Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

ant

ES Analysis for 10/10/06

Recommended Posts

The key reference areas for the ES on 10/10/06 are as follows...

 

The ES is in a 3-day trading range from 10/5 to 10/9. See the composite profile in the first chart below. The upper limit of the bracket is 1362.75-1363.25 and the lower limit of the bracket is 1352.50-1353.25. The high volume node is 1358.50, which is near the middle of the distribution. I am expecting the bracket limit(s) to be tested tomorrow. If a bracket limit is faded (i.e., a responsive trade), the target will be the high volume node (or middle of the distribution). However, I will keep in mind that if one of the bracket limits is rejected, the market may trade swiftly to the opposite side.

 

It is important to note where the ES is in market development. In the longer-term, the ES is in an uptrend. See the second chart. However, if the ES were to trade below the lower bracket limit, the next downside reference areas are the low volume area/single prints of 10/4 around 1351.25-1350.75, and below that is a key reference area between 1346.50-1348.25, which contains the high volume area of the composite of 9/27 to 10/2, the high of 10/3, and a low volume area on 10/4. Note that the key reference areas to the downside are well-defined.

 

Next, I look at the daily profiles for the ES in the third chart to review the market structure. It is noted that there is a buying tail on 10/9 around 1355-1356, which is also near the POC of 10/6. This is also a key reference area. As always, my approach will be to monitor market internals as the ES approaches any of these key reference areas.

ES-Composite.thumb.GIF.d84b80a7e3c903d3bc7d3d2a4726c6ca.GIF

ES-Daily.thumb.GIF.4a2644c052762c0545b6ab5b68fc9f75.GIF

ES-DailyProfile.GIF.74564c4beb76150d953b500787c232c8.GIF

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent Antonio. Its been a tough 3 day session. I am actually waiting for the markets to breakout of the current range.

 

Technically I am stilll bullish. But alot of traders are worried fundamentally and this can be a problem for prices to lift.

 

Going to be looking at the range between 11865 - 11945 on the YM. We have tested both ends 2-3 times already so I am going to becareful on fading these two pivots. Market internals should warn us of any breakouts likely to occur.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Let's take a look at how the reference areas worked out today...

 

The upper limit of the bracket is 1362.75-1363.25 and the lower limit of the bracket is 1352.50-1353.25. The high volume node is 1358.50, which is near the middle of the distribution. I am expecting the bracket limit(s) to be tested tomorrow. If a bracket limit is faded (i.e., a responsive trade), the target will be the high volume node (or middle of the distribution).

 

The ES opened and traded down to the high volume node of the 3-day composite and reversed on weak market internals, which formed Tick and volume divergences. The ES then traded to the upper bracket limit at 1363.25 where a responsive trade could have been taken with the middle of the distribution as the target. (It's amazing how often these Market Profile S/R levels get hit to the tick.) As the ES traded to the middle of the bracket, internal divergences formed again. Towards the end of the day, the upper limit was tested again. See the chart below for an illustration of the day's action. Note that the ES is now in a 4-day trading range and the key reference areas for today will also apply tomorrow, 10/11. See the second chart for an updated composite profile.

ES.GIF.7a02c85d22aa5472abb9b66d59e56b07.GIF

ES2.thumb.GIF.489068922e611d50ba292bb21ac3e812.GIF

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The ES traded primarily within the 4-day bracket that had formed. The reference areas that came into play today in the ES were (see chart below):

 

  • The single prints of 10/9 at 1355-1356.
  • The upper bracket limit around 1362.75.
  • The single prints of 10/4 at 1351.25-1350.75.

 

ES.thumb.GIF.b22b252f74d03b892038ecb12b077562.GIF

 

So the key reference areas for tomorrow, 10/12, are (see chart below):

 

  • The upper limit of the bracket at 1362.75.
  • The high volume node of the 5-day composite at 1358.25-1359.50.
  • The single prints from today between 1353.75-1351, which also includes the lower limit of the bracket.
  • The high volume node of the composite of 9/27 to 10/3 at 1348.25-1346-50.

 

ES2.thumb.GIF.d9a59d4e4b8da11e1154f78f1c92830e.GIF

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good question James. I think we have initiative selling tail and initiative TPOs, but no initiative selling range extension. So I don't believe that 10/11 was a selling 3-I day.

 

The ES is in a very tight, 5-day trading range and am expecting to see imbalance (breakout) soon. I will be monitoring market internals at the bracket limits.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Antonio. I am actually anticipating a breakout today with the gap up and decent volume on the SSF's.

 

Also yesterday's buying presence below value was a good piece of information for me to hold a long bias.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A picture is worth a thousand words... If the uptrend is to continue, then the previous day's value area should provide support. I would not want to see today's low being taken out. Will look to buy pullbacks...

ES.GIF.ced7568a5e94e10cda47231e435c7312.GIF

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Agreed since some of the new traders usually lose money in start and some loses more while chasing their lost money and eventually ends up blaming to their brokers part.
    • The crypto market are also in phase of maturing like the forex and other trading assets so we can do much more accurate analysis than before since early days it was purely a luck if the investments in crypto bears results because most of the coins or tokens never come to fruition. Some early birds were also able to make profits on these tokens or coins. e,g., like turtle coin starts with 1 satoshi and go up to 7 sathoshis, quite good rewards. another token lmgx now hovering at 10 started from 1, 
    • How's about other crypto exchanges? Are all they banned in your country or only Binance?
    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.