Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Recommended Posts

Unusual to post essentially the same chart three days in a row:

 

 

 

 

0837: While most do not like to trade pre-market for some reason, I should point out here that we came within 2pts of the UL after the Claims reports. This provided a legitimate short op. Whether it succeeds or not is of course unknowable. (Edit: short entry came 17m later)

 

 

I guess this doesnt count as a real time call. :haha:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I guess this doesnt count as a real time call. :haha:

 

No, it doesn't count if you do it in advance. :roll eyes:

 

Getting back to business, I don't believe I ever posted a chart of the next-older TC from March. If I did, I can't find it. In any case, here is an updated copy. Note that we are well back within the limits of the March channel.

 

That deep and extended oversold period drags the mean down, so it may actually be lower than drawn. But I've learned not to play with this stuff too much, so I'll leave it as is until the mkt tells me different.

 

And in case anybody's wondering, the original short is now worth 64pts. The second short is worth 61.

Image7.png.f5d0a1ce0bab30733ad3a012f4d8489a.png

Edited by DbPhoenix

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I guess this doesnt count as a real time call. :haha:

 

No, it doesn't count if you do it in advance. :roll eyes:

 

Getting back to business, I don't believe I ever posted a chart of the next-older TC from March. If I did, I can't find it. In any case, here is an updated copy. Note that we are well back within the limits of the March channel.

 

That deep and extended oversold period drags the mean down, so it may actually be lower than drawn. But I've learned not to play with this stuff too much, so I'll leave it as is until the mkt tells me different.

 

And in case anybody's wondering, the original short is now worth 64pts. The second short is worth 61.

Image7.png.df54922f0d0dcc6b79a070dd98c24fa2.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
No, it doesn't count if you do it in advance. :roll eyes:

 

Getting back to business, I don't believe I ever posted a chart of the next-older TC from March. If I did, I can't find it. In any case, here is an updated copy. Note that we are well back within the limits of the March channel.

 

That deep and extended oversold period drags the mean down, so it may actually be lower than drawn. But I've learned not to play with this stuff too much, so I'll leave it as is until the mkt tells me different.

 

And in case anybody's wondering, the original short is now worth 64pts. The second short is worth 61.

 

Well, a VREV at PDL was not what I expected :doh:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This will be my journal to profitability. I've been studying trading for almost 3 years. After much sifting I've finally found Wyckoff and DBP and a method that makes sense to me. Currently my biggest weakness is in pre-market prep and analyzing AMT. SLA is so simple I seem able to follow it without much thought.

 

I know that DBP encourages people who are following his method to do it exactly as described but I've never been able to do this. I personally believe each trader must find his own way. Just like two comedians can't tell the same joke the same way and be funny I believe everyone needs to make this method their own. This isn't an excuse to start using indicators. :)

 

I'll get back to this in more detail but here are my 4 trades from this morning - two winners and two losers. The losers were taken off of a double-top after at DL break and the a rejection after a fanned DL break. I need to do some back testing on double-tops. I never saw a good entry for the long off of yesterday's low since I was still short during the REV.

trades.thumb.png.42b715d45218675768a90d08d40c98f7.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Today's chart:

 

It should be clear from the inset that one who views a chart in hindsight receives a very different picture from one who views it in real time. This is why those who are interested in this are encouraged to replay the charts, from the beginning, and work forward rather than try to analyze a static picture.

 

Edit: As an extension to the chart below, I'm adding the next hour to show how the reversal played out acc. to the SLA/AMT. One could, of course, have played the reversal and entered at 51, but most prefer to play it safe and enter on the first retracement.

5aa7121b607f0_NQ100Futures(1Minute)20140424110729.thumb.png.71d7d577caf3581c3c641d8e866b618d.png

Image1.png.bbf73103e9e6176e053eec81295b4d77.png

Edited by DbPhoenix

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Today's chart:

 

It should be clear from the inset that one who views a chart in hindsight receives a very different picture from one who views it in real time. This is why those who are interested in this are encouraged to replay the charts, from the beginning, and work forward rather than try to analyze a static picture.

