Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

atto

Chat Junkies

Recommended Posts

Depending on what you're looking at, I don't think that would be overkill, but it certainly would never show up on my 1m chart. Think of it this way: if that chart was a daily, those "stalking" lines could possibly be trend lines for the intraday traders. It all depends on what you care to pay attention to.

 

The purpose of trend and s/d lines (imho) is to keep you on the right side of a trend (however big or small it is, you pick). If you're trading the squiggle, your "stalking" lines may help, and once broken, may provide a countertrend long. However, if you're not looking for those kinds of moves, then you wouldn't benefit that much from using those tight lines.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The purpose of trend and s/d lines (imho) is to keep you on the right side of a trend (however big or small it is, you pick). If you're trading the squiggle, your "stalking" lines may help, and once broken, may provide a countertrend long. However, if you're not looking for those kinds of moves, then you wouldn't benefit that much from using those tight lines.

 

I would not use them to provide possible countertrend longs. However, at the moment price starts to fall, you have no other option then to draw a supplyline which is similar to the first one, it's only after another swing and a new low and the bigger lines can come into play. But at the time of trade, you don't know if there'll be a new low. So, on your 5s chart, would you not have scaled out at the break of the first of my stalking lines?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally, I wouldn't have, as I give a little more room for retraces. For those kinds of moves, my stops and scale outs are on broken S/R (so just horizontal stepping).

 

I'm absent from chat today due to a hectic schedule, I'll see you guys tomorrow.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In lieu of a working history, Db wanted to see Jw's and mine morning conversation. It strongly refers to Hlm's and mine from yesterday, which you guys will probably hear more of soon.

 

-----------

 

[08:40:26] That One Guy: i was pissed i missed you and hlms conversation

[08:40:34] atto: heh, yeah

[08:40:41] That One Guy: arguments of the trading elites

[08:40:58] atto: Well, I'm digging into the *why* behind his concept. Why a swing vwap would coincide with s/r

[08:41:03] atto: Which it appears it does.

[08:41:11] That One Guy: yeah

[08:41:16] That One Guy: very often

[08:41:44] atto: But it's not that the vwap causes s/r, or gives s/r. It coincides, because s/r is only given by traders protecting prices

[08:41:56] atto: So the question behind it is why they would value that calculated value.

[08:42:04] That One Guy: yeah

[08:42:08] atto: The same questions can be applied to any s/r methodology

[08:42:15] That One Guy: why does sup and res form anyway

[08:42:24] That One Guy: if its done by bigger traders

[08:42:28] atto: Which is truely interesting by itself.

[08:42:28] That One Guy: why do that value that area?

[08:42:43] That One Guy: to i say f**k why

[08:42:54] That One Guy: if i can find it consitient

[08:42:59] atto: For instance, the Wyckoff form of s/r I use is based on areas traders see value in (which isn't too far from the concept of vwaps)

[08:43:13] atto: Prices where sellers and buyers have entered.

[08:43:19] That One Guy: yeah

[08:43:30] atto: So, it logically follows that those prices are important to some people. Hence horizontal s/r.

[08:43:39] That One Guy: i veiw vwap as just the most general area where traders are involved

[08:43:41] atto: Which is why Db doesn't like to call trendlines and the such as s/r

[08:43:42] That One Guy: dpending on the tf

[08:43:59] System: dadacomputers has entered the room Trading Room

[08:44:04] That One Guy: im finding things like flips

[08:44:20] That One Guy: with horizontal s/r

[08:44:21] atto: My real question, regarding vwaps, is why would a lot of traders (sufficient to turn price) be interested in that price. It's the net average, sure. But there isn't a large group of traders that entered at that price anyways.

[08:44:28] That One Guy: sometimes we never reach the flip point

[08:44:39] That One Guy: and it often coincides with the vwap flip

[08:45:06] That One Guy: yeah i see what you are saying

[08:45:08] atto: But that's something we'll work through.

[08:45:19] atto: Hlm wanted me to detail the truths I believe behind my method.

