Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

ant

"Market Delta" Footprint for TradeStation

Recommended Posts

Hi Guys,

I have tired like heck to make it work in Multicharts but with my limited knowledge of code It will not work. If someone has the indicator that works on MC can they please help me out, would be very grateful.

Many Regards

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi Guys,

I have tired like heck to make it work in Multicharts but with my limited knowledge of code It will not work. If someone has the indicator that works on MC can they please help me out, would be very grateful.

Many Regards

 

 

I doubt anybody can help you if you don't help yourself.

 

What do you mean by doesn't work?

 

-- can't compile? what's the error message?

-- jibblish chart? do you have a screen shot?

-- which code are you using? (there are many versions floating around)

do you have a reference link?

 

:-(

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I doubt anybody can help you if you don't help yourself.

 

What do you mean by doesn't work?

 

-- can't compile? what's the error message?

-- jibblish chart? do you have a screen shot?

-- which code are you using? (there are many versions floating around)

do you have a reference link?

 

:-(

 

Hi Tams,

 

Very Kind of you to a answer back, this is the message I am gettingis:

 

 

01.05.09 17:58:01

------ Build started: ------

Study: "MarketDelta" (Indicator)

Please wait ....

------ Compiled with error(s): ------

this word has already been defined

errLine 23, errColumn 1, errLineEnd 23, errColumnEnd 2

 

Many Thanks,

email

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi Tams,

 

Very Kind of you to a answer back, this is the message I am gettingis:

 

 

01.05.09 17:58:01

------ Build started: ------

Study: "MarketDelta" (Indicator)

Please wait ....

------ Compiled with error(s): ------

this word has already been defined

errLine 23, errColumn 1, errLineEnd 23, errColumnEnd 2

 

Many Thanks,

email

 

 

the error is in Line 23.

look for the highlighted word in your PowerEditor.

Edited by Tams

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Email,

 

What's on line 23? Is it the line with the "TickSize" variable? If so, maybe Multicharts already defines "TickSize" so that variable definition is not required. If I'm referencing the correct line, try deleting it and compile it again. If that's not the right line, then post the 23rd line of the indicator and I'll do my best to help.

 

Regards,

Antonio

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi Email,

What's on line 23? Is it the line with the "TickSize" variable? If so, maybe Multicharts already defines "TickSize" so that variable definition is not required. If I'm referencing the correct line, try deleting it and compile it again. If that's not the right line, then post the 23rd line of the indicator and I'll do my best to help.

Regards,

Antonio

 

 

 

probably he has previously downloaded an indicator with a function called "Ticksize".

(he can confirm this by checking the functions list in his PowerEditor).

 

 

if that's the case, he can do one of the following:

1. use wiggly brackets {} to enclose that line.

 

or,

 

2. highlight that word and press ctrl-H

replace that word with ticksize1 throughout the code.

 

good luck.

 

 

 

[voice edited]

Edited by Tams

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Ant/ Tams,

 

I tried to place the brackets at line 23 but then the problem shifts to line 25.

 

this is line 22 to line 26 : 22) Green4(RGB(0,128,0)),

23) i( 0 );

24) nothing on this line

variables: (25

26) intrabarpersist Price( 0 ),

 

 

Thanks Again,

email

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Email,

 

Line 23 is not what I thought it was. One problem that others have had is that when the variable "i" is used as a subscript in the arrays used by the code, it is not surrounded by square brackets. Go through the code and make sure the arrays use square brackets. For example, you should have Bid and Ask, and not Bid<i> or something else. Hope this helps.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, I Hope I`m not being a pain in the back, he is the code if you can notice anything.

 

 

inputs:

Threshold1( 150 ),

Threshold2( 300 ),

Threshold3( 600 ),

DisplayDelta( false ),

Type( 1 ), // 1 = Use Upticks/Downticks, 2 = Use Bid/Ask

BidAskArraySz( 1000 );

 

variables:

TickSize( MinMove / PriceScale ),

PriceAtIndex( Open ),

BaseIndex( BidAskArraySz/2 ),

Red1(RGB(255,185,185)),

Red2(RGB(255,128,128)),

Red3(RGB(255,0,0)),

Red4(RGB(128,0,0)),

Green1(RGB(210,255,210)),

Green2(RGB(125,255,125)),

Green3(RGB(0,255,0)),

Green4(RGB(0,128,0)),

i( 0 );

 

variables:

intrabarpersist Price( 0 ),

intrabarpersist MyVol( 0 ),

intrabarpersist VolTmp( 0 ),

intrabarpersist LastTick( 0 ),

intrabarpersist MyCurrentBar( 0 ),

intrabarpersist Index( 0 ),

intrabarpersist BidAskDelta( 0 ),

intrabarpersist xDelta( 0 ),

intrabarpersist TextString(""),

intrabarpersist MyUpTicks( 0 ),

intrabarpersist MyDownTicks( 0 );

 

Arrays:

intrabarpersist Bid[](0),

intrabarpersist Ask[](0);

 

Array_SetMaxIndex( Bid, BidAskArraySz );

Array_SetMaxIndex( Ask, BidAskArraySz );

 

if (Type = 1 or Type = 2) and LastBarOnChart and BarType < 2 then

begin

MyVol = Ticks;

PriceAtIndex = Open;

 

if CurrentBar > MyCurrentBar then

begin

VolTmp = 0;

MyCurrentBar = CurrentBar;

MyUpTicks = 0;

MyDownTicks = 0;

 

for i = 0 to BidAskArraySz - 1

begin

Bid = 0;

Ask = 0;

end;

end;

 

Index = BaseIndex + (Close - PriceAtIndex) / TickSize;

 

if InsideBid < InsideAsk then

begin

if Type = 1 then

begin

// Use Upticks/Downticks

if DownTicks <> MyDownTicks then

Bid[index] = Bid[index] + MyVol - VolTmp

else if UpTicks <> MyUpTicks then

Ask[index] = Ask[index] + MyVol - VolTmp

else

begin

if Close <= LastTick then

Bid[index] = Bid[index] + MyVol - VolTmp

else

Ask[index] = Ask[index] + MyVol - VolTmp;

end;

end

else

begin

// Use Bid/Ask

// Warning: TradeStation provides snapshot of bid/ask

if Close <= InsideBid then

Bid[index] = Bid[index] + MyVol - VolTmp

else if Close >= InsideAsk then

Ask[index] = Ask[index] + MyVol - VolTmp

else

begin

// Last tick was between bid/ask

if Close <= LastTick then

Bid[index] = Bid[index] + MyVol - VolTmp

else

Ask[index] = Ask[index] + MyVol - VolTmp;

end;

end;

end;

 

MyUpTicks = UpTicks;

MyDownTicks = DownTicks;

VolTmp = MyVol;

LastTick = Close;

 

xDelta = 0;

Price = Low;

 

while Price <= High

begin

Index = BaseIndex + (Price - PriceAtIndex) / TickSize;

TextString = NumToStr(Bid[index],0) + " x " + NumToStr(Ask[index],0);

Value99 = Text_New(Date, Time, 0, " ");

Text_SetString(Value99, TextString);

Text_SetLocation(Value99, Date, Time, Price);

Text_SetStyle(Value99, 1, 1);

 

BidAskDelta = Ask[index] - Bid[index];

if BidAskDelta > Threshold3 then

Text_SetColor(Value99, Green4)

else if BidAskDelta > Threshold2 then

Text_SetColor(Value99, Green3)

else if BidAskDelta > Threshold1 then

Text_SetColor(Value99, Green2)

else if BidAskDelta >= 0 then

Text_SetColor(Value99, Green1)

else if BidAskDelta < -Threshold3 then

Text_SetColor(Value99, Red4)

else if BidAskDelta < -Threshold2 then

Text_SetColor(Value99, Red3)

else if BidAskDelta < -Threshold1 then

Text_SetColor(Value99, Red2)

else

Text_SetColor(Value99, Red1);

 

xDelta = xDelta + BidAskDelta;

 

Price = Price + TickSize;

end;

 

if DisplayDelta = true then

begin

Value99 = Text_New(Date, Time, 0, " ");

Text_SetString(Value99, NumToStr(xDelta, 0 ));

Text_SetLocation(Value99, Date, Time, Low - TickSize);

Text_SetStyle(Value99, 1, 1);

 

if xDelta >= 0 then

Text_SetColor(Value99, Green)

else

Text_SetColor(Value99, Red);

end;

end;

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Assuming that the code is being copied into Multicharts exactly as you displayed it, then everything looks fine to me. It's hard to debug this without Multicharts. The only other thing I would suggest is that if it's complaining that variable "i" has already been defined, then rename it to something else. For example, change "i" to "x" throughout the code. Tams, already suggested renaming the variable at line 23. Did you try it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi ant,

 

Yes I did what Tams said, and what happens when I compile it is that the error shifts to line 25. By the way, when I first imported the inid and then compiled it and then shows me the error the "i" is highlighted in blue. The I (i) must be the problem.

 

Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, OK got it I think, it just said complete. I`m too tirred to open the chart but it seems to be ok now.

 

I did what you said and that was to change the "i" to an x but I missed one at first, I re did it and now seems to have compiled.

 

Thank you Sir,

Emil;e

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi, I Hope I`m not being a pain in the back, he is the code if you can notice anything...

 

if you had read further down the thread, you would have came across this post:

http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/f46/market-delta-footprint-for-tradestation-516.html#post14170

 

someone had already fixed the problem almost 2 years ago:

 

in MultiCharts, the letter " i " is a reserved word.

(used as a substitute for OpenInt)

thus the TradeStation codes with the variable "i" would not work in MultiCharts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Tams,

 

Yes, I read that post but it flew over my head, I did not get it. I am starting to understand it a bit know. Please keep in mind that I do not know a thing about code.

 

Ok, just noticed while trying to apply the indicator to the chart that I get a red box at the bottom of the chart and it says; "Message: Error in study "Market Delta": Array bounds. Wrong index value : 20500.

 

What does that mean.

 

Thanks again

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I suspect you have one or more of the variable not fixed.

 

If you have not done so, you should go copy the MultiCharts code from the link I posted above.

At least I know someone has compiled that code with no problem.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tams,

 

The compile was successfull, thats what it said. Even when i open the study list is show as compiled, before it did not.

 

Could it be that I need to change the actual setting/inputs when the indi window pops up.

 

cheers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's the same values I have.

 

The market is closed right now, this indicator need live feed to work.

Well, at least you have it compiled; you can test it out on Monday.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I hope you guys know that BIDxASK you get with this indicator are INCORRECT due to the tradestation data feed limitation. There is a thread on TS forums that explains this issue.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Nick,

 

 

Could you please elaborate a bit on this because i`m sure allot of others here do not have access to the TS forums. Does that also apply to Multicharts. I am assuming no because the feed comes from various sources.

Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is the answer I posted on TS forum.... the comments are refering to TS datafeed and it may be different for your datafeed...

 

For the benefit of the community I am posting the answer from data integrity:

 

..I have checked with our Product management department in regards to your Data feed accuracy for Inside Bid and Inside Ask.

 

I believe that the inaccuracy is most likely due to the fact that not every bid and ask is sent -- i.e. the "quote field update frequency" limitation. I had checked to see if there was a design flaw. The response I was given is No, it’s not a design flaw.

 

It's because it's a quote request. In a quote request, a snapshot of the market is taken 3-5 times a second. This is as opposed to a tick request, which will update trade ticks (but not bid and ask ticks) in such a way that every individual tick is always sent. I hope this has addressed your concerns.

 

On which I asked again:

Thank you for a quick explanation, but i still can't understand how the "missed" ticks due to update end up on the wrong side.... Basically, if TS supposedly missed the updates, then I should end up with less trades reported... but that is not the case. All trades are reported, but they are in the wrong column ( switched side from bid to ask and vica versa). PLEASE look at the provided pics posted in the forums.

 

... and the final answer was:

I have forwarded your response to our Product Management team and

their response to your question was they'll be mis-categorized if the

bid/ask has moved but not been updated in the current bid and current

ask fields.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Agreed since some of the new traders usually lose money in start and some loses more while chasing their lost money and eventually ends up blaming to their brokers part.
    • The crypto market are also in phase of maturing like the forex and other trading assets so we can do much more accurate analysis than before since early days it was purely a luck if the investments in crypto bears results because most of the coins or tokens never come to fruition. Some early birds were also able to make profits on these tokens or coins. e,g., like turtle coin starts with 1 satoshi and go up to 7 sathoshis, quite good rewards. another token lmgx now hovering at 10 started from 1, 
    • How's about other crypto exchanges? Are all they banned in your country or only Binance?
    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.