Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

CandleWhisperer

How Do You Pay Yourself?

Recommended Posts

Let's get this out the way before we begin:

 

1. Anybody that answers can use hypothetical numbers (for math reasons or illustration purposes). Your personal financial status is your own business.

 

2. Newbie’s that are not yet trading real money but have ideas of how they plan to pay themselves when the time arises, are free to answer.

 

The question as the thread name states is : How do you pay yourself?

 

A few years ago I read an article about Michael Jardine of Enthios.com. In the article he said he paid himself as follows:

 

1. he had a minimum amount that he started the month with. For math purposes assume $50,000.00

 

2. At the end of the month/beginning of the next month, he took all monies above the minimum out of the account (in the form of a check to him) and started the month out new. So if he had $300,000.00 at the end of the month he would keep $50,000.00 and get a check for $250,000.00. Again, I am making the numbers up here, but you get the idea.

 

3. What I do not remember is what he did if the month came up short. Suppose he had $35,000.00 at the end of the month. Did he deposit the $15,000.00 to get the number back to his min level?

 

One of the reasons he did this was psychological. It helped him under trade in size. In other words, just because he could trade 10 s&p contracts did mean he should trade that many. By keeping the size of the account down, at the start of the month, there was no temptation to increase size beyond his personal risk tolerance level.

 

I prefer the taking out some amount at the start of the end of the month/start of the new one, but keeping the bulk of the monies in the account. Suppose there is $25,000.00 in my account. At the end of the month there is $50,000.00. I take out enough to cover bills and some externalities, say, $10,000,00 and now have $40,000.00 in the account. On the plus side, if the next month ends with a drawdown of $15,000.00 I am back where I started the prior month at $25,000.00. More importantly for me, I do not have to deposit again. On the down side, I do not get paid that month , or I got paid 1/2 as much for the last two months if you will.

 

This brings up the other question. Are you making at least as much as you could be making if you did something else commiserate with your skill set? If you graduated from Harvard and could be making $250,000.00 a year in corporate America, but are trading instead and are making $75,000.00 a year that's a $175,000.00 loss to you. So basically, the minimum amount you should be paying yourself is the minimum amount you would be worth in the labor market. Be honest. Economists call it being under-employed. By being a trader, are you volunteering to be under-employed?

 

Anyway, I look forward to your answers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

CW - My view is simple & similar to the example you provided from that website or author. Basically I want enough in the account at all times to provide enough of a cushion for me and that's about it since futures accounts pay little to no interest. I then have basically a savings account or money market where my 'secondary' futures account sits at least earning something.

 

So the account(s) held at the actual futures broker is 'just enough' and excess is moved to something that will earn interest. In my eyes that's dead money sitting at a broker earning 0.00% interest. I'll take .25% or whatever the rate is over 0.00% any day. May not be a ton of interest w/ today's rates, but I can't stand watching money earn nothing while sitting there.

 

From there it's a matter of paying bills, having some fun money, etc. I'm one that likes to pay off current and future bills as well, esp during good months. So after a good month, I may pull a chunk out and pay off the mortgage a few more months out, etc. I just don't like bills and like to take chunks out of them whenever possible.

 

And if at any time the primary futures account takes a hit, a quick bank wire and it's back to normal. If things are going as planned, this does not happen too often. ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good question CandleWhisperer as this is a question a lot of people might have.

 

I wish I had one answer to your question but I don't. I have have a good run of 1-2 weeks I will take x-amount out and put it in my checking acct. I am similar to brownsfan in that when I have the money I like to pay off bills.

 

That's the thing with trading, money does not come in a set amount every 2 weeks like a job, it is very erratic. I currently need $500 per contract on es with my broker. So If I want to trade 4 cars I need at least $2500-$3000 in my acct. (to also give myself a little cushion.) When I am profitable I like to take it out as when it sits in my acct I am more likely to let it get away from me. In this regard I keep my acct. margin low as a money mgt. tool.

 

I would also like to add that TradeStation raised their Minimum margin requirement to $6,200 per contract when we were super volatile in October. This made me close my acct. with them as $24,800 + daily drawback to trade at my level seemed like overkill. I also know IB raised their minimum as well.

 

Has this effected anyone trading with these guys?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
When I am profitable I like to take it out as when it sits in my acct I am more likely to let it get away from me.

 

Same here.

I still have a day job that covers my expenses. Then I have my futures account, a straight out brokerage account for equities and my Roth.

I try to keep my futures account as close to flat as possible and put winnings in the equity account. Namely a pyschology thing and so that I really have to think about things before adding contracts. Then I put in a set monthly contribution to my Roth as if it was a 401k at a real job.