[08:45:59] atto: I'm of the belief that all successful methodologies based on price have some fundamental truth that exists outside of price. Example: the concepts of support/resistance

[08:46:02] atto: Protecting prices

[08:46:07] atto: "Value" (however you define that)

[08:46:22] atto: Etc

[08:46:27] That One Guy: yeah

[08:46:40] atto: Generally, these truths are the same thing, from different views

[08:46:42] System: DbPhoenix has entered the room Trading Room

[08:46:52] atto: However, one must understand them before moving on.

[08:47:11] atto: Which is why I'm more interested in the *why* than *how*. The *how* becomes trivial if the why is understood.

[08:47:18] System: jasont has entered the room Trading Room

[08:47:23] atto: Err, possibly not trivial, but much simpler.

[08:47:27] DbPhoenix: Hey, atto

[08:47:29] That One Guy: yeah i see

[08:47:29] atto: Hey

[08:47:44] atto: So I'm just digging as to what that is.. what causes it to work.

[08:47:48] DbPhoenix: Does the history not exist for those who've just logged on?

[08:47:57] atto: Db, unfortunately, history is bugged

[08:48:06] That One Guy: i say form your own ideas behind why

[08:48:11] atto: I'll copy this mornings, but it's basically just about yesterday afternoons.

[08:48:18] That One Guy: if it makes you confident

[08:48:21] That One Guy: in what you see

[08:48:23] DbPhoenix: Too bad. Sounds like an interesting conversation. But don't repeat it all.

[08:48:24] atto: Jw, yeah. He wanted me to detail mine, and he'll relate to it.

[08:48:26] That One Guy: who cares how true it is

[08:48:32] atto: Db, I'll copy it to a file and send it to you

[08:48:43] DbPhoenix: ok

[08:48:48] DbPhoenix: Or maybe to the group.

[08:48:49] That One Guy: thats what i dont understand about many experience traders are the arguments that happen

[08:48:51] atto: Well, truth matters. Else, you run into problems of hoping in something that has no base.

[08:48:53] atto: Db, k

[08:49:01] That One Guy: people make money in so many different ways

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Db, if you have some time, could you post a 5 sec chart of your entry yesterday on NQ? Thanks in advance.

 

Crappy weather, lots of time.

 

This is hard to explain to a beginner, and I'm not going to try, mostly because explaining off a static, hindsight chart is nowhere near sufficient. But you're not a beginner, and this is just the sort of trade that you or atto might like.

 

Given the support level, my reasons for entering should be clear. Or maybe not. But my reasons for staying in had to do with the volume price indications arrowed (and, in case anybody is wondering, this has nothing to do with matching a particular volume bar with a particular price bar; it has rather to do with the movements of each and all in tandem as they form in real time, just as a snapshot of Fred and Ginger is only marginally related to what they're doing throughout the entire dance routine).

 

 

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=9220&stc=1&d=1232810737

 

 

Edit: You've given me an idea regarding beginners and this chart. We'll see what happens.:)

Image1a.gif.2b6ed7d3c5c110e3e3a79e629f95d5de.gif

Edited by DbPhoenix

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Given the support level, my reasons for entering should be clear. Or maybe not. But my reasons for staying in had to do with the volume price indications arrowed (and, in case anybody is wondering, this has nothing to do with matching a particular volume bar with a particular price bar; it has rather to do with the movements of each and all in tandem as they form in real time, just as a snapshot of Fred and Ginger is only marginally related to what they're doing throughout the entire dance routine).

 

Thanks, I appreciate the effort.

 

True, the reasons for entering off that level are obvious. I was looking for the same thing (40-42 support zone), but didn't want to jump in straight away. There's a fine line between actually pulling the trade and having a small hesitation, in this case I think my bias "blocked" me from taking a long. And like you said in the room, the trade was only there for a dozen of seconds. But that's outside of the market, and the volume was there...

 

What I found particularly nice on the 5sec chart is the sharp entry. 1 minute people entered around 45-46 and 5 minute people, well... they were definitely far behind in the queue. It's also a nice illustration of how entering on a smaller bar interval doesn't mean you can't stay in. On the tick chart the highest volume is actually just at the lowest point of the day.