 

Edit: As an extension to the chart below, I'm adding the next hour to show how the reversal played out acc. to the SLA/AMT. One could, of course, have played the reversal and entered at 51, but most prefer to play it safe and enter on the first retracement.

Image1.png.8dbf11c115c2d669a0e78409e83d2d2a.png

5aa7121d4e93a_NQ100Futures(1Minute)20140424110729.thumb.png.28e9e2da1b0b5a474a0e81e4a24b0007.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Beautiful reversal trade at 45.

 

This is all almost starting to look too easy. Not saying its easy to trade and profit, but once you do your prep, outline the levels, know where you are, do what you should do, and just sit back and watch and wait, then this is kinda easy. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beautiful reversal trade at 45.

 

This is all almost starting to look too easy. Not saying its easy to trade and profit, but once you do your prep, outline the levels, know where you are, do what you should do, and just sit back and watch and wait, then this is kinda easy. :)

 

I shouldn't complain but I was disappointed that I missed the reversal. By the time I exited my short it was moving fast and the first decent pullback was at 62 and didn't look appealing to me. I almost took 51.50 but it moved through while I thought about it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Today's chart:

 

It should be clear from the inset that one who views a chart in hindsight receives a very different picture from one who views it in real time. This is why those who are interested in this are encouraged to replay the charts, from the beginning, and work forward rather than try to analyze a static picture.

 

Terrible winrate :D

 

Silence is a lot sweeter than listening to boo birds. I don't miss ET. Are we going to Big Mike's next?

 

EDIT - I just got some scammy looking e-mail from ET about HFT and the easy money to be made. Yuck.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh am I misreading your chart? Oh yes, I am, the trade there is the exit from the short. When I saw your dashed red line and the trade just above it, I quickly assumed this was your long entry as the bounce from the line.

 

May I ask green, where are you at in terms of trying to go live? Are you waiting to sim some more, are you backtesting more, or still trying out different things?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Oh am I misreading your chart? Oh yes, I am, the trade there is the exit from the short. When I saw your dashed red line and the trade just above it, I quickly assumed this was your long entry as the bounce from the line.

 

May I ask green, where are you at in terms of trying to go live? Are you waiting to sim some more, are you backtesting more, or still trying out different things?

 

I'm in the process of developing a "flight plan" - basically a morning checklist where I note all that needs to be noted before the market opens. Once an area of interest is reached it's just SLA which I feel comfortable with and don't need further testing with. I'd like to sim through 50 or so pre-market days, fill out my flight plan and then run the playback around areas I have predefined. I also want to do some statistical analysis around ON highs and lows which can easily be done in excel but will take a little time. I will also analyze the results off these levels and try to figure out what I'm missing so that my game plan each morning is solid.

 

Basically I don't have the right habits in place pre-market. I need a way to force the right behavior and I think some sort of checklist followed by honest post-market evaluation. I don't want to have to do any thinking once the opening bell sounds.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Today's chart:

 

 

... One could, of course, have played the reversal and entered at 51, but most prefer to play it safe and enter on the first retracement....

 

It was there for the taking... :)

 

In the past you have talked about paying attention not only to the diagonals but also to the horizontals, those who did, got rewarded today.

 

It helps. However, my focus was the mean of the March trend channel. The confluence of the three says something about the balance between demand and supply.

5aa7121b6cf1a_NQ06-14(60Min)24_04_2014.jpg.4f2de5681c502d4ff1567ec7c4e63714.jpg

Edited by DbPhoenix

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm in the process of developing a "flight plan" - basically a morning checklist where I note all that needs to be noted before the market opens.

 

This sounds like a good plan indeed. Thanks for sharing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Your UL is drawn incorrectly, but how is this against the rules? The point is to track demand and supply. My chart does just that. And did. Confirmed by subsequent price action.

