SPY=ES is out performed by 97.8% of the stocks that meet the criteria.

58% of the stocks move x2 compared with SPY=ES

 

Gabe

 

 

I don't think this is a valid conclusion (the part bold). You cannot ignore margin and leverage. To make an apple to apple comparison and conclusion like that, you need to assume a fixed investment amound, say $5000 and then see which give you more bang for your buck based on that fixed amount.

 

This is probably off topic for this thead though. Feel free to remove my post.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I don't think this is a valid conclusion (the part bold). You cannot ignore margin and leverage. To make an apple to apple comparison and conclusion like that, you need to assume a fixed investment amound, say $5000 and then see which give you more bang for your buck based on that fixed amount.

 

This is probably off topic for this thead though. Feel free to remove my post.

 

I agree that you cannot ignore the effects of margin and leverage. I may be wrong, but I beleieve this is why the notion of "risk-adjusted" returns is thought to be useful.

 

And I see no reason to have posts removed if they are the result of the natural course of the discussion within this thread. I appreciate your participation But, as a side note, I was a bit thrown by the guy yesterday asking about "Darvas Box Indicators," though. I just presumed he got himself lost, and wandered away. Your "Google" response was perfect.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I don't think this is a valid conclusion (the part bold). You cannot ignore margin and leverage. To make an apple to apple comparison and conclusion like that, you need to assume a fixed investment amound, say $5000 and then see which give you more bang for your buck based on that fixed amount.

 

This is probably off topic for this thead though. Feel free to remove my post.

 

I posted the stats as a continuation of trying to find a reason why Thales prefers stocks to futures but you may be right and this subject should be in a thread of it's own.

As a quick reply to the above, assuming you use $5000, you can buy 2 ES contracts and catch a typical daily range (hypothetical assumption) of 10 point (10%) = $1000, or buy 150 shares of a stock that trades @ $100 (30% margin) that moves 4% = $600 . In this example you are correct that my conclusion was wrong because the futures will make you more $ but I think that stocks trend better throughout the day and while you may be chopped to pieces trading futures, you can survive and do well in stocks.

 

My appologies if this did not belong here. If someone wishes to continue the debate I'll start a new thread for further replies.

 

Gabe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Statistically intraday stock swings are larger than index swings. Is that the reason you prefer stocks to index futures?

 

Gabe

 

I have no personal preference, really. As a matter of personal preference, I'd trade potatos if they'd bring the contract back and there were sufficient opportunity to make it worth while to do so.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I think that stocks trend better throughout the day and while you may be chopped to pieces trading futures, you can survive and do well in stocks.

 

My appologies if this did not belong here. If someone wishes to continue the debate I'll start a new thread for further replies.

 

Gabe

 

1) There are certainly more opportunities to participate in a trending move by trading individual issues. Everyday there are trending stocks, whereas many days the indices are simply vacillating within a range.

 

2) Let's not worry about what does or does not belong in the thread. As long as you are not asking about where to locate indicators, we should be ok.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.