 

After that, I found 52-53 to be a safe (but already 9 points later) entry (at demandline + volume + higher low), after breaking higher to 60 first.

 

Imho first 15 minutes of the day definitely worth watching in replay...

nq_tick.thumb.GIF.8e9ed9c9200b8219d35b524676bfd9e1.GIF

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thanks, I appreciate the effort.

 

True, the reasons for entering off that level are obvious. I was looking for the same thing (40-42 support zone), but didn't want to jump in straight away. There's a fine line between actually pulling the trade and having a small hesitation, in this case I think my bias "blocked" me from taking a long. And like you said in the room, the trade was only there for a dozen of seconds. But that's outside of the market, and the volume was there...

 

What I found particularly nice on the 5sec chart is the sharp entry. 1 minute people entered around 45-46 and 5 minute people, well... they were definitely far behind in the queue. It's also a nice illustration of how entering on a smaller bar interval doesn't mean you can't stay in. On the tick chart the highest volume is actually just at the lowest point of the day.

 

After that, I found 52-53 to be a safe (but already 9 points later) entry (at demandline + volume + higher low), after breaking higher to 60 first.

 

Imho first 15 minutes of the day definitely worth watching in replay...

 

What tipped the scale was the first two arrowed volume bars. If there hadn't been an indication of strong preliminary support, I probably would have passed. But that, followed by the lower bar at the test, nudged me into the trade.

 

However, that little hesitation you refer to is also an example of the "deep breath before the plunge" that I've referred to. One could also have entered just above that, but he would have been sweating a bit when price came back to 45 at 0947. Granted all the "bullish" indications shown by the double arrows might have persuaded him to stay put, or at least keep his initial stop where it was rather than move to BE too quickly. But entering even higher would probably have necessitated an exit (and possible re-entry). An argument can be made then for just taking the risk at what is often the best time. After all, the extent of what one had to lose at a 44 entry was almost trivial.

 

As for replay, the difficulty here is knowing what happened next. But there's no alternative other than time machine, and mine's in the shop.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess we can use here for discussion when chat's down. I don't feel like dealing with it anymore, so we'll just let Soul get it fixed. Looking on short side as well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Since the chat room isn't working again, I'll state here that I'm looking at 70 to 95 and to short at 95 where possible.

 

hmm, I missed yesterday and Friday so don't know what's been said or posted in the room, but what's at 95?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here all of us were right and no way to prove it

 

Oh well :)

 

 

Here's where the 95 business came from. Let's hope the chart doesn't disappear.

 

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=9241&stc=1&d=1233069198

Edited by DbPhoenix

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
What a great U-turn day. And no chat room :(

 

kind of caught me by surprise. But it's clear I'm looking at the wrong things...

Chatroom would've been great help today.

 