 

My point was that I was wrong that it was against the rules. As for my UL - how is it drawn wrong? I initially had chosen the highest high between the two lows but when price doubled the range I thought we can move the UL. If the point is to track supply and demand doesn't my channel do this?

 

EDIT - sorry my reading comprehension seems poor today. Sometimes I post and then comprehend. No reply required.

asis.thumb.png.632405de6f00eb466e8aa985d80dfa0c.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In the past you have talked about paying attention not only to the diagonals but also to the horizontals, those who did, got rewarded today.

 

I find that the horizontals are actually better at drawing a firm line in the sand so to speak. I see price hesitate more at these levels, and when breakthrough occurs, it does so with force.

 

The diagonals of channels and means according to AMT are a little more fluid in that the channel extremes represent potential overbought and oversold areas, which can get stretched out less or more. It is remarkable how price does sometimes turn right around at a diagonal line, but the firm price levels on a horizontal level like a previous day high or a high on an hourly chart from weeks ago everyone sees much better.

 

Just an observation though. Without doubt, both have to be watched.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It was there for the taking... :)

 

In the past you have talked about paying attention not only to the diagonals but also to the horizontals, those who did, got rewarded today.

 

It helps. However, my focus was the mean of the March trend channel. The confluence of the three says something about the balance between demand and supply.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The above looks eerily similar to what's in the SLA-AMT file.

 

1) Use AMT to identify an extreme.

2) Wait for price to reach it.

2) Start using SLA when that extreme is reached.

 

Can it get simpler than this?

 

Gringo

 

Hi, Gringo, I am very new here, how to use AMT to identify an extreme? sorry for this childish questions, any simple explain of AMT? thanks

 

See the first post in this thread.

Edited by DbPhoenix

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There's no need to repost the macro charts of the last few days; they all still apply. I do, however, want to point out that price has been hovering around the mean of yesterday's downmove. This will very likely mean that we do nothing all morning. Or we could take a shot at the UL of the March TC at 3605. Or we could drop to the LL, wherever that might be (FWIW, I'm going to go with 45 again; we'll see what price does if and when it gets there). Otherwise, it will be an SLA day without benefit of AMT.

Image1.png.feb06af7fe69453245cca9109547f1e1.png

Edited by DbPhoenix

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There's no need to repost the macro charts of the last few days; they all still apply. I do, however, want to point out that price has been hovering around the mean of yesterday's downmove. This will very likely mean that we do nothing all morning. Or we could take a shot at the UL of the March TC at 3605. Or we could drop to the LL, wherever that might be (FWIW, I'm going to go with 45 again; we'll see what price does if and when it gets there). Otherwise, it will be an SLA day without benefit of AMT.

Image1.png.8aabf3652765e31a2ec83c0e5c7e0bfa.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
There's no need to repost the macro charts of the last few days; they all still apply. I do, however, want to point out that price has been hovering around the mean of yesterday's downmove. This will very likely mean that we do nothing all morning. Or we could take a shot at the UL of the March TC at 3605. Or we could drop to the LL, wherever that might be (FWIW, I'm going to go with 45 again; we'll see what price does if and when it gets there). Otherwise, it will be an SLA day without benefit of AMT.

 

Thanks, looks like 45 was it, but it just got stuck there.

 

The probability that we would have another V reversal at the same place two days in a row was slim to none. As for the LL, looks to me like it's around 3485.

Edited by DbPhoenix

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Similar Content

    • By vishnux
      Hey guys , what are the main things you look for to detect if the consolidation area is accumulating or distributing ? 
      1 ) I see springs in top , still markup happens and it becomes accumulation area and vice versa
      2) There is lots of volume absorption in support line and still markdown occurs.
      3) sometimes in market high / low it becomes re-accumulation  / re-distribution
      Is there any clear way to find it ? 
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.