Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

brownsfan019

ES Limit Up?

Recommended Posts

So... we opened, then sold off? I was at work the entire time watching from my blackberry :crap:

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=8026&stc=1&d=1221872360

 

Look at that weekly high wave candle and HUGE volume. Throw on a weekly chart and compress it as many years as you can go back, it's unreal! Gotta love manufactured bottoms :roll eyes:

 

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=8027&stc=1&d=1221872360

daily.jpg.a7867789511f6446a12ae73bb5eed248.jpg

weeklywth.thumb.jpg.42e3237a7e4a3a2dbd35e9c2dce95943.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's what happened James. The market opened at 930 and there was a big run up that did not last long and then came down swiftly. I can only imagine what it was like holding through that. First, your dom just stops taking orders. Then, you sit there wondering... And then at 930 it's off to the races.

 

It was very interesting to watch as this does not happen often. Some pretty significant news event would need to occur to see this again.

 

Very worthwhile being in front of the computer this morning to watch this in action as it unfolded.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, limit up into the open.

 

I had so little sleep this past week. The news came out in the Asian session. Before you know it you're trading Asia, then Europe, then US, then Asia opens again . . .

 

The move in the ES was nothing compared to other markets. Shanghai nearly hit limit, almost made 10%. Hang Seng rallied over 2,000 points.

 

The fed isn't protecting investors, or the public. They are just throwing money hand over fist into day trader's hands. :rofl:

 

Edit: I must admit, it never ceases to amaze me the levels to which the US Government goes to, to absolutely rip apart the US investing public. Nearly all of these announcements have been done outside the day-session of the US market. Imagine being a fund with a weekly / monthly outlook. It would be fairly difficult.

 

Friday was a great example. Asian traders have benefited most from these moves. US day-session opened, they took profit and that was basically the end of it.

Edited by smwinc

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
....... I must admit, it never ceases to amaze me the levels to which the US Government goes to, to absolutely rip apart the US investing public.

 

Not true. It goes to such levels to rip apart US DAYTRADERS. If Ma and Pa Kettle were sophisticated enough to understand money can be made when stocks fall, the Government never would have done what they did.

 

You don't seem them rushing in to halt long buying on 445 pt up days, do you?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, that is just incorrect. Retail daytraders aren't the problem that regulators are concerned with. Basically (assuming you are a daytrader) you don't have enough capital individually or as a group to make much difference. The concern is for commericial entities (hedge funds for example) that have access to significant leverage and move size in the markets on a daily basis.

 

Simply put, the change in rules is meant to give the markets a break from the constant short pressure put on the financial sector by these groups. During that time, the government will try to fix the problems and keep the economy out of recession. Remember that we have an election in just a few weeks.

 

Much of this is simple common sense. One assumes that a professional participant could think this through and determine how and when to put on a position that would profit while managing risk appropriately. The same cannot be said for the general public (or daytraders for that matter). That is why in the industry, daytraders and the public at large are known as "weak hands" and "dumb money"....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sorry, that is just incorrect. Retail daytraders aren't the problem that regulators are concerned with. Basically (assuming you are a daytrader) you don't have enough capital individually or as a group to make much difference. The concern is for commericial entities (hedge funds for example) that have access to significant leverage and move size in the markets on a daily basis.

 

Simply put, the change in rules is meant to give the markets a break from the constant short pressure put on the financial sector by these groups. During that time, the government will try to fix the problems and keep the economy out of recession. Remember that we have an election in just a few weeks.

 

Much of this is simple common sense. One assumes that a professional participant could think this through and determine how and when to put on a position that would profit while managing risk appropriately. The same cannot be said for the general public (or daytraders for that matter). That is why in the industry, daytraders and the public at large are known as "weak hands" and "dumb money"....

 

You are making an error that they want you to make. A Day trade is by definition a trade that is entered and exited on the same day. Therefore if you enter a trade in the morning and are flat by the close you have made a day trade. If you make a day trade you are a day trader. How big your account is has nothing to do with it. Simply, there are many well funded institutions that make day trades and thus are day traders.