I'll know I'm in good shape at some point when the futures account is really feeding the equity account, and the equity account is maxing out the Roth.When that happens, thats probly when I quit working my day job.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a great thread.

 

I remember the one useful thing one of my business prof's told me - entrepreneurs #1 mistake is forgetting to pay themselves a salary at all - or paying themselves too much. Its a fine line.

 

I am on the same ideology of Brownsfan - I hate bills and try to pay everything that I can as far in advance as I can. I may be a bit neurotic but the idea of this profession and the fact that I may not have income every month makes me very cautious with and how I spend my money and I like knowing that I don't have any pressing bills 6 months out.

 

That being said, I have a very small account right now and i'm just trying to grow it so i'm actually taking hardly any out at all. I have the unique situation of having some people who loaned me money to get this account going so I pay them 10% of profits each month. I take an additional 5% out to pay myself.

 

Keep in mind though - this is simply so I still have a TINY bit of cash for food, maybe a movie, etc but to keep my maximum capital in my accounts where I can grow it. I'm at the point where i'm working towards being able to trade 10 lots - and i'm by no means there yet so I keep as much in the accounts as I possibly can.

 

I know a couple guys who do start every month with X and at the end they take everything else out. It seems like a logical way to go about it except I kind of feel like i'd be cutting my profitability short doing that. Yes you get all that money every month but you're also going to be capping you're income level every month.

 

The OP brings up an interesting point about taking that money out at the end of each month so it doesn't influence you're trade size and you don't get in over you're head. Part of me agrees with this logic (I can see where it could cause problems) and part of me disagrees. I disagree from the standpoint that if you are trading 1 lot per X amount of money then your $ risk per lot is 1Y. If you increase your account size to 2X then you can trade 2 lots with still only risking that initial 1Y. So be it 10 lots on 100k or 1 lot on 10k i'm still risking the same $ per lot. That makes me think why not trade bigger size as your account grows? Its the same $ risk is it not?

 

I'm on the fence personally - lets put it this way - i'm not in a position to have any of the problems with big size or paying myself a big salary each month right now. But it is something that I am already starting to ponder.

 

Either way - great thread, great points, great discussion. Keep it up!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How about trading behind your own limited company?

 

This to me would be one of the advantages of trading for a living by controlling the amount of money you receive as salary.

 

From a UK tax perspective...

 

If Inland Revenue viewed your trading income as salary then you would pay 40% tax on any salary above approx £35000 + national insurance. If they viewed your profits as capital gains them anything earned over £9600 would be liable to 40% tax. That's pretty steep!

 

Running your trading business as a limited company would mean you have more flexibility and control over how much tax you pay.

 

I'm not sure how this translates to the US tax system or any other country but I would guess that goverments tends to screw employees (because they don't have much choice) and encourage businesses (by giving them more generous tax breaks) because they create jobs ....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
...The OP brings up an interesting point about taking that money out at the end of each month so it doesn't influence you're trade size and you don't get in over you're head. Part of me agrees with this logic (I can see where it could cause problems) and part of me disagrees. I disagree from the standpoint that if you are trading 1 lot per X amount of money then your $ risk per lot is 1Y. If you increase your account size to 2X then you can trade 2 lots with still only risking that initial 1Y. So be it 10 lots on 100k or 1 lot on 10k i'm still risking the same $ per lot. That makes me think why not trade bigger size as your account grows? Its the same $ risk is it not?.....

 

 

Thank you for the response. I am shocked at the lack of them for such an important topic.

 

Anyway, the point had to do more with a trader's psychological make up than a strict risk/reward equation. It is possible to increase position size in such a way as to keep the r/r the same as you pointed out, but the accompanying psychological change doesn't necessarily stay the same. The idea of trading 10 contract in the es may effect a trader simply because the contract size is 10 rather than 2 even if the account is 10xs bigger when trading the 10.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been through a few, but here is the basics of my current structure which may change in the near future due to OPM.

 

Broker Accounts: Amount required to cover multiple time frames (positions maxed) plus my potential statistical draw down for two weeks.

 

Bank Account (specifically for trading): Revenue is moved over from my broker accounts every two weeks. If a loss occurs, the account is replenished and triggers a detailed personal audit to ensure that it has statistical merit. All trading expenses are paid from this account. Decisions to increase or decrease size is based off of this account.

 

Personal Account: As long as my trading bank account (not broker accounts) is in good standing and above required figures, I am paid every two weeks. Adjustments are made quarterly if needed.

 

As always, this most likley will be different due to ones strategy, goals, funds, personality, etc. The one thing that should not change is a well thought out plan/system with defined rules.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.