Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

forrestang

Was This a Valid Short

Recommended Posts

I think the picture should be explanatory of what I was seeing at the time.

This was on Monday, 1 June 2009, @ 9:05CST.

 

 

 

"Was this a good short here?"

 

matching the volume that causes the price to go up,

and volume that causes the price to go down,

will help you visualize the participants of the market.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
"Was this a good short here?"

 

matching the volume that causes the price to go up,

and volume that causes the price to go down,

will help you visualize the participants of the market.

 

:confused:

 

I'm not sure what you mean?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I think the picture should be explanatory of what I was seeing at the time.

This was on Monday, 1 June 2009, @ 9:05CST.

 

11071d1243957975-valid-short-vsa_2jun2008.jpg

 

 

 

What do you mean by "technically a down bar"?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
:confused:

 

I'm not sure what you mean?

 

Sorry Tams, if I've got this wrong, but I think you were meaning that yes there was high volume on the up bar... but then low volume on the down bar. Therefore, although the move up faltered, there aren't many keen sellers.... hence the drift up. Thats how I'd interpret that situation (albeit with hindsight) so be interesting to see what others think...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
What do you mean by "technically a down bar"?

 

Forgive me as I'm still a bit new to this, but when i say down bar, I just simply mean a bar that closes lower than the previous close.

 

And I was thinking we'd want to see a 'no demand' bar after a buying climax, where you'd have a slight probe above the climax to see if there are still anymore buyers present before the distribution phase is over.

 

And 'No Demand' bars occur on upbars correct?

 

I might be thinking waaay too much into that buying climax and what a good entry is? it's possible the reason that didn't work for me yesterday was because the move up was for real, and there was no resistance over head.

 

Actually, the highest resistance level I have is 939.00, and typically i'd want to see a climax occur around a resistance level, and I didn't have any annotated as we've reached new levels......as far as the data I have is concerned.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The most important question to ask for this trade which will answer your question about whether or not it was a "good short" is this question: What was the background? Forrestang, can you show us what the background conditions were prior to this trade?

 

Eiger

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Forgive me as I'm still a bit new to this, but when i say down bar, I just simply mean a bar that closes lower than the previous close.

 

And I was thinking we'd want to see a 'no demand' bar after a buying climax, where you'd have a slight probe above the climax to see if there are still anymore buyers present before the distribution phase is over.

 

And 'No Demand' bars occur on upbars correct?

 

I might be thinking waaay too much into that buying climax and what a good entry is? it's possible the reason that didn't work for me yesterday was because the move up was for real, and there was no resistance over head.

 

Actually, the highest resistance level I have is 939.00, and typically i'd want to see a climax occur around a resistance level, and I didn't have any annotated as we've reached new levels......as far as the data I have is concerned.

 

 

 

you then have to ask yourself which is the way you want to go...

 

1. I want to Short because the buying has dried up.

 

2. I want to Short because people are selling.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
you then have to ask yourself which is the way you want to go...

 

1. I want to Short because the buying has dried up.

 

2. I want to Short because people are selling.

 

Ok, I get you.

 

This short was because I was thinking buying had dried up.

 

Is my logic correct for thinking buying had dried up? How would you confirm that selling was occurring?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

a close below previous bar's close does not necessarily mean a "Down" trend has been established.

 

it is a "down" close in relation to 5 minutes ago.

 

it is still an "up" price in relation to previous bar's LOW,

or median price.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The most important question to ask for this trade which will answer your question about whether or not it was a "good short" is this question: What was the background? Forrestang, can you show us what the background conditions were prior to this trade?

 

Eiger

 

The background is something I'm not akin to understanding yet, as this was relatively early and there was nothing that stood out to me.

 

Similiarly with the second pic I posted of what happened today, I'm not sure of what the background is telling me if anything?

 

Forrest

vsa_question1.thumb.jpg.08a2027af1e31dab9570849decc84951.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ok, I get you.

This short was because I was thinking buying had dried up.

Is my logic correct for thinking buying had dried up? How would you confirm that selling was occurring?

 

 

 

I always tell people:

 

Don't be a hero,

 

you don't have to be the first to sell a top,

or the first to buy a bottom.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I always tell people:

 

Don't be a hero,

 

you don't have to be the first to sell a top,

or the first to buy a bottom.

 

Is trying to pick tops/bottoms something that comes with looking at VSA? I don't want to think along those lines as I always hear it's not possible to do consistently.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Is trying to pick tops/bottoms something that comes with looking at VSA? I don't want to think along those lines as I always hear it's not possible to do consistently.

 

 

There are ways to pick Top/Bottom.

It is possible; I know people who do it consistently.