The turning point happens to be in the middle of that '70 and 95' you mentioned...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Date: 7th June 2024. ECB closer look: All options open for the second half of the year! ECB officials continue to dampen rate cut speculation, following on from Lagarde’s hawkish comments yesterday. Officials have been out in force this morning to continue stressing that the inflation outlook remains uncertain and that the central bank is not committing to a particular rate path for the rest of the year. The ECB cut rates by 25 basis points, but as we expected it was a “hawkish” cut that left all options open for the second half of the year. Lagarde repeatedly stressed that future decisions will be data dependent, and even refused to confirm that yesterday’s move was the first step of an easing cycle. Rate cuts in September and December are still a possibility, but not cast in stone. Simkus admitted that there may be more than one rate cut this year, but on the whole, the comments were designed to keep a lid on speculation that the central bank kicked off a rate cut cycle yesterday. Austria’s central bank head Holzmann went on record yesterday to confirm that he was the sole dissenter objecting to a cut yesterday, and so far the doves have been quiet, which is helping to affirm Lagarde’s hawkish message yesterday.   Details of the Rate Cut The ECB delivered the first rate cut in five years and lowered key rates by 25 basis points. The deposit rate is now at 3.75% and the main refinancing rate at 4.25%. It was a “hawkish cut,” as near term inflation forecasts were revised higher, and Lagarde flagged that domestic inflation remains high. The statement stressed that the ECB is not pre-committing to a particular rate path, and the comments leave all options on the table for the second half of the year.   Economic Activity and Forecasts  The ECB noted the improvement in economic activity through the first quarter of the year. Lagarde also highlighted that manufacturing is showing signs of stabilization, with stronger exports expected to support growth in coming quarters. At the same time, monetary policy should be less of a drag on demand over time, according to the ECB. The new set of forecasts show GDP rising 0.9% this year, which is more than the 0.6% expected back in March. The forecast for 2025 has been revised slightly down to 1.4% from 1.5% previously, and the ECB still expects a slight acceleration to 1.6% for 2026. The inflation forecast for this year was raised to 2.5% from 2.3%, and the projection for 2025 was hiked to 2.2% from 2.0%. As such, inflation will fall toward the target later than previously anticipated, though the forecast for 2026 was left unchanged at 1.9%. This means the headline rate is still expected to fall below the target at the end of the forecast horizon.   Upside Risks to Inflation The statement noted upside risks to the inflation outlook from wages and profits, which could be higher than currently anticipated. Geopolitical tensions and extreme weather events could also push up prices once again, according to the ECB. At the same time, the ECB acknowledged that inflation could come in lower than anticipated if monetary restrictions have more of a dampening effect than currently anticipated, or if global growth weakens more than projected.   The press conference was mainly dedicated to driving home the point that future decisions will depend on data available at the time of the respective meeting. Lagarde even refused to confirm that the central bank has effectively kicked off an easing cycle, and said in response to a question that she wouldn’t necessarily say that the ECB started a “dialing-back process”. She suggested it is likely, but refused to confirm it, which in theory means rates could actually go up again. This seems unlikely, given that this move was a near unanimous decision, but its makes clear that the ECB will not cut rates at every meeting and that the outlook for the rest of the year is still very much open. The ECB still thinks that monetary policy needs to remain restrictive for the foreseeable future against the backdrop of high domestic inflation. However, as chief economist Lane suggested recently, officials will have to debate at every meeting whether the data allows the central bank to dial back the degree of restrictiveness.   Employment and Inflation Dynamics Wage growth, profits, and services price inflation will remain the key numbers to watch through the rest of the year. Lagarde pointed to data on the compensation of employees, due to be released tomorrow, but also flagged that current wage agreements are often still backward looking, as they reflect attempts to compensate for the sharp rise in prices since the start of the Ukraine war. As we flagged previously, the multi-year wage agreements in Germany are a prime example of that. However, as Lagarde highlighted, the deals on the table so far show sharp increases for this year, but also imply a slowdown in wage growth in coming years. However, unemployment is at a record low and the number of vacancies has dropped only slightly. At the same time, service price inflation remains stubbornly high, which suggests that companies have sufficient room to pass on higher labor costs. With real disposable income rising, thanks to lower inflation and higher wages, companies could find it even easier to hike prices in the second half of the year, and yesterday’s rate cut is also likely to boost demand. In the current situation, this could add to domestic price pressures. Looking ahead, the only thing that is clear is that Lagarde did her best to keep expectations of back-to-back cuts under control. The chances still are that the ECB will deliver two more 25 basis point cuts in September and December, but at this point, nothing is cast in stone. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business. Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar. Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding on how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE! Click HERE to READ more Market news. Andria Pichidi Market Analyst HFMarkets Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in FX and CFDs products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • TRGP Targa Resources stock narrow range breakout watch above 119.02, https://stockconsultant.com/?TRGP
    • ROOT stock, short term downtrend break, bullish stats , https://stockconsultant.com/?ROOT
    • CVNA Carvana stock great setup at 101.16 support area, high trade quality, target 128-136, https://stockconsultant.com/?CVNA
    • IBM stock attempting to move higher off lower support area, https://stockconsultant.com/?IBM
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.