 

Most Mutual funds are not day traders they are investors (holding periods of months if not years). As such they tend to be LONG ONLY. The unsophisticated public mostly places money here. And because this they don't understand that money can be made when the market falls as well as when it rises. Nobody called the last two days PANIC BUYING......

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, this is my profession, so it is unlikely that I would make a mistake of that kind. If you re-read, you may notice that I talk about "retail daytraders". I try to be very specific about who "they" are.

 

Finally your conception of what is happening is likely to be incomplete. The events that have shaped this last week in the financial markets have happened largely out of the public's sight, and are related to the problems that institutions have had managing risk associated with holding of commercial paper originating from Lehman (and others). I can talk more about it if there is interest. OR not...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sure, first I am not interested in having you change anything.

 

As regards my comments I stated what I know, and that is that institutional markets out of the immediate view of the public have experienced turmoil.

 

What I can say in a public forum is as follows. Institutional market funds (not open to the general public) were caught holding commercial paper whose value was questionable. That paper originated from Lehman Bros and others and to those of us in this business it is incredible that a short term fund manager would take that kind of risk. But they did, and it backfired on them causing that institutional fund to experience a breakdown. In our business, this is called "breaking the dollar" meaning the net assets of the money market fund were no longer dollar good, but in fact were worth slightly less than a dollar. The repercussions of this were noticed immediately since it is extremely unusual for this to happen (I can't remember the last occurrence). The fund closed operation and for a time commercial entities with assets in the fund could not redeem...Although there is more to it, government regulators immediately noticed this and acted to avert what used to be called a "crisis of confidence" that would have spread to the larger market. What you may notice starting on Monday, is that part of the program the Treasury is working on will in essence offer some guarantee to cover losses that could affect (public) money market funds.

 

In terms of politics, this is an election year and if the present administration were to let the problem run its course without intervening, it would have given the election to the dems....

 

I will leave it at that.

 

Good luck to you.

Edited by steve46

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry if I came across as if you'd change anything. I simply meant nothing I learn fundamentally, would change the way I trade technically, I simply meant I like to learn new information on current events, etc. Hope that clears it up.

 

On the other hand, what do you think this will mean for regulation surrounding CTAs and hedge funds?

 

And by an institutional fund that "broke the dollar", are you referring to LEH or other firm(s) that don't hit the headlines? I'm sure over the coming years there will be books and more information leaked.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
That is why in the industry, daytraders and the public at large are known as "weak hands" and "dumb money"....

 

We may be weak, but we are not dumb.

Steve 46, go back to trading. :crap:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No need to apologize James.

 

"Broke the dollar" means that the institutional money market fund (that I referred to) did not maintain sufficient funds to respond to demands for redemption.

Edited by steve46

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
We may be weak, but we are not dumb.

Steve 46, go back to trading. :crap:

 

 

I didn't invent these euphemisms, but I can tell you that time after time, they are proved correct. As an example I often fade signals at the daily pivot, and I do so because time after time, retail traders prove to be "weak hands" that get flushed out of positions easily. Even when retail traders use stops, they are positioned so obviously that it is easy for professionals to trigger them. For retail traders, I suggest that instead of taking it personally, they try to determine how professionals approach the markets, and try to trade more like they do....

 

Good luck to you

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Steve46,

No offense here. You may well have the right ideas here, but did you ever take Economics 101 in college, because you have a funny way of explaining things.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I understand entirely. I was trained in a specific way. Its possible that we don't have enough in common to communicate. Fortunately there are plenty of other points of view for you to evaluate.

 

By the way, I should clear something up....I don't think of retail traders as inherently "dumb"...Clearly however, retail traders are prone to making dumb decisions when it comes to trading. I think the same is true of the professionals who allowed a money market fund, a short term fund at that, to own commercial paper from Lehman, that was really incredibly dumb (and irresponsible)...Clearly retail traders aren't the only people making dumb decisions these days.

 

Good luck

Edited by steve46

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.