But you must employ the finer "Tools" to read the market at the finer level.

You also need a deeper understanding of the auction process that is happening behind the scene.

 

Picking Top/Bottom can be intense; not everybody wants to trade at that intensity.

 

 

.

Edited by Tams

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The background is something I'm not akin to understanding yet, as this was relatively early and there was nothing that stood out to me.

 

Similiarly with the second pic I posted of what happened today, I'm not sure of what the background is telling me if anything?

 

Forrest

 

Well, you are missing the key piece if you don't understand the background. Focusing only on the last few bars will only cause you to contribute your trading account to the market paticipants who do understand the background. At the point you took a short, they would have been happy to buy it from you. VSA is all about understanding the background first, then applying the VSA signals.

 

The attached chart is a 60-minute chart of the ES. It shows data going back into late April. You can see there was an uptrend that stalled on May 7 & 8. the uptrend had been in place since March 9 and, by anyone's standards, has been a strong trend, moving about 35% off the bottom.

 

Throughout May, the market has been in a trading range. There had been no indication of significant supply coming into the market. Instead, the market held the gains it made off the March lows quite well. We discussed this on the VSA III thread last week. Overall, the market has been bullish and remains so.

 

Friday afternoon, the market began to rally on good volume and wide spread, but stalled at the top of the range and at the May 7 highs. On Monday morning, the market rallied further pushing some 21 points above Friday's close by 10:30 AM. The Friday - Monday rally is seen at A. This is known in VSA as Pushing Through Supply. It is a vigorous move up and out of a trading range, the top of which is a supply or resistance area. It signals that higher prices can be expected. What you thought was a buying climax is the one exception to the high volume rule in VSA. You would only know that this exception was occuring by looking at the background first.

 

So, looking at the background first would answer your question about whether or not this was a good short. The answer is no, because the background was exceptionally bullish.

 

Hope this is helpful,

 

Eiger

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hope this is helpful,

 

Eiger

 

It is! I have a 60 min on my screen now and see what you're talking about where it pushed through. Concerning VSA, would it be unwise to initiate any shorts when such a thing occurs? To include the short I posted from this morning?

 

Would you personally look only to the long side when you get a Push Through Supply?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So, looking at the background first would answer your question about whether or not this was a good short. The answer is no, because the background was exceptionally bullish.

 

Good post Eiger, but doesn't forestang's goals for the trade (i.e. what sort of entry was he looking for - a quick retracement or something more substantial) come into it?

 

If he was looking for a day position then yes the background would be critical in going with/against trend. Maybe you could enlighten us as to what sort of position you were aiming to get into forest? Although I have a guess at an answer already considering your on a H1 bar...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

If he was looking for a day position then yes the background would be critical in going with/against trend. Maybe you could enlighten us as to what sort of position you were aiming to get into forest? Although I have a guess at an answer already considering your on a H1 bar...

 

I was looking for a retracement of some sort.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I was looking for a retracement of some sort.

 

 

Why ask for a hamburger when you can have steak?

 

 

Rule # Uno: The Trend is Your Friend. Don't argue with a friend.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
... doesn't forestang's goals for the trade (i.e. what sort of entry was he looking for - a quick retracement or something more substantial) come into it? ...

 

You (by your statement, I don't mean you personally) are basically telling me that you want to put your preferences ahead of the market. Not a prudent idea. The background will help you assess what type of trade is likely to work. Let the market tell you what to do, not the other way around.

 

Eiger

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not really Eiger... what I meant was more that within any trend (this one being bullish and with established background as you pointed out) there will obviously be short term moves to the downside periodically. What I was wondering was if forest was trying to catch one of these by studying buying action / volume. If so, wouldn't this be legitimate - as long as expectation as to the potential risk / reward are kept in check?

 

Hamburger vs. Steak as Tams put it, right enough... but I just wondered if forest really was trying to order the hamburger (and he was) :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just one observation as a non-vsa guy - the thread was rather simple 'is this a short'. It quickly turned into a 3 page discussion w/ all sorts of opinions.

 

What appears to an outsider as a simple question has needed 3 pages so far and there are still questions.

 

Don't take this the wrong way, but does this stuff work in real-time? If so, can any of the VSA'ers join us in the p/l thread and show that it does? I've seen this kind of stuff discussed here for a while, yet have never seen any definitive proof of this working in real-time.

 

I ask b/c if no one is making this work in real-time, then these questions are just the blind leading the blind.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't appreciate your repeated "harassment/invitation" to join your p/l thread.

 

There are reasons for participation,

and there are reasons for opt-out.

 

Proving one's method works is NOT a reason to post at the p/l thread.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.