Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Sledge

Candlesticks in Context

Recommended Posts

I would like to start a discussion if I may regarding Price Action at a SINGLE candle perspective. Dissecting the bars so to speak (I know Db does this with much skill) This will be very "Candlestick 101" but I would like to discuss this from a different perspective than what appears to be out there currently.

 

Hopefully, after my post- you'll get the idea of what I'm trying to accomplish:

 

I have searched and searched without any real fruit of trying to find a very basic discussion about reading single candles. There are a million sites dedicated to "candlestick patterns"-- but that isn't what I'm trying to accomplish.

 

A better term would be "Candlesticks in Context" As an example: If you see a Dragonfly Doji form at a market top- it is a strong bearish signal. That exact same candle (size, spread etc) formed at a market bottom- is a very strong bullish signal. Obviously, this is the most elementary example I could use to make the point.

 

My ultimate goal is to learn to read SINGLE bars price action as they develop and/or close for them to "speak to me." As another example a nice flat row of doji's and spinning tops at a market bottom- the "sum of all the bars" equals accumulation. Hopefully I am explaining myself appropriately.

 

What I would like to get to with this thread is:

1. Looking at Single Bars and discussing individual bars and their psychology IN CONTEXT

2. BUT BUT BUT- keeping in mind of the greater "landscape" of the chart.

 

I'm not looking to focus on one single bar necessarily to trigger trades in this thread (there is a lot of discussion about that on the web)

 

I was even thinking of going so far as to make up some type of "flash cards" it sounds like "trading 101" type stuff, but I think it would be beneficial- Just to drill myself- staying with the Dragonfly Doji example. If someone popped me that card and said, "What's your next move" the correct answer to the "card" would be "Where on the chart did it form?"

 

It is sort of taking the very basics of price action and going deeper into it at the same time.

 

You see a Spinning top form very quickly off a recent top? That means profit taking is occurring etc. See a down candle with a long tail just one or two bars out of the trend pullback- most likely that is the professional $ moving in to "put on the brakes" - but the downward trend most likely will continue- it is a "warning bar" of sorts- it is this type of discussion I hope to spark.

 

Just an intro Chart to show you what I mean:

 

example.thumb.JPG.76c6e330f0e4b6331aab10e0ce88538b.JPG

 

A: You see just prior to it being a Wide Spread Bar with Buying on the bar, this bar (Bar A) shows another attempt to reach lower and failure. After a few bars of wrangling- you see the up move.

 

B. Now this isn't Identical but at bar "B" you have a very similar bar to Bar "A” But now at a Market Top- this bar has a completely different meaning and it is a "warning sign" of impending downward movement to come. We know this because of the preceding two bars show effort without results.

 

C&D: These bars show the "brakes being applied” These are not bars to short without further confirmation- they are bars that if you are short- you would pay attention to as a warning to tighten up stops or be ready to close your position soon.

 

Hope the text plus the chart assist in showing what I would like to try and discuss.

Aaron

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is how i view trading candles. The most important thing is to find the support and resistance. Be it Market profile, trendlines, etc. For the chart I attached i just used the highs and lows. There is really no need to examine each and every bar, imo. Just need to watch the candles when they are approaching what you have defined as support and resistance.

 

2lavwp0.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent start to the thread.

 

trader273: I know that the norm is to look for the S/R points, and I agree with you 1000% that it is imperative to locate them and utilize them in trading. BUT I would really like to discuss the candles in the thread individually if possible. This exercise may be harder than people think it will be.

 

What I would like to get too is analyzing each candle and then taking a grouping of the individual candles to collectively see the bigger picture.

 

So as an example say we just take 10 candles to start. We analyze the 10 candles 1-by-1, then at the end of analyzing all 10 candles individually- what do they tell us collectively?

 

daedalus:

Yes I actually trade hourly and Daily candles. I know the larger the timeframe- the better the signal.

 

For our purposes though, this should be fine to use a 5 min, hour, 4 hr or Daily chart. Analyzing the meaning of each bar in context can be accomplished on any timeframe.

 

Aaron

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

What I would like to get too is analyzing each candle and then taking a grouping of the individual candles to collectively see the bigger picture.

What you are talking about is blending of candles. If you want to see four hourly candles together, open a four hour chart.

 

So as an example say we just take 10 candles to start. We analyze the 10 candles 1-by-1, then at the end of analyzing all 10 candles individually- what do they tell us collectively?

 

Aaron

 

Well, have fun with that. I think you are making this much harder than it needs to be. Bullish candles in a downtrend do not really mean that much if its not at an area of support. Now some might work, but if you get caught in a trend, good luck.

 

I don't see what benefit would come about from analyzing every candle. If you have read any candle book, one of the first things they talk about is using candles in the overall technical picture. What you are doing is zooming in dramatically on each and every candle and ignoring the big picture.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
What you are talking about is blending of candles. If you want to see four hourly candles together, open a four hour chart.

 

Well, have fun with that. I think you are making this much harder than it needs to be. Bullish candles in a downtrend do not really mean that much if its not at an area of support. Now some might work, but if you get caught in a trend, good luck.

 

I don't see what benefit would come about from analyzing every candle. If you have read any candle book, one of the first things they talk about is using candles in the overall technical picture. What you are doing is zooming in dramatically on each and every candle and ignoring the big picture.

 

I'm not trying to spark debate with anyone, I'm just attempting to view this landscape a bit differently than it has been done in the past. Let me try to explain it this way:

 

When you learn to play an instrument. You go through the almost painful experience of learning- one note at a time. That one note you have to learn what it not only looks like, but also what it sounds like correct? Ok after you master the one note (reading it and playing it)- you can move onto another note. Over time you have all of the "notes" learned and memorized. You know what they look like in print and you know what they sound like in your mind.

 

After your training of each individual note- you can pick up a piece of sheet music and can acutally read the paper and hear the song start to play in your mind- long before fingers meet the strings. Without the "boring" part of learning each individual note- a piece of sheet music may as well be a foreign language to you.

 

I'm just trying to spark further conversation about the "notes" before I attempt to play the entire piece.

Aaron

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Then the mod should change the thread title then. This is anything but candles in context. It should be named, candles: one by one, or Micro-view using candlesticks. I dont want a newbie coming here and then getting focused on each candlestick, because they think thats what candles in context are, when in reality whats being talked about here is the complete opposite.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Then the mod should change the thread title then. This is anything but candles in context. It should be named, candles: one by one, or Micro-view using candlesticks. I dont want a newbie coming here and then getting focused on each candlestick, because they think thats what candles in context are, when in reality whats being talked about here is the complete opposite.

 

I agree that looking at each candle, indicator level or anything in isolation renders the conclusion near useless. The market is all about context, it's used to derive perceived valuation and place a high probability bet. How can 1 candle fit the title of "in context"?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I agree that looking at each candle, indicator level or anything in isolation renders the conclusion near useless. The market is all about context, it's used to derive perceived valuation and place a high probability bet. How can 1 candle fit the title of "in context"?

 

See this is actually why my brain refuses to get into candle patterns. If one unit of representing data does not have meaning but 3 do...then there should be a better way of representing data by combining what gives those 3 units meaning.

To me a good example is the good ol doji on a 5 minute chart.

Instrument X opens at 100, volatility is high for the day so a massive spike on the NYSE TICK sweeps instrument X to 105, 30 seconds later price falls back to 100 and drifts down over the next 2 minutes to 95, then slowly drifts back up over the next few minutes to close near 100.

Another day Instrument X opens at 100, volatility is low for the day. Instrument X opens time wise 5 ticks below the top of a range, price sits between 99 and 101 for 4 minutes, the test of the top of the range comes quickly after 4 minutes, price is rejected down to 95 quickly...buyers step and defend the top of the range and move price back to 100 over the next minute..bar closes, 20 seconds into the next bar the range breakouts and price blasts to 110.

Both are dojis, both are totally different information wise. Obviously a skilled candle trader would pick up on the totally different context of the doji in those two situations, the newb would not. What I question though is that there is not a better way to summarize the movement of the underlieing ticks that make up both dojis, considering that if you changed your chart to a 1 minute candle chart, you would see a candle pattern and not a doji, and would see a different candle pattern in each instance.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest forsearch

How would one interpret a doji candle on a constant volume chart then?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
How would one interpret a doji candle on a constant volume chart then?

 

Depends FS. A doji in and of itself is meaningless w/o a chart to examine. A doji in the middle of a range IMO means absolutely nothing. A doji that is retesting a HOD or LOD in a double/triple top type setup is a different story.

 

Equally important - what constant volume setting is being used? A 500 or 25,000 setting? What market(s)?

 

Not nearly enough information in your question to provide any real response.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
How would one interpret a doji candle on a constant volume chart then?

 

ehh, damn that was fast..:) I was going to try to build an arguement towards constant volume charts but I guess its always good to cut to the chase.

To me the problem is no different on volume charts than with the previous time based example as far as respesenting each tick. The problem for me is that the body of a candle is formed by whatever time frame or volume level you decide to chart it as. Just because software developers decide to make the defaults 1,3,5 minutes or 100, 200, 1000 volume wise does not mean that is the optimal way to summerize the underlying tick data. The biggest variable in what patterns are displayed in the summary of the tick data depends on what time or volume variable is chosen...if it makes no sense to display a 4 minute and 39 second chart or 527 volume chart, then to me you need to prove that a 5 minute or 1000 volume chart has utility over the former or your simply accepting randomness in your analysis that could be cut out.

How to cut out that randomness I do not know at this point, but to me that is a very interesting discussion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Ive said it million times before, and Ill say it again: Candle Patterns, by themselves, will make you go broke.

 

Thus the reasoning for looking at an individual candle first. Then placing it into the greater context of the puzzle.

 

I had little reason to believe that a simple concept of discussing candles, their formation and what that candle says to the trader looking at it would ruffle so many feathers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thus the reasoning for looking at an individual candle first. Then placing it into the greater context of the puzzle.

 

 

You got it backwards there. You look at the overall picture first, THEN a candle pattern to support your idea. You dont look at candle patterns and then try to get the bigger picture to fit those ideas. That's why candles are secondary, not primary.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I had little reason to believe that a simple concept of discussing candles, their formation and what that candle says to the trader looking at it would ruffle so many feathers.

 

Hi Sledge

 

I think the "issue" and what the other people are alluding to is with what you are saying above. Maybe I am not understanding clearly what exactly it is you want, but when you say "...simple concept of discussing candles, their formation and what that candle says to the trader looking at it...", this is the core of the whole issue. A candle pattern by itself doesn't tell you anything and this is a rather pointless excercise to identify them all, although there are several resources giving explanations on what a specific pattern is supposed to mean. Is this what you are looking for?

 

You did mention context, but when trader273 said candle patterns are more relevant at Support/Resistance, you shot that down and say you just want to talk about individual candle patterns. Isn't Support/Resistance context? I think maybe this will be helpful if you can give us an idea of what you mean by context, if you don't consider S/R as context?

 

If you really do not want to talk about context, but just about specific candle patterns and what they mean, maybe this would be easier to look at some of resources Brownsfan has posted with regards to candle patterns elsewhere?

 

I noticed you used to be fairly active on the VSA thread. The same goes for that. This is easy to identify a "no demand" bar, but without looking at where it occurs, it is not really telling you much. If someone post the exact same text you use here on the VSA thread, but instead of using "candle formations" use "VSA formations", would that sound like a logical approach to you to want to look at just the formations and disregarding the big picture?

 

Somehow I suspect though that there is a misunderstanding here on what it is you really are trying to do here. Maybe you can try to explain this again?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi Sledge

 

I think the "issue" and what the other people are alluding to is with what you are saying above. Maybe I am not understanding clearly what exactly it is you want, but when you say "...simple concept of discussing candles, their formation and what that candle says to the trader looking at it...", this is the core of the whole issue. A candle pattern by itself doesn't tell you anything and this is a rather pointless excercise to identify them all, although there are several resources giving explanations on what a specific pattern is supposed to mean. Is this what you are looking for?

 

You did mention context, but when trader273 said candle patterns are more relevant at Support/Resistance, you shot that down and say you just want to talk about individual candle patterns. Isn't Support/Resistance context? I think maybe this will be helpful if you can give us an idea of what you mean by context, if you don't consider S/R as context?

 

If you really do not want to talk about context, but just about specific candle patterns and what they mean, maybe this would be easier to look at some of resources Brownsfan has posted with regards to candle patterns elsewhere?

 

I noticed you used to be fairly active on the VSA thread. The same goes for that. This is easy to identify a "no demand" bar, but without looking at where it occurs, it is not really telling you much. If someone post the exact same text you use here on the VSA thread, but instead of using "candle formations" use "VSA formations", would that sound like a logical approach to you to want to look at just the formations and disregarding the big picture?

 

Somehow I suspect though that there is a misunderstanding here on what it is you really are trying to do here. Maybe you can try to explain this again?

 

sevensa-

I think you are correct that their is a misunderstanding. I didn't want to bring any VSA "schtuff" into the Candlestick Corner, but maybe to help with the clarification side of it- I can utilize a VSA example to clarify this topic.

 

Ok we have in VSA a "No Demand bar" as you stated. That is an up bar with volume less than the previous two bars. That bar- by itself means virtually nothing. But if you place that bar in the context of the chart after a wide spread bar up- it has a lot more significance. That exact bar placed at the bottom of a bear run means that we are not ready to rise just yet. That same bar at the top means we are exhausting. Add a few more of those at a market top together and we get a stronger justification for going short.

 

I am not shooting down ideas of candles or candle formations at S/R- I know they are significant and VERY worthwhile. Any spotting of exhaustion at either S or R is significant. So please do not think I am trying to shoot down the idea in any way.

 

Not sure if that helps.

Aaron

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
sevensa-

I think you are correct that their is a misunderstanding. I didn't want to bring any VSA "schtuff" into the Candlestick Corner, but maybe to help with the clarification side of it- I can utilize a VSA example to clarify this topic.

 

Ok we have in VSA a "No Demand bar" as you stated. That is an up bar with volume less than the previous two bars. That bar- by itself means virtually nothing. But if you place that bar in the context of the chart after a wide spread bar up- it has a lot more significance. That exact bar placed at the bottom of a bear run means that we are not ready to rise just yet. That same bar at the top means we are exhausting. Add a few more of those at a market top together and we get a stronger justification for going short.

 

I am not shooting down ideas of candles or candle formations at S/R- I know they are significant and VERY worthwhile. Any spotting of exhaustion at either S or R is significant. So please do not think I am trying to shoot down the idea in any way.

 

Not sure if that helps.

Aaron

 

the name of this thread is "candles in context" and yet it seems you don't want to talk about S/R as context. Since this is the case... why don't you let us know what you would like to use to establish context... for example... long shadows... solid wide range bars... etc... these are candles that can establish context.... however they really reflect the hidden S/R anyways so really its just another layer of abstraction...

 

maybe it would be actually useful if we first create a list of candles that can be used as context... then move forward and interpret other candles within the context of these "context" candles.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dojis:

 

We will start with the three main types.

 

1. Close on the top(High).

2. Close on the bottom (low).

3. Close in the middle of the range.

 

If you divide the candle into three 3 equal segments and label them from the bottom 3,2, and 1. We can talk about the first Doji as 1-1. This implies the open was in the top third and the close was in the top third.

 

This candle represents an "approach-avoidance type of behavior. The market opens, starts to move in on direction and then comes back to where it started. The wick can be seen as sellers selling as it moves down and then buyers buying as the candle moves up. Net effect is to be back where we started. Hence, we KNOW that the sellers where in charge at the beginning of the day and the buyers where in charge at the end. How else can this candle develop?

 

According to Bill Williams, 85% of the time the market will change directions within the next 1 to 5 Candles of the same duration of the candle you are examining when you see this 1-1.

 

Obviously, the same holds true but in the opposite when dealing with 3-3, a Doji with the close equal to the open on the low.

 

The 2-2, close and open in the middle is neutral. We can't really know who was in charge at the open or the close of the day.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Agreed since some of the new traders usually lose money in start and some loses more while chasing their lost money and eventually ends up blaming to their brokers part.
    • The crypto market are also in phase of maturing like the forex and other trading assets so we can do much more accurate analysis than before since early days it was purely a luck if the investments in crypto bears results because most of the coins or tokens never come to fruition. Some early birds were also able to make profits on these tokens or coins. e,g., like turtle coin starts with 1 satoshi and go up to 7 sathoshis, quite good rewards. another token lmgx now hovering at 10 started from 1, 
    • How's about other crypto exchanges? Are all they banned in your country or only Binance?
